Florida Statute 672.318 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 672
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SALES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 672.318

672.318 Third-party beneficiaries of warranties express or implied.—A seller’s warranty whether express or implied extends to any natural person who is in the family or household of his or her buyer, who is a guest in his or her home or who is an employee, servant or agent of his or her buyer if it is reasonable to expect that such person may use, consume or be affected by the goods and who is injured in person by breach of the warranty. A seller may not exclude nor limit the operation of this section.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-254; s. 1, ch. 67-574; s. 567, ch. 97-102.

Note.—s. 2-318, U.C.C.

F.S. 672.318 on Google Scholar

F.S. 672.318 on Casetext

Amendments to 672.318

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 672.318

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 672.318.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 672.318

Total Results: 12

In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES—REPORT NO. 13-01 (PRODUCTS LIABILITY)

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2015-03-26T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 160 So. 3d 869

Snippet: warranty previously requiring privity, see F.S. 672.318 and Kramer, 520 So.2d at 39 & n.

In re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases—Report No. 09-10

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2012-05-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 91 So. 3d 785, 2012 WL 1722576

Snippet: -warranty previously requiring-privity, see ■§ 672.318, Fla. Stat. (Í98-7-), — and Kramer v. — Piper -

Standard Jury Inst.-Civil Cases (No. 02-2)

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2004-03-31T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 872 So. 2d 893

Snippet: of warranty previously requiring privity, see § 672.318, Florida Statutes Fla. Stat. (1987); Kramer v.

Standard Jury Instructions-Civil Cases

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-07-06T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 778 So. 2d 264

Snippet: of warranty previously requiring privity, see § 672.318, Florida Statutes (1987), and Kramer v. Piper Aircraft

OCEAN RITZ v. GGV Associates, Ltd.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-05-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 710 So. 2d 702

Snippet: warranty runs to third-party beneficiaries. Section 672.318, Florida Statutes. In the case of services rendered

Standard Jury Instructions—Civil Cases (No. 98-1)

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1998-04-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 711 So. 2d 1

Snippet: Smith was in privity with either defendant, see § 672.318, Fla. Stat. (1996), and regardless of any implied

In Re Standard Jury Instructions

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1989-03-08T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 540 So. 2d 825

Snippet: of warranty previously requiring privity, see § 672.318, Florida Statutes (1987), and Kramer v. Piper Aircraft…was in privity with *828 either defendant, see § 672.318, Florida Statutes (1987), and regardless of any

Kramer v. Piper Aircraft Corp.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1988-02-10T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 520 So. 2d 37

Snippet: in those cases which fall within the scope of § 672.318, Fla. Stat. (1985), of the Florida Uniform Commercial

Continental Insurance v. Montella

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-03-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 427 So. 2d 796

Snippet: Uniform Commercial Code, sections 672.313 through 672.318, Florida Statutes (1981), and furthers no public

Hartman v. OPELIKA MACH. & WELDING

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-05-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 414 So. 2d 1105

Snippet: such person may use" the product. Section 672.318, Florida Statutes. [7] As previously noted, the

McCarthy v. Florida Ladder Company

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1974-06-14T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 295 So. 2d 707

Snippet: recently, the Uniform Commercial Code, Section 672.318, Fla. Stat., F.S.A., specifies that an employee

Barry v. Ivarson Incorporated

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1971-06-09T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 249 So. 2d 44

Snippet: plaintiffs-lessees come within the ambit of § 672.318 which extends the provisions of F.S. § 672.314 …these two cases, appellants submit that F.S. § 672.318 (1969), F.S.A., should be construed to include …what may be called the underlying theme in F.S. § 672.318 (1969), F.S.A., of nullifying the privity concept…case are not entitled to the benefits of F.S. § 672.318 (1969), F.S.A., and, therefore, affirm. In Speed…named as third-party beneficiaries within F.S. § 672.318 (1969), F.S.A. Not only are appellants not within