Florida Statute 682.2 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 682
ARBITRATION CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 682.02

682.02 Arbitration agreements made valid, irrevocable, and enforceable; scope.—

(1) An agreement contained in a record to submit to arbitration any existing or subsequent controversy arising between the parties to the agreement is valid, enforceable, and irrevocable except upon a ground that exists at law or in equity for the revocation of a contract.

(2) The court shall decide whether an agreement to arbitrate exists or a controversy is subject to an agreement to arbitrate.

(3) An arbitrator shall decide whether a condition precedent to arbitrability has been fulfilled and whether a contract containing a valid agreement to arbitrate is enforceable.

(4) If a party to a judicial proceeding challenges the existence of, or claims that a controversy is not subject to, an agreement to arbitrate, the arbitration proceeding may continue pending final resolution of the issue by the court, unless the court otherwise orders.

(5) This section also applies to written interlocal agreements under ss. 163.01 and 373.713 in which two or more parties agree to submit to arbitration any controversy between them concerning water use permit applications and other matters, regardless of whether or not the water management district with jurisdiction over the subject application is a party to the interlocal agreement or a participant in the arbitration.

History.—s. 1, ch. 57-402; s. 12, ch. 67-254; s. 3, ch. 98-402; s. 26, ch. 2010-205; s. 7, ch. 2013-232.

Note.—Former s. 57.11.

F.S. 682.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 682.02 on CourtListener

Amendments to 682.02

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 682.02

Total Results: 86

Seifert v. US Home Corp.

750 So. 2d 633, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 544, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 2041, 1999 WL 1044175

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1999 | Docket: 148704

Cited 358 times | Published

not think that the legislature in enacting section 682.02, Florida Statutes (1999), nor the courts in

Roe v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co.

533 So. 2d 279, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 603, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 1117, 1988 WL 103832

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 1988 | Docket: 1656402

Cited 57 times | Published

authorizes the parties to agree as they have. Section 682.02, Florida Statutes (1987), provides in pertinent

Ronbeck Const. Co., Inc. v. Savanna Club Corp.

592 So. 2d 344, 1992 WL 1346

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1992 | Docket: 1429128

Cited 51 times | Published

us to review under rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(v). Section 682.02, Florida Statutes (1989), provides: Two or

Blankfeld v. Richmond Health Care, Inc.

902 So. 2d 296, 2005 WL 1226070

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2005 | Docket: 2544764

Cited 41 times | Published

the justiciable character of the controversy." § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (2004). Our supreme court has even

MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE, ETC. v. Melamed

405 So. 2d 790

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1981 | Docket: 1703829

Cited 31 times | Published

it incorporates the law of another state.[2]See § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (1979); Damora v. Stresscon International

POST TENSIONED ENG'G. CORP. v. Fairways Plaza Assoc.

412 So. 2d 871

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1982 | Docket: 1525978

Cited 25 times | Published

courts cannot, over objection, compel arbitration, § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (1981); Damora v. Stresscon International

Rittman v. Allstate Ins. Co.

727 So. 2d 391, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2508, 1999 WL 122904

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1999 | Docket: 1730154

Cited 24 times | Published

medical services provider is irrevocable. See § 682.02, Fla.Stat. (1995); State Farm Mutual Automobile

O'Keefe Architects v. Ced Const. Partners

944 So. 2d 181, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 673, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2420, 2006 WL 2971783

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2006 | Docket: 1156244

Cited 23 times | Published

refusal to perform the whole or any part thereof." § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (2005) (emphasis supplied). If a *185

Damora v. Stresscon International, Inc.

324 So. 2d 80

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1975 | Docket: 1248538

Cited 22 times | Published

Florida Arbitration Code should not apply. See Section 682.02, Florida Statutes (1973). The Florida courts

Ojus Industries, Inc. v. Mann

221 So. 2d 780

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1969 | Docket: 1202575

Cited 22 times | Published

Sells, is a well known public accounting firm. Section 682.02 Fla. Stat., F.S.A., provides that the parties

Mills v. Robert W. Gottfried, Inc.

272 So. 2d 837

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1973 | Docket: 1644691

Cited 21 times | Published

contrary to the public policy of this state (see Section 682.02, F.S. 1971, F.S.A.) and should be enforced

Scobee Combs Funeral Home, Inc. v. E.F. Hutton & Co.

711 F. Supp. 605, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11846, 1989 WL 49032

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1989 | Docket: 1244364

Cited 20 times | Published

procedure can be compelled. Defendants also cite to Section 682.02, Florida Statutes, as requiring a written contract

STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. Anderson

332 So. 2d 623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1976 | Docket: 1691918

Cited 16 times | Published

a complaint to compel arbitration pursuant to § 682.02 F.S. 1973. Issue was joined by appellant's answer

Avid Engineering, Inc. v. Orlando Marketplace Ltd.

809 So. 2d 1, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16915, 2001 WL 1516966

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2001 | Docket: 1385390

Cited 15 times | Published

arbitration provision fails to comply with section 682.02, Florida Statutes (1999), because both parties

Aztec Medical Services, Inc. v. Burger

792 So. 2d 617, 2001 WL 946391

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2001 | Docket: 2448881

Cited 15 times | Published

861. The district court reversed and held: Section 682.02, Florida Statutes, provides that parties may

Eugene W. Kelsey v. ARCHIT. OPENINGS

484 So. 2d 610, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 301

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 1986 | Docket: 1343634

Cited 14 times | Published

the parties' intent to submit to arbitration. § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (1983). There is no dispute that the

RIVERFRONT PROP. LTD. v. Max Factor III

460 So. 2d 948

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1984 | Docket: 1766584

Cited 14 times | Published

it incorporates the law of another state.[1]See § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (1983); Damora v. Stresscon International

Pierce v. JW CHARLES-BUSH SECURITIES

603 So. 2d 625, 1992 WL 183985

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1992 | Docket: 1475532

Cited 13 times | Published

controlling law at that time was: In this case Section 682.02, Florida Statutes (1975), provides for the

Florida Farm Bureau Ins. Co. v. Sheaffer

687 So. 2d 1331, 1997 WL 35019

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1997 | Docket: 1718684

Cited 12 times | Published

application of the Florida Arbitration Code, see, section 682.02, Florida Statutes (1995); Sun City Diner of

Knight v. HS Equities, Inc.

280 So. 2d 456

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1973 | Docket: 1291384

Cited 12 times | Published

within the emphasized language appearing in Section 682.02, supra, rendering arbitration provisions unenforceable

Holt v. O'Brien Imports of Fort Myers, Inc.

862 So. 2d 87, 2003 WL 22681423

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2003 | Docket: 1762581

Cited 11 times | Published

motion to dismiss and compel arbitration under section 682.02, Florida Statutes (2000). The trial court granted

RBF Management Co. v. Sunshine Towers Apartment Residences Association, Inc.

352 So. 2d 561

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1977 | Docket: 1701366

Cited 11 times | Published

clause of the contracts and the provisions of Section 682.02 and 682.03, Florida Statutes (1975). The circuit

Ibis Lakes Homeowners Ass'n v. Ibis Isle Homeowners Ass'n

102 So. 3d 722, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21408, 2012 WL 6163184

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2012 | Docket: 60226770

Cited 10 times | Published

governs arbitration in commercial contract cases. Section 682.02 permits parties to “include in a written contract

Value Car Sales, Inc. v. Bouton

608 So. 2d 860, 1992 WL 281877

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1992 | Docket: 1449040

Cited 10 times | Published

to the issues in the law action. We reverse. Section 682.02, Florida Statutes, provides that parties may

Trojan Horse, Inc. v. Lakeside Games

526 So. 2d 194, 1988 WL 56528

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 1988 | Docket: 2037163

Cited 10 times | Published

commerce. Under the Florida Arbitration Code, § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (1983), Florida courts lack statutory

Butcher & Singer, Inc. v. Frisch

433 So. 2d 1360, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20851

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1983 | Docket: 1425462

Cited 10 times | Published

award. This is a correct general premise. See Section 682.02, Florida Statutes (1981), Damora v. Stresscon

Pacemaker Corp. v. Euster

357 So. 2d 208, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15653

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1978 | Docket: 454017

Cited 10 times | Published

arbitration order include other disputes or claims. Section 682.02, Florida Statutes (1975) provides that parties

Bill Heard Chevrolet Corp. v. Wilson

877 So. 2d 15, 2004 WL 1057714

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2004 | Docket: 1684473

Cited 9 times | Published

resolution of disputes, as authorized by Florida Statute 682.02. CUSTOMER may require that disputes eligible

Jensen v. Rice

809 So. 2d 895, 2002 WL 385567

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2002 | Docket: 1385539

Cited 9 times | Published

unenforceable and voidable under Florida law, § 682.02, Florida Statutes (2001); Damora v. Stresscon

Lipton Professional Soccer, Inc. v. Mijatovic

416 So. 2d 1236

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1982 | Docket: 1224605

Cited 9 times | Published

bargaining agreement incorporates New York law, see section 682.02, the obligation to arbitrate persists through

EMSA Ltd. Partnership v. Mason

677 So. 2d 105, 11 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1887, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7993, 1996 WL 426081

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1996 | Docket: 1690039

Cited 8 times | Published

accordance with the Florida Arbitration Code." Section 682.02, Florida Statutes (1989), provides: Two or

Merkle v. Rice Construction Company

271 So. 2d 220

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1973 | Docket: 1438382

Cited 8 times | Published

medium of arbitration to settle such disputes. F.S. § 682.02 F.S.A. is as follows: "682.02 Arbitration agreements

Spirit Airlines, Inc. v. Steven Maizes

899 F.3d 1230

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 15, 2018 | Docket: 7669062

Cited 7 times | Published

arbitrability for courts. See Fla. Stat. § 682.02 (2). According to Spirit, the ambiguity created

Kp Meiring Const., Inc. v. Northbay I & E, Inc.

761 So. 2d 1221, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8137, 2000 WL 868187

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2000 | Docket: 2360213

Cited 7 times | Published

arbitration of disputes." Roe, 533 So.2d at 281. Section 682.02 states that an "agreement or provision [for

Young v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.

434 So. 2d 369, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19910

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1983 | Docket: 1318273

Cited 7 times | Published

4th DCA 1966). [7] See Florida Arbitration Code § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (1981). However, even if the agreement

Arrasola v. MGP Motor Holdings, LLC

172 So. 3d 508, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11708, 2015 WL 4634686

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 2015 | Docket: 2681899

Cited 6 times | Published

valid agreement to arbitrate is enforceable. § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (2014). In the present case,

Fi-Evergreen Woods, LLC v. Robinson

135 So. 3d 331, 2013 WL 5493462, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15627

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2013 | Docket: 60239567

Cited 6 times | Published

Statutes (2011), the Florida Arbitration Act, section 682.02, Florida Statutes (2012), does not require

Franks v. Bowers

116 So. 3d 1240, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 416, 2013 WL 3064807, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1222

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2013 | Docket: 60232304

Cited 6 times | Published

refusal to perform the whole or any part thereof. § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (2012) (emphasis added). This broadly

Default Proof Credit Card Systems, Inc. v. Friedland

992 So. 2d 442, 2008 WL 4224345

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 2008 | Docket: 1389234

Cited 6 times | Published

the application of the law of another state. See § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (2007)[4]; cf. Trojan Horse, Inc.

KFC NAT. MANAGEMENT CO. v. Beauregard

739 So. 2d 630, 15 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 467, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8524, 1999 WL 420338

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1999 | Docket: 1293919

Cited 6 times | Published

616 So.2d 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); 9 U.S.C. § 2; § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (1997). Public policy favors arbitration

Stinson-Head, Inc. v. City of Sanibel

661 So. 2d 119, 1995 WL 581333

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1995 | Docket: 532502

Cited 6 times | Published

the justiciable character of the controversy." § 682.02. To stay arbitration, a party must raise an issue

Stinson-Head, Inc. v. City of Sanibel

661 So. 2d 119, 1995 WL 581333

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1995 | Docket: 532502

Cited 6 times | Published

the justiciable character of the controversy." § 682.02. To stay arbitration, a party must raise an issue

Elbadramany v. Stanley

490 So. 2d 964, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1186

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1986 | Docket: 1489362

Cited 6 times | Published

arbitrate future disputes within the meaning of section 682.02, Florida Statutes (1985). Arbitration agreements

United HealthCare of Florida, Inc. v. Brown

984 So. 2d 583, 27 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1302, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8117, 2008 WL 2261745

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2008 | Docket: 1686042

Cited 5 times | Published

between [the parties] relating to such contract." § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (2007). Here, there is no dispute

Delta Cas. Co. v. Pinnacle Medical, Inc.

721 So. 2d 321

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1998 | Docket: 1323285

Cited 5 times | Published

the provisions of chapter 682 are applicable. Section 682.02, Florida Statutes (1995) provides in part:

STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. Gonnella

677 So. 2d 1355, 1996 WL 446525

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1996 | Docket: 1266527

Cited 5 times | Published

disputes involving medical benefits. Moreover, section 682.02, Florida Statutes (1995), provides that a written

Collier Land Corp. v. ROYAL PALM BEACH REALTY

338 So. 2d 859, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15757

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1976 | Docket: 1511783

Cited 5 times | Published

Paragraph 38 of the agreement, in light of Section 682.02, Florida Statutes (1975) (Florida Arbitration

Premier Real Estate Holdings, LLC v. Butch

24 So. 3d 708, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20029, 2009 WL 4927861

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2009 | Docket: 1648880

Cited 4 times | Published

shall be valid, enforceable, and irrevocable.... § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (2006). Buyer submits that the failure

Alexander v. Minton

855 So. 2d 94, 2003 WL 21360273

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2003 | Docket: 1752560

Cited 4 times | Published

therefore is "related to" the operating agreement. See § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (2002) (providing that agreement or

Grosseibl v. J. Chris Howard Builders

739 So. 2d 1255, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11143, 1999 WL 629642

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1999 | Docket: 1294047

Cited 4 times | Published

agreements are valid, irrevocable and enforceable. § 682.02, Fla. Stat. Arbitration is required for those

COASTAL HEALTH CARE GROUP v. Schlosser

673 So. 2d 62, 1996 WL 123167

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1996 | Docket: 1671396

Cited 4 times | Published

Florida Arbitration Code should not apply. See Section 682.02, Florida Statutes (1973). Id. at 81-82 (footnote

LOXAHATCHEE, ETC. v. Guy Villa & Sons, Inc.

371 So. 2d 111

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1979 | Docket: 1785675

Cited 4 times | Published

arbitration, it was ineffective. In this case Section 682.02, Florida Statutes (1975), provides for the

Fortune Ins. Co. v. USA DIAGNOSTICS

684 So. 2d 208, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11931, 1996 WL 655746

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1996 | Docket: 1740809

Cited 3 times | Published

School Board, 576 So.2d 806 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Section 682.02, Florida Statutes, provides that when parties

Williams v. Hardy

468 So. 2d 429, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1083

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1985 | Docket: 1401695

Cited 3 times | Published

Generally, arbitration provisions are validated by section 682.02, Florida Statutes, but this statute does not

Walter L. Keller & Associates, PA v. HEALTH MGMT. FOUNDATION

438 So. 2d 1076, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22683

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1983 | Docket: 1445688

Cited 3 times | Published

"the justiciable character of the controversy." § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (1981); Post Tensioned Engineering

Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Meade

404 So. 2d 1141, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21434

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1981 | Docket: 1782655

Cited 3 times | Published

arbitrators' fees. [2] Ch. 682, Fla. Stat. (1979). [3] § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (1979). [4] Hanover Fire Ins. Co

Curtis v. Olson

837 So. 2d 1155, 2003 WL 366757

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2003 | Docket: 1527480

Cited 2 times | Published

contracting parties which relate to such contract. See § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (2002). The determination of jurisdictional

Qadri v. POINTDIREX, LLC

823 So. 2d 861, 2002 WL 1940028

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2002 | Docket: 458762

Cited 2 times | Published

constitutes a binding agreement within the meaning of section 682.02, Florida Statutes (2001).[2] They *863 rely

HW Gay Enterprises Inc. v. JOHN HALL ELEC. CONTRACTING INC.

792 So. 2d 580, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10845, 2001 WL 864275

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2001 | Docket: 1416697

Cited 2 times | Published

agreement in the written contract did not violate section 682.02, Florida Statutes (2000), which provides that

City of Miami Beach v. TURCHIN/CRS

641 So. 2d 471, 1994 WL 440757

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 1994 | Docket: 1152085

Cited 2 times | Published

damage issue to arbitrators with limitation); § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (1993). Prejudgment interest is merely

Lake Plumbing v. SEABREEZE CONST. CORP.

493 So. 2d 1100, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1962, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1986 | Docket: 1671682

Cited 2 times | Published

intended to encourage arbitration of disputes. See § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (1985). Our supreme court has long

Sherwood v. Slazinski

162 So. 3d 229, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2348, 2015 WL 719851

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2015 | Docket: 2635792

Cited 1 times | Published

exists or a controversy is subject to arbitration. § 682.02(2). An arbitrator decides the satisfaction of

Schulberg v. Schulberg

883 So. 2d 352, 2004 WL 2101991

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2004 | Docket: 1370052

Cited 1 times | Published

the scope of the Florida Arbitration Code. See § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (2003) ("Two or more parties ... may

Eastern Funding, LLC v. Roman

882 So. 2d 1059, 2004 WL 1886027

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2004 | Docket: 1289721

Cited 1 times | Published

party objects prior to an arbitration award. See § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (2003). In Damora v. Stresscon International

Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Roe

515 So. 2d 1370, 1987 WL 2128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1987 | Docket: 1468448

Cited 1 times | Published

be binding if either party demands a trial. Section 682.02, Florida Statutes (1985) provides that parties

City of West Palm Beach v. Kevin Harrell

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2025 | Docket: 70962828

Published

arbitrability” that is for the arbitrator to decide. See § 682.02(3), Fla. Stat. (2023) (“An arbitrator shall decide

Miami Dolphins, Ltd., and South Florida Stadium LLC v. Cameron Engwiller

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2025 | Docket: 69864377

Published

So. 3d 481, 484 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022); see also § 682.02(1), Fla. Stat. (2022) (“An agreement contained

OptumRX, as Successor by Merger to Catamaran Corporation, and Optumrx in Its Own Right v. Bay Pharmacy Inc., Bay Pharmacy Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2024 | Docket: 69202339

Published

that Damora interpreted the 1973 version of section 682.02, which provided in pertinent part that:

PATTERSON AND WALTER v. CLARKE

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2024 | Docket: 69159270

Published

precedent to arbitrability has been fulfilled," § 682.02(3), Fla. Stat. (2023); see also Sherwood v. Slazinski

United States Fire Insurance Company v. America Walks at Port St. Lucie, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 2024 | Docket: 68530217

Published

dispute is within the scope of the agreement. See § 682.02(2), Fla. Stat. (2022) (“The court shall decide

OPTUMRX v. HEPZIBAH, INC., VISTACARE PHARMACY SERVICES, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2024 | Docket: 68443425

Published

the Damora opinion is no longer apt because section 682.02, the section Damora was construing, was substantially

M.P. v. GUIRIBITEY COSMETIC & BEAUTY INSTITUTE, INC., etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2023 | Docket: 67853829

Published

arbitration was waived.” Id. at 636; see also § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (2022). The court is authorized to

MANUEL COSTA, D.D.S. v. MIAMI LAKES AM, LLC, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2023 | Docket: 67078468

Published

agreement to arbitrate is enforceable.” § 682.02(2), (3), Fla. Stat. (2022). Consistent

JOHAN F. HAGSTROM v. CO.FE.ME. USA MARINE EXHAUST, LLC, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2021 | Docket: 59936540

Published

in equity for the revocation of a contract.” § 682.02(1), Fla. Stat. Although arbitration is unquestionably

FALLANG FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. PRIVCAP COMPANIES LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2021 | Docket: 59759003

Published

briefs by the parties in this case, we note that section 682.02, Florida Statutes (2018), contains “gatekeeper”

HERBERT JEAN v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2021 | Docket: 59241544

Published

1204, 1208, 163 L. Ed. 2d 1038 (2006); see also § 682.02(2), Fla. Stat.; Specht v. Netscape Commc’ns Corp

Landing Group of Tampa, Inc. v. Kifner

951 So. 2d 1014, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4306, 2007 WL 858418

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2007 | Docket: 64849764

Published

reaching its decision in Moser. Id. at 233-37. Section 682.02 of Florida Statutes indicates that the code

Coggin Automotive Corp. v. Reed

750 So. 2d 744, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 983, 2000 WL 126209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2000 | Docket: 64794754

Published

agreements are valid, irrevocable and enforceable. § 682.02, Fla. Stat. (1999). However, arbitration is required

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Mar 28, 1996 | Docket: 3257863

Published

through the exercise of its home rule power.4 Section 682.02, Florida Statutes, states: Two or more parties

Terminal Construction Co. v. DeSantis

614 So. 2d 7, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1637, 1993 WL 30613

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1993 | Docket: 64694389

Published

324 So.2d 80 (Fla.1975). Damora relied on section 682.02 of Florida’s arbitration code, authorizing

Darin & Armstrong, Inc. v. Monte Costella, Inc.

542 So. 2d 1053, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1086, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2313, 1989 WL 43352

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1989 | Docket: 64642264

Published

statements and proofs to the arbitrator. . Section 682.02 of the Florida Arbitration Code, Ch. 682, Fla

Paid Prescriptions, Inc. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

350 So. 2d 100, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16761

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1977 | Docket: 64560393

Published

Arbitration Code, Chapter 682, Florida Statutes (1975). § 682.02 thereof provides as follows: “Arbitration agreements

State Board of Regents v. Greenleaf

275 So. 2d 565, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7074

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1973 | Docket: 64531338

Published

is affirmed. Florida Arbitration Code, F.S. Section 682.02, F.S.A.; 5 Am.Jur.2d 564, Arbitration and Award

Arison Shipping Co. v. Klosters Rederi A/S

268 So. 2d 428, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6004

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 1972 | Docket: 64528434

Published

its petition to compel arbitration, filed under § 682.02 of the Florida Arbitration Code, Chapter 682 Fla

Strickland v. Dixie Industrial Sales, Inc.

252 So. 2d 373, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5999

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1971 | Docket: 64522041

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed on authority of Section 682.02, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.; Page v. Staley, Fla.App

Roberts Realty of the Bahamas, Ltd. v. Miller & Solomon (Bahamas), Ltd.

234 So. 2d 416, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6529

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1970 | Docket: 64514332

Published

without sufficient merit to warrant reversal. See § 682.02, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Pacific Mills v. Hillman Garment