The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 672.606 (internal citation omitted). . . .
. . . . § 672.606. . . .
. . . . § 672.606(b). . . .
. . . to goods for which payment has been made and accepted or which have been received and excepted (s. 672.606 . . . to goods for which payment has been made and accepted or which have been received and excepted (s. 672.606 . . .
. . . Discussion Florida Statutes §§ 672.501, 672.502, 672.508, 672.601, 672.602, 672.606, 672.703, 672.706 . . .
. . . respect to goods for which payment has been made and accepted or which have been received and accepted (s.672.606 . . . Stat. § 672.606: (1) Acceptance of goods occurs when the buyer: (a) After a reasonable opportunity to . . .
. . . Section 672.606 governs what constitutes acceptance of goods by a buyer. . . . Under § 672.606, acceptance occurs when the buyer: (a) After a reasonable opportunity to inspect the . . . Stat. § 672.606(1). As to goods that are accepted, Fla. . . .
. . . See § 672.606, Fla. Stat. (2000); McNeill v. . . .
. . . respect to goods for which payment has been made and accepted or which have been received and accepted (s.672.606 . . .
. . . merchandise within the meaning of Florida’s version of the Uniform Commercial Code as codified in section 672.606 . . . acceptance as a matter of law because it is an act inconsistent with the appellee’s ownership of the same. § 672.606 . . .
. . . . § 672.606. . . . Ann. § 672.606(1). . . . Hence, Defendant is deemed to have accepted the gloves pursuant to § 672.606(1)(a). . . . The Court also believes Defendant accepted the gloves pursuant to § 672.606(l)(b) and § 672.606(l)(c) . . . The record indicates that Defendant at no time rejected the gloves as provided in § 672.606(l)(b). . . .
. . . . § 672.606, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .
. . . . § 672.606(1), Fla.Stat. (1985). . . . .
. . . Under the code, § 672.606, acceptance of goods occurs when the buyer, after a reasonable opportunity . . .
. . . Acceptance occurs under Section 672.606, Florida Statutes, when the buyer fails to make an effective . . .
. . . . § 672.606(1)(b), Lurgi’s failure to do so did not leave it without a defense against NASCO’s claim. . . . The pertinent statutes read as follows: “672.606 What constitutes acceptance of goods (1) Acceptance . . .