Florida Statute 663.064 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVIII
BANKS AND BANKING

Chapter 663
INTERNATIONAL BANKING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 663.064

663.064 International branches; permissible activities; requirements.—

(1) An international banking corporation that meets the requirements of ss. 658.26, 663.04, and 663.05 may, with the approval of the office, establish one or more branches in this state. The operations of an international branch shall be conducted pursuant to requirements determined by the office as necessary to ensure compliance with the provisions of the financial institutions codes, including requirements for the maintenance of accounts and records separate from those of the international banking corporation of which it is a branch.

(2) An international branch has the same rights and privileges as a federally licensed international branch. The permissible deposits of an international branch must be determined in accordance with rules adopted by the commission. In adopting such rules, the commission shall consider the similar deposit-taking authority of a federally licensed international branch and the need to provide reasonably consistent regulatory requirements for international banking corporations doing business in this state.

(3) An international branch licensed by the office may engage in any activity permissible for an international bank agency, international administrative office, or international representative office.

History.—s. 160, ch. 92-303; s. 1821, ch. 2003-261; s. 11, ch. 2010-9; s. 15, ch. 2017-83.

F.S. 663.064 on Google Scholar

F.S. 663.064 on Casetext

Amendments to 663.064

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 663.064

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 663.064.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 663.064

Total Results: 20

KEITH R.E. JOHNSON AND KREJ LEASING, INC. v. AKEEFE GARRETT

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-04-04

Snippet: citing Bovis v. 7-Eleven, Inc., 505 So. 2d 661, 663-64 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)); see also Competitive Softball

ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. JEFFREY L. KATZELL, M.D., P.A. a/a/o SYLVIANE LOUVRIER

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-06-23

Snippet: Testing v. Allstate Insurance Co., 888 So. 2d 663–64 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) in which this Court held

PRIORITY MEDICAL CENTERS, LLC, etc. v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-04-28

Snippet: Testing v. Allstate Insurance Co., 888 So. 2d 663-64 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) in which this Court held that

ASHLEY NICOLE MCKENZIE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-12-02

Snippet: this issue. In Tyler v. State, 945 So. 2d 662, 663-64 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), we noted: This and

SHAY LUGASSY, individually, etc. v. YUVAL LUGASSY, individually, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-06-17

Snippet: Inc. v. Broward Yachts, Inc., 792 So. 2d 660, 663–64 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (quoting Blue Cross & Blue

Gwendolyn E. Odom, etc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-09-20

Citation: 254 So. 3d 268

Snippet: 1955). In Braddock , 80 So.2d at 663-64 , a minor child and his father brought personal

Willie Crockett v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-09-06

Citation: 206 So. 3d 742, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13344

Snippet: findings of fact or conclusions of law. 120 So.3d at 663-64. Here, in contrast, the trial court conducted a

Harrison v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-09-11

Citation: 172 So. 3d 1018, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13614, 2015 WL 5306230

Snippet: their belief’); Miller v. State, 785 So.2d 662, 663-64 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (finding that the trial court

Chapman v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-07-10

Citation: 186 So. 3d 3, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10486, 2015 WL 4136778

Snippet: Than Others', 23 Fla. St. U.L.Rev. 625, 663-64 (1996). Judge Warner points out that the Supreme

Pamela Mitchell v. Osceola County School Board

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-03-10

Citation: 159 So. 3d 334, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3367, 2015 WL 1018551

Snippet: Antinarelli v. Ocean Suite Hotel, 642 So.2d 661, 663-64 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), this court held that a hotel

Dr. Ross G. Stone v. Nancy Stone and Alma Stone

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-11-12

Citation: 157 So. 3d 295, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18431

Snippet: See Zuckerman v. Alter, 615 So.2d 661, -663-64 (Fla.1993) (“If by the terms of *303

Arch Specialty Insurance Co. v. Kubicki Draper, LLP

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-03-26

Citation: 137 So. 3d 487, 2014 WL 1225188, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4363

Snippet: Cabot v. Clear-water Constr. Co., 89 So.2d 662, 663-64 (Fla.1956). Further, the pleadings and the trial

Ramirez v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-05-17

Citation: 113 So. 3d 105, 2013 WL 2116570, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7966

Snippet: Fla. Stat. (2009); Miles v. State, 94 So.3d 662, 663-64 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012); see In re Std. Jury Instrs

Beltran v. Vincent P. Miraglia, M.D., P.A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-04-10

Citation: 125 So. 3d 855, 2013 WL 1442239, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5725

Snippet: Cabot v. Clearwater Construction Co., 89 So.2d 662, 663-64 (Fla.1956), the Florida Supreme Court explained

Rooney v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-12-12

Citation: 102 So. 3d 734, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21405, 2012 WL 6171942

Snippet: Bowman v. Kingsland Dev., Inc., 432 So.2d 660, 663-64 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Here, however, Edith was not

Garvin v. Tidwell

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-10-24

Citation: 126 So. 3d 1224, 2012 WL 5232224, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18508

Snippet: to seek punitive damages. Stamato, 818 So.2d at 663-64. We held that the appellant was not entitled to

Tricam Industries, Inc. v. Coba

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-08-29

Citation: 100 So. 3d 105, 2012 WL 3733642, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14333

Snippet: party.” Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Asad, 78 So.3d 660, 663-64 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012). A denial of a motion for a

Department of Revenue ex rel. Thorman v. Holley

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-05-01

Citation: 86 So. 3d 1199, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6769, 2012 WL 1514438

Snippet: 109 (quoting Ticktin v. Kearin, 807 So.2d 659, 663-64 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)). The prejudice to the defendant

Shirey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-04-25

Citation: 94 So. 3d 619, 2012 WL 1414143, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6490

Snippet: abruptly and arbitrarily.4 Ceval-los, 18 So.3d at 663-64. We further held that “a rear-driver plaintiff

Ellerbee v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-03-01

Citation: 87 So. 3d 730, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 142, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 455, 2012 WL 652793

Snippet: sexual battery); Caballero v. State, 851 So.2d 655, 663-64 (Fla.2003) (rejecting Ring claim where defendant