Florida Statute 672.318 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 672
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SALES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 672.318

672.318 Third-party beneficiaries of warranties express or implied.—A seller’s warranty whether express or implied extends to any natural person who is in the family or household of his or her buyer, who is a guest in his or her home or who is an employee, servant or agent of his or her buyer if it is reasonable to expect that such person may use, consume or be affected by the goods and who is injured in person by breach of the warranty. A seller may not exclude nor limit the operation of this section.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-254; s. 1, ch. 67-574; s. 567, ch. 97-102.

Note.—s. 2-318, U.C.C.

F.S. 672.318 on Google Scholar

F.S. 672.318 on Casetext

Amendments to 672.318

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 672.318

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 672.318.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 672.318

Total Results: 12

In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES—REPORT NO. 13-01 (PRODUCTS LIABILITY)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-03-26

Citation: 160 So. 3d 869, 2015 WL 1400770

Snippet: warranty previously requiring privity, see F.S. 672.318 and Kramer, 520 So.2d at 39 & n. 4.

In re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases—Report No. 09-10

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-05-17

Citation: 91 So. 3d 785, 2012 WL 1722576

Snippet: of-warranty previously requiring-privity, see ■§ 672.318, Fla. Stat. (Í98-7-), — and Kramer v. — Piper -Aircraft

Standard Jury Inst.-Civil Cases (No. 02-2)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-04-01

Citation: 872 So. 2d 893, 2004 WL 635319

Snippet: of warranty previously requiring privity, see § 672.318, Florida Statutes Fla. Stat. (1987); Kramer v.

Standard Jury Instructions-Civil Cases

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-07-06

Citation: 778 So. 2d 264, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 518, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1371, 2000 WL 889771

Snippet: of warranty previously requiring privity, see § 672.318, Florida Statutes (1987), and Kramer v. Piper Aircraft

OCEAN RITZ v. GGV Associates, Ltd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-05-01

Citation: 710 So. 2d 702, 1998 WL 210330

Snippet: warranty runs to third-party beneficiaries. Section 672.318, Florida Statutes. In the case of services rendered

Standard Jury Instructions—Civil Cases (No. 98-1)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-04-02

Citation: 711 So. 2d 1, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 287, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 605, 1998 WL 154462

Snippet: Smith was in privity with either defendant, see § 672.318, Fla. Stat. (1996), and regardless of any implied

In Re Standard Jury Instructions

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-03-09

Citation: 540 So. 2d 825, 1989 WL 24051

Snippet: of warranty previously requiring privity, see § 672.318, Florida Statutes (1987), and Kramer v. Piper Aircraft

Kramer v. Piper Aircraft Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-02-11

Citation: 520 So. 2d 37, 1988 WL 10275

Snippet: in those cases which fall within the scope of § 672.318, Fla. Stat. (1985), of the Florida Uniform Commercial

Continental Insurance v. Montella

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-03-09

Citation: 427 So. 2d 796, 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 776, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19191

Snippet: Uniform Commercial Code, sections 672.313 through 672.318, Florida Statutes (1981), and furthers no public

Hartman v. OPELIKA MACH. & WELDING

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-05-28

Citation: 414 So. 2d 1105

Snippet: expect such person may use" the product. Section 672.318, Florida Statutes. [7] As previously noted, the

McCarthy v. Florida Ladder Company

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-06-14

Citation: 295 So. 2d 707, 15 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 375

Snippet: recently, the Uniform Commercial Code, Section 672.318, Fla. Stat., F.S.A., specifies that an employee

Barry v. Ivarson Incorporated

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-06-09

Citation: 249 So. 2d 44, 9 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 404

Snippet: plaintiffs-lessees come within the ambit of § 672.318 which extends the provisions of F.S. § 672.314