682.10
Change of award by arbitrators.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
682.10 Change of award by arbitrators.—
(1) On motion to an arbitrator by a party to an arbitration proceeding, the arbitrator may modify or correct an award:
(a) Upon a ground stated in s. 682.14(1)(a) or (c);
(b) Because the arbitrator has not made a final and definite award upon a claim submitted by the parties to the arbitration proceeding; or
(c) To clarify the award.
(2) A motion under subsection (1) must be made and notice given to all parties within 20 days after the movant receives notice of the award.
(3) A party to the arbitration proceeding must give notice of any objection to the motion within 10 days after receipt of the notice.
(4) If a motion to the court is pending under s. 682.12, s. 682.13, or s. 682.14, the court may submit the claim to the arbitrator to consider whether to modify or correct the award:
(a) Upon a ground stated in s. 682.14(1)(a) or (c);
(b) Because the arbitrator has not made a final and definite award upon a claim submitted by the parties to the arbitration proceeding; or
(c) To clarify the award.
History.—s. 9, ch. 57-402; s. 12, ch. 67-254; s. 728, ch. 97-102; s. 21, ch. 2013-232.
Note.—Former s. 57.19.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1969–2026 · leading case: A-1 Duran Roofing, Inc. v. Select Contracting, Inc.
A-1 Duran Roofing, Inc. v. Select Contracting, Inc. (2004)
“See § 682.10, Fla. Stat. (2000). The award so modified, corrected, or clarified is subject to the statutory provisions governing confirmation under section 682.”
Wells v. Castro (2013)
“§ 682.10, Fla. Stat. (2012) ("The award so modified or corrected is subject to the provisions of ss.”
Aubie BALTIN; Gwilda Baltin, Plaintiffs-Appellants. v. ALARON TRADING CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee (1997)
“10 of the Florida Arbitration Code, Fla. Stat. Ann. § 682.10 . Because the district court did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the federal claim, we also hold that the district court properly declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over this state law claim.”
NATIONBANC SECURITIES, INC. v. Aron (2001)
“NationsBanc filed a motion asking the trial court to reconsider, in light of Moser , its earlier finding of entitlement; the Arons requested the circuit court to remand the cause to the NASD panel for clarification pursuant to section 682.10, Florida Statutes (1995), to clarify…”
Guzman v. Am. Sec. Ins. Co. (2019)
“" Fla. Stat. § 682.10 . "An [umpire] may modify, correct, or clarify an award on application made within twenty days after its delivery.”
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 824 v. Verizon Florida, LLC (2015)
“See Fla. Stat. § 682.10 (1) ("On motion ,to an arbitrator by a party to an arbitration proceeding, the arbitrator may modify or correct an award: .”
Carter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. (1969)
“NOTES [1] F.S. § 682.10, F.S.A. [2] F.S. § 682.14, F.”
Keyes Co. v. Spencer (2009)
“§ 682.10, Fla. Stat. (2007). The arbitrator denied that motion on the ground that he had properly decided those issues.”
CHATFIELD DEAN & CO., INC. v. Kesler (2002)
“14, Florida Statutes (1995), nor a timely application to the circuit court to seek a clarification pursuant to section 682.10, Florida Statutes (1995). Because the arbitration award was not timely revised, Kesler could not thereafter seek attorney's fees.”
Developers of Northlake v. Northlake Inc. (2005)
“See § 682.10, Fla. Stat. (1999). For these reasons, we reverse the order enforcing the mediation settlement agreement and the judgment for ,283.”
School Board of Seminole County v. McGregor (1980)
“McGregor, the trial judge, to prevent him from referring a matter back to the arbitrator, pursuant to Section 682.10, Florida Statutes (1979), for correction or clarification of an arbitrator’s award for back-pay due to the respondent, Lynette T.”
Lopez & Roque Tile Co. Inc. v. Clearwater Dev. Corp. (1974)
“Lopez contends that its request for reconsideration was an application for modification under F.S. 682.10, F.S.A., which, until acted upon, would have the effect of tolling the time for moving to vacate the award.”
— 682.10(1)(b) — 1 case
— 682.10(1)(c) — 1 case
— 682.10(b) — 1 case
Guzman v. Am. Sec. Ins. Co. (2019)
“" Fla. Stat. § 682.10 . "An [umpire] may modify, correct, or clarify an award on application made within twenty days after its delivery.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.