Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 684.15 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 684.0015 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 684.0015 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 684.0015

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS
Chapter 684
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 684.0015
684.0015 Failure or impossibility to act.
(1) If an arbitrator becomes de jure or de facto unable to perform his or her functions or for other reasons fails to act without undue delay, his or her mandate terminates if he or she withdraws from office or if the parties agree on the termination. Otherwise, if a controversy remains concerning any of these grounds, any party may request the court specified in s. 684.0008 to decide on the termination of the mandate. The decision of the court is not appealable.
(2) If, under this section or s. 684.0014(2), an arbitrator withdraws from his or her office or a party agrees to the termination of the mandate of an arbitrator, such actions do not imply the acceptance of the validity of any ground described in this section or in s. 684.0013(2).
History.s. 16, ch. 2010-60.

F.S. 684.0015 on Google Scholar

F.S. 684.0015 on CourtListener

Amendments to 684.0015


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 684.0015

Total Results: 2

Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. McLeod

15 So. 3d 682, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8763, 2009 WL 1811554

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 2009 | Docket: 1661028

Cited 20 times | Published

proposition, the Merrill Lynch majority cited to section 684.15, Florida Statutes (1999), a provision appearing

Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Adams

791 So. 2d 25, 2001 WL 331976

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 2001 | Docket: 1229333

Cited 5 times | Published

acts were not inconsistent with arbitration. See § 684.15, Fla. Stat. (1999). We therefore affirm the order