Florida Statute 687.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 687
INTEREST AND USURY; LENDING PRACTICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 687.01

687.01 Rate of interest in absence of contract.—In all cases where interest shall accrue without a special contract for the rate thereof, the rate is the rate provided for in s. 55.03.

History.—s. 1, ch. 1483, 1866; ss. 1, 2, ch. 1562, 1866; RS 2320; GS 3103; RGS 4849; CGL 6936; s. 1, ch. 22745, 1945; s. 1, ch. 82-42; s. 10, ch. 94-239.

F.S. 687.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 687.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 687.01

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 687.01

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 687.01.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 687.01

Total Results: 20

BAKER FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC, LLC A/A/O HAHN DINH vs LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-02-06

Snippet: prejudgment interest pursuant to 627.736(4)(d), 55.03, 687.01, and the policy of insurance.” The trial court

ARNE LANGSETMO v. KRISTEN MARIE METZA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-03-09

Snippet: Florida Statutes, sets the rate of interest. See § 687.01, Fla. Stat. (2021); Genser v. Reef Condo. Ass’n

JOEL MCFARLANE v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-01-13

Snippet: defense. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 1 Thereafter, McFarlane’s privately obtained counsel

LENOS TRIGEORGIS v. GEORGE TRIGEORGIS

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-03-28

Citation: 240 So. 3d 772

Snippet: With respect to the interest rate, section 687.01, Florida Statutes (2016) provides that “[i]n all

Robert Pernell McCloud v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-11-17

Citation: 208 So. 3d 668, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 548, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2530

Snippet: regarding the penalty phase in his trial, including: *687(1) improper prosecutorial comments; (2) ¿^proportionality

Stephens v. Owens Law Group . P.A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-01-20

Citation: 198 So. 3d 709, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 649

Snippet: recalculate its interest award. See §§ 55.03, 687.01, Fla. Stat. (2013). Affirmed in part, reversed

Jenkins v. Plaza 3000, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-02-12

Citation: 134 So. 3d 1127, 2014 WL 537494, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1838

Snippet: be used to calculate prejudgment interest. See § 687.01, Fla. Stat. (2012); Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing

Regions Bank v. Maroone Chevrolet, L.L.C.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-07-17

Citation: 118 So. 3d 251, 81 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 89, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11234, 2013 WL 3724587

Snippet: set by statute. § 687.01, Fla. Stat. (1994); § 55.03, Fla. Stat. (2003). Section 687.01 refers to section

Morroni v. Philip L. Burnett, P.A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-06-02

Citation: 38 So. 3d 195, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7818, 2010 WL 2178743

Snippet: this the circuit erred as a matter of law. See § 687.01, Fla. Stat. (2006); Perdue Farms Inc. v. Hook,

Erp v. Erp

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-03-28

Citation: 976 So. 2d 1234, 2008 WL 818822

Snippet: date of the entry of the judgment. See §§ 55.03, 687.01, Fla. Stat. (2004); Amerace Corp. v. Stallings

REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC. v. Calabrese

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-10-13

Citation: 939 So. 2d 225, 2006 WL 2918807

Snippet: statutory rate of interest, pursuant to section 687.01, Florida Statutes (2005). Here, however, the contract

Griffin Bros. Co. v. Mohammed

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-01-25

Citation: 918 So. 2d 425, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 781, 2006 WL 167838

Snippet: certain to result in injury. Turner, 754 So.2d at 687.1 In the present case, since the declaratory action

Cleary v. Cleary

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-04-14

Citation: 872 So. 2d 299, 2004 WL 784645

Snippet: retroactive alimony. Therefore, pursuant to section 687.01, Florida Statutes (2002), the applicable rate of

Spiegel v. H. Allen Holmes, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-03-24

Citation: 867 So. 2d 1277, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3748, 2004 WL 574552

Snippet: agreement. SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur. . See § 687.01, Fla. Stat. (2003) (“In all cases where interest

Amerace Corp. v. Stallings

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-06-13

Citation: 823 So. 2d 110, 2002 WL 1290910

Snippet: in conflict with that statute. Moreover, section 687.01, Florida Statutes (1998), establishes the statutory

Computer Task Group, Inc. v. Peierls

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-02-08

Citation: 810 So. 2d 977, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1278, 2002 WL 191561

Snippet: employed the variable rates prescribed by section 687.01 for each of the years beginning in 1988 and ending

Nelson v. Ameriquest Technologies, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-08-18

Citation: 739 So. 2d 161, 1999 WL 623453

Snippet: is permitted by statute. First of all, section 687.01, Florida Statutes (1995), the controlling interest

WPB, LTD. v. Supran

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-08-12

Citation: 720 So. 2d 1091, 1998 WL 466706

Snippet: The main issue in this appeal is whether section 687.01, Florida Statutes (1989), controls a commercial

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1995-12-07

Snippet: Butterworth Attorney General RAB/tgk 1 Cf., s. 687.01, Fla. Stat. (1994 Supp.), which states that "[i]n

Lyons v. Wyman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-07-19

Citation: 658 So. 2d 1104, 1995 WL 421251

Snippet: inception in July, 1980, through June, 1982. § 687.01, Fla. Stat. (1981). However, because the statutory