Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 671.201 - Full Text and Legal Analysis Florida Statute 671.201 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Fla. Stat. § 671.201 (2026) Copy Cite Official Site Syfertize CourtListener Amendments
671.201 General definitions.Unless the context otherwise requires, words or phrases defined in this section, or in the additional definitions contained in other chapters of this code which apply to particular chapters or parts thereof, have the meanings stated. Subject to definitions contained in other chapters of this code which apply to particular chapters or parts thereof, the term:
(1) “Action,” in the sense of a judicial proceeding, includes recoupment, counterclaim, setoff, suit in equity, and any other proceedings in which rights are determined.
(2) “Aggrieved party” means a party entitled to pursue a remedy.
(3) “Agreement,” as distinguished from “contract,” means the bargain of the parties in fact, as found in their language or inferred from other circumstances, including course of dealing, usage of trade, or course of performance as provided in ss. 671.205 and 672.208.
(4) “Bank” means a person engaged in the business of banking and includes a savings bank, a savings and loan association, a credit union, and a trust company.
(5) “Bearer” means a person in control of a negotiable electronic document of title or a person in possession of a negotiable instrument, a negotiable tangible document of title, or a certificated security that is payable to bearer or indorsed in blank.
(6) “Bill of lading” means a document of title evidencing the receipt of goods for shipment issued by a person engaged in the business of directly or indirectly transporting or forwarding goods. The term does not include a warehouse receipt.
(7) “Branch” includes a separately incorporated foreign branch of a bank.
(8) “Burden of establishing” a fact means the burden of persuading the triers of fact that the existence of the fact is more probable than its nonexistence.
(9) “Buyer in ordinary course of business” means a person who, in ordinary course, buys goods in good faith, without knowledge that the sale violates the rights of another person in the goods, from a person, other than a pawnbroker, in the business of selling goods of that kind. A person buys goods in ordinary course if the sale to the person comports with the usual or customary practices in the kind of business in which the seller is engaged or with the seller’s own usual or customary practices. A person who sells oil, gas, or other minerals at the wellhead or minehead is a person in the business of selling goods of that kind. A buyer in ordinary course of business may buy for cash, by exchange of other property, or on secured or unsecured credit and may acquire goods or documents of title under a preexisting contract for sale. Only a buyer who takes possession of the goods or has a right to recover the goods from the seller under chapter 672 may be a buyer in ordinary course of business. “Buyer in ordinary course of business” does not include a person who acquires goods in a transfer in bulk or as security for or in total or partial satisfaction of a money debt.
(10) “Central bank digital currency” means a digital currency, a digital medium of exchange, or a digital monetary unit of account issued by the United States Federal Reserve System, a federal agency, a foreign government, a foreign central bank, or a foreign reserve system, that is made directly available to a consumer by such entities. The term includes a digital currency, a digital medium of exchange, or a digital monetary unit of account issued by the United States Federal Reserve System, a federal agency, a foreign government, a foreign central bank, or a foreign reserve system, that is processed or validated directly by such entities.
(11) “Conspicuous,” with reference to a term, means so written, displayed, or presented that, based on the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable person against which it is to operate ought to have noticed it. Whether a term is “conspicuous” is a decision for the court.
(12) “Consumer” means an individual who enters into a transaction primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
(13) “Contract,” as distinguished from “agreement,” means the total legal obligation that results from the parties’ agreement as determined by this code and as supplemented by any other applicable laws.
(14) “Creditor” includes a general creditor, a secured creditor, a lien creditor, and any representative of creditors, including an assignee for the benefit of creditors, a trustee in bankruptcy, a receiver in equity, and an executor or administrator of an insolvent debtor’s or assignor’s estate.
(15) “Defendant” includes a person in the position of defendant in a counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim.
(16) “Delivery,” with respect to an electronic document of title, means voluntary transfer of control and, with respect to instruments, tangible document of title, or an authoritative tangible copy of a record evidencing chattel paper, means voluntary transfer of possession.
(17) “Document of title” means a record:
(a) That in the regular course of business or financing is treated as adequately evidencing that the person in possession or control of the record is entitled to receive, control, hold, and dispose of the record and the goods the record covers; and
(b) That purports to be issued by or addressed to a bailee and to cover goods in the bailee’s possession which are either identified or are fungible portions of an identified mass. The term includes a bill of lading, transport document, dock warrant, dock receipt, warehouse receipt, and order for delivery of goods. An electronic document of title means a document of title evidenced by a record consisting of information stored in an electronic medium. A tangible document of title means a document of title evidenced by a record consisting of information that is inscribed on a tangible medium.
(18) “Electronic” means relating to technology having electrical, digital, magnetic, wireless, optical, electromagnetic, or similar capabilities.
(19) “Fault” means a default, breach, or wrongful act or omission.
(20) “Fungible goods” means:
(a) Goods of which any unit, by nature or usage of trade, is the equivalent of any other like unit; or
(b) Goods that, by agreement, are treated as equivalents.
(21) “Genuine” means free of forgery or counterfeiting.
(22) “Good faith,” except as otherwise provided in this code, means honesty in fact and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing.
(23) “Holder” means:
(a) The person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession;
(b) The person in possession of a negotiable tangible document of title if the goods are deliverable either to bearer or to the order of the person in possession; or
(c) The person in control, other than pursuant to s. 677.106(7), of a negotiable electronic document of title.
(24) “Insolvency proceeding” includes an assignment for the benefit of creditors or other proceeding intended to liquidate or rehabilitate the estate of the person involved.
(25) “Insolvent” means:
(a) Having ceased to pay debts in the ordinary course of business other than as a result of a bona fide dispute;
(b) Being unable to pay debts as they become due; or
(c) Being insolvent within the meaning of the Federal Bankruptcy Law.
(26) “Money” means a medium of exchange that is currently authorized or adopted by a domestic or foreign government. The term includes a monetary unit of account established by an intergovernmental organization or by agreement between two or more countries. The term does not include a central bank digital currency.
(27) Subject to subsection (29), a person has “notice” of a fact if the person:
(a) Has actual knowledge of it;
(b) Has received a notice or notification of it; or
(c) From all the facts and circumstances known to the person at the time in question, has reason to know that it exists. A person “knows” or has “knowledge” of a fact when the person has actual knowledge of it. “Discover” or “learn” or a word or phrase of similar import refers to knowledge rather than to reason to know. The time and circumstances under which a notice or notification may cease to be effective are not determined by this section.
(28) A person “notifies” or “gives” a notice or notification to another person by taking such steps as may be reasonably required to inform the other person in ordinary course, whether or not the other person actually comes to know of it. Subject to subsection (29), a person “receives” a notice or notification when:
(a) It comes to that person’s attention; or
(b) It is duly delivered in a form reasonable under the circumstances at the place of business through which the contract was made or at another location held out by that person as the place for receipt of such communications.
(29) Notice, knowledge, or a notice or notification received by an organization is effective for a particular transaction from the time when it is brought to the attention of the individual conducting that transaction, and, in any event, from the time when it would have been brought to the individual’s attention if the organization had exercised due diligence. An organization exercises due diligence if it maintains reasonable routines for communicating significant information to the person conducting the transaction and there is reasonable compliance with the routines. Due diligence does not require an individual acting for the organization to communicate information unless such communication is part of the individual’s regular duties or the individual has reason to know of the transaction and that the transaction would be materially affected by the information.
(30) “Organization” means a person other than an individual.
(31) “Party,” as distinguished from “third party,” means a person who has engaged in a transaction or made an agreement subject to this code.
(32) “Person” means an individual; corporation; business trust; estate; trust; partnership; limited liability company; association; joint venture; government; governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality; or any other legal or commercial entity. The term includes a protected series, however denominated, of an entity if the protected series is established under law other than the Uniform Commercial Code which limits, or conditionally limits if conditions specified under the law are satisfied, the ability of a creditor of the entity or of any other protected series of the entity to satisfy a claim from assets of the protected series.
(33) “Present value” means the amount as of a date certain of one or more sums payable in the future, discounted to the date certain by use of either an interest rate specified by the parties if that rate is not manifestly unreasonable at the time the transaction is entered into or, if an interest rate is not so specified, a commercially reasonable rate that takes into account the facts and circumstances at the time the transaction is entered into.
(34) “Purchase” means taking by sale, lease, discount, negotiation, mortgage, pledge, lien, security interest, issue or reissue, gift, or any other voluntary transaction creating an interest in property.
(35) “Purchaser” means a person who takes by purchase.
(36) “Record” means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form.
(37) “Remedy” means any remedial right to which an aggrieved party is entitled with or without resort to a tribunal.
(38) “Representative” means a person empowered to act for another, including an agent, an officer of a corporation or association, and a trustee, executor, or administrator of an estate.
(39) “Right” includes “remedy.”
(40) “Security interest” means an interest in personal property or fixtures which secures payment or performance of an obligation. “Security interest” includes any interest of a consignor and a buyer of accounts, chattel paper, a payment intangible, or a promissory note in a transaction that is subject to chapter 679. “Security interest” does not include the special property interest of a buyer of goods on identification of those goods to a contract for sale under s. 672.401, but a buyer may also acquire a security interest by complying with chapter 679. Except as otherwise provided in s. 672.505, the right of a seller or lessor of goods under chapter 672 or chapter 680 to retain or acquire possession of the goods is not a security interest, but a seller or lessor may also acquire a security interest by complying with chapter 679. The retention or reservation of title by a seller of goods, notwithstanding shipment or delivery to the buyer under s. 672.401, is limited in effect to a reservation of a security interest. Whether a transaction in the form of a lease creates a security interest is determined by the facts of each case; however:
(a) A transaction in the form of a lease creates a security interest if the consideration that the lessee is to pay the lessor for the right to possession and use of the goods is an obligation for the term of the lease not subject to termination by the lessee and:
1. The original term of the lease is equal to or greater than the remaining economic life of the goods;
2. The lessee is bound to renew the lease for the remaining economic life of the goods or is bound to become the owner of the goods;
3. The lessee has an option to renew the lease for the remaining economic life of the goods for no additional consideration or nominal additional consideration upon compliance with the lease agreement; or
4. The lessee has an option to become the owner of the goods for no additional consideration or nominal additional consideration upon compliance with the lease agreement.
(b) A transaction does not create a security interest merely because:
1. The present value of the consideration the lessee is obligated to pay the lessor for the right to possession and use of the goods is substantially equal to or is greater than the fair market value of the goods at the time the lease is entered into;
2. The lessee assumes the risk of loss of the goods;
3. The lessee agrees to pay, with respect to the goods, taxes; insurance; filing, recording, or registration fees; or service or maintenance costs;
4. The lessee has an option to renew the lease or to become the owner of the goods;
5. The lessee has an option to renew the lease for a fixed rent that is equal to or greater than the reasonably predictable fair market rent for the use of the goods for the term of the renewal at the time the option is to be performed; or
6. The lessee has an option to become the owner of the goods for a fixed price that is equal to or greater than the reasonably predictable fair market value of the goods at the time the option is to be performed.
(c) Additional consideration is nominal if it is less than the lessee’s reasonably predictable cost of performing under the lease agreement if the option is not exercised. Additional consideration is not nominal if:
1. When the option to renew the lease is granted to the lessee, the rent is stated to be the fair market rent for the use of the goods for the term of the renewal determined at the time the option is to be performed; or
2. When the option to become the owner of the goods is granted to the lessee, the price is stated to be the fair market value of the goods determined at the time the option is to be performed.
(d) The “remaining economic life of the goods” and “reasonably predictable” fair market rent, fair market value, or cost of performing under the lease agreement must be determined with reference to the facts and circumstances at the time the transaction is entered into.
(41) “Send,” in connection with a record or notification, means:
(a) To deposit in the mail, deliver for transmission, or transmit by any other usual means of communication, with postage or cost of transmission provided for, addressed to any address reasonable under the circumstances; or
(b) To cause the record or notification to be received within the time it would have been received if properly sent under paragraph (a).
(42) “Sign,” “signing,” “signed,” or “signature” means, with present intent to authenticate or adopt a record, to:
(a) Execute or adopt a tangible symbol; or
(b) Attach to or logically associate with the record an electronic symbol, sound, or process.
(43) “State” means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
(44) “Surety” includes a guarantor or other secondary obligor.
(45) “Term” means a portion of an agreement which relates to a particular matter.
(46) “Unauthorized signature” means a signature made without actual, implied, or apparent authority. The term includes a forgery.
(47) “Warehouse receipt” means a document of title issued by a person engaged in the business of storing goods for hire.
(48) “Writing” includes printing, typewriting, or any other intentional reduction to tangible form. “Written” has a corresponding meaning.
History.s. 1, ch. 65-254; s. 1, ch. 78-222; s. 2, ch. 79-398; s. 2, ch. 87-275; s. 4, ch. 90-278; s. 3, ch. 92-82; s. 552, ch. 97-102; s. 1, ch. 2000-112; s. 10, ch. 2001-198; s. 8, ch. 2007-134; s. 3, ch. 2010-131; s. 1, ch. 2023-80; s. 36, ch. 2025-92.
Note.s. 1-201, U.C.C.; supersedes ss. 614.02, 673.01, 674.01, 674.07, 674.28, 674.29, 674.30, 678.54.

Cases Citing F.S. 671.201

Copy

·Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Pickard, 269 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972).

Cited 59 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...William Penny (part-time accountant and secretary for Pickard) at Mr. Slama's request from his handwritten notes. It was typed as if on a letterhead of Southern Fiberglass and contained a signature line with the typed words, "Harold L. Slama, President." § 671.201(39), Fla....
...In addition, the Pickard group acted as consultants to the Ashland companies; to that end Pickard furnished them with plans, specifications, and a "plug" mold for the manufacture, by defendants, of still larger trawler hulls. Ashland determined the location of Pickard's Miami boat yard. [7] See: § 671.201(39) and State v....
0 red3 yellow33 green34 procedural
Cited "but see"Graham (1981)
phrase: "but see"
Cited "but see"In Re Estate of Donner (1978)
phrase: "but see"
Cited "but see"Donner (1978)
phrase: "but see"
Copy

·Millennium Partners, L.P. v. Colmar Storage, LLC, 494 F.3d 1293 (11th Cir. 2007).

Cited 41 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 74 Fed. R. Serv. 140, 63 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 550, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 18687, 2007 WL 2245780

...ssed to a bailee and purport to cover goods in the bailee's possession which are either identified or are fungible portions of an identified mass. 12 F LA. S TAT. A NN. § 671.201(15) (West 2007)....
0 red0 yellow36 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityDavis (2026)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2025)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2023)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Focht v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 124 So. 3d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

Cited 25 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15126, 2013 WL 5338048

...As with the assignment, however, Wells Fargo did not submit the original note until several months after it had filed the complaint. To establish standing as the holder of a note endorsed in blank, a party must be in possession of the original note. See § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
0 red1 yellow17 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"(citing case) (2020)
phrase: "but see"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityWinchel (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Fox v. McCaw Cellular Commc'ns, 745 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Cited 21 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 870859

...y to subject the insured to a personal judgment for the excess. On the other hand, an example of the duty of good faith as between parties dealing at arms length is found in the UCC provision defining good faith as being synonymous with honesty. See § 671.201(19), Fla.Stat....
0 red0 yellow18 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMyers (2025)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityTejeda (2024)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2020)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Sellers v. Frank Griffin AMC Jeep, Inc., 526 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

Cited 21 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 50148

...PSI Cosmetics, 125 Misc.2d 68, 478 N.Y.S.2d 505, 510 (N.Y.City Civ.Ct. 1984); see Hill v. Bentco Leasing, Inc., 288 Ark. 623, 708 S.W.2d 608 (1986) (absence of option to purchase not conclusive in determining whether a transaction is a sale or a lease for purposes of law against usury). Section 671.201(37), in defining security interest, expressly discounts the notion that the absence of an option to purchase in the lease necessarily would preclude a finding that the transaction is intended to be a security transaction....
0 red0 yellow16 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCerasani (2007)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2006)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityBrophy (2005)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Citizens Nat. Bank of Orlando v. Bornstein, 374 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 1979).

Cited 25 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 27 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 242

...Although it was later assigned by Milford as security for a bond, the certificate as purchased from the Bank simply evidenced the right to payment and was clearly not an agreement creating or providing for a "security interest" as that term is defined in section 671.201(37)....
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBovarnick (2006)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityMcFarland (2004)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityIn Re VOC Analytical Laboratories, Inc. (2001)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·In Re Grubbs Constr. Co., 319 B.R. 698 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005).

Cited 17 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 55 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 501, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 75, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 19, 2005 WL 56972

...Consequently, courts and commentators have been required to formulate modes of analyses to uncover the precise nature of the agreement." The new definition of a security agreement contained in U.C.C. 1-201(37) as adopted in Ohio as Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 1301.01(KK)(2004)(see also section 671.201(37)(2001), Fla....
...end of the term would be to exercise the option. Having made such a finding the Court concludes that the consideration given for the purchase options was nominal and as such the agreements must be leases intended for security pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 671.201(37)." The Economic Realities Test has also been variously referred to as the "sensible person test." See Triplex, 258 B.R....
0 red0 yellow20 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2026)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2023)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2023)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Isaly Klondike Co. v. Sunstate Dairy & Food Prods. Co. (In Re Sunstate Dairy & Food Prods. Co.), 145 B.R. 341 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1992).

Cited 18 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 19 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 113, 6 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 224, 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 1496, 23 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 777

...[4] Section 672.702(3) of the Florida Statutes provides: The seller's right to reclaim under subsection (2) is subject to the rights of a buyer in ordinary course or other good faith purchaser under this chapter . . . [5] A purchaser is "a person who takes by purchase," (Fla.Stat. § 671.201(33) (1991)), and purchase includes "taking by sale, discount, negotiation, mortgage, pledge, lien, issue or reissue, gift or any other voluntary transaction creating an interest in property" (Fla.Stat. § 671.201(32) (1991)). Good faith is "honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned." Fla.Stat. § 671.201(19) (1991)....
0 red0 yellow12 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2010)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityIn Re Circuit City Stores, Inc. (2010)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityIn Re Dana Corp. (2007)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Monsanto Agr. Prods. Co. v. Edenfield, 426 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Cited 17 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 781

...'s limitation of warranty and liability was not unconscionable. There was no special interrogatory in the jury verdict on the question of whether the limitation of warranty was conspicuous, and the trial judge did not rule on the issue. In addition, § 671.201(10), Fla....
0 red1 yellow8 green0 procedural
DistinguishedMcCabe (2013)
phrase: "distinguishing"
Cited as authorityFeaster (2026)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2024)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Branford State Bank v. Hackney Tractor Co., 455 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1134, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1834, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14884

...nowledge of appellant's interest in the security at the time it obtained the equipment in March, 1977. NOTES [1] The borrower traded in the equipment to the appellee toward the purchase of new equipment. The appellee qualified as a "purchaser" under section 671.201(33). Appellee was not a buyer in the ordinary course of business since it did not buy from a person in the business of selling goods of that kind. Section 671.201(9)....
...buyer not in ordinary course of business, ... to the extent that he gives value and receives delivery of the collateral without knowledge of the security interest and before it is perfected; ... . (emphasis added) A person "has `knowledge' of a fact when he has actual knowledge of it." Section 671.201(25)(c)....
0 red1 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"(citing case) (1990)
phrase: "but see"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2014)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityJanuary (2013)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Int'l Harvest. Cr. v. Am. Nat. Bk., 296 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1974).

Cited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 85 A.L.R. 3d 1015

...Fla. Stat. § 679.202, F.S.A. specifically provides: "Each provision of this chapter with regard to rights, obligations and remedies applies whether title to collateral is in the secured party or in the debtor." (Emphasis supplied.) Also, Fla. Stat. § 671.201(37), F.S.A....
...." (Emphasis supplied.) Second, there is no difference between the relationship of a buyer and seller under a sales contract giving rise to a security interest and the relationship of any other debtor and creditor under any type of security agreement. As evidenced by Fla. Stat. §§ 671.201(37) and 679.102(2), F.S.A., the Code recognizes only a single form of contractual lien on personal property — a "security interest." Third, the majority opinion fails to recognize the fact that the owner of a purchase money security interest may be someone other than the seller....
1 red1 yellow6 green0 procedural
OverruledStephens (1990)
phrase: "overruled by"
Cited "but see"(citing case) (1975)
phrase: "but see"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2001)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·State v. De Anza Corp., 416 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Cited 14 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...Section 83.753 provides that "every rental agreement or duty within this part imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance or enforcement." This provision is identical to language in the Uniform Commercial Code. § 671.203, Fla. Stat. (1981). The term "good faith" is defined in section 671.201(19), Florida Statutes (1981), identically as in section 83.43(8), as "honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned." In the context of the Uniform Commercial Code, this provision adds an additional term into the contract th...
0 red0 yellow5 green4 procedural
Cited as authorityEdelman (2005)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (1999)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (1995)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Equilease Corp. v. AAA Mach. Co. (In Re AAA Mach. Co.), 30 B.R. 323 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1983).

Cited 14 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 36 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 287, 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 6126

...e documents evidencing the agreements were not properly perfected since no excise tax was paid in connection with their recording. Whether agreements are true leases or security agreements is to be determined by the facts of each case. See Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37), In Re Mountain Carpet, Inc., 11 B.R....
...Most courts look to a combination of factors to make such a determination. One of the most often applied factors and one specifically addressed by the applicable section of the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) is whether an option to purchase is included with the agreement. Florida has adopted the U.C.C. and Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37) states as follows: Whether a lease is intended as security is to be determined by the facts of each case; however, (a) the inclusion of an option to purchase does not of itself make the lease one intended for security, and (b) an agree...
...e end of the term would be to exercise the option. Having made such a finding the Court concludes that the consideration given for the purchase options was nominal and as such the agreements must be leases intended for security pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37)....
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityIn Re Grubbs Const. Co. (2005)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityIn Re QDS Components, Inc. (2002)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityIn Re Bevis Co., Inc. (1996)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Harvey v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 69 So. 3d 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10194, 2011 WL 1485310

...The person entitled to enforce a negotiable instrument, such as a promissory note, is the "holder of the instrument." § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2009). A "holder" is "[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession...." § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). "Bearer" means "a person in possession of a negotiable instrument ... that is payable to bearer or indorsed in blank." § 671.201(5), Fla....
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2019)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityRincon (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityMullan (2015)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Seinfeld v. Com. Bank & Trust Co., 405 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 32 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1137

...This portion of the affidavit was obviously an attempt to track the statutory requisites of a holder in due course [2] that he take the instrument "in good faith," Section 673.302(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1979) — which is in turn defined as "honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned," Section 671.201(19) — and "without notice ......
...In addition, since as the bank correctly contends, the issue of both "good faith," see Baraban v. Manatee National Bank of Bradenton, 212 So.2d 341 (Fla.2d DCA 1968); Frantz v. First National Bank of Anchorage, 584 P.2d 1125 (Alaska 1978), and lack of notice, Section 671.201(25) Florida Statutes (1979) are based upon the bank's subjective knowledge and state of mind, the failure to submit the testimony of those employees who actually dealt with Wolfson concerning these facts made it impossible, on the face of the matter, for the movant to sustain its position on these questions....
0 red1 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"(citing case) (1999)
phrase: "but see"
Cited as authorityHouk (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityTalcott (2002)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Taylor v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, 74 So. 3d 1115 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17849, 2011 WL 5374772

...ey, USMoney in turn endorsed the note without recourse to Bayview. Before the summary judgment hearing, Bayview filed the original note and the allonge. Thus Bayview established its status as holder of the note and its right to enforce the note. See § 671.201(20), Fla....
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityLin (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Jackson Vitrified v. People's Am., 388 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 30 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 281

...ory. Such an intent could not have been intended. The alternative argument of Ervin and Cooper, supra, regarding the term "representative," is more inviting. "`Representative' includes an agent, . . or any other person empowered to act for another." § 671.201(35), Fla....
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGrady (1988)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (1985)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityKnesz (1984)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Troupe v. Redner, 652 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 51111

...Gainey Builders, Inc., 184 So.2d 897 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966). The "holder" is the *396 "person who is in possession of a document of title or an instrument or an investment security drawn, issued or endorsed to him or to his order or to the bearer or in blank." § 671.201(20), Fla....
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2024)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2024)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityPaul (2011)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Gathercrest Ltd. v. First Am. Bank & Trust, 649 F. Supp. 106 (M.D. Fla. 1985).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18147

...erformance as provided in this Act (Sections 1-205 and 2-208). Whether an agreement has legal consequences is determined by the provisions of this Act, if applicable; otherwise by the law of contracts (Section 1-103). (Compare "Contract"). Fla.Stat. 671.201(3)....
...Therefore, the only remaining issue is whether or not the documents were to be delivered against honor of the draft. The instructions specified that the documents accompanying the drafts were to be delivered against acceptance. However, under the UCC, to honor is defined as "to pay or to accept and pay". Fla.Stat. § 671.201(21); see Wiley v....
...to its terms, rather than hold that honor requires both acceptance "and" payment. R. Anderson, Uniform Commercial Code, § 1-201:71. In view of the language of the UCC sections on collection of documentary drafts, the Court agrees that § 1-201(21) [§ 671.201(21)] should be construed to mean that a draft is honored when it is delivered for acceptance and is accepted, and that payment is not necessarily required in order for a draft to be honored....
0 red1 yellow8 green0 procedural
Declined to follow(citing case) (2012)
phrase: "decline to follow"
Cited as authoritySiematic (2009)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityBryant (2007)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Venn v. Howell's Auto Repair Ctr., Inc. (In Re Howell), 161 B.R. 285 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 1993).

Cited 11 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida | 7 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 301, 24 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 38, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1804, 1993 WL 499377

...Thus, the only issue to be decided by the Court is whether the lease evidences a financing or a true lease transaction. The parties agree that the characterization of the lease is governed by the definitional provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code as codified by Florida. Florida Statute § 671.201(37) defines the term "security interest" to mean "an interest in personal property or fixtures which secures payment or performance of an obligation", and continues in relevant part: Whether a lease transaction creates a lease or security...
...sonable at the time the transaction is entered into; otherwise, the discount is determined by a commercially reasonable rate that takes into account the facts and circumstances of each case at the time the transaction was entered into. Fla.Stat.Ann. § 671.201 (West Supp.1993) (effective January 1, 1991). The Defendant urges the Court to adopt an interpretation of this statutory language that essentially eliminates any consideration of the factors listed under § 671.201(37)(b) when determining the nature of a lease....
...[1] The compelling language in subsection (a) is therefore inapplicable in this case. However the cause is not lost since a court is free to determine whether a lease constitutes a security interest upon the review of any fact or circumstance relevant to the transaction. Fla.Ann. Stat. § 671.201 (West Supp.1993)....
...se, however the clause merely permits the lessor to accelerate any amounts due under the lease upon a default. Thus, the clause is directed at a contractual right belonging to the lessor rather than the lessee. Termination clauses contemplated under § 671.201(37) address whether the lessee has a right to terminate a lease without further obligation and it is these rights which are not expressly addressed in the lease....
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityIn Re Grubbs Const. Co. (2005)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityIn Re QDS Components, Inc. (2002)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityIn Re PSINet, Inc. (2001)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·First New England Fin. Corp. v. Woffard, 421 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 650

...and claims accruing between the assignee and obligor before the obligor receives notice of the sub-assignment. Defenses and claims arising from the terms of the contract creating the right are available to the obligor regardless of when they accrue. Section 671.201(26), Florida Statutes, defines the giving and receipt of notice: A person "notifies" or "gives" a notice or notification to another by taking such steps as may be reasonably required to inform the other in ordinary course whether or not such other actually comes to know of it....
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2023)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityShannon (2000)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (1995)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Any Kind Checks Cashed, Inc. v. Talcott, 830 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 48 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 800

...l establishment has steered a crooked course through this debate. Id.; see Patricia L. Heatherman, Comment, Good Faith in Revised Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code: Any Change? Should There Be?, 29 WILLAMETTE L.REV. 567 (1993). Prior to 1992, section 671.201(19), Florida Statutes (1991), defined "good faith" as "honesty in fact in the conduct of the transaction concerned." Florida courts interpreted this definition as creating a subjective test....
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2025)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2021)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityGlicken (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Garner v. Pearson, 545 F. Supp. 549 (M.D. Fla. 1982).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida

...person is the owner of, or has an interest in, the security. Fla.Stat. § 678.8-301; Dean Witter & Co. v. Educational Computer Corp., 369 F.Supp. 757, 764 (E.D.Pa.1974). One has "notice" of a fact when he has actual knowledge of the fact. Fla.Stat. § 671.201(25)(a)....
...ed the claim. Exchange's constructive notice argument thus fails as a matter of law. One has "constructive notice" of a fact when from all the facts and circumstances known to him at the relevant time he has reason to know that it exists. Fla. Stat. § 671.201(25)....
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBeaver (1999)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityBeaver (1999)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authoritySwerhun (1993)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Paul v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 68 So. 3d 979 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13896, 2011 WL 3862091

...its terms." Riggs v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC, 36 So.3d 932, 933 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); see also Mortgage Elec. Registration Sys., Inc. v. Azize, 965 So.2d 151, 153 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Troupe v. Redner, 652 So.2d 394, 395-96 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (citing § 671.201(20), Fla....
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2019)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2015)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Frank Griffin Volkswagen, Inc. v. Smith, 610 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 365476

...ions under the contract." § 672.106(2), Fla. Stat. (1987) (UCC § 2-106). The code defines the term "contract" as "the total legal obligation which results from the parties' agreement as affected by this code and any other applicable rules of law." § 671.201(11), Fla....
0 red0 yellow5 green1 procedural
Cited as authorityDavis (2024)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityLongo (2022)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityOcana (2008)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·All Am. Mfg. Corp. v. Quality Textile Screen Prints, Inc. (In Re All Am. Mfg. Corp.), 172 B.R. 394 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1994).

Cited 8 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 27 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 48, 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 200, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 1443

...DISCUSSION State law determines whether the Second Agreement should be treated as a lease or financing agreement. In re Howell, 161 B.R. 285, 287 (Bankr.N.D.Fla.1993). Whether a purported lease transaction creates a security interest here is governed by subparagraph (a) of § 671.201(37) Florida Statutes, which provides as follows: A transaction creates a security interest if the consideration the lessee is to pay the lessor for the right to possession and use of the goods is an obligation for the term of the lease not...
...upon compliance with the lease agreement; or (4) The lessee has an option to become the owner of the goods for no additional consideration or nominal additional consideration upon compliance with the lease agreement. (emphasis added). By its terms, § 671.201(37) mandates that if a "lease" contains both a non-termination clause, whereby the "lessee" may not terminate the "lease" without further obligation, and also contains one of the other provisions listed in subsections (a)(1)-(4), then the...
...The Initial Agreement here contains an express provision preventing cancellation. The Second Agreement likewise is non-cancelable, since All American could not terminate the Second Agreement without further obligation to Quality Textile. [1] Thus, the first prong of § 671.201(37)(a) is satisfied. The second prong of § 671.201(37)(a) also is satisfied since, as stipulated to by Quality Textile in the Pretrial Order, Quality Textile was obligated to purchase the Equipment and to transfer title to All American at the end of the Second Agreement. See Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37)(a)(2) (a transaction creates a security interest if "[t]he lessee is bound to ......
...Even if Quality Textile was not bound to purchase the Equipment, the $1.00 purchase price under the Purchase Option represents nominal consideration, since the Equipment certainly had a fair market value far greater than $1.00 at the date the Purchase Option was to be exercised. See Fla. Stat. § 671.201(37)(c)(1)....
...Co., 634 F.2d 1050 (10th Cir.1980) ($1.00 purchase price indicative of financing arrangement under Oklahoma law). In sum, since the Second Agreement was non-cancelable and included by incorporation a nominal $1.00 purchase option, this Court finds that under the mandatory provisions of Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37)(a) the Second Agreement constituted a financing arrangement rather than a true lease. The Court would reach the same conclusion by applying the discretionary standards set forth in Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37)(b). Section 671.201(37)(b) provides a non-exclusive list of factors that are indicative of a financing arrangement rather than a true lease....
...The presence of these several indicia of a financing agreement prove that the Second Agreement was not a true lease, but instead was a financing arrangement creating a security interest. In sum, under either under the applicable mandatory provisions of Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37)(a) or the discretionary factors listed in § 671.201(37)(b), the Second Agreement was not a true lease, but was instead a financing arrangement, intended to create a security interest....
...ong as All American made the monthly payments. Instead, the Second Agreement specifically requires All American to "make payments in the sum of $1,900.00 a month and monthly thereafter in a like amount until said machine is fully paid." [2] Although § 671.201(37)(b) by its terms states that a transaction does not create a security interest merely because it provides for any one of the listed factors, all of the factors may be considered in determining whether a lease constitutes a security interest....
0 red1 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"(citing case) (1999)
phrase: "but see"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2011)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityIn Re Double G Trucking of the Arklatex, Inc. (2010)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Rudy's Glass Const. Co. v. EF Johnson Co., 404 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 32 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1373, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21337

...*1088 Morales, Rudolph & Hevia and Nestor Morales, Miami, for appellants. Heitner & Rosenfeld and Allan Stein and Mindy Rodney, North Miami Beach, for appellee. Before BARKDULL, SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ. NESBITT, Judge. The issue presented by this appeal is whether a disclaimer of warranty was conspicuous as defined by Section 671.201(10), Florida Statutes (1979) and therefore effective under Section 672.316, Florida Statutes (1979) to exclude or modify an implied warranty of fitness....
...ies are excluded by expressions like "as is," "with all faults" or other language which in common understanding calls the buyer's attention to the exclusion of warranties and makes plain that there is no implied warranty; "Conspicuous" is defined in Section 671.201(10), supra, as follows: (10) A term or clause is "conspicuous" when it is so written that a reasonable person against whom it is to operate ought to have noticed it....
...Rehurek v. Chrysler Credit Corporation, 262 So.2d 452 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 267 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1972). The only question is whether the manner of communicating this disclaimer makes it conspicuous as required by Section 672.316, supra, and defined by Section 671.201(10), supra....
...tions of the contract contained on the reverse side of the document. This provided the purchaser/lessee with adequate notice that he was agreeing to other provisions which were on the back of the contract. As indicated by the definition contained in 671.201(10), Florida Statutes (1979), language *1090 in the body of a form is conspicuous if it is in larger or contrasting type or color....
...n letters of which "fine print" is a highly understated description. It is true both that the exclusion is in all capital letters, as opposed to the even-tinier lower case printing which surrounds it, and that the definition of "conspicuous" in Sec. 671.201(10) includes the statement that "[l]anguage in the body of a form is `conspicuous' if it is in larger or other contrasting type or color." But the provision states in its entirety: (10) A term or clause is "conspicuous" when it is so written that a reasonable person against whom it is to operate ought to have noticed it....
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2021)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2014)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Anderson v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. ex rel. BankAtlantic, LLC, 119 F. Supp. 3d 1328 (S.D. Fla. 2015).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 87 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 182, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98235, 2015 WL 4554921

...Viewing this language in a vacuum, it would appear that notice to the “customer,” as the term is used in § 670.505, would require notice to the accountholder. However, the U.C.C. also sets forth when an individual “receives a notice or notification.” Under § 671.201, a person gives notice to another “by taking such steps as maybe reasonably required to inform the other person in ordinary course, whether or not the other person actually comes to know of it.” Fla....
...der the circumstances at the place of business through which the contract was made or at another location held out by that person as the place for receipt of such communications.” Id. (emphasis added); see also Fla. Stat. § 671.209 (5) (mirroring § 671.201(26))....
...states that “a person ‘receives’ a notice or notification when ... [i]t is duly delivered in a form reasonable under the circumstances at ... [a] location held out by that person as the place for receipt of such communications.” Fla. Stat. § 671.201 (26); Fla....
...e their account statements, statements containing the contested debits. Because there is no dispute over whether the Contract Plaintiffs received account statements at the address they designated, those Plaintiffs received notice as per Fla. Stat. §§ 671.201 (26) and 671.209(5)....
...As stated previously: The U.C.C.-.- states that “a person ‘receives’ a notice or notification when ... [i]t is duly delivered -in a form reasonable under the circumstances at ... [a] location held out by that person as the place for receipt of such communications.” Fla. Stat. § 671.201 (26); Fla....
...e their account statements, statements containing the contested debits. Because there is no dispute over whether the Contract Plaintiffs received account statements at the address they designated, those Plaintiffs received notice as per Fla. Stat. §§ 671.201 (26) and 671.209(5)....
...§ 4A-505 bears little to no relation to the facts of this case. See id. at 119-20. Further, Plaintiffs' citation to Grabowski for the proposition that "customer” as used in the U.C.C. may not extend to Plaintiffs' purported agent is belied by the definitional provisions of Fla. Stat. §§ 671.201 (26) and 671.209(5)....
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityOwoc (2026)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2025)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2025)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Bondurant v. Beard Equip. Co., 345 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

Cited 14 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 340

...ed in the name of the debtor in this state or who is known by the secured party to have a security interest in the collateral... ." (Emphasis added.) Bondurant argues from the above statute and from the definition of the word "send", as set forth at Section 671.201(38), that written notice must be sent by the secured party before Beard was permitted to dispose of the collateral. Send is defined in Section 671.201(38) as follows: "`Send' in connection with any writing or notice means to deposit in the mail or deliver for transmission by any other usual means of communication with postage or cost of transmission provided for and properly address...
...The receipt of any writing or notice within the time at which it would have arrived if properly sent has the effect of a proper sending." Send in the above definition applies only to written notice. Notice under Section 679.504(3), however, need only be "reasonable". Compare 671.201(38), which seems to require notice in writing, with the following definitions of notice from 671.201(25), (26), and (27): "(25) A person has `notice' of a fact when (a) He has actual knowledge of it; or (b) He has received a notice or notification of it; or (c) From all the facts and circumstances known to him at the time in question he has reason to know that it exists....
1 red1 yellow6 green0 procedural
No longer good law(citing case) (2008)
phrase: "no longer good law"
Cited "but see"Landers (1982)
phrase: "but see"
Cited as authorityIn Re De Pasquale (1994)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Royal Food Markets Inc. v. U.S. Berkel Food MacHines, Inc. (In Re Royal Food Markets, Inc.), 121 B.R. 913 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1990).

Cited 9 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 13 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 876, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 2548, 12 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 182

...The creditor contends that the equipment is held by the debtor pursuant to a "true lease" and wishes to enforce the terms of the lease agreement to regain possession of the equipment. Whether an agreement is a true lease or a security agreement is to be determined by the facts of each case. Fla. Stat. § 671.201(37); In re Mountain Carpet, Inc., 11 B.R....
...y agreement. Whether an option to purchase is included in the agreement is one of the most often applied factors and is one which is specifically addressed by the Uniform Commercial Code. Florida has adopted the Uniform Commercial Code and Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37) states as follows: Whether a lease is intended as security is to be determined by the facts of each case; however, (a) the inclusion of an option to purchase does not of itself make the lease one intended for security, and (b) an agree...
...Thus, this Court concludes that because the consideration to be given for the purchase option is nominal, and because the lease agreement recognizes an equity interest in the debtor, the agreement is a lease intended for security pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37)....
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityIn Re Grubbs Const. Co. (2005)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2000)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityIn Re Bevis Co., Inc. (1996)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Dependable Ins. Co., Inc. v. Landers, 421 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 34 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1474, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21259

...A printed heading in capitals (as: NON-NEGOTIABLE BILL OF LADING) is conspicuous. Language in the body of a form is "conspicuous" if it is in larger or other contrasting type or color. But in a telegram any stated term is "conspicuous." Whether a term or clause is "conspicuous" or not is for decision by the court. § 671.201(10), Fla....
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityShaw (2010)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Swift v. JI Case Co., 266 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

..."The judgment below is affirmed." CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C.J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] F.S. § 679.302, F.S.A. [2] F.S. § 679.306(2), F.S.A. [3] The exchange of equipment which took place between Swift and Gator constitutes a sale and Swift would be considered a purchaser. F.S. § 671.201(9), F.S.A. [4] F.S. § 679.307(1), F.S.A. [5] F.S. § 671.201(9), F.S.A. [6] Cf. F.S. § 671.201(19), F.S.A....
0 red1 yellow4 green1 procedural
Cited "but see"Foy (1988)
phrase: "but see"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2004)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (1988)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Thomas Franklin v. Bank of Am., N.A., Successor in etc., 202 So. 3d 923 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15582

...lder in possession with rights of a holder. § 673.3011(1) & (2), Fla. Stat. (2009). A holder is a “person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21), Fla....
0 red1 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"Browning (2025)
phrase: "but see"
Cited as authorityBrowning (2025)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2025)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Benoay v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc., 699 F. Supp. 1523 (S.D. Fla. 1988).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14946, 1988 WL 123507

...See, e.g., Breyer v. First National Monetary Corp., 548 F.Supp. 955, 598, n. 5 (D.N.J.1982). Furthermore, pursuant to Florida law, the customer agreement was "signed" by Prudential-Bache, since the agreement had its name printed on it. [4] See, e.g., Fla.Stat. § 671.201(39)(1985) and comments thereto; See, generally, 11 Fla....
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySilver (2011)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityLinville (2010)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityGarcia (2007)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·East Bay Ltd. P'ship v. Am. Gen. Life & Accident Ins., 744 F. Supp. 1118 (M.D. Fla. 1990).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15474, 1990 WL 129282

...eached its duty of good faith as required by Section 671.203, Florida Statutes. Section 671.203 provides that "[e]very contract or duty within this code imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance or enforcement." Good faith is defined in Section 671.201(19) to mean "honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned." Defendant had no contractual duty to allow Plaintiff to prepay the loan, and in fact had no duty whatsoever to allow prepayment....
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCabanas (1996)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityBarnes (1996)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityHall (1995)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Cook Sales, Inc. v. Shores (In Re Shores), 332 B.R. 31 (M.D. Fla. 2005).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28426, 2005 WL 2663484

...Conversely, Appellees argue such a determination is a mix of law and fact. Neither party provided any support for their assertions. After researching applicable case law, the Court finds the review of the Bankruptcy Court's determination that the Agreement was not subject to the safe harbor provisions in Florida Statute § 671.201(37) is a question of law and is reviewed de novo....
...598, 605 (D.Kan.2002), affirmed, 52 Fed.Appx. 119 (2002). III. Discussion A. Bankruptcy Court In an effort to determine whether the Agreement at issue is a financing arrangement [3] or a true lease, the Bankruptcy Court began by examining Florida Statute § 671.201(37). In pertinent part, Florida Statute § 671.201(37), provides: Whether a transaction creates a lease or security interest is determined by the facts of each case; however: (a) A transaction creates a security interest if the consideration the lessee is to pay the lessor for the right to...
...ance with the lease agreement. The Bankruptcy Court found that because the Agreement between the parties was subject to termination by the lessee at any time without further obligation, the Appellees could not rely upon the safe harbor provisions of section 671.201(37)....
...36) months. Based upon these two factors, the Bankruptcy Court determined the Agreement to be a financing arrangement (Dkt. 2 at 5). B. Appellant's Arguments Appellant contends on appeal that the Bankruptcy Court correctly noted that Florida Statute § 671.201(37) controls the determination in this case. However, Appellant argues the Bankruptcy Court erred in its application of section 671.201(37) as the Agreement contains a clause allowing the lessee to terminate the lease without further obligation. Appellant asserts section 671.201(37)(a) creates a security interest "if the consideration the lessee is to pay the lessor for the right to possession and use of the goods is an obligation for the term of the lease not subject to termination by the lessee," and if one or more of the other factors listed in the subsection of section 671.201(37)(a) is also present....
...Appellant also asserts the case cited by the Bankruptcy Court, In re Canaveral Seafoods, Inc., 79 B.R. at 58, is inapplicable to the case at bar for several reasons. Appellant initially argues that the court in Canaveral Seafoods did not apply Florida Statute § 671.201(37) and instead held that if the lease contained an option to purchase for a nominal sum at the end of the lease term, then the transaction constituted a financing arrangement and not a true lease....
...Appellees' objection to Appellant's claim is erroneous and should be reversed. C. Appellees' Arguments Appellees filed a response arguing that Appellant was attempting to twist the safe harbor provisions for a fmancing arrangement in Florida Statute § 671.201(37) into safe harbor provisions for a lease....
...it have found that where a debtor has the right to terminate the obligation to pay by surrendering personal property without further financial obligation, the transaction is a true lease (Dkt. 5 at 13). [5] U.C.C. § 1-201(37)(2) and Florida Statute § 671.201(37)(a) mirror each other. [6] Appellant further asserts the Bankruptcy Court ignored the impact of Florida Statute § 671.201(37)(3), which provides a transaction does not create a security interest because of the existence of certain characteristics, such as an option to purchase....
...s, and then only if they meet certain requirements (Dkt. 10 at 7)(citing Florida Statute §§ 559.9231-559.9241). [9] The Court does find the Bankruptcy Court's determination as to the inapplicability of the safe harbor provisions in Florida Statute § 671.201(37) to be proper....
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2007)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2007)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityIn Re Sutton (2007)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·In Re Est. of Barsanti, 773 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1781380

...ck was not "clearly erroneous." It is undisputed that the Conakry stock bearer certificates are in the possession of Mrs. Patrone's husband in Venezuela. Thus Mrs. Patrone's husband, as possessor, is presumed to be the owner and rightful holder. See § 671.201(20), Fla....
0 red0 yellow4 green1 procedural
Cited as authorityMori (2012)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2003)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2002)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·SCADIF, S.A. v. First Union Nat'l Bank, 208 F. Supp. 2d 1352 (S.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 48 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 232, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12962, 2002 WL 1473458

...The Florida Uniform Commercial Code further expressly provides that such agreements encompass "the bargain of the parties in fact as found in their language or by implication from other circumstances including course of dealing or usage of trade ...." § 671.201(3), Fla....
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2012)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2005)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityHubert (2004)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Bank of New York v. Olympia & York Florida Equity Corp. (In Re Holywell Corp.), 51 B.R. 56 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1985).

Cited 7 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 13 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 446, 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 997, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 5879, 13 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 446

...Similarly, O & Y's claim against the lessor would be a claim as an insider, which would be behind all the claims of other creditors. O & Y's claim would be rendered virtually worthless. The predicate for the bank's contention is UCC § 1-201(37), Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37): "(37) `Security interest' means an interest in personal property or fixtures which secures payment or performance of an obligation ....
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityIn Re Edison Bros. Stores, Inc. (1997)
phrase: "rule_authority"
AffirmedIn Re Holywell Corp. (1987)
phrase: "affirmed by"
Copy

·Xerographic Supplies Corp. v. Hertz Com., 386 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1261, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17239

...LIED, INCLUDING WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OTHER THAN USUAL FACTORY WARRANTIES MADE BY THE MANUFACTURER. Xerographic contends that this disclaimer was in compliance with requirements of Section 672.316(2) and 671.201(10), Florida Statutes (1975), and therefore should have been given effect....
...Kenworthy, not a party to this appeal, was the user of the copier and plaintiff in the main claim below. [2] Section 672.316(2) sets forth the language that must be included in any valid disclaimer as well as the requirement that the disclaimer be conspicuous. Section 671.201(10) defines the term "conspicuous."
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (1991)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityCooper (1985)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·ITT Indus. Credit Co. v. Regan, 487 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 1986).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 188, 1 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 274, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 1978

...Pursuant to the Code, when the buyer takes possession of property under a credit sales contract, he acquires the property, not merely an equity interest in the property. See § 672.401(1), Fla. Stat. (1985). The seller retains only a security interest in the property. See id.; § 671.201(37), Fla....
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityIn Re Iferd (1998)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityIn Re Kavolchyck (1993)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Gibson v. Resolution Trust Corp., 51 F.3d 1016 (11th Cir. 1995).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1995 WL 238647

...§ 1821 (e)(ll), the RTC may not avoid “any legally enforceable or perfected security interest.” Under Florida law a security interest is an “interest in personal property or fixtures which secures payment or performance of an obligation.” See Fla.Stat.Ann. § 671.201(37) (West 1995)....
0 red1 yellow16 green0 procedural
DistinguishedSkow (2012)
phrase: "distinguishing"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2020)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityLevia Womack (2020)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Sheppard v. Revlon, Inc., 267 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 11 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 487

...." According to the Official Comment to Code § 2-304, which is § 672.304, Fla. Stat., F.S.A., the "price of goods is payable in something other than money." Mrs. Sheppard obtained the merchandise as a result of performing an act required, to-wit: purchasing $5.00, or more, of Revlon cosmetics at one itme. See also: § 671.201(11) and (44)(d), Fla....
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityDavis (2024)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (1986)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityMcQuiston (1986)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Regan v. ITT Indus. Credit Co., 469 So. 2d 1387 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 64

...ASE MONEY CREDITORS UNDER THE "DEBTOR'S EQUITY" CONCEPT OF INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER SURVIVE THE ENACTMENT OF CHAPTER 78-222, LAWS OF FLORIDA? MILLS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] The preamble to Chapter 78-222, Laws of Florida (1978), reenacting Section 671.201, Florida Statutes, and amending subsections (3) and (4) of Section 679.312, Florida Statutes, states: WHEREAS, in a situation where there are conflicting security interests in the same collateral and a purchase money security interest...
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityTodora (2013)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityDelgado (1997)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityNaumowicz (1988)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·O'NEILL v. Barnett Bank of Jacksonville, NA, 360 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 24 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 779

...and whether Barnett's prior security interest was superior to O'Neill's subsequent ownership interest where it had properly registered its security interest with the Federal Aviation Administration. We resolve both issues in favor of Barnett. Under Section 671.201(9), Florida Statutes (1975), a buyer in the ordinary course of business is a person who in good faith and without knowledge that the sale to him is in violation of the security interest of a third party in the goods buys in ordinary course from a person in the business of selling goods of that kind....
...corded instruments affecting the aircraft identified in this certificate to make a personal search of the records or avail themselves of the services of an agent or attorney." O'Neill was not a buyer in the ordinary course of business as required by Section 671.201(9), therefore, Section 679.307(1) is not applicable to this case....
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (1981)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Georgia-Pac. Corp. v. Walter E. Heller & Co. Se., 440 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 37 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 735, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24347

...Plaintiff contends that the removal of such goods by the Defendant was in derogation of the Plaintiff's superior rights to possession as a secured creditor and as such constituted conversion. Plaintiff argues that either the transaction constituted a consignment intended as security within the meaning of Section 671.201(37), Florida Statutes, or was a sale or return transaction governed by the provisions of Section 672.326, Florida Statutes, which in pertinent part provides that: "(3) Where goods are delivered to a person for sale and such person mai...
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityEngler (1994)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (1994)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Florida Dept. of Corr. v. BLOUNT, ETC., 411 So. 2d 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 33 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 912, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19512

...63, 100-101 (1975). In other words, Section 319.22(1) provides that a purchaser shall not acquire a "marketable" title until the certificate of title is issued to him; however, it does not prevent valid title from being passed. Correria, at 24. Under Section 671.201(9), a "buyer in ordinary course of business" is "a person who in good faith and without knowledge that the sale to him is in violation of the ownership rights or security interest of a third party in the goods buys in ordinary course...
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2000)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityHolt (1988)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Ernie Passeos, Inc. v. O'HALLORAN, 855 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 21536736

...nce." § 679.307(1), Fla. Stat. (1997). A person who buys goods in a "transfer in bulk" or with knowledge that the sale is "in violation of the ... security interest of a third party in the goods" is not a "`[b]uyer in ordinary course of business.'" § 671.201(9), Fla....
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2025)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityJoseph (2006)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Westship, Inc. v. Trident Shipworks, Inc., 247 B.R. 856 (M.D. Fla. 2000).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8680, 2000 WL 507105

...nt. See S.Rep. No. 95-989 (1978), reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5787, 5849-50. At the same time, the Uniform Commercial Code as codified by Florida provides guidance to courts in distinguishing between a lease and a security interest. See Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37) (1999)....
...t difference between the two as applied to the facts of this case. Both Congress and Florida law instruct courts to look to "the circumstances of the case and consider the economic substance of the transaction." S.Rep. No. 95-989; see also Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37) (whether a transaction creates a lease calls for case-by-case analysis)....
...[8] Moreover, *864 the Lease term ends before the mortgage payments are complete. See S.Rep. No. 95-989 (stating that if rental payments are essentially payment of the mortgage, then there is no lease). Further, there is no express provision preventing cancellation by Trident. See Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37)(a); All American Mfg., 172 B.R. at 398. Finally, there is no option to purchase the leased property at the end of the lease term. See S.Rep. No. 95-989; Fla.Stat. § 671.201(37)....
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityIn Re Chira (2007)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityIn Re Morande Enterprises, Inc. (2006)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Hartzog v. Dixon, 366 So. 2d 848 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...A security interest is broadly defined as "an interest in personal property ... which secures payment or performance of an obligation... . The term also includes any interest of a buyer of accounts, chattel paper, or contract rights which is subject to Chapter 679." Section 671.201(37), Fla....
...them regarding an entitlement to the stock... ." "`Agreement' means the bargain of the parties in fact as found in their language or by implication from other circumstances including course of dealing or usage of trade or course of performance... ." Section 671.201(3)....
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (1995)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityGibson (1995)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityGibson (1990)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Kenney v. HSBC Bank USA, Nat'l Ass'n, 175 So. 3d 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14073, 2015 WL 5665217

...who is entitled to enforce. § 673.3011(1)-(3), Fla. Stat. (2013). A “holder” is defined as “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityFrost (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Isaac v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 74 So. 3d 495 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 74 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 220, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4768, 2011 WL 1261142

..."If an instrument is payable to bearer, it may be negotiated by transfer of possession alone." § 673.2011(2), Fla. Stat. A "holder" is defined as "[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession." § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCobbum (2015)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·BVA Credit Corp. v. Fisher, 369 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 26 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 795

...679.504 provides that a secured party may, after default, sell, lease or otherwise dispose of any or all of the collateral and apply the proceeds toward the satisfaction of indebtedness secured by the security interest under which the disposition is made. F.S. 671.201(37) defines "security interest" and provides "* * * Unless a lease or consignment is intended as security, reservation of title thereunder is not a `security interest' * * *....
0 red0 yellow4 green1 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2004)
phrase: "rule_authority"
AffirmedReed (1990)
phrase: "affirmed in"
Cited as authorityReed (1990)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Lonray, Inc. v. Azucar, Inc., 568 F. Supp. 189 (M.D. Fla. 1983).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15945

...e the damages exceed $10,000.00. Reserve Insurance Co., 386 So.2d at 551. 6. The bailor's burden of establishing negligence requires that it persuade the trier of fact that the existence of the fact is more probable than its nonexistence. Fla. Stat. § 671.201(8)....
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Affirmed(citing case) (1990)
phrase: "affirmed in"
Cited as authority(citing case) (1985)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Thomas Caraccia v. U.S. Bank, Nat'l Ass'n, 185 So. 3d 1277 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2708, 2016 WL 731773

...with the rights of a holder, or a person not in possession but entitled to enforce it. § 673.3011, Fla. Stat. (2013). A holder is “the person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
0 red2 yellow13 green0 procedural
Distinguished(citing case) (2017)
phrase: "distinguishing"
DistinguishedRafaeli (2017)
phrase: "distinguishing"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2020)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Graphic Prods. Corp. v. WWF Paper Corp. (In Re Graphic Prods. Corp.), 176 B.R. 65 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1994).

Cited 3 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 262, 32 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 879, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 2011, 26 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 545

...[7] The sole remaining issue is whether WWF made a written demand on GPC within 10 days after the goods were delivered to GPC. Section 546(c) does not contain specific requirements for what must be in a written demand other than the requirement that the demand be in writing. Section 671.201(26), Florida Statutes, provides that A person "notifies" or "gives" notice or notification to another by taking such steps as may be reasonably required to inform the other in ordinary course whether or not such other actually comes to know of it....
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2012)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityIn Re Moltech Power Systems, Inc. (2005)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2005)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Adler v. Key Fin. Servs., Inc., 553 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 142688

...Under the Uniform Commercial Code, "[a] person `notifies' or `gives' a notice or notification to another by taking such steps as may be reasonably required to inform the other in ordinary course whether or not such other actually comes to know of it." § 671.201(26), Fla....
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2000)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2000)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (1990)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Citibank, N.A. v. Dalessio, 756 F. Supp. 2d 1361 (M.D. Fla. 2010).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2010 WL 5137601

...The `holder' is the `person who is in possession of a document of title or an instrument or an investment security drawn, issued or endorsed to him or to his order or to the bearer or in blank.'" Troupe v. Redner, 652 So.2d 394, 395-96 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (citations omitted); see Fla. Stat. § 671.201(21) (2010); Mortg....
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMunoz (2020)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityHeino (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityHill (2012)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Rafaeli, 225 So. 3d 264 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 93 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 149, 2017 WL 3085331, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10444

...t, is enforceable by the holder. § 673.3011(1), Fla. Stat. (2015). The term “holder” means “[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2021)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2020)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2020)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·S. Contract Carpe, Inc. v. Cty. Nat. Bk. of S. Fla., 528 So. 2d 42 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 62004

...We do not agree with this position and accordingly affirm the judgment below. Our holding that the single-signature-when-two-are-required is an "unauthorized" one for 674.406(4) purposes is based largely on our interpretation of the most obviously pertinent source, the specific definition of the term in the UCC itself. Section 671.201(43), Florida Statutes (1985) states: (43) `Unauthorized' signature or indorsement means one made without actual, implied or apparent authority and includes a forgery....
0 red1 yellow3 green0 procedural
CriticizedHarvey (1996)
phrase: "criticized by"
Cited as authorityHarvey (1996)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (1991)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Schmidt v. Deutsche Bank, 170 So. 3d 938 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11576, 2015 WL 4577287

...4th DCA 2014). Here, Bank asserted it had standing as the holder of the note. To be a “holder” entitled to enforce under the facts of this case, Bank was required to show physical possession of the original note and the allonge endorsed in blank. See § 671.201(21), Fla....
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPeters (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityBolous (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityRincon (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Liebowitz v. Wright Props., Inc., 427 So. 2d 783 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 862, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19190

...therefore, he asserts, no fund was created from which Wright could collect. That may be so but it does not necessarily leave appellee without a remedy. As the designated escrow agent, Wright was a "holder" as defined in the Uniform Commercial Code, section 671.201(20), Florida Statutes (1981), which states: "Holder" means a person who is in possession of a document of title or an instrument or an investment security drawn, issued or indorsed to him or to his order or to bearer or in blank....
0 red0 yellow1 green1 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (1987)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Review denied(citing case) (1987)
phrase: "review denied"
Copy

·Associated Air Servs., Inc. v. W.J.C., Inc. (In Re Associated Air Servs., Inc.), 42 B.R. 768 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1984).

Cited 5 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1001, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5506

...ty. (Emphasis Supplied) The facts of the case at bar fit precisely within subsection (b). Since ASSOCIATED AIR is to pay One and 00/100 ($1.00) Dollar and receive an assignment of the lease at the end of the term of the agreement, it would seem that § 671.201(37) mandates a finding (or conclusion of law) that it is a lease intended for security and therefore W.J.C....
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityIn Re Kavolchyck (1993)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Ardmore Farms v. Smith, 423 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...r this position is mentioned. Florida law is to the contrary. A facsimile signature can be sufficient, even on a document as important as an arrest warrant. See, State v. Hickman, 189 So.2d 254 (Fla.App. 1966). See, further, Uniform Commercial Code, § 671.201(39), Florida Statutes, defining "signed" for Code purposes, as "includes any symbol executed or adopted by a party with present intention to authenticate a writing." [3] The E/C's argument that the claim form must be signed by the claimant...
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityChung (1984)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Crews v. First Union Nat'l Bank of Florida, N.A. (In Re Michelle's Hallmark Cards & Gifts, Inc.), 219 B.R. 316 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1998).

Cited 3 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 237, 36 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 225, 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 389, 32 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 504, 1998 WL 154658

...alid and perfected security interest in the debtor's furniture, fixtures, equipment, and inventory. A security interest is defined as "an interest in personal property or fixtures which secures payment or performance of an obligation". Fla.Stat.Ann. § 671.201(37) (West 1998)....
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2025)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityIn Re Camtech Precision Mfg., Inc. (2011)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityIn Re Sarah Michaels, Inc. (2007)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

Bert Smith Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Franklin, 400 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 31 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1273, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19930

...Stat. (1979). Thus, even if the retail order contained disclaimers, they had to be conspicuous to be effective. Bert Smith contends that the trial court erred in allowing the jury to determine whether the alleged disclaimers were conspicuous. We agree. Section 671.201(10) states that, "Whether a term or clause is conspicuous or not is for decision by the court." Nevertheless, Bert Smith did not object when the trial court instructed the jury on the question....
Copy

·Madura v. Bac Home Loans Servicing, LP, 593 F. App'x 834 (11th Cir. 2014).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

...Knight, 90 So.3d 824, 826 (Fla.4th Dist.Ct.App.2012). “A ‘holder’ is someone who is ‘in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession....’” Id. (quoting Fla. Stat. § 671.201 (5))....
0 red0 yellow6 green1 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2025)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2019)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2019)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Knight, 90 So. 3d 824 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 77 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 335, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5570, 2012 WL 1192143

...the “holder of the instrument.” § 673.3011(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). A “holder” is someone who is “in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession ....” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008). The “bearer” is a person “in possession of a negotiable instrument ... that is payable to bearer or indorsed in blank.” § 671.201(5), Fla....
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGarron (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityRincon (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Am. Nat. Bank v. Int'l Harv. Cr. Corp., 269 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 11 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 682

...Installment Contracts in question were drawn pursuant to F.S. § 520.34, F.S.A., and without any verbiage therein indicating any severability of items of equipment from the total contract sales. Also, we must assume that the Uniform Commercial Code Section 671.201(11) is applicable wherein the definition of "contract" is set out as: "means the total legal obligation which results from the parties' agreement as affected by this code ..." This must assume that the "agreement" as defined in the Code at Section 671.201(3) does not limit the security to the total contract, nor by the bargain of the parties in fact as found in their language or by implication from other circumstances including course of dealing or usage of trade or course of performance as provided in this Code....
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityWhitworth (1976)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Adopted(citing case) (1974)
phrase: "adopted in"
Copy

·In Re Est. of Silvian, 347 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...t and her brother, William Arkin. It was not redeposited to Account No. 26359 because this account had been closed out by appellant in the interim. The court below ruled that the $3800 belonged to the Estate of Westley Silvian, to which we disagree. Section 671.201(20), Florida Statutes, defines a "holder" as a "person who is in possession of ......
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySimpson (1999)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityIn Re Cochrane (1995)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Graf v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 636 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3501, 1994 WL 135209

...r's "receipt." I would affirm. NOTES [1] Note that any language attempting to exclude or modify implied warranties of merchantability or implied warranties of fitness under section 672.315(2) must be conspicuous when contained in a writing. See also section 671.201(10), Florida Statutes, which defines "conspicuous" under Florida's version of the U.C.C.
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGoldhoff (2023)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2023)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas, Etc. v. Christopher Harris a/k/a Christopher E. Harris, 264 So. 3d 186 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...Here, the Bank filed its complaint, alleging its status as the holder of the note. A “holder” is defined as: “The person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
...possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable . . . to an identified [entity] that is the [entity] in possession,” such that the trial court should have denied the motion for involuntary dismissal at the close of the plaintiff’s case. See § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2025)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2024)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2020)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Bank of New York Mellon v. Heath, 219 So. 3d 104 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 1492988, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5790

...A plaintiff has standing to foreclose if the plaintiff is the holder of the promissory *106 note. See § 673.3011(1), Fla. Stat. (2014). A “holder” is defined as “[t]he person in. possession of .a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla....
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityBeaufort (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

Midland-Guardian Co. v. Hagin, 370 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...ditional sale, trust receipt, other lien or title retention contract and lease or consignment intended as security * *. A perusal of the retail installment contract here involved shows that it was intended to create a security interest as defined in § 671.201(37)....
Copy

·PennyMac Corp. v. Frost, 214 So. 3d 686 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 92 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 169, 2017 WL 1013192, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3441

identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2015). Thus, a plaintiff who
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMuhammad (2019)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Suburbia Fed. S. & L. Ass'n v. Bel-Air Conditioning, 385 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1411

provided in s. 679.310. (Emphasis supplied.) Section 671.201(37), Florida Statutes (1979), in turn, defines
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (1982)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Matter of Forest Enter., Inc., 64 B.R. 310 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1986).

Cited 3 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 14 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1142, 2 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 764, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 5455

Caterpillar. The word "send" is defined in Fla.Stat. § 671.201(38) as follows: "Send" in connection with any
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityIn Re De Pasquale (1994)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Leader Global Solutions, LLC v. Tradeco Infraestructura, S.A. DE C.V., 155 F. Supp. 3d 1310 (S.D. Fla. 2016).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4851, 2016 WL 146612

supplemented by any other applicable laws.” Fla. Stat. § 671.201. . The Court questions whether Tradeco can amend
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBaxter (2023)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityFeng (2020)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Lindsey v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 139 So. 3d 903 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3145, 2013 WL 692825

payee or an affidavit of ownership); see also § 671.201(5), Fla. Stat. (2011) (defining “bearer” as person
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2015)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityRussell (2015)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Dep't of Transp. v. United Capital Funding Corp., 219 So. 3d 126 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 92 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 668, 2017 WL 1536070, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5902

context in which it is used indicates otherwise. § 671.201(30), Fla. Stat. (2012). We see nothing in sections
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2024)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·St. Clair v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 173 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10840, 2015 WL 4379738

is payable either to bearer or to the holder. § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). A person in possession
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2024)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityRutledge (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Donna Murray & Marc Murray v. HSBC Bank USA, 157 So. 3d 355 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 725, 2015 WL 248651

identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). Thus, to be a holder
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2019)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityFrost (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityLuiz (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

Milnes v. Gen. Elec. Credit Corp., 377 So. 2d 725 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 27 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1428

that kind, but does not include a pawnbroker. § 671.201(9), Fla. Stat. (1977). We see no conflict between
Copy

Richwagen v. Lilienthal, 386 So. 2d 247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 964

appellant. A warehouse receipt is defined in Section 671.201(45), Florida Statutes (1975) as: ... a receipt
Copy

Uc Leasing, Inc. v. Barnett Bk., W. Fla., 443 So. 2d 384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 37 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1323

provisions of Ch. 679, Florida Statutes (1981). See § 671.201(37), Florida Statutes (1981). It was further held
Copy

·Brittany's Place Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 205 So. 3d 794 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14788

identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). Under the UCC, a holder
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBuchman (2025)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Keane v. Pan Am. Bank, 309 So. 2d 579 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 16 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1054

Stat. § 673.403 (1971). [2] See Fla. Stat. § 671.201(43) (1971). [3] "(3) Subject to the provisions
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (1987)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Quaker Oats Co. v. Affiliated of Florida, Inc. (In Re Affiliated of Florida, Inc.), 237 B.R. 495 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1998).

Cited 2 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 42 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 955, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 338, 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 997, 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1877, 1998 WL 1107972

creating an interest in property." Fla.Stat. § 671.201(32). Consequently, a secured creditor is a "purchaser"
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityIn Re Primary Health Systems, Inc. (2001)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·United States v. Vico, 360 F. Supp. 3d 1328 (S.D. Fla. 2019).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida

Dictionary (9th Ed.) at 1006; see also Fla. Stat. § 671.201 (" 'Security interest' means an interest in personal
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLieberman (2023)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Brown v. Superior Pontiac-GMC, Inc., 352 So. 2d 576 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 22 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1213

Section 607.247, Florida Statutes (1975). [2] § 671.201(12), Fla. Stat. (1975).
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySchlussel (1994)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

Coplan Pipe & Supply Co. v. Ben-Frieda Corp., 256 So. 2d 218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 408

to the same extent as any other holder. See: § 671.201(20), Fla. Stat., F.S.A. Appellant Coplan Pipe
Copy

·Rayfield Inv. Co. v. Kreps, 35 So. 3d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 72 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 110, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6149, 2010 WL 1779891

and "includes any interest of a consignor...." § 671.201(35), Fla. Stat. (2009). As for consignments, UCC
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2025)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2019)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Bldg. Materials v. Presidential Fin., 972 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 199883

With respect to notice to an organization, section 671.201(27), Florida Statutes (2002), provides as follows:
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2020)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

Peter E. Shapiro, P.A. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 352 F. Supp. 3d 1226 (S.D. Fla. 2018).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida

affected by the information. Fla. Stat. § 671.201(27) ; see also § 671.201(25). Some background is necessary
Copy

Hadley v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc., 707 F. Supp. 509 (M.D. Fla. 1989).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2540, 1989 WL 22253

question he had reason to know that it exists." Section 671.201(25)(c), Florida Statutes; Section 47-1-201(25)(c)
Copy

Hamilton Cnty. Bank v. Tuten, 250 So. 2d 17 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 9 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 511

"(1) A buyer in ordinary course of business (§ 671.201(9)) other than a person buying farm products from
Copy

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Becker, 211 So. 3d 142 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 514340, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1546

identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). “Thus, to be a holder
Copy

Finizio v. Shubow, 557 So. 2d 640 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 WL 17496

contained in the Uniform Commercial Code at section 671.201, Florida Statutes (1987), where it is defined
Copy

·Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Applewhite, 213 So. 3d 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 1076936, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3775

identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21), Fla. Stat. (2015) (emphasis added). There
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2021)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Kumar v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 225 So. 3d 888 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9715, 2017 WL 2885555

person in possession or indorsed in blank. See § 671.201(5), (21), Fla. Stat. (2009). “If the note does
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2025)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Elsman v. Hsbc Bank USA, 182 So. 3d 770 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19500, 2015 WL 9491875

identified person that is th.e person in possession.” § 671.201(21), Fla. Stat. (2009). If an indorsement is made
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2024)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Espirito Santo Bank of Florida v. Agronomics Fin. Corp., 591 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1054, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12888, 1991 WL 276886

be gleaned from other sections of the Code. Section 671.201(19), under “General Definitions and Principles
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2025)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Frederick Sabido & Jonelle Sabido v. The Bank of New York Mellon, Etc., 241 So. 3d 865 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

transferees were not entitled to enforce it as holders. § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016). The Bank was then required
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2023)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Wells Fargo Bank v. Diz, 253 So. 3d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). A “bearer” is defined
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2024)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Gafoor Jaffer & Nina Jaffer v. Chase Home Fin., LLC, 155 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 184, 2015 WL 71828

instrument.4 Also relevant to the analysis is section 671.201(21), Florida Statutes (2013), which defines
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2021)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityGarron (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityToyos (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Mario A. Rodriguez & Lendy Rodriguez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. d/b/a Am.'s Servicing Co., 178 So. 3d 62 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15239, 2015 WL 5948169

identified person that is the person in , possession,” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2010) (emphasis added). Thus
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2021)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityHouk (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityLuiz (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Gary S. Snyder & Jane Snyder v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, 169 So. 3d 1270 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11413, 2015 WL 4549529

identified person that is the person in possession^]” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). In other words, the
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityHagstrom (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Phan v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 198 So. 3d 744 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 88 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1306, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2841, 2016 WL 746400

connotes possession of the document itself. See § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008) (“ ‘Holder’ means: The
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2021)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityWinchel (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Houk v. PennyMac Corp., 210 So. 3d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 535437, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1659

person that is the person in possession. ...” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). "To hold a note under
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityChaikin (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Assil v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC, 171 So. 3d 226 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11965, 2015 WL 4747196

identified person that is. the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008). “If the note does not
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityGlicken (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. McFadyen, 194 So. 3d 418 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 89 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 652, 2016 WL 1658773, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6351

possession of the document itself. See § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008) (“ ‘Holder’ means: The
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2022)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityGarcia (2021)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityDiz (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

Automatic Truck & Trail. W. Ctrs., Inc. v. Eastamp, Inc., 320 So. 2d 7 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 17 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1282

without qualification; and a creditor is defined in § 671.201, F.S. 1973, the general definition section of
Copy

Lucretia J. Vann v. Boncidium, LLC, et al. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2026).

Cited 1 times | District Court of Appeal of Florida

... for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, LOBREE and GOODEN, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 671.201(23)(a), Fla. Stat. (2025) (“‘Holder’ means . . . [t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the ...
Copy

Jaffe v. Bank of Am., N.A., 674 F. Supp. 2d 1360 (S.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 72 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 618, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119984, 2009 WL 4906676

proceedings in which rights are determined." Fla. Stat. 671.201(1). Thus, BoA claims it is entitled to attorneys'
Copy

Luiz v. Lynx Asset Servs., LLC, 198 So. 3d 1102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 90 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 665, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12795, 2016 WL 4445941

identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2015). While the note contained
Copy

Sykes Corp. v. E. Metal Supply, Inc., 659 So. 2d 475 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 27 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 504, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8870, 1995 WL 497263

unauthorized endorsement includes a forgery. § 671.201(43), Fla.Stat. (1991). An unauthorized signature
Copy

·Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Atl. Bank of West Orlando, 364 So. 2d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 25 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1451, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16474

sold to a good faith purchaser. We disagree. Section 671.201(9) defines a buyer in the ordinary course of
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityIn Re Carcorp, Inc. (2002)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityMenkel (1989)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·In re Elowitz, 550 B.R. 603 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2016).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 75 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1237, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 205, 89 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 823, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 2206

that is the person in possession.” Fla. Stat. § 671.201(21).12 It is well-established that “[a] plaintiff
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPadilla (2020)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Taoufiq Seffar v. Residential Credit Solutions, Inc., 160 So. 3d 122 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4270, 2015 WL 1334288

identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). Thus, to be a holder
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLuiz (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityMcFadyen (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Hagstrom, 203 So. 3d 918 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11054

statutory definition of the holder of the note. Section 671.201, Florida Statutes (2011), defines “holder”
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2020)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Olivera v. Bank of Am., N.A., 141 So. 3d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 3377081, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10610

possession of the note. 2 See § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009) (“ ‘Holder’ means .
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2015)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Gonzalez v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., 180 So. 3d 1106 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18133, 2015 WL 7781746

identified person that is the person in possession -” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). Therefore, GreenTree
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPeters (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Alaqua Prop., 190 So. 3d 662 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6147, 2016 WL 1600421

person that is the person in possession ...” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014); see also Deutsche
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGloger (2019)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Grant v. Southtrust Bank of Nw. Florida, 605 So. 2d 171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 18 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 985, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9995, 1992 WL 227869

throughout this chapter.” Pertinent to this case is Section 671.201(26), Florida Statutes (1991) (U.C.C. § 1-201)
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityIn Re De Pasquale (1994)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., as Tr. v. William F. Noll, I I I, 261 So. 3d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

to an identified person who is in possession. § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016). Lack
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2020)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Powers v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., 202 So. 3d 121 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15241

is payable either to bearer or to the holder. § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). A person in possession
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityWinchel (2017)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Johnson, 250 So. 3d 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

foreclose at that time as the holder of the note. See § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016) (defining "holder" as
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2020)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·State v. Haas, 433 So. 2d 1343 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20846

Black’s Law Dictionary 345 (5th ed. 1979). See also § 671.201(24), Fla.Stat. (1981).
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPropps (1985)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Diego Cartwright v. LJL Mortg. Pool, LLC, Rachel Y. Young a/k/a Rachel Young a/k/a Rachael Young, Roderick Young, Jeniffer Young-Campbell & Amber Lake Homeowners' Ass'n, Inc., 185 So. 3d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1438, 2016 WL 404074

identified person that is the person in possession.’.’ § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). As a substituted
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2019)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Wane v. Loan Corp., 926 F. Supp. 2d 1312 (M.D. Fla. 2013).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2013 WL 672574, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25245

holder of the note pursuant to Florida Statute § 671.201(21); and (17) unclean hands. (Doc. # 70). Bank
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPropst (2015)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·PMT NPL Fin. v. Centurion Sys., 257 So. 3d 516 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

allonge attached to the complaint.”). See generally § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2017) (defining “holder”
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2020)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

·Carlos M. Rivera & Yanira J. Pena Santiago v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Mortg. Elec. Reg. Sys. Inc. as Nominee for FDIC as Receiver for Amtrust Bank, Shaughnessy Vill. Homeowners Ass'n, Inc., & Olympia Master Ass'n, Inc., 189 So. 3d 323 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 WL 1579076, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5999

bank is the e-note’s holder, as defined in section 671.201(21), Florida Statutes (2010), and has the same
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2018)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

In Re Aquamarine USA, Inc., 330 B.R. 280 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 58 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 647, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 1730, 45 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 99

reason to know that it exists. FLA. STAT. ANN. § 671.201(25) (West 2004). SunTrust claims it was not advised
Copy

George L. Kenney a/k/a George Kenney v. HSBC USA, Nat'l Ass'n, Susie N. Kenney a/k/a Susie Kenney, Sea Oaks Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc., Sea Oaks of Juno Beach Condo. Two Ass'n, Mortg. Elec. Reg. Sys., Inc. (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). “A plaintiff who
Copy

Santana Equestrian Private Fin., LLC v. Tiffany Richtmyer (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

seller’s own usual or customary practices. § 671.201(9), Fla. Stat. (2020). As explained in Carlsen
Copy

First Bank of Immokalee v. Fwcc, 745 So. 2d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

notice of dishonor" by the midnight deadline. Section 671.201, Florida Statutes (1993), contains the general
Copy

Jennifer Roller, Andrea Soule, & Kathleen Doud, as Beneficiaries of the James G. Collins Trust u/a/d August 30, 1990 Vs Judith R. Collins & Cypress Trust Co., as Successor Tr. of the James G. Collins Trust u/a/d August 30, 1990 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

“person” or “a party” as a trust. However, section 671.201, Florida Statutes (2021), contains general
Copy

Hsbc Bank USA, Nat'l Assoc., Etc. v. James Hess a/k/a James H. Hess, 228 So. 3d 143 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 4679601

identified person.that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016). , In cases where
Copy

Empire of Am. Fed. Sav. Bank v. Brady, 776 F. Supp. 1571 (S.D. Fla. 1991).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 17 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1191, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15963, 1991 WL 230487

had “inferable knowledge” under Florida Statute § 671.-201(25)4 that BRADY intended to sign the notes as
Copy

The Allegro at Boynton Beach, LLC v. C. Bruce Pearson & Olson Land Partners, LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

“delivery” is the “voluntary transfer of possession.” § 671.201(15), Fla. Stat. (2018). The production of the
Copy

Claudine M. Stacknik v. U. S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

note as a holder, as that term is defined in section 671.201(21)(a), Florida Statutes (2013). While our
Copy

Bank of New York v. Burgiel, 248 So. 3d 237 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

person that is the person in possession.” Id. § 671.201(21)(a). In this case, Bank’s complaint
Copy

Musselman v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas (In re Balderrama), 473 B.R. 823 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2012).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 380, 2012 WL 1893634, 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 2350

622 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 5th 2010). . Fla. Stat. § 671.201(21). . “Bearer means a person ... in possession
Copy

Alwyn York McConnell v. JPMorgan Chase, 190 So. 3d 264 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 WL 2745295, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7195

identified person that is the person in possession!.]” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2010). 1 The person
Copy

Hanna v. PennyMac Holdings, LLC, 270 So. 3d 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

enforce an instrument, and that pursuant to section 671.201(21)(a), Florida Statutes, a "holder" is a "person
Copy

Hanna v. PennyMac Holdings, LLC, 270 So. 3d 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

enforce an instrument, and that pursuant to section 671.201(21)(a), Florida Statutes, a "holder" is a "person
Copy

Nermine Hanna v. Pennymac Holdings, LLC & Patricia T. Connor (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

enforce an instrument, and that pursuant to section 671.201(21)(a), Florida Statutes, a “holder” is a “person
Copy

Ottoniel Cruz & Luz M. Cruz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, Nat'l Ass'n (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014).
Copy

Catherine P. Cox v. U.S. Bank, Trust N.a., as Tr. for Lsf9 Master Participation Trust (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2015). Thus, a plaintiff
Copy

Nationstar Mortg., LLC, as Successor in Interest to Wells Fargo Bank, N. a. v. Stephen Johnson (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

at that time as the holder of the note. See § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016) (defining "holder"
Copy

Robert T. Frost a/k/a Robert Frost v. Christiana Trust, a Div. of Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB, etc., 193 So. 3d 1092 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9596, 2016 WL 3419300

identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671,201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). “Thus, to be a holder
Copy

Richter v. United States, 663 F. Supp. 68 (S.D. Fla. 1987).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 722, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13731

selling goods of that kind....” Fla.Stat.Ann. § 671.201(9) (West Supp. 1987). “Good faith” is defined
Copy

Vicoria S. Magaldi v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 199 So. 3d 982 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9258, 2016 WL 3268351

identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). Thus, to be a holder
Copy

Ottoniel Cruz & Luz M. Cruz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, Nat'l Ass'n, etc., 199 So. 3d 992 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9272, 2016 WL 3342651

identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014).
Copy

Bruno v. Fleet Credit Corp., 564 So. 2d 599 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 807, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5434, 1990 WL 105516

a true lease and not a secured creditor. See § 671.201(37), Fla. Stat. (1985). In addition to these agreements
Copy

Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Ehud Rafaeli, Lizabeth Rafaeli (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2015). Here, the note owner’s
Copy

Henderson v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, 92 So. 3d 301 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 2913159, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11669

bearer or to an identified person in possession. § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. “Bearer” means “a person in
Copy

Bank of New York, Etc. v. Andrew Calloway (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

possession.’” Caraccia, 185 So. 3d at 1279 (quoting § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013)). Here, Bank of
Copy

Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurly, Banick & Strickfoot, P.A. v. Ricciardelli (In re G.O. Harris Fin. Corp.), 51 B.R. 100 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1985).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1810, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 5748

se*104cures payment or performance of an obligation”. § 671.201(37), Fla.Stats. Thus, “a security interest has
Copy

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Elliott, 953 F.2d 1560 (11th Cir. 1992).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 18 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 588, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 2691, 1992 WL 22976

creating an interest in property.” Fla.Stat. § 671.201(31) and (32). Thus, pursuant to their agreements
Copy

State Environ. Reg. v. Ctl Distrib., 715 So. 2d 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 WL 75058

acknowledge the buyer's receipt of the product. See section 671.201(6), Florida Statutes (1995). Among other things
Copy

Rincon v. HSBC Bank (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

section 673.3091, Florida Statutes (2012). Section 671.201(21), Florida Statues (2012), defines "holder"
Copy

The Bank of New York Mellon, Etc. v. Remonde Lopez & Samuel Lopez (Fla. 4th DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). “Thus, to be
Copy

Morris v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 182 So. 3d 680 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18409, 2015 WL 8316579

identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011). “When a plaintiff
Copy

In Re Allied Printing, Inc., 344 B.R. 153 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 175, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2853, 2005 WL 3947958

by the facts of each case in accordance with § 671.201(37) of the Florida Statutes which provides as
Copy

Key Capital Corp. v. Keen, 535 So. 2d 345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2739, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5563, 1988 WL 133930

determined by the facts of each case....” Section 671.201(37), Fla. Stat. (1985). The disputed motor
Copy

Green v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC, 230 So. 3d 989 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

payable to the original lender, CHL, Inc. Cf. § 671.201(21), Fla. Stat. (2015) (defining “holder” as “[t]he
Copy

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Rivero Diagnostic Ctr., Inc., a/a/o Carlos Bacallao (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

marks that call attention to the language. § 671.201(10), Florida Statutes (2008) (emphasis added)
Copy

Gregory Mirmelli v. Harvey Silverman, Etc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

nevertheless is entitled to enforce the note”); § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2017) (“‘Holder’ means .
Copy

Certified Priority Restoration a/a/o Cheryl Coakley v. Universal Ins. Co. of North Am. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

which it is to operate ought to have noticed it.” § 671.201(10), Fla. Stat. (2017). Conspicuous terms include:
Copy

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust, Etc. v. Fleming Harris (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2019). “[I]f an instrument
Copy

Sarit J. Assil n/k/a Sarit Levy v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC, Soheil Assil, etc., Victoria Grove Homeowners Associaton, Inc., John Doe & Jane Doe, etc. (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

identified person that is the person in possession.” § 671.201(21)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008). “If the note does not
Copy

Feltman v. BankAtlantic (In re Allied Respiratory Care Servs., Inc.), 182 B.R. 589 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1995).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 26 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 901, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 18, 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 747

in the form of money, which is defined at section 671.201(24) of the Florida Statutes,3 as “a medium
Copy

Rincon v. HSBC Bank USA, Nat'l Ass'n, 196 So. 3d 417 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2016 WL 1465695, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5760

holder of a note has standing to foreclose. Section 671.201(21), Florida Statutes (2012), defines “holder”
Copy

Stevens v. Beck (In re Dickey), 19 B.R. 489 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1982).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 4310

logical construction. Pursuant to Florida Statutes § 671.-201(32) and (33), “Purchase” is defined to include

This Florida statute resource is curated by this site's author, a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney (Florida Bar No. 39104). For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.