Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 670.505 (2025)

Preclusion of objection to debit of customer’s account.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

670.505 Preclusion of objection to debit of customer’s account.—If a receiving bank has received payment from its customer with respect to a payment order issued in the name of the customer as sender and accepted by the bank, and the customer received notification reasonably identifying the order, the customer is precluded from asserting that the bank is not entitled to retain the payment unless the customer notifies the bank of the customer’s objection to the payment within 1 year after the notification was received by the customer.

History.—s. 1, ch. 91-70.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2009–2016 · leading case: Anderson v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. ex rel. BankAtlantic, LLC, 119 F. Supp. 3d 1328 (S.D. Fla. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Anderson v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. ex rel. BankAtlantic, LLC, 119 F. Supp. 3d 1328 (S.D. Fla. 2015). · cites it 29× “Fla. Stat. § 670.505 (emphasis added). The Official Comment to § 670.”

Est. of Yevgenyi Scherban v. Suntrust Bank, 223 F. Supp. 3d 71 (D.D.C. 2016). · cites it 2× “See Fla. Stat. § 670.505 ; see also Lake Wales Publ’g Co.”

Bancredit Cayman Ltd. v. Regions Bank Corp. (In Re Bancredit Cayman Ltd.), 419 B.R. 898 (Bankr. S.D. Florida 2009). · cites it 11× “Fla.Stat. § 670.505. Thus, “the obligation to refund may not be asserted by the customer if the customer has not objected to the debiting of the account within one year after the customer received notification of the debit.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.