Florida Statute 684.0015 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 684
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 684.0015

684.0015 Failure or impossibility to act.—

(1) If an arbitrator becomes de jure or de facto unable to perform his or her functions or for other reasons fails to act without undue delay, his or her mandate terminates if he or she withdraws from office or if the parties agree on the termination. Otherwise, if a controversy remains concerning any of these grounds, any party may request the court specified in s. 684.0008 to decide on the termination of the mandate. The decision of the court is not appealable.

(2) If, under this section or s. 684.0014(2), an arbitrator withdraws from his or her office or a party agrees to the termination of the mandate of an arbitrator, such actions do not imply the acceptance of the validity of any ground described in this section or in s. 684.0013(2).

History.—s. 16, ch. 2010-60.

F.S. 684.0015 on Google Scholar

F.S. 684.0015 on Casetext

Amendments to 684.0015

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 684.0015

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 684.0015.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 684.0015

Total Results: 3

Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. McLeod

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-06-26T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 15 So. 3d 682, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8763, 2009 WL 1811554

Snippet: proposition, the Merrill Lynch majority cited to section 684.15, Florida Statutes (1999), a provision appearing…discovery in arbitration by first considering section 684.15 and then making a brief review of the availability…discovery in arbitration proceedings generally. Section 684.15 does not support the Merrill Lynch majority'…those procedures in judicial proceedings. Section 684.15 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (2) The…Jarvis, supra, at 7-13. In accordance with section 684.15(2), depositions and discovery are available in

Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Adams

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2001-04-06T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 791 So. 2d 25

Snippet: acts were not inconsistent with arbitration. See § 684.15, Fla. Stat. (1999). We therefore affirm the order

BYRON, HARLESS, SCHAFFER, REID AND ASSOC., INC. v. State Ex Rel. Schellenberg

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1978-06-01T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 360 So. 2d 83

Snippet: 431 U.S. at 684, 97 S.Ct. at 2016, 52 L.Ed.2d at 684. [15] Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589, 598-99, 97 S.Ct