Cases from cite.case.law:

FLORIDA HOLDING LLC, v. LAUDERHILL LENDING, LLC LLC,, 275 So. 3d 183 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . The requirements to enforce a lost note are set forth in Section 673.3091, Florida Statutes (2017), which . . . See § 673.3091(1)(a). . . . See § 673.3091(1)(b) & (c). . . .

CERTO v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, f k a N. A. II, ALT- A, 268 So. 3d 901 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . the plaintiff to prove it was entitled to enforce the instrument; i.e., had/has standing); see also § 673.3091 . . .

ROUSSELL, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, f k a JP N. A. II, 263 So. 3d 100 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . ." § 673.3091(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2017). . . . The bank failed to satisfy the requirements of section 673.3091(1)(a). . . .

L. MIELKE C. v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR GSAA HOME EQUITY TRUST, 264 So. 3d 249 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Because we find that the requirements for enforcing a lost note pursuant to section 673.3091, Florida . . . Accordingly, the trial court held that an "action under section 673.3091 is connected to an action for . . . Section 673.3091 provides as follows: (1) A person not in possession of an instrument is entitled to . . . The language of section 673.3091 demonstrates that it is not intended to create a cause of action to . . . As a result, section 673.3091 does not create a standalone cause of action apart from a breach. . . .

SANTOS, v. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR HOLDERS OF THE GSAA HOME EQUITY TRUST, 258 So. 3d 535 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . remaining issue, i.e. that there was insufficient evidence to support the indemnity required under section 673.3091 . . .

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f k a CWALT, v. BURGIEL, s At LLC,, 248 So. 3d 237 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . rights of a holder, or a person not in possession of the note who is entitled to enforce under section 673.3091 . . .

D. VIEIRA a k a D. a k a v. PENNYMAC CORP., 241 So. 3d 193 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . asserted that although the note was lost, it was entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to section 673.3091 . . . Thus, PennyMac had to prove standing and the right to enforce the note, using section 673.3091, Fla. . . . Section 673.3091(1)(a), requires in part that "[t]he person seeking to enforce the instrument was entitled . . .

DEBISH, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. ON BEHALF OF REGISTERED HOLDERS OF FIRST FRANKLIN MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST,, 240 So. 3d 16 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Corp. , 185 So.3d 645, 646-47 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) ; § 673.3091(2), Fla. Stat. (2017). . . .

M. HEYWARD, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., 238 So. 3d 930 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . however, is that Wells Fargo was required to prove its entitlement to enforce the note under section 673.3091 . . .

HINES v. NEW URBAN PINE ROAD LLC,, 239 So. 3d 750 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . and (2) there was insufficient evidence to reestablish the lost note under Florida Statutes section 673.3091 . . . (quoting § 673.3091, Fla. Stat.). Here, the unbroken chain of assignments and Mr. . . . substantial evidence supporting the trial court's findings that the lost note requirements of section 673.3091 . . .

D. FIELDING, v. PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 239 So. 3d 140 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s. 673.3091 . . .

SABIDO v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f k a JP L N. A., 241 So. 3d 865 (Fla. App. Ct. 2017)

. . . the original promissory note to the trial court or seek to reestablish the lost note under section 673.3091 . . . Section 673.3091(1), Florida Statutes (2016) provides: (1) A person not in possession of an instrument . . . Thus, subsection 673.3091(1)(a) required that the Bank prove one of two things, that it either 1. . . . person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s. 673.3091 . . . The Bank was then required to comply with the second option in section 673.3091(1)(a) set forth above-the . . .

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, v. C. BEAUFORT,, 238 So. 3d 365 (Fla. App. Ct. 2017)

. . . a person not in possession who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to Florida Statute § 673.3091 . . . That this was a "boilerplate" defense is disclosed by the fact that section 673.3091, Florida Statutes . . .

T. WISMAN, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, 239 So. 3d 726 (Fla. App. Ct. 2017)

. . . as "an entity not in possession of the Note which is entitled to enforce the Note pursuant to F.S. 673.3091 . . . a mortgage includes a person not in possession of the note who is entitled to enforce under section 673.3091 . . . loss was not the result of a transfer or seizure, and the instrument cannot reasonably be obtained. § 673.3091 . . . Id. § 673.3091(2). . . . standing to foreclose as a person not in possession of the note who is entitled to enforce under section 673.3091 . . .

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON As FOR NATIONSTAR HOME EQUITY TRUST A, v. L. PEDERSEN, J., 706 F. App'x 542 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 673.3091(1). . . . Id. § 673.3091(2). . . . Stat. § 673.3091. . . .

N. PETERS a k a N. n k a v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, f k a, 227 So. 3d 175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Section 673.3091, Florida Statutes (2012), sets forth the requirements for a person not in possession . . . instrument from a person who was entitled to enforce the instrument when loss of possession occurred.” § 673.3091 . . .

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. PIERRE, 215 So. 3d 633 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s[ection] 673.3091 . . .

N. DIGIOVANNI, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY f k a N. a n k a n k a If a s Is s a s Is, 226 So. 3d 984 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .” § 673.3091(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, H I v. LOUISSAINT,, 212 So. 3d 473 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . rights of a holder, or a person not in possession of the note who is entitled to enforce under section 673.3091 . . . (citing § 673.3091, Fla. Stat. (2009)). . . .

F. CALIXTE J. v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,, 211 So. 3d 1084 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . might occur by reason of a claim by another person to enforce the instrument,” as required by section 673.3091 . . .

A. HOUK, v. PENNYMAC CORP., 210 So. 3d 726 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . is entitled to enforce the instrument, but has lost'the Mortgage Note pursuant to Florida Statutes § 673.3091 . . . person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s. 673.3091 . . . Therefore, PennyMac had to satisfy the requirements outlined in section 673.3091 in order to prevail. . . . Section 673.3091 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (1) A person not in possession of an instrument . . . See § 673.3091(1). . . .

U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, J. P. v. S. BECKER D., 211 So. 3d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s[ection] 673.3091 . . .

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, v. U. N. KEE WING, N. A. BAC LP, 210 So. 3d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . to reestablish the lost note, Appellant was required to satisfy the requirements detailed in section 673.3091 . . . possession of an unknown person or a person that cannot be found or is not amenable to service of process. § 673.3091 . . .

GARRISON, v. CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC., 233 F. Supp. 3d 1282 (M.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . if Defendant cannot meet the requirements to enforce the Loan under Florida Statutes, §§ 673.3011 or 673.3091 . . . Plaintiff has cited no authority to support the proposition that Florida Statutes, §§ 673.3011 and 673.3091 . . .

D. FRANKLIN, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A. N. A., 202 So. 3d 923 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . the original promissory note to the trial court or seek to reestablish the lost note under section 673.3091 . . .

K. WALTON, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, ABS I MSAC, 201 So. 3d 831 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 673.3091, Fla. Stat. Mr. . . .

U. S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, N. A. GSAMP v. V. ANGELONI,, 199 So. 3d 492 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 673.3091(l)(a)-(c), Florida Statutes (2014) provides: (1) A person not in possession of an instrument . . . enforcement under subsection (1) must prove the terms of the note and the party’s right to enforce it. § 673.3091 . . .

LUIZ, v. LYNX ASSET SERVICES, LLC,, 198 So. 3d 1102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . §§ 673.3011, 673.3091, Fla. Stat. (2016) (emphasis added). . . . establish standing to file suit, in addition to establishing the lost note requirements of section 673.3091 . . . See §§ 673.3011, 673.3091, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .

POAG, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC,, 198 So. 3d 1002 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . The Poags' argue that Nationstar failed to prove reestablishment of the lost note under section 673.3091 . . . On September 18, 2012, Nations-tar filed a complaint to reestablish a lost note under section'673.3091 . . . “A finding that a lost note is reestablished, under section 673.3091, Florida Statutes, is reversible . . . Corp., 185 So.3d 645, 645-46 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (quoting § 673.3091, Fla. . . . Section 673.3091 provides the requirements for entitlement to enforce a lost note as follows: (1) A person . . . court correctly denied enforcement óf the note, but erred in reestablishing the note under section 673.3091 . . . Section 673.3091, which has more difficult enforcement standards, does not itself set forth reestablishment . . . The question of whether section 673.3091 displaces- section 71.011 as to the standards for reestablishing . . . (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (stating that “Establishing a lost negotiable instrument is governed by section 673.3091 . . . reestablished under the plain language of section 71.011, ■ but that its enforcement is governed by section 673.3091 . . .

HOME OUTLET, LLC, v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 194 So. 3d 1075 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 673.3091, Florida Statutes (2012), sets out the requirements for reestablishing á lost note. . . . possession of an unknown person or a person that cannot be found or is not amenable to service of process. § 673.3091 . . .

T. FROST a k a v. CHRISTIANA TRUST, a FSB, JP s, 193 So. 3d 1092 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . person not in possession' of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s. 673.3091 . . .

S. MAGALDI, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, As WAMU, 199 So. 3d 982 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to section] 673.3091 . . .

CRUZ M. v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, F. A., 199 So. 3d 992 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to sfeetion] 673.3091 . . . not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to sfeetion] 673.3091 . . . JPMorgan would have to prove: (1) it was the owner, and (2) reestablishment of the lost note under section 673.3091 . . .

BANK OF AMERICA, N. A. v. A. NASH,, 200 So. 3d 131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . rights of a holder, or a person not in possession of the note who is entitled to enforce under section 673.3091 . . .

ROBELTO v. U. S. BANK TRUST, N. A., 194 So. 3d 429 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . complaint, HSBC moved to amend to include a count for reestablishment of the note pursuant to section 673.3091 . . . “A finding that a lost note is reestablished under 673.3091, Florida Statutes is reversible upon the. . . . Section 673.3091, Florida Statutes, establishes the requirements to enforce a lost note: A person not . . . possession of an unknown person or a person that cannot be found or is not amenable to service of process. § 673.3091 . . . note and provide security to the obligor in the event some other person seeks to enforce the note. § 673.3091 . . .

U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CSAB v. BENOIT,, 190 So. 3d 235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 673.3091, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, v. A. McFADYEN,, 194 So. 3d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Stat. 673.3091 to enforce-the lost, destroyed or stolen Note.” . . . person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s. 673.3091 . . . It therefore had to satisfy the requirements detailed in section 673.3091 of the Florida Statutes to . . . Adequate protection may be provided by any reasonable means. § 673.3091, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . . the time the original was lost, it satisfied all of the requirements of section 673.3011 and section 673.3091 . . .

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, v. F. MARCIANO,, 190 So. 3d 166 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . person not in possession of the ■instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s. 673.3091 . . .

JOHNSON, v. SPACE COAST CREDIT UNION,, 184 So. 3d 1247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . the original promissory note to the trial court or seek to reestablish the lost note under section 673.3091 . . .

BLITCH v. FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION,, 185 So. 3d 645 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 673.3091, Fla. Stat. (2014) (emphasis added). . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 190 So. 3d 999 (Fla. 2016)

. . . .” § 673.3091(2), Fla. Stat. (2015). . . . Stat. (2015)., Accordingly, because both sections 673.3091(2) and 702.11(1) are important provisions . . . It also incorporates the requirements of section 673.3091 (Enforcement of lost, destroyed, or stolen . . . It is also designed to comply with section 673.3091; Florida Statutes (2013). . . . Adequate protection as required by sections' 702.11 (2013) and 673.3091(2), Florida Statutes (2013), . . .

ELSMAN, v. HSBC BANK USA MLMI, 182 So. 3d 770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . rights of a holder, or a person not in possession of the note who is entitled to enforce under section 673.3091 . . .

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, v. MARQUEZ,, 180 So. 3d 219 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . . § 673.3091, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . Proof by affidavit attached to the complaint, as required under the 2018 amendment to section 673.3091 . . .

GONZALEZ v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L. P., 180 So. 3d 1106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s. 673.3091 . . .

FIGUEROA, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,, 180 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Pursuant to section 673.3091(1), Florida Statutes (2014), a person not in possession of an instrument . . . an unknown person or a person that cannot be found or is riot amenable to service of process. , ; § 673.3091 . . . note “must prove the terms of the instrument and the [party’s] right to enforce the instrument.”; § 673.3091 . . . against loss that might occur by reason of a claim by another person to enforce the instrument.” § 673.3091 . . . the original promissory note to the trial court or seek to reestablish the lost note under section 673.3091 . . .

P. SEIDLER C. v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. N. A., 179 So. 3d 416 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . A finding that a lost note is reestablished, under section 673.3091, Florida Statutes, is reversible . . . plaintiff Wacho-via Bank, N.A. filed its complaint to reestablish a lost promissory note, under section 673.3091 . . . Section 673.3091(2), Florida Statutes, provides that “[a] person seeking enforcement of an instrument . . . alleged that it did not possess the note and was seeking to reestablish, a lost note, under section 673.3091 . . . Wells Fargo needed to prove Wachovia was entitled to enforce the note when possession was lost. § 673.3091 . . .

BOUMARATE v. HSBC BANK USA, N. A., 172 So. 3d 535 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Boumarates argue that the Bank failed to prove its entitlement to enforce the lost note under section 673.3091 . . . Section 673.3091 sets out when a person not in possession of a negotiable instrument may enforce the . . . Adequate protection may be provided by any reasonable means. § 673.3091 (l)-(2), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . . See § 673.3091, Fla. Stat.; see also Deakter v. . . . See § 673.3091(l)(a), Fla. Stat. . . .

S. SNYDER v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK,, 169 So. 3d 1270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s. 673.3091 . . . See § 673.3091, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. G. ROBINSON L., 168 So. 3d 1279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . foreclose a mortgage and to reestablish and enforce the lost note and attached allonges under section 673.3091 . . . See § 673.3091(1), Fla. Stat. (2012); Beaumont v. . . .

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a FDIC v. S S DEVELOPMENT, INC. a K. K. a FDIC v. S S a K. K., 620 F. App'x 698 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 673.3091(1), did not provide adequate protection against third-party claims under Fla. . . . . § 673.3091(2), and had unclean hands. We reject these arguments and affirm. I. . . . Stat. § 673.3091(1). Perry v. Fairbanks Capital Corp., 888 So.2d 725, 727 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). . . . Stat. § 673.3091(1). . . . Stat. § 673.3091(2). . . .

HAM, Jr. v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC,, 164 So. 3d 714 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . In Count I, Aurora alleged that it sought to “reestablish a promissory note under Section 673.3091, Florida . . . Aurora’s lost note allegations in the original complaint, pursuant to section 673.3091, Florida Statutes . . .

GOREL FLCA LLC, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,, 165 So. 3d 44 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . rights of a holder, or a person not in possession of the note who is entitled to enforce under section 673.3091 . . .

SEFFAR, v. RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC., 160 So. 3d 122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s[ection] 673.3091 . . .

MURRAY v. HSBC BANK USA,, 157 So. 3d 355 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s[ection] 673.3091 . . .

JAFFER v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC,, 155 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s. 673.3091 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 153 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 2014)

. . . that the claimant is entitled to enforce a lost, destroyed, or stolen instrument pursuant to section 673.3091 . . . Adequate protection as required under section 673.3091(2), Florida Statutes, shall be provided before . . . 673.3011, Florida Statutes, which defines a person entitled to enforce an instrument under section 673.3091 . . . It is also designed to comply with section 673.3091, Florida Statutes (2013). . . . Adequate protection as required by sections 702.11 (2013) and 673.3091(2), Florida Statutes (2013), must . . .

DELIA, v. GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION,, 161 So. 3d 554 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Section 673.3091, Florida Statutes (2013), governs the enforcement of lost notes: 673.3091. . . . mortgage foreclosure, the following constitute reasonable means of providing adequate protection under s. 673.3091 . . .

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, v. M. ZORIE,, 146 So. 3d 1209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Count two sought to reestablish a lost or destroyed promissory note under section 673.3091, Florida Statutes . . .

WOLKOFF v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., 153 So. 3d 280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . In Correa, the bank failed to present evidence of the terms of a lost note under section 673.3091(2), . . . Florida Statutes (2007), or its right to enforce the lost note under section 673.3091(l)(b). . . .

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. P. MORCOM, 125 So. 3d 320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s. 673.3091 . . .

S. CORREA, v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, BACF D, 118 So. 3d 952 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . For the requirements to reestablish a lost note we look to section 673.3091, Florida Statutes (2007). . . . Section 673.3091(1) provides as follows: (1) A person not in possession of an instrument is entitled . . . Section 673.3091(2) requires a person seeking enforcement of a lost, destroyed, or stolen instrument . . . Bank failed to prove the terms of the note under section 673.3091(2) or its right to enforce the note . . . under section 673.3091 (l)(b). . . .

LYTTLE v. BANKUNITED, FDIC,, 115 So. 3d 425 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . tender the original promissory note to the trial court or seek to reestablish the note under section 673.3091 . . .

BOUMARATE, v. HSBC BANK USA, N. A., 109 So. 3d 1239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . for foreclosure and a second count to re-establish a lost instrument (the note) pursuant to section 673.3091 . . .

C. RICHARDS, v. HSBC BANK USA PHH, 91 So. 3d 233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . tender the original promissory note to the trial court or seek to reestablish the note under section 673.3091 . . .

In BALDERRAMA, P. v., 473 B.R. 823 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to § 673.3091 . . .

GUERRERO v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC., 83 So. 3d 970 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . occur by reason of a claim by another person to enforce the[se] instrument[s]” as required by section 673.3091 . . . See § 673.3091(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . . Section 673.3091 of the Florida Statutes governing reestablishment of lost instruments provides: Enforcement . . .

D. BEAUMONT, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,, 81 So. 3d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 673.3091, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . . . § 673.3091(1), Fla. Stat. . . . Beaumont against loss that might occur by reason of a claim by another person to enforce the instrument. § 673.3091 . . . instrument who is entitled to reestablish a lost, destroyed or stolen instrument pursuant to section 673.3091 . . .

ISRA HOMES, INC. a LLC, a S. v. APPLEY V V a W. u t d LLC, a J. J. a A. A. E. S., 78 So. 3d 724 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s. 673.3091 . . .

FELTUS, v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 80 So. 3d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . In the count to reestablish the note pursuant to section 673.3091, Florida Statutes (2009), U.S. . . . instrument from a person who was entitled to enforce the instrument when loss of possession occurred.” § 673.3091 . . .

BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N. A. N. A. v. H. RODGERS J., 79 So. 3d 108 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . of the foreclosure complaint in this case, the promissory note was lost or by what entity- Section 673.3091 . . .

GEE, v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 72 So. 3d 211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . the original promissory note to the trial court or seek to reestablish the lost note under section 673.3091 . . .

In AUM SHREE OF TAMPA, LLC, d b a LLC, d b a v. HSBC USA, HSBC USA, v. LLC, d b a HSBC USA, v., 449 B.R. 584 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to Section 673.3091 . . .

CITIBANK, N. A. v. DALESSIO, v., 756 F. Supp. 2d 1361 (M.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . promissory note to the trial court or seek to reestablish the lost note under Florida Statute Section 673.3091 . . .

SERVEDIO a k a v. US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 46 So. 3d 1105 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . the original promissory note to the trial court or seek to reestablish the lost note under section 673.3091 . . .

TAYLOR, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, ETC., 44 So. 3d 618 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s. 673.3091 . . .

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. v. A. BADRA G. s, 991 So. 2d 1037 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . that the promissory note, which was lost, cannot be re-established under the 2004 version of section 673.3091 . . . In this action, MERS relied on section 673.3091, Florida Statutes. . . . The 2003 version of section 673.3091, which we apply here, required a person seeking to enforce a lost . . . The 2003 version of section 673.3091 provides, in pertinent part: (1) A person not in possession of an . . . We need not resolve, here, whether the 2004 amendment to section 673.3091 was substantive, as argued . . .

DASMA INVESTMENTS, LLC, a v. REALTY ASSOCIATES FUND III, L. P. a, 459 F. Supp. 2d 1294 (S.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . . § 673.3091. . . . Furthermore, neither Dasma or Ribonnet has made any attempt to reestablish the note pursuant to § 673.3091 . . .

In AMERICAN EQUITY CORPORATION OF PINELLAS,, 332 B.R. 645 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . for a party to enforce a lost, destroyed or stolen instrument, it must comply with Florida Statute 673.3091 . . .

D. CONNELLY a v. G. MATTHEWS, S. A., 899 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Section 673.3091(l)(c) specifies the requirements for a holder to enforce an instrument when the original . . . [e.s.] § 673.3091(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (2004). . . . See § 673.3091(2), Fla. Stat. . . .

T. PERRY J. v. FAIRBANKS CAPITAL CORP., 888 So. 2d 725 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . and either the original must be produced, or the lost document must be reestablished under section 673.3091 . . . See section 673.3091(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. NOVASTAR MORTGAGE, INC. d b a W. III,, 862 So. 2d 793 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See § 673.3091, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . .

STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, v. LORD,, 851 So. 2d 790 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . predecessor in interest possessed the note and did not otherwise satisfy the requirements of section 673.3091 . . . was in possession of the instrument and entitled to enforce it when-loss of possession occurred.” § 673.3091 . . . Section 673.3091 provides, in part: (1) A person not in possession of an instrument is entitled to enforce . . . Likewise, here, where State Street failed to comply with section 673.3091, the trial court correctly . . . Because EMC could not enforce the lost note under section 673.3091, it had no power of enforcement which . . .

DEAKTER, v. MENENDEZ, Jr., 830 So. 2d 124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . “the plaintiff could not demonstrate his entitlement to enforce a lost note under Florida Statute § 673.3091 . . . See § 673.3091(1), Fla. Stat. (1993). . . . Section 673.3091(1)(e) provides that the instrument must be lost, destroyed or stolen; in short, the . . . See § 673.3091(1), Fla. Stat. (1993). . . . See § 673.3091(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .

SLIZYK, S. S. v. A. SMILACK,, 825 So. 2d 428 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . property where appellee did not produce the original note and mortgage and did not comply with section 673.3091 . . . On appeal, appellant claims that appellee could not comply with section 673.3091, controlling the reestablishment . . .

JTM, INC. v. TOTALBANK,, 795 So. 2d 161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to s. 673.3091 . . . Neither of the circumstances listed in 673.3091 and 673.4181(4) is present here. . . .

NATIONAL LOAN INVESTORS, L. P. v. JOYMAR ASSOCIATES,, 767 So. 2d 549 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . .” § 673.3091, Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

MASON, v. B. RUBIN, 727 So. 2d 283 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Establishing a lost negotiable instrument is governed by a different statute, section 673.3091, Florida . . . requirements than the former, and the trial court correctly concluded that the husband did not satisfy section 673.3091 . . .