Florida Statute 682.03 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 682
ARBITRATION CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 682.03

682.03 Proceedings to compel and to stay arbitration.—

(1) On motion of a person showing an agreement to arbitrate and alleging another person’s refusal to arbitrate pursuant to the agreement:

(a) If the refusing party does not appear or does not oppose the motion, the court shall order the parties to arbitrate.

(b) If the refusing party opposes the motion, the court shall proceed summarily to decide the issue and order the parties to arbitrate unless it finds that there is no enforceable agreement to arbitrate.

(2) On motion of a person alleging that an arbitration proceeding has been initiated or threatened but that there is no agreement to arbitrate, the court shall proceed summarily to decide the issue. If the court finds that there is an enforceable agreement to arbitrate, it shall order the parties to arbitrate.

(3) If the court finds that there is no enforceable agreement to arbitrate, it may not order the parties to arbitrate pursuant to subsection (1) or subsection (2).

(4) The court may not refuse to order arbitration because the claim subject to arbitration lacks merit or grounds for the claim have not been established.

(5) If a proceeding involving a claim referable to arbitration under an alleged agreement to arbitrate is pending in court, a motion under this section must be made in that court. Otherwise, a motion under this section may be made in any court as provided in s. 682.19.

(6) If a party makes a motion to the court to order arbitration, the court on just terms shall stay any judicial proceeding that involves a claim alleged to be subject to the arbitration until the court renders a final decision under this section.

(7) If the court orders arbitration, the court on just terms shall stay any judicial proceeding that involves a claim subject to the arbitration. If a claim subject to the arbitration is severable, the court may limit the stay to that claim.

History.—s. 2, ch. 57-402; s. 12, ch. 67-254; s. 8, ch. 2013-232.

Note.—Former s. 57.12.

F.S. 682.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 682.03 on CourtListener

Amendments to 682.03

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 682.03

Total Results: 179

Gainesville Health Care Center, Inc. v. Weston

857 So. 2d 278, 2003 WL 22142519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2003 | Docket: 1759178

Cited 67 times | Published

1992) (discussing "separability" pursuant to section 682.03 of the Florida Arbitration Code). While the

Ronbeck Const. Co., Inc. v. Savanna Club Corp.

592 So. 2d 344, 1992 WL 1346

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1992 | Docket: 1429128

Cited 51 times | Published

contract separate from the rest of the contract. Section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1989), contains several

US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Romay

744 So. 2d 467

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1999 | Docket: 2037856

Cited 44 times | Published

compel arbitration. See Florida Arbitration Code, § 682.03, Fla. Stat. (1995). Appraisal provisions in insurance

Vic Potamkin Chevrolet, Inc. v. Bloom

386 So. 2d 286

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1980 | Docket: 1518309

Cited 34 times | Published

20(1)(a) confers the right to appellate review. Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (1979) authorizes a party

John B. Goodman Limited Partnership v. Thf Construction, Inc.

321 F.3d 1094

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 14, 2003 | Docket: 740908

Cited 28 times | Published

1 In language similar to that used in the FAA, § 682.03(1) of the Florida Arbitration Code states: "If

Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Melamed

425 So. 2d 127, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1982 | Docket: 462205

Cited 27 times | Published

comply with the procedural requirements of section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (1981).[4] Speedy resolution

POST TENSIONED ENG'G. CORP. v. Fairways Plaza Assoc.

412 So. 2d 871

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1982 | Docket: 1525978

Cited 25 times | Published

for its breach. The Florida Arbitration Code, Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (1981), specifically provides:

Rittman v. Allstate Ins. Co.

727 So. 2d 391, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2508, 1999 WL 122904

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1999 | Docket: 1730154

Cited 24 times | Published

may have an effect on the litigation. See *395 § 682.03(3), Fla.Stat. (1995); Okeelanta Corp. v. United

O'Keefe Architects v. Ced Const. Partners

944 So. 2d 181, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 673, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2420, 2006 WL 2971783

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2006 | Docket: 1156244

Cited 23 times | Published

to the making of the agreement or provision." § 682.03(1), Fla. Stat. (2005). In ruling on a motion to

Damora v. Stresscon International, Inc.

324 So. 2d 80

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1975 | Docket: 1248538

Cited 22 times | Published

architect who is seeking to enforce, pursuant to Section 682.03, Florida Statutes, a contract provision requiring

Ojus Industries, Inc. v. Mann

221 So. 2d 780

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1969 | Docket: 1202575

Cited 22 times | Published

justiciable character of the controversy." Section 682.03 provides for application to the court for an

Kel Homes, LLC v. Burris

933 So. 2d 699, 2006 WL 2033904

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2006 | Docket: 1712185

Cited 21 times | Published

remand for further proceedings on this issue. See § 682.03(1), Fla. Stat. (2005) ("If the court shall find

Mills v. Robert W. Gottfried, Inc.

272 So. 2d 837

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1973 | Docket: 1644691

Cited 21 times | Published

made to the trial court in accordance with Section 682.03(2), F.S. 1971, F.S.A., for an order for arbitration

Zac Smith & Co. v. MOONSPINNER CONDO. ASSOCIATION, INC.

472 So. 2d 1324

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1985 | Docket: 2192431

Cited 20 times | Published

to stay and compel arbitration, pursuant to Section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1983), of the matters contained

MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE v. Melamed

453 So. 2d 858

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1984 | Docket: 1651475

Cited 19 times | Published

held an evidentiary hearing as required by section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (1983).[4] Pursuant to

First Montauk Securities Corp. v. Four Mile Ranch Development Co.

65 F. Supp. 2d 1371, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19593, 1999 WL 722560

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1999 | Docket: 2450399

Cited 18 times | Published

Arbitration Act ("FAA"), 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., § 682.03(4) Florida Statutes, and the federal Declaratory

McDaniel v. Berhalter

405 So. 2d 1027

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1981 | Docket: 1703581

Cited 17 times | Published

arbitration pursuant to the Florida Arbitration Code, Section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1979). The trial court granted

RAM OF SO. FL., INC. v. WCI Communities, Inc.

869 So. 2d 1210, 2004 WL 591476

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2004 | Docket: 1653886

Cited 16 times | Published

trial court rather than by the arbitrator. See § 682.03(1), Fla. Stat. (2000); Riverwalk Apts., L.P. v

North American Van Lines v. Collyer

616 So. 2d 177, 1993 WL 95495

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1993 | Docket: 13720

Cited 16 times | Published

from the terms of their contract. We reverse. Section 682.03, Florida Statutes, provides in relevant part:

Sabates v. International Med. Centers, Inc.

450 So. 2d 514

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1984 | Docket: 382155

Cited 16 times | Published

arbitration. V. The Stay of Judicial Proceedings Section 682.03(3), Florida Statutes (1981), provides that

STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. Anderson

332 So. 2d 623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1976 | Docket: 1691918

Cited 16 times | Published

court was the rather summary one authorized by § 682.03 F.S. 1973, we perceive no reason which precludes

Piercy v. SCHOOL BD. OF WASH. CTY.

576 So. 2d 806, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1963, 1991 WL 30427

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1991 | Docket: 1669781

Cited 15 times | Published

considering applications to compel arbitration under Section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1987), is limited to determining

Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. Young

456 So. 2d 1175, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 420, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3422

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1984 | Docket: 1447607

Cited 15 times | Published

Act and that our decision is controlled by section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1981), which provides that

Roberto Basulto v. Hialeah Automotive, etc.

141 So. 3d 1145, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 140, 2014 WL 1057334, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1051

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2014 | Docket: 405872

Cited 14 times | Published

determination, shall grant or deny the application. § 682.03(1), Fla. Stat. (2004). We also note that effective

Florida Select Ins. Co. v. Keelean

727 So. 2d 1131, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3082, 1999 WL 140538

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1999 | Docket: 1730087

Cited 12 times | Published

agreement," or assert that no agreement exists. See § 682.03(1), (4), Fla. Stat. (1995). When faced with a

Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. Phillips

126 So. 3d 186, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2493, 2013 WL 2096252

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2013 | Docket: 60236340

Cited 11 times | Published

proceeding” in various provisions. In particular, section 682.03(4) provides as follows: “On application the

TANDEM HEALTH CARE v. Whitney

897 So. 2d 531, 2005 WL 496365

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2005 | Docket: 1735442

Cited 11 times | Published

Home Corp., 750 So.2d 633, 636 (Fla.1999). Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2003), furnishes a guide

Holt v. O'Brien Imports of Fort Myers, Inc.

862 So. 2d 87, 2003 WL 22681423

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2003 | Docket: 1762581

Cited 11 times | Published

rights under the Florida Arbitration Code, section 682.03, to have the court decide certain gateway issues

Post Tensioned Engineering Corp. v. Fairways Plaza Associates

429 So. 2d 1212

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1983 | Docket: 1667588

Cited 11 times | Published

Commercial maintains that a stay is required by Section 682.03(3), Florida Statutes (1981). That section provides:

RBF Management Co. v. Sunshine Towers Apartment Residences Association, Inc.

352 So. 2d 561

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1977 | Docket: 1701366

Cited 11 times | Published

jurisdiction to compel arbitration pursuant to Section 682.03, Florida Statutes and notwithstanding the provisions

Ibis Lakes Homeowners Ass'n v. Ibis Isle Homeowners Ass'n

102 So. 3d 722, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21408, 2012 WL 6163184

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2012 | Docket: 60226770

Cited 10 times | Published

compelling or staying arbitration pursuant to section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1999).” Hospitality Ventures

INFINITY DESIGN BUILDERS v. Hutchinson

964 So. 2d 752, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13250, 2007 WL 2403169

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2007 | Docket: 1689700

Cited 10 times | Published

the arbitration proceeding in accordance with section 682.03(4), Florida Statutes (2006). The trial court

Butcher & Singer, Inc. v. Frisch

433 So. 2d 1360, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20851

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1983 | Docket: 1425462

Cited 10 times | Published

usual motion to compel arbitration pursuant to Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (1981), the substance

WM. PASSALACQUA BLDRS v. Mayfair House Ass'n

395 So. 2d 1171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1981 | Docket: 1692899

Cited 10 times | Published

circuit court for an order to compel arbitration. Section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1977). A motion to compel

Affiliated Marketing, Inc. v. Dyco Chem. & Coatings, Inc.

340 So. 2d 1240

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1976 | Docket: 1299621

Cited 10 times | Published

the matter was determined in proceedings under § 682.03 and unless the party participated in the arbitration

Harris v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.

283 So. 2d 147

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1973 | Docket: 1489956

Cited 10 times | Published

made under § 682.03; (b) An order granting an application to stay arbitration made under § 682.03(2)-(4);

Operis Group, Corp. v. EI AT DORAL, LLC

973 So. 2d 485, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16714, 2007 WL 3085429

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2007 | Docket: 1293277

Cited 9 times | Published

WHETHER A VALID AGREEMENT TO ARBITRATE EXISTS Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes, (2006), states: "If the

Rowe Enterprises v. International Systems

932 So. 2d 537, 2006 WL 1697633

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2006 | Docket: 1684821

Cited 9 times | Published

relevant provisions of the two acts (i.e., section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2005), and title 9, section

Linden v. Auto Trend, Inc.

923 So. 2d 1281, 2006 WL 782751

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2006 | Docket: 1496603

Cited 9 times | Published

court granted the motion to compel arbitration. Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2005), governs proceedings

Presidential Leasing, Inc. v. Krout

896 So. 2d 938, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2694, 2005 WL 497152

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2005 | Docket: 1282976

Cited 9 times | Published

rights under the Florida Arbitration Code, section 682.03, ... to have the court decide certain gateway

US Fidelity and Guar. Co. v. Woolard

523 So. 2d 798, 1988 WL 36079

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1988 | Docket: 1517266

Cited 9 times | Published

"counter-complaint" seeking to compel arbitration pursuant to section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes, and a provision in the

Lipton Professional Soccer, Inc. v. Mijatovic

416 So. 2d 1236

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1982 | Docket: 1224605

Cited 9 times | Published

circuit court order denying Lipton's application, section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1981), "for an order directing

Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Mirth

333 So. 2d 545, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15182

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1976 | Docket: 1290950

Cited 9 times | Published

arbitration, as authorized and provided for by § 682.03(4) Fla. Stat., F.S.A. Additionally, the plaintiff

Gersh v. Concept House, Inc.

291 So. 2d 258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1974 | Docket: 1350908

Cited 9 times | Published

Court having jurisdiction thereof." Fla. Stat. § 682.03(4), F.S.A., states: "On application the court

Best v. Education Affiliates, Inc.

82 So. 3d 143, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2659, 2012 WL 555490

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2012 | Docket: 60306096

Cited 8 times | Published

governs arbitration in commercial contract cases. Section 682.03 provides that once a party has filed a motion

Houchins v. King Motor Co.

906 So. 2d 325, 2005 WL 1554598

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2005 | Docket: 1775249

Cited 8 times | Published

whether a valid arbitration agreement exists. Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes provides: A party to an

Epstein v. Precision Response Corp.

883 So. 2d 377, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14286, 2004 WL 2173310

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2004 | Docket: 1718270

Cited 8 times | Published

of the arbitration proceedings pursuant to section 682.03(4), Florida Statutes (2003). In requesting

Temple Emanu-El v. Tremarco Industries

705 So. 2d 983, 1998 WL 27857

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1998 | Docket: 1753806

Cited 8 times | Published

Firestone warranty and its arbitration provision. Section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1997), states that: "A party

EMSA Ltd. Partnership v. Mason

677 So. 2d 105, 11 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1887, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7993, 1996 WL 426081

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1996 | Docket: 1690039

Cited 8 times | Published

dismissal versus a stay, we initially note that section 682.03(3), Florida Statutes (1995), provides as follows:

Thomas W. Ward & Assoc., Inc. v. Spinks

574 So. 2d 169, 1990 WL 211755

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1990 | Docket: 1436708

Cited 8 times | Published

after the written contracts terminated. Fla. Stat. § 682.03(1) (1989); Calloway Homes, Inc. v. Smiley, 422

Raymond, James & Associates v. Maves

384 So. 2d 716

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1980 | Docket: 1678610

Cited 8 times | Published

(1977). The trial court was required under Section 682.03 to grant an application for an order compelling

Merkle v. Rice Construction Company

271 So. 2d 220

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1973 | Docket: 1438382

Cited 8 times | Published

out and enforcing such arbitration. See F.S., § 682.03 F.S.A. et seq. It is unnecessary here to go into

Avatar Properties, Inc. v. Greetham

27 So. 3d 764, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1442, 2010 WL 476663

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2010 | Docket: 1664617

Cited 7 times | Published

an order compelling arbitration pursuant to section 682.03 and then wait to see whether it will be called

Kp Meiring Const., Inc. v. Northbay I & E, Inc.

761 So. 2d 1221, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8137, 2000 WL 868187

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2000 | Docket: 2360213

Cited 7 times | Published

to the making of the agreement or provision." § 682.03. Thus, the trial court must examine the contracts

JALIS CONST. INC. v. Mintz

724 So. 2d 1254, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 672, 1999 WL 31111

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1999 | Docket: 1410255

Cited 7 times | Published

reverse. Under the Florida Arbitration Code, section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (1997), when the party

Gale Group v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.

683 So. 2d 661, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12774, 1996 WL 695272

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1996 | Docket: 1514991

Cited 7 times | Published

considering motions to compel arbitration pursuant to section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1993), the trial court is

Ebens v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

278 So. 2d 674, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8103

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1973 | Docket: 1706528

Cited 7 times | Published

arbitration should be granted, as provided for in § 682.03 Fla. Stat., F.S.A. Judgment of dismissal reversed

Arrasola v. MGP Motor Holdings, LLC

172 So. 3d 508, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11708, 2015 WL 4634686

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 2015 | Docket: 2681899

Cited 6 times | Published

there is no enforceable agreement to arbitrate.” § 682.03(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2014). The word “decide” in

Fi-Evergreen Woods, LLC v. Robinson

135 So. 3d 331, 2013 WL 5493462, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15627

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2013 | Docket: 60239567

Cited 6 times | Published

determination, shall grant or deny the application. § 682.03(1), Fla. Stat. (2012) (emphasis added).4 We have

Soler v. Secondary Holdings, Inc.

771 So. 2d 62, 2000 WL 1580838

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2000 | Docket: 46581

Cited 6 times | Published

agreement which covered this controversy. See § 682.03(1), (4), Fla. Stat. (1999). Since the arbitration

Neate v. Cypress Club Condominium, Inc.

718 So. 2d 390, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12903, 1998 WL 712873

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1998 | Docket: 1515123

Cited 6 times | Published

sections 682.02 and 682.03." 677 So.2d at 107. Section 682.03(3) is part of the Florida Arbitration Code

Stinson-Head, Inc. v. City of Sanibel

661 So. 2d 119, 1995 WL 581333

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1995 | Docket: 532502

Cited 6 times | Published

the claim in issue lacks merit or bona fides." § 682.03(5). "`The trial court's role when considering

Raffa Associates, Inc. v. Boca Raton Resort & Club

616 So. 2d 1096, 1993 WL 102020

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1993 | Docket: 1726684

Cited 6 times | Published

1959)). The Zac Smith court also explained that section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1983), which authorizes

UNITED SER. GENERAL LIFE CO. v. Bauer

568 So. 2d 1321, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8240, 1990 WL 162387

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1990 | Docket: 243496

Cited 6 times | Published

impression, and our view requires elaboration. Section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1987), states that a court

Proper v. DON CONOLLY CONST. CO. INC.

546 So. 2d 758, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1687, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3932, 1989 WL 76440

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1989 | Docket: 1730945

Cited 6 times | Published

review denied, 433 So.2d 519 (Fla. 1983), and section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (1987), a trial court

Dairyland Insurance Company v. Hudnall

279 So. 2d 905, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8034

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1973 | Docket: 1522187

Cited 6 times | Published

the matter was determined in proceedings under § 682.03 and unless the party participated in the arbitration

FLA. EDUC. ASSOCIATION/UNITED v. Sachs

650 So. 2d 29, 1995 WL 48450

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1995 | Docket: 1345761

Cited 5 times | Published

dismissed for failure to prosecute, FEA, relying on section 682.03(4), Florida Statutes (1991),[1] moved to stay

PHYSICIANS WEIGHT LOSS CENTERS. v. Payne

461 So. 2d 977, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2638, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16279

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1984 | Docket: 2517405

Cited 5 times | Published

(appellants) motion was made "pursuant to Florida Statute § 682.03(1), Florida case law, and applicable federal law

Manalili v. Commercial Mowing and Grading

442 So. 2d 411

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1983 | Docket: 469147

Cited 5 times | Published

that the right to arbitrate has not been waived. § 682.03, Fla. Stat. (1981), and William Passalacqua Builders

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Falowski

425 So. 2d 129

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1982 | Docket: 1181617

Cited 5 times | Published

Melamed sets forth the procedure for applying Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (1981), to determine whether

Miller Const. Co. v. First Baptist Church, Etc.

396 So. 2d 281, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19139

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1981 | Docket: 1447627

Cited 5 times | Published

proceeding pending arbitration, pursuant to Section 682.03(3), Florida Statutes (1967). McCORD, ROBERT

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Lee

358 So. 2d 88

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1978 | Docket: 1690919

Cited 5 times | Published

the arbitration proceedings. See generally Section 682.03(4), Florida Statutes (1975). Further, under

Wegner v. Schillinger

921 So. 2d 854, 2006 WL 544482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2006 | Docket: 1755971

Cited 4 times | Published

authorize multiple motions to compel arbitration. Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2005), authorizes an

Hospitality Ventures of Coral Springs, LC v. AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOC., INC.

755 So. 2d 159, 2000 WL 232764

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2000 | Docket: 1699457

Cited 4 times | Published

compelling or staying arbitration pursuant to section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1999). The only proper parties

Poole and Kent Co. v. GUSI ERICKSON CONST. COMPANY

759 So. 2d 2, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12707, 1999 WL 766005

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1999 | Docket: 1422808

Cited 4 times | Published

application to stay arbitration pursuant to section 682.03(4), Florida Statutes (1997), it is clear that

Phillips v. General Acc. Ins. Co.

685 So. 2d 27, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12461, 1996 WL 681255

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 1996 | Docket: 1415674

Cited 4 times | Published

considering applications to compel arbitration under Section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1987), is limited to determining

Sun City Diner v. CENTURY FIN. ADV.

662 So. 2d 967, 1995 WL 566015

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1995 | Docket: 1282709

Cited 4 times | Published

Sun City Diner and Sun City International. Section 682.03(3), Florida Statutes, requires that any proceeding

NCR Credit Corp. v. Reptron Electronics, Inc.

863 F. Supp. 1561, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14247, 1994 WL 544357

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1994 | Docket: 1618714

Cited 4 times | Published

that the comparable Florida statute, Fla.Stat. § 682.03(3), requiring courts to stay a lawsuit that involves

Chicago Ins. Co. v. Tarr

638 So. 2d 106, 1994 WL 201384

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1994 | Docket: 1652586

Cited 4 times | Published

considering applications to compel arbitration under Section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1987), is limited to determining

Acumen Const., Inc. v. Neher

616 So. 2d 98, 1993 WL 75799

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1993 | Docket: 1392090

Cited 4 times | Published

the addendum, the trial court was required by section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (1989), to summarily hear

OCALA BREEDERS'SALES CO. v. Brunetti

567 So. 2d 490, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7080, 1990 WL 133826

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1990 | Docket: 1380952

Cited 4 times | Published

severable, the stay may be with respect thereto only." § 682.03(3), Fla. Stat. (1989).[6] The Code necessarily

Kidder Elec. of Fla., Inc. v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.

530 So. 2d 475, 1988 WL 89740

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1988 | Docket: 1267910

Cited 4 times | Published

proceed with arbitration" as permitted under section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes. Thereafter, to toll the

Newport Motel, Inc. v. COBIN RESTAURANT. INC.

281 So. 2d 234, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7639

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1973 | Docket: 1261841

Cited 4 times | Published

arbitrated should be stayed pending arbitration. § 682.03(3) Fla. Stat., F.S.A. The obtaining of an order

Travelers Insurance Co. v. Luckett

279 So. 2d 885, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8021

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1973 | Docket: 1522165

Cited 4 times | Published

the matter was determined in proceedings under § 682.03 and unless the party participated in the arbitration

Sun Insurance Office, Ltd. v. Phillips

230 So. 2d 17

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1970 | Docket: 2579529

Cited 4 times | Published

moved to compel it pursuant to Florida Statutes § 682.03 (1969), F.S.A. The order denying the "motion to

Three Palms Pointe, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

250 F. Supp. 2d 1357, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3875, 2003 WL 1192860

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2003 | Docket: 2225682

Cited 3 times | Published

courts have repeatedly utilized Florida Statutes § 682.03 as a basis to compel appraisals.[4]See New Amsterdam

Brandon, Jones, Sandall, Zeide, Kohn, Chalal & Musso, P.A. v. MedPartners, Inc.

203 F.R.D. 677, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21482, 2001 WL 1349307

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2001 | Docket: 66015211

Cited 3 times | Published

for arbitration pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 43 and Section 682.03(1) of the Florida Statutes.4 Both sides agree

Okeelanta Corp. v. US Sugar Corp.

712 So. 2d 814, 1998 WL 371286

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1998 | Docket: 1472150

Cited 3 times | Published

petition for certiorari review of that order. Section 682.03(3), Florida Statutes (1997), requires the court

Woodlake Redevelopment v. Woodlake Condo.

671 So. 2d 253

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1996 | Docket: 1248057

Cited 3 times | Published

matter, we turn to the Florida Arbitration Code. Section 682.03(3), Florida Statutes (1995), provides as follows:

Grektorp v. City Towers of Florida, Inc.

644 So. 2d 613, 1994 WL 617165

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1994 | Docket: 1248815

Cited 3 times | Published

be reconsidered in light of this opinion and section 682.03(3), Florida Statutes (1991). ALTENBERND and

Greenstein v. Baxas Howell Mobley, Inc.

583 So. 2d 402, 1991 WL 139149

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1991 | Docket: 1284049

Cited 3 times | Published

stayed when the order for arbitration is made. § 682.03(3) Fla. Stat. (1989). See also Ocala Breeders'

Walter L. Keller & Associates, PA v. HEALTH MGMT. FOUNDATION

438 So. 2d 1076, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22683

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1983 | Docket: 1445688

Cited 3 times | Published

the lawsuit. The Florida Arbitration Code, section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (1981), specifically provides:

LEON CTY. CLASSROOM TEACHRS v. School Bd.

363 So. 2d 353

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1978 | Docket: 461271

Cited 3 times | Published

and Chapter 86, the Declaratory Judgment Act. Section 682.03(4), Florida Statutes, states the circumstances

Caltagirone v. School Bd. of Hernando Cty.

355 So. 2d 873, 98 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2641

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1978 | Docket: 1360321

Cited 3 times | Published

Board to submit to arbitration pursuant to Section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1975). The Board filed a

John Cox v. Village of Tequesta

185 So. 3d 601, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1440, 2016 WL 403252

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2016 | Docket: 3033855

Cited 2 times | Published

accordance with the applicable arbitration clause. Section 682.03, Florida Statutes (2012), provides: (1)

Greenbrook NH, LLC v. Estate of Sayre Ex Rel. Raymond

150 So. 3d 878, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18287, 2014 WL 5783829

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2014 | Docket: 2593760

Cited 2 times | Published

and motion to stay proceedings. See § 682.03, Fla. Stat. (2010) (delineating “[proceedings

Gren v. Gren

133 So. 3d 1066, 2014 WL 51640, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 175

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2014 | Docket: 60238658

Cited 2 times | Published

arbitration was waived.” Seifert, 750 So.2d at 636; § 682.03, Fla. Stat. (2012). Once those issues are determined

FI-Evergreen Woods, LLC v. Estate of Vrastil

118 So. 3d 859, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10753, 2013 WL 3357519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2013 | Docket: 60233454

Cited 2 times | Published

holding an evidentiary hearing, as required by section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2012). That section provides:

Curcio v. Sovereign Healthcare of Boynton Beach L.L.C.

8 So. 3d 449, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2882, 2009 WL 928534

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2009 | Docket: 1154993

Cited 2 times | Published

conduct an evidentiary hearing pursuant to section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2005), on plaintiff's

Charles Boyd Const. v. Vacation Beach

959 So. 2d 1227, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9597, 2007 WL 1789297

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2007 | Docket: 1525698

Cited 2 times | Published

section 4 of the Federal Arbitration Act is section 682.03(1), which reads: A party to an agreement or

Childs v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

899 F. Supp. 613, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17783, 1995 WL 510340

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1995 | Docket: 1258924

Cited 2 times | Published

appraisal/arbitration process. II. DISCUSSION Florida Statute 682.03(1) provides that: A party to an agreement

425 Fla., Inc. v. George v. Behan Constr., Inc.

497 So. 2d 1340

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1986 | Docket: 1689849

Cited 2 times | Published

arbitration was being determined and handled. Section 682.03(3), Florida Statutes (1985) requires a court

Burt v. Duval County School Bd.

481 So. 2d 55, 29 Educ. L. Rep. 900

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1985 | Docket: 549004

Cited 2 times | Published

sought to be arbitrated have not been shown." § 682.03(5), Florida Statutes. The dispute in this case

Anderson-Parrish v. St. Petersburg Beach

468 So. 2d 507, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1177, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14155

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1985 | Docket: 1401956

Cited 2 times | Published

arbitrate. We agree. The Florida Arbitration Code, section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1983), provides: ... If

Koch v. WALLER & CO., INC.

439 So. 2d 1041

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1983 | Docket: 1265515

Cited 2 times | Published

the party causing the arbitration to be had." Section 682.03(4), Florida Statutes (1981). Alternatively

Laquer v. Falcone

165 So. 3d 19, 2015 WL 1810318

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2015 | Docket: 2651478

Cited 1 times | Published

court stayed the cross-claims, pursuant to section 682.03, Florida Statutes (2013), and *22

Sherwood v. Slazinski

162 So. 3d 229, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2348, 2015 WL 719851

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2015 | Docket: 2635792

Cited 1 times | Published

unless the court orders otherwise. § 682.02(4). Section 682.03 addresses proceedings to compel and to stay

Hopewell, LLC v. Alarion Bank

84 So. 3d 1073, 2012 WL 400449, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1880

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2012 | Docket: 2411532

Cited 1 times | Published

dismissal of the complaint is not required. See § 682.03(1), (3), Fla. Stat. (2010); Rittman v. Allstate

Marshall, Amaya & Anton v. Arnold-Dobal

76 So. 3d 998, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18989, 2011 WL 5964363

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2011 | Docket: 2359791

Cited 1 times | Published

court should have followed the requirements of section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes, which provides: A party

Speegle Construction, Co. v. District Board of Trustees of Northwest Florida State College

75 So. 3d 360, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18587, 2011 WL 5842804

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2011 | Docket: 2358295

Cited 1 times | Published

a petition to stay arbitration pursuant to section 682.03(4), Florida Statutes. Appellee contends that

Wallshein v. SHUGARMAN

50 So. 3d 89, 31 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1259, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19083, 2010 WL 5093260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2010 | Docket: 2400643

Cited 1 times | Published

an expedited evidentiary hearing pursuant to section 682.03, Florida Statutes (2007). Subsection 682.03(1)

FL-Carrollwood Care Center, LLC v. Estate of Gordon

34 So. 3d 804, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7020, 2010 WL 2010797

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2010 | Docket: 1641950

Cited 1 times | Published

request for an evidentiary hearing. We agree. Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2007), provides as follows:

CRYSTAL MOTOR CAR CO. OF HERNANDO v. Bailey

24 So. 3d 789, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20559, 2009 WL 5150079

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2009 | Docket: 1151798

Cited 1 times | Published

containing an arbitration agreement. We agree. Section 682.03 of the Florida Statutes governs proceedings

Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP v. Forier

19 So. 3d 452, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16074, 2009 WL 3447240

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2009 | Docket: 60254645

Cited 1 times | Published

evidentiary hearing on its motion in accordance with section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2008). The circuit court

Olson Electric Co. v. Winter Park Redevelopment Agency

987 So. 2d 178, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 10908, 2008 WL 2774449

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2008 | Docket: 64855254

Cited 1 times | Published

entitlement of a party to seek arbitration. . See § 682.03, Fla. Stat. (2007).

Avatar Properties, Inc. v. NCJ Inv. Co.

848 So. 2d 1259, 2003 WL 21554924

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2003 | Docket: 1712328

Cited 1 times | Published

relief when Avatar joined it to the arbitration: section 682.03(4), Florida Statutes, provides that a court

Montesino v. Advent Technologies, Inc.

676 So. 2d 32, 1996 WL 333196

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1996 | Docket: 1318097

Cited 1 times | Published

arbitration and for permanent injunction, pursuant to section 682.03(4), Florida Statutes (1995). After a summary

MODERN HEALTH CARE SERV., INC. v. Puglisi

597 So. 2d 930, 1992 WL 84157

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1992 | Docket: 1350971

Cited 1 times | Published

departure from the essential requirements of the law); § 682.03, Fla. Stat. (1991). Puglisi's argument that Modern

Balarin v. Allstate Insurance Company

481 So. 2d 1263, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 184

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1986 | Docket: 804311

Cited 1 times | Published

Chamberlain, 372 So.2d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); § 682.03(1), Fla. Stat. (1983). Reversed and remanded.

Beemik Builders & Constructors, Inc. v. Huber Plumbing, Inc.

476 So. 2d 780, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2357

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1985 | Docket: 1277587

Cited 1 times | Published

arguments, the first of which is that pursuant to section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (1983), a court must grant

Kimberly Jean Nowicki v. Get Wet Watersports Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 2025 | Docket: 69929829

Published

of a person with appellant’s last name. Section 682.03, Florida Statutes (2022), governs proceedings

Hartzella Ventures Limited v. Emmanuil Grinshpun

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2025 | Docket: 69793063

Published

508, 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (interpreting section 682.03(1)(b), Florida Statutes, to find that “an

Juan A. Lopez-Cortes and Genevieve Cautino v. American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus and Randy

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2024 | Docket: 69464052

Published

involves a claim subject to the arbitration.” § 682.03(7), Fla. Stat. (2023) (emphasis added). Nonetheless

OptumRX, as Successor by Merger to Catamaran Corporation, and Optumrx in Its Own Right v. Bay Pharmacy Inc., Bay Pharmacy Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2024 | Docket: 69202339

Published

Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52, 67 (1941)). Section 682.03, Florida Statutes (2022), provides the state

PATTERSON AND WALTER v. CLARKE

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2024 | Docket: 69159270

Published

subject to an agreement to arbitrate." Section 682.03(1)(b) sets forth the procedure the court must

Concierge Auctions, LLC v. Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2024 | Docket: 68057999

Published

multiple motions to compel arbitration. Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2005), 4 authorizes

FLYING PANDA FLORIDA, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY v. KRISTEN RUTHERFORD, IJUMP PALM BAY, LLC D/B/A PLANET 3 EXTREME AIR PARK, A FOREIGN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, LION TAMER, LLC., A FOREIGN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2024 | Docket: 68277198

Published

, 750 So. 2d 633, 636 (Fla. 1999))); see also § 682.03(1), Fla. Stat. Here, Rutherford does not

RETAIL DETAIL MERCHANDISING, LLC v. DIANE MURPHY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2023 | Docket: 66922395

Published

2 (emphasis added). In the motion, it cited section 682.03, Florida Statutes (2022), which directs a court

M.P. v. GUIRIBITEY COSMETIC & BEAUTY INSTITUTE, INC., etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2023 | Docket: 67853829

Published

there is no enforceable agreement to arbitrate.” § 682.03(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2022). In the instant

KRATOS INVESTMENTS LLC v. ABS HEALTHCARE SERVICES, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2022 | Docket: 63144880

Published

involves a claim subject to the arbitration.” § 682.03(7), Fla. Stat. (emphasis added). See also Chemstar

HERBERT JEAN v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2021 | Docket: 59241544

Published

summarily declare Jean assented to arbitration. See § 682.03(1)(b), Fla. Stat. However, here, in the absence

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD v. EDWARD C. PERRIN

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 2020 | Docket: 17009725

Published

this Action is brought pursuant to Florida Statute 682.03 (2018), the Motion to Dismiss on the

Brickell Motors v. Torres

257 So. 3d 563

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2018 | Docket: 8015416

Published

3d 422, 425 n.3 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)). Section 682.03(1)(a), Florida Statutes, mandates that “[o]n

DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. v. WILDRED OSTANNE

255 So. 3d 382

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2018 | Docket: 7975841

Published

enforceable agreement to arbitrate.’”) (citing § 682.03(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2014)).

Gomez v. S & I Properties, LLC

220 So. 3d 539, 2017 WL 2457217, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8326

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2017 | Docket: 6070174

Published

involves a claim subject to the arbitration.” § 682.03(7), Fla. Stat. (2016). Dismissal, in other words

Fouche v. Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc.

217 So. 3d 225, 2017 WL 1423547, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2017 | Docket: 5912214

Published

staying, her lawsuit. We agree. Pursuant to section 682.03 of the Florida Statutes, the imposition of

Timber Pines Plaza, LLC v. Zabrzyski

211 So. 3d 1147, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3194

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2017 | Docket: 4618887

Published

Senior Judge, concur. 1 . See § 682.03(7), Fla. Stat. (2016) ("If the court orders arbitration

Angels Senior Living at Connerton Court, LLC v. Gundry

210 So. 3d 257, 2017 WL 603310, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1965

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2017 | Docket: 4585349

Published

authorize multiple motions to compel arbitration. Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2005), author-

American Eagle Veteran Contracting, LLC v. Eiland

201 So. 3d 829, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15204

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2016 | Docket: 4481316

Published

have the right to move to compel arbitration. § 682.03, Fla. Stat. (2014). Deciding whether a dispute

Cirrus Holdings USA, LLC v. Welch

199 So. 3d 558, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13814, 2016 WL 4917051

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2016 | Docket: 60256643

Published

without explanation, and this appeal follows. Section 682.03, Florida Statutes (2015), states that if one

American Management Services, Inc., and Brandy Fedorak v. Juanita Merced

186 So. 3d 612, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3132, 2016 WL 805275

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2016 | Docket: 3040746

Published

making of the arbitration agreement. See § 682.03(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2010); Linden v. Auto

CT Miami, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Latinoamerica Miami, Inc.

201 So. 3d 85, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13468

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2015 | Docket: 2757119

Published

with the trial court that it did not. Section 682.03(1) of the pre-2013 Florida Statutes provides:

Estate of Williams v. Kevin F. Jursinski, P.A.

160 So. 3d 500, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4041, 2015 WL 1259497

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2015 | Docket: 60246875

Published

invoked by Jursinski’s motion to compel under section 682.03, Florida Statutes (2014), the voluntary dismissal

APR Energy, LLC v. First Investment Group Corp.

88 F. Supp. 3d 1300, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20524, 2015 WL 736275

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2015 | Docket: 64300647

Published

attendant relief pursuant to Florida Statutes section 682.03. See Complaint at 10. Because the Court determines

Hound Mounds, Inc. and Geoffrey Bodle v. Adrian Finch

153 So. 3d 368, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20460, 2014 WL 7150482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2014 | Docket: 2616022

Published

determination, shall grant or deny the application. § 682.03(4), Fla. Stat. (2010). 1 Arbitration

APR Energy, LLC v. First Investment Group Corp.

51 F. Supp. 3d 1227, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137425, 2014 WL 4854277

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2014 | Docket: 64297640

Published

attendant relief pursuant to Florida Statutes section 682.03. See Complaint at 10. Because the Court determines

Spivey v. Teen Challenge of Florida, Inc.

122 So. 3d 986, 2013 WL 5584237, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16284

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2013 | Docket: 60234835

Published

n and to dismiss the complaint pursuant to section 682.03, Florida Statutes, asserting that there was

Marcum LLP v. Potamkin

107 So. 3d 1193, 2013 WL 615698, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2609

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2013 | Docket: 60228588

Published

assignment. We discern no such intention in section 682.03(4) or any other provision of the Florida Arbitration

FL-Carrollwood Care Center, LLC v. Jaramillo

36 So. 3d 180, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7720, 2010 WL 2218654

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2010 | Docket: 1639129

Published

745 So.2d 1136, 1138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)). "Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes [ (2008) ], furnishes

Gencom Group v. Garcia Stromberg, LLC

34 So. 3d 170, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6134, 2010 WL 1779913

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2010 | Docket: 60289998

Published

shall grant or deny the application. Fla. Stat. § 682.03(4) (2009). The trial court conducted a hearing

KING'S ACADEMY, INC. v. Doe

29 So. 3d 439, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2925, 2010 WL 785908

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2010 | Docket: 1643011

Published

holding an evidentiary hearing as required under section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2007), determined the

Commercial Interiors Corp. of Boca Raton v. Pinkerton & Laws, Inc.

19 So. 3d 1062, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14718, 2009 WL 3149098

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2009 | Docket: 60254560

Published

matter was determined in a proceeding under section 682.03, and unless the party participated in the arbitration

Prescott Architects, Inc. v. Lexington Insurance

638 F. Supp. 2d 1317, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56855

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 2009 | Docket: 2342703

Published

Florida courts have repeatedly used Fla. Stat. § 682.03, governing arbitration, to compel appraisals,

Open MRI of Okeechobee, LLC v. Aldana

969 So. 2d 589, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 19755, 2007 WL 4322778

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2007 | Docket: 64853159

Published

appeal. We reject appellants’ argument that section 682.03(3), Florida Statutes (2006), mandates that

Freedom Life Insurance Co. of America v. Wallant

953 So. 2d 16, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2776, 2007 WL 600629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2007 | Docket: 64849969

Published

authorize multiple motions to compel arbitration. Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2005), authorizes an

Vista Healthplan, Inc. v. HCA, Inc.

861 So. 2d 102, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19211, 2003 WL 22956958

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2003 | Docket: 64826950

Published

we reverse the order requiring arbitration. Section 682.03(3), Florida Statutes (2003) provides that any

John B. Goodman Ltd. Partnership v. THF Construction, Inc.

321 F.3d 1094, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2826

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 14, 2003 | Docket: 65655214

Published

1 In language similar to that used in the FAA, § 682.03(1) of the Florida Arbitration Code states: “If

Gilbert Contractors, Inc. v. Kay

769 So. 2d 479, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13286, 2000 WL 1513766

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2000 | Docket: 64801084

Published

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (1999)(If the court shall find that a

Mirson v. Corradino Group, Inc.

751 So. 2d 699, 15 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1775, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1031, 2000 WL 140154

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2000 | Docket: 64795201

Published

agreement or provision for arbitration); see section 682.03(4), Florida Statutes (1997)4 This, is the very

Telecard Communications of Florida, Inc. v. Powell

700 So. 2d 1235, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10273, 1997 WL 559418

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1997 | Docket: 64776377

Published

Mason, 677 So.2d 105, 107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); § 682.03(3) Fla. Stat. (1995). In all other respects, the

Chemstar Corp. v. Stark

634 So. 2d 794, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3092, 1994 WL 112156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1994 | Docket: 64747419

Published

is governed by the Florida Arbitration Code, section 682.03(4), Florida Statutes (1991), which provides

Florida Education Ass'n/United v. Sachs

627 So. 2d 1240, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12277, 1993 WL 499230

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 1993 | Docket: 64744650

Published

arbitration as to its counterclaim, citing section 682.03(4), Florida Statutes (1991).1 FEA alleged in

Wimbley v. Jacksonville Moving & Storage Co.

624 So. 2d 323, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8979, 1993 WL 347552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1993 | Docket: 64742968

Published

motion to compel arbitration on the authority of section 682.03, Florida Statutes. Appellee asserted that the

Doan v. Amelia Retreat Condominium Ass'n

604 So. 2d 1292, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10001, 1992 WL 230389

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1992 | Docket: 64669855

Published

considering applications to compel arbitration under section 682.03, Florida Statutes, is limited to determining

Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. v. Lifshutz

554 So. 2d 34, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7312, 1989 WL 155666

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1989 | Docket: 64647147

Published

request an evidentiary hearing as provided in § 682.03(1) Fla.Stat. (1987). DENIED. WALDEN, GUNTHER and

Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Greenspoon & Marder, P.A.

551 So. 2d 584, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2530, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6059, 1989 WL 129047

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1989 | Docket: 64645926

Published

what more we can require of the trial court. Section 682.03(4), Florida Statutes (1987), specifically authorizes

Ram Electronics Corp. v. Westley

534 So. 2d 936, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2746, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5538, 1988 WL 133899

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1988 | Docket: 64638981

Published

obligated to submit the matter to arbitration. § 682.03(1), Fla.Stat. (1987); Walter L. Keller & Assoc

Grillo v. Raymond James & Associates, Inc.

524 So. 2d 1121, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1162, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1945, 1988 WL 45881

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1988 | Docket: 64634735

Published

the appellee’s motion of summary judgment. See § 682.03(1), Fla. Stat. (1987); U.S. Fire Insurance at

Rothenberg v. Willis

483 So. 2d 821, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 510, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6576

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1986 | Docket: 64617545

Published

Falowski, *822425 So.2d 129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); § 682.-03(1), Fla.Stat. (1983). I would reverse for an evidentiary

Davidson v. Foshee Enterprises, Inc.

467 So. 2d 1118, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1122, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13836

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1985 | Docket: 64611571

Published

matter of said third-party claim pursuant to section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1981). In the event a proper

Century Surfacing, Inc. v. Metric Constructors, Inc.

422 So. 2d 329, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22126

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1982 | Docket: 64593535

Published

upon a parties’ Motion to Compel pursuant to Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (1981). The contractual

Yanakakis v. Pacre Corp. (In re Pacre Corp.)

21 B.R. 759, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 3902

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jun 17, 1982 | Docket: 65778214

Published

the matter was determined in proceedings under § 682.03 and unless the party participated in the arbitration

Watson v. Duval County School Board

408 So. 2d 1053, 2 Educ. L. Rep. 621, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21301

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1981 | Docket: 64587393

Published

the matter was determined in proceedings under § 682.03 and unless the party participated in the arbitration

Manatee Education Ass'n v. School Board of Manatee County

400 So. 2d 185, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20387

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1981 | Docket: 64583445

Published

could prevail and the arbitration was unlawful. Section 682.03(4), Florida Statutes (1979), provides that

Travelers Insurance Co. v. Lee

387 So. 2d 387, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17523

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1980 | Docket: 64577886

Published

Insurance Co., 162 So.2d 690 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964) and § 682.03(4), Fla.Stat. (1975). But see Midwest Mutual Insurance

Leon County Classroom Teachers Ass. v. School Board of Leon County

363 So. 2d 353, 99 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2714, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16782

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1978 | Docket: 64566633

Published

Chapter 86, the Declaratory Judgment Act. Section 682.-03(4), Florida Statutes, states the circumstances

Galera v. Ohio Casualty Co.

284 So. 2d 712, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6578

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1973 | Docket: 64535287

Published

“Application and Motion for Stay Order under F.S. 682.03”. This petition contained a prayer for relief

Frank J. Rooney, Inc. v. Food Fair Industries, Inc.

254 So. 2d 30, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5670

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1971 | Docket: 64522833

Published

Industries, Inc. brought a motion pursuant to F.S. § 682.03, F.S.A., The Florida Arbitration Code, to compel

Prudence Mutual Casualty Co. v. Humphreys

220 So. 2d 381, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6018

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1969 | Docket: 64508965

Published

appellee pursuant to the terms of the policy. See § 682.03, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. The trial judge dismissed