Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 674.301 (2025)
Deferred posting; recovery of payment by return of items; time of dishonor; return of items by payor bank.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
674.301 Deferred posting; recovery of payment by return of items; time of dishonor; return of items by payor bank.—
(1) If a payor bank settles for a demand item other than a documentary draft presented otherwise than for immediate payment over the counter before midnight of the banking day of receipt, the payor bank may revoke the settlement and recover the settlement if, before it has made final payment and before its midnight deadline, it:
(a) Returns the item; or
(b) Sends written notice of dishonor or nonpayment if the item is unavailable for return.
(2) If a demand item is received by a payor bank for credit on its books, it may return the item or send notice of dishonor and may revoke any credit given or recover the amount thereof withdrawn by its customer, if it acts within the time limit and in the manner specified in subsection (1).
(3) Unless previous notice of dishonor has been sent, an item is dishonored at the time when for purposes of dishonor it is returned or notice sent in accordance with this section.
(4) An item is returned:
(a) As to an item presented through a clearinghouse, when it is delivered to the presenting or last collecting bank or to the clearinghouse or is sent or delivered in accordance with clearinghouse rules; or
(b) In all other cases, when it is sent or delivered to the bank’s customer or transferor or pursuant to instructions.
Note.—s. 4-301, U.C.C.; supersedes s. 676.55.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1985–1993 · leading case: Gathercrest Ltd. v. First Am. Bank & Trust, 649 F. Supp. 106 (M.D. Fla. 1985).
Gathercrest Ltd. v. First Am. Bank & Trust, 649 F. Supp. 106 (M.D. Fla. 1985). “Fla.Stat. § 674.301, Comment 2. Faced with a similar quandry, other courts attempting to determine if documentary drafts were handled by a payor bank in a timely manner have followed the mandate of UCC § 4-102 (§ 674.”
First Union Nat. Bank v. First Fla. Bank, NA, 616 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). “…See § 674.105, Fla. Stat. (1985). We describe Union Bank as the presenting bank for the purposes of this opinion. See § 674.301, Fla. Stat. (1985).”
— 674.301(1) — 1 case
Gathercrest Ltd. v. First Am. Bank & Trust, 649 F. Supp. 106 (M.D. Fla. 1985). “Fla.Stat. § 674.301, Comment 2. Faced with a similar quandry, other courts attempting to determine if documentary drafts were handled by a payor bank in a timely manner have followed the mandate of UCC § 4-102 (§ 674.”
— 674.301(2) — 1 case
Gathercrest Ltd. v. First Am. Bank & Trust, 649 F. Supp. 106 (M.D. Fla. 1985). “Fla.Stat. § 674.301, Comment 2. Faced with a similar quandry, other courts attempting to determine if documentary drafts were handled by a payor bank in a timely manner have followed the mandate of UCC § 4-102 (§ 674.”
— 674.301(4)(a) — 1 case
First Union Nat. Bank v. First Fla. Bank, NA, 616 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). “…See § 674.105, Fla. Stat. (1985). We describe Union Bank as the presenting bank for the purposes of this opinion. See § 674.301, Fla. Stat. (1985).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.