Cases from cite.case.law:

FLORIDA CAPITAL GROUP, INC. v. S. BISHOP,, 240 So. 3d 108 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Because the trial court did not modify or correct the award pursuant to section 682.10 or section 682.14 . . .

N. WELLS O. v. HALMAC DEVELOPMENT, INC., 189 So. 3d 1015 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . or within 90 days after the movant receives notice of a modified or corrected award pursuant to s. 682.10 . . .

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION v. VERIZON FLORIDA, LLC,, 803 F.3d 1241 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . The arbitrator interpreted this request as being made under Section 682.10 of the Florida Statutes, which . . . Stat. § 682.10(1) ("On motion ,to an arbitrator by a party to an arbitration proceeding, the arbitrator . . .

NESTOR, v. WARD, a, 163 So. 3d 582 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . time the court shall issue a confirming order unless the award is modified or corrected pursuant to s. 682.10 . . . party to an arbitration proceeding may move an arbitrator to modify or correct an arbitration award. § 682.10 . . .

N. WELLS O. v. CASTRO,, 117 So. 3d 1233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 682.10, Florida Statutes (2012), also provides that upon the modification or correction of an . . . award by an arbitrator or umpire, the award is subject to the same provisions. § 682.10, Fla. . . .

KEYES COMPANY, v. SPENCER, 16 So. 3d 213 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . required to seek timely modification or clarification from either the arbitrator, pursuant to section 682.10 . . . correct the award in which she asked the arbitrator to award her prevailing party fees and costs. § 682.10 . . .

WEDGEWOOD HOLDINGS, INC. a v. WILPON,, 972 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . required to seek timely modification or clarification from either the arbitrator, pursuant to section 682.10 . . .

CORAL- TECH ASSOCIATES, INC. a v. PLUMBING CONTRACTORS, INC. a, 916 So. 2d 958 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . .; see also §§ 682.10, 682.13-.14, Fla. Stat. . . .

DEVELOPERS OF NORTHLAKE, INC. v. NORTHLAKE EQUITIES, INC., 944 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See § 682.10, Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

Dr. ZIMMERMAN, Dr. W. D. v. FLORIDA WINDSTORM UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION,, 873 So. 2d 411 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Arbitration under this subsection shall be conducted pursuant to the procedures specified in ss. 682.06-682.10 . . .

A- DURAN ROOFING, INC. a v. SELECT CONTRACTING, INC. a a, 865 So. 2d 601 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 682.10, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . . required to seek timely modification or clarification from either the arbitrator, pursuant to section 682.10 . . . Appellees moved to have the arbitrator clarify the award under section 682.10 to state which party prevailed . . .

OREGON PARTNERS NO. LTD. v. KLAUDER NUNNO ENTERPRISES, INC., 837 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See § 682.10, Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .

CHATFIELD DEAN CO. INC. v. B. KESLER B. P. A., 818 So. 2d 572 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . In the latter instance, section 682.10 [Florida Statutes (1995) ] sets it at twenty days after delivery . . . Statutes (1995), nor a timely application to the circuit court to seek a clarification pursuant to section 682.10 . . .

DEEN, v. OSTER,, 814 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . The letter also could not be considered a proper application for modification under section 682.10. . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, v. FIRST FLORIDIAN AUTO AND HOME INSURANCE COMPANY,, 803 So. 2d 771 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Arbitration under this subsection shall be conducted pursuant to the procedures specified in ss. 682.06-682.10 . . .

B. MOSER, v. BARRON CHASE SECURITIES, INC., 783 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 2001)

. . . . §§ 682.09, 682.10, 682.12-682.15, Fla.Stat. (1997). . . . .

SECURITIES, INC. v. ARON, 787 So. 2d 881 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . regardless of whether they labeled it a motion to confirm the award, or to clarify it under section 682.10 . . . Section 682.10 provides: 682.10 Change of award by arbitrators or umpire. . . . In the latter instance, section 682.10 sets it at twenty days after delivery of the award to the applicant . . . The Arons were proceeding under section 682.10 and, thus, did not make a timely application. . . . They would have us read sections 682.12 and 682.10 in conjunction to mean that an application to confirm . . .

BALTIN v. ALARON TRADING CORPORATION,, 128 F.3d 1466 (11th Cir. 1997)

. . . The Baltins’ suit was based, in the alternative, on section 682.10 of the Florida Arbitration Code, Fla . . . Ann. § 682.10. . . . . The Baltins' suit was based, in the alternative, on section 682.10 of the Florida Arbitration Code, Fla . . . Ann. § 682.10. . . .

ANDREW H. WARNER, INC. v. SIGA, INC., 690 So. 2d 626 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . opinion, or it can submit the award to the arbitration panel for clarification pursuant to sections 682.10 . . .

DADE COUNTY POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, v. CITY OF HOMESTEAD,, 642 So. 2d 24 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . The trial court, therefore, should have remanded the matter to the arbitrator for clarification, § 682.10 . . .

B H CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY CO. INC. a St. Co. a v. DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TALLAHASSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, FLORIDA, a, 542 So. 2d 382 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . 1985, respectively. .The parties sought modification or correction of the award, pursuant to sections 682.10 . . .

UNITED STATES, v. RMS ELECTRONICS, INC., 624 F.2d 1081 (C.C.P.A. 1980)

. . . time of the Kennedy Round and the subsequent substitution of items 682.05 and 682.07 for former item 682.10 . . . TSUS item 682.10 was applicable to all imported transformers regardless of whether they were rated. . . .

v. RMS, 67 C.C.P.A. 79 (C.C.P.A. 1980)

. . . time of the Kennedy Round and the subsequent substitution of items 682.05 and 682.07 for former item 682.10 . . . TSUS item 682.10 was applicable to all imported transformers regardless of whether they were rated. . . .

SCHOOL BOARD OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, v. B. McGREGOR, T., 383 So. 2d 694 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . the trial judge, to prevent him from referring a matter back to the arbitrator, pursuant to Section 682.10 . . . Florida Statutes § 682.10 provides that: on application of a party to the arbitration, or if an application . . .

LOPEZ ROQUE TILE COMPANY, INC. v. CLEARWATER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,, 291 So. 2d 126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . vacate as being untimely and confi rms arbitration award The Florida Arbitration Code provides in part: “682.10 . . . Lopez contends that its request for reconsideration was an application for modification under F.S. 682.10 . . . request for reconsideration could not be considered a proper application for modification under F.S. 682.10 . . .

v., 65 Cust. Ct. 648 (Cust. Ct. 1970)

. . . tuners classified under item 685.20 of the tariff schedules, and transformers classified under item 682.10 . . .

v., 65 Cust. Ct. 58 (Cust. Ct. 1970)

. . . entered at Chicago, Ill., and classified in liquidation under the provision for transformers in item 682.10 . . .

S. CARTER v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 224 So. 2d 802 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . . * * * ” Section 682.10 provides that written notice of change in an award must be given the other party . . . . § 682.10, F.S.A. . F.S. § 682.14, F.S.A. . F.S. § 682.11, F.S.A. . . . .