Cases from cite.case.law:

POOLE AND KENT COMPANY, v. GUSI ERICKSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,, 759 So. 2d 2 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 682.19, Florida Statutes (1997), explains that once an initial application is filed, all subsequent . . .

BARR, v. FLORIDA BOARD OF REGENTS,, 644 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . See also Hedron, 420 So.2d at 394 (holding that section 682.19 “which provides for venue in arbitration . . . enforcement of awards under the Arbitration Code, Chapter 682 has a specific venue provision, section 682.19 . . . that the BOR’s home venue privilege is superseded in arbitration actions by the provisions of section 682.19 . . . For purposes of the section 682.19 venue provision, the BOR’s duty to supervise collective bargaining . . .

THOMSON McKINNON SECURITIES, INC. v. SLATER,, 615 So. 2d 781 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Section 682.19, Florida Statutes (1991), regarding venue, provides: Any application under this law may . . . 9 U.S.C.S. § 9, or if Salter had no residence or place of business in Florida, pursuant to section 682.19 . . . Under the facts of the case at bar, the statutes at issue, 9 U.S.C.S. § 9, and Sections 682.12 and 682.19 . . .

BENNETT, v. DEPARTMENT OF NAVY,, 699 F.2d 1140 (Fed. Cir. 1983)

. . . The MSPB, however, disallowed $682.19 in deposition costs and $35 in witness fees. . . .

HEDRON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF BREVARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE,, 420 So. 2d 393 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Appellant correctly contends that section 682.19, Florida Statutes (1981), which provides for venue in . . . Section 682.19 reads as follows: Venue. — Any application under this law may be made to the court of . . .

AMERICAN PUBLIC GAS ASSOCIATION v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, E. I. De USA,, 587 F.2d 1089 (D.C. Cir. 1978)

. . . ATMI seeks $444.29, Exxon’s bill is for $682.19, with allowable costs calculated by the clerk at $588.21 . . .

CENTURY ELEVATOR CO. INC. v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS, LOCAL UNION NO., 317 So. 2d 108 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . . § 682.19. . . . out above under Fla.Stat. § 47.051 and the first choice of venue as set out above under Fla.Stat. § 682.19 . . . Statutes, then he has failed, in my opinion, to provide us with any understanding of why Fla.Stat. § 682.19 . . . The word “may” in the context of its use in Fla.Stat. § 682.19 simply is not important enough to overcome . . .