672.606
What constitutes acceptance of goods.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
672.606 What constitutes acceptance of goods.—
(1) Acceptance of goods occurs when the buyer:
(a) After a reasonable opportunity to inspect the goods signifies to the seller that the goods are conforming or that the buyer will take or retain them in spite of their nonconformity; or
(b) Fails to make an effective rejection (s. 672.602(1)), but such acceptance does not occur until the buyer has had a reasonable opportunity to inspect them; or
(c) Does any act inconsistent with the seller’s ownership; but if such act is wrongful as against the seller it is an acceptance only if ratified by her or him.
(2) Acceptance of a part of any commercial unit is acceptance of that entire unit.
History.—s. 1, ch. 65-254; s. 591, ch. 97-102.
Note.—s. 2-606, U.C.C.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1976–2024 · leading case: Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Galaxis USA, Ltd.
Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Galaxis USA, Ltd. (2002)
“Fla. Stat. § 672.606 (1). As to goods that are accepted, Fla.”
US Fid. & Guar. Co. v. N. Am. Steel Corp. (1976)
“105 and that under Fla. Stat. § 672.606 (1)(b) Lurgi failed to make an effective rejection of the goods within a reasonable time after it had an opportunity to inspect them.”
JDI HOLDINGS, LLC v. Jet Management, Inc. (2010)
“Fla. Stat. § 672.606 . An acceptance with knowledge of a nonconformity cannot be revoked because of that nonconformity.”
CENTRAL FLA. ANTENNA SERVICE v. Crabtree (1987)
“[7] § 672.606(1), Fla. Stat. (1985). [8] See section 671.”
Validsa, Inc. v. PDVSA Services Inc. (2009)
“See Fla. Stat. § 672.606 (b). Here, it is undisputed that Plaintiff completed all of its deliveries under Contracts 326, 368 and 405, and Defendants accepted all of the goods delivered under those Contracts.”
Furr v. Corvette Experience, Inc. (In Re Corvette Collection of Boston, Inc.) (2003)
“Acceptance is defined under Fla. Stat. § 672.606 : (1) Acceptance of goods occurs when the buyer: (a) After a reasonable opportunity to inspect the goods signifies to the seller that the goods are conforming or that the buyer will take or retain them in spite of their…”
Exim Brickell LLC v. PDVSA Services Inc. (2013)
“” Fla. Stat. § 672.606 (internal citation omitted).”
BP Dev. & Mgmt. Corp. v. P. LAFER ENT., INC. (1989)
“§ 672.606, Fla. Stat. (1985). Here, the record clearly establishes that B.”
Euroworld of California, Inc. v. Blakey (1985)
“Under the code, § 672.606, acceptance of goods occurs when the buyer, after a reasonable opportunity to inspect the goods, signifies to the seller that the goods are conforming or that he will take or retain them in spite of their nonconformity.”
In Re Holistic Services Corp. (1983)
“Acceptance occurs under Section 672.606, Florida Statutes, when the buyer fails to make an effective rejection after having a reasonable opportunity to inspect the goods.”
Hawke Distributing, Inc. v. Nuevo Sol Partners, Inc. (1997)
“ased upon the unrefuted record evidence below that the appellant purchased and retained 390 video disc players from appellee and later shipped a portion of the same overseas for resale to a third party purchaser, the trial court properly determined that appellant had accepted…”
Dawn International LTD. v. Jacob Fleishman Sales, Inc. (2024)
“See UCC § 2-606(1); Fla. Stat. § 672.606 (1). A buyer must pay for any goods accepted at the price contracted.”
— 672.606(1) — 2 cases
CENTRAL FLA. ANTENNA SERVICE v. Crabtree (1987)
“[7] § 672.606(1), Fla. Stat. (1985). [8] See section 671.”
Hawke Distributing, Inc. v. Nuevo Sol Partners, Inc. (1997)
“ased upon the unrefuted record evidence below that the appellant purchased and retained 390 video disc players from appellee and later shipped a portion of the same overseas for resale to a third party purchaser, the trial court properly determined that appellant had accepted…”
— 672.606(l)(c) — 1 case
Hawke Distributing, Inc. v. Nuevo Sol Partners, Inc. (1997)
“ased upon the unrefuted record evidence below that the appellant purchased and retained 390 video disc players from appellee and later shipped a portion of the same overseas for resale to a third party purchaser, the trial court properly determined that appellant had accepted…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.