Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 684.0015 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 684.0015 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 684.0015

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS
Chapter 684
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 684.0015
684.0015 Failure or impossibility to act.
(1) If an arbitrator becomes de jure or de facto unable to perform his or her functions or for other reasons fails to act without undue delay, his or her mandate terminates if he or she withdraws from office or if the parties agree on the termination. Otherwise, if a controversy remains concerning any of these grounds, any party may request the court specified in s. 684.0008 to decide on the termination of the mandate. The decision of the court is not appealable.
(2) If, under this section or s. 684.0014(2), an arbitrator withdraws from his or her office or a party agrees to the termination of the mandate of an arbitrator, such actions do not imply the acceptance of the validity of any ground described in this section or in s. 684.0013(2).
History.s. 16, ch. 2010-60.

F.S. 684.0015 on Google Scholar

F.S. 684.0015 on Casetext

Amendments to 684.0015


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 684.0015
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 684.0015.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 684.0015

Total Results: 3

Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. McLeod

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-06-26

Citation: 15 So. 3d 682, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8763, 2009 WL 1811554

Snippet: proposition, the Merrill Lynch majority cited to section 684.15, Florida Statutes (1999), a provision appearing

Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Adams

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-04-06

Citation: 791 So. 2d 25, 2001 WL 331976

Snippet: acts were not inconsistent with arbitration. See § 684.15, Fla. Stat. (1999). We therefore affirm the order

BYRON, HARLESS, SCHAFFER, REID AND ASSOC., INC. v. State Ex Rel. Schellenberg

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-06-01

Citation: 360 So. 2d 83, 3 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2425

Snippet: 431 U.S. at 684, 97 S.Ct. at 2016, 52 L.Ed.2d at 684. [15] Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589, 598-99, 97 S.Ct