Florida Statute 670.108 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 670
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: FUNDS TRANSFERS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 670.108

670.108 Relationship to Electronic Fund Transfer Act.—

(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), this chapter does not apply to a funds transfer any part of which is governed by the Electronic Fund Transfer Act of 1978 (Title XX, Pub. L. No. 95-630, 92 Stat. 3728, 15 U.S.C. ss. 1693 et seq.), as amended from time to time.

(2) This chapter applies to a funds transfer that is a remittance transfer as defined in the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. s. 1693o-1, as amended from time to time, unless the remittance transfer is an electronic fund transfer as defined in the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C s. 1693a, as amended from time to time.

(3) If there is an inconsistency between a funds transfer under this chapter and the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act governs the inconsistency.

History.—s. 1, ch. 91-70; s. 3, ch. 2016-53.

F.S. 670.108 on Google Scholar

F.S. 670.108 on Casetext

Amendments to 670.108

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 670.108

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 670.108.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 670.108

Total Results: 11

Joyner v. Hair

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-03-25

Citation: 485 So. 2d 491, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 726

Snippet: Realty Co. v. Seaboard All-Florida Railway, 91 Fla. 670, 108 So. 675 (1926); Krasnosky v. Krasnosky, 282 So

Daytona Enterprises, Inc. v. Wagner

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1956-12-14

Citation: 91 So. 2d 171

Snippet: Co. v. Seaboard All-Florida Ry., 1926, 91 Fla. 670, 108 So. 675. If the chancellor determines that the

Largay Enterprises Inc. v. Berman

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1952-10-17

Citation: 61 So. 2d 366, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1770

Snippet: Realty Co. v. Seaboard All-Florida Ry., 91 Fla. 670, 108 So. 675, and that the lower court erred in taking

State Ex Rel. Schwarz v. Heffernan

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-02-27

Citation: 194 So. 313, 142 Fla. 137

Snippet: Seaboard *Page 141 All Florida R. Co., 91 Fla. 670, 108 So. 675; Malone v. Meres, 91. Fla. 709, 109 So

Jacques v. Blanton

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-07-14

Citation: 182 So. 778, 133 Fla. 479, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1003

Snippet: Realty Co. v. Seaboard All Florida Rwy., 91 Fla. 670, 108 So. 675; White v. State, 77 Fla. 528, 81 So. 639

State Ex Rel. Gore v. Chillingworth

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-12-16

Citation: 171 So. 649, 126 Fla. 645

Snippet: Realty Co. v. Seaboard All-Florida Ry.,91 Fla. 670, 108 South. Rep. 675; 50 C.J. 679. It appearing, therefore

Peacock v. Miller

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-02-28

Citation: 166 So. 212, 123 Fla. 97, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 937

Snippet: Realty Co. v. Seaboard All-Fla. R. Co., 91 Fla. 670, 108 So. 675; Malone v. Meres, 91 Fla. 709, 109 So

Curtis v. Albritton as Cir. Judge

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-02-11

Citation: 132 So. 677, 101 Fla. 853

Snippet: Realty Co. v. Seaboard All-Florida Ry., 91 Fla. 670, 108 So. 675, in speaking of an alleged defect in process

State Ex Rel. Skipper v. Bird

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-03-26

Citation: 127 So. 331, 99 Fla. 673

Snippet: Realty Co. v. Seaboard All-Florida Ry., 91 Fla. 670, 108 So. R. 675. The Constitution provides that one

State Ex Rel. Pepper v. Atkinson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1929-11-21

Citation: 124 So. 458, 98 Fla. 996

Snippet: Realty Co. v. Seaboard-All Florida Ry., 91 Fla. 670, 108 So. R. 675; Oppenheimer v. Guckenheimer, 34 Fla

State Ex Rel. Smith v. Gray

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1928-03-08

Citation: 116 So. 475, 95 Fla. 412

Snippet: Realty Co. v. S. All-Florida Ry. Co., 91 Fla. 670, 108 So.2d Rep. 675. The recital in the executive order