Florida Statute 687.06 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 687
INTEREST AND USURY; LENDING PRACTICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 687.06

687.06 Attorney’s fee in enforcing nonusurious contracts; proviso; insurance premiums; attorney’s fee provided in note.—This chapter shall not be so construed as to prevent provision for the payment of such attorney’s fees as the court may determine in cases brought before the court to be reasonable and just for legal services rendered in enforcing nonusurious contracts, either at law or in equity. This chapter shall not be construed so as to prohibit mortgagees from contracting for or collecting premiums for insurance actually issued on the property mortgaged, with the usual loss payable or mortgage clause attached thereto; provided further, that it shall not be necessary for the court to adjudge an attorney’s fee, provided in any note or other instrument of writing, to be reasonable and just, when such fee does not exceed 10 percent of the principal sum named in said note, or other instrument in writing.

History.—s. 4, ch. 5960, 1909; s. 1, ch. 6870, 1915; RGS 4854; CGL 6941; s. 26, ch. 73-334.

F.S. 687.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 687.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 687.06

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 687.06

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 687.06.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 687.06

Total Results: 20

COASTAL COMMUNITY BANK v. Jones

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-11-17T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 23 So. 3d 757, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17150, 2009 WL 3817889

Snippet: attorney." On appeal, Coastal argues that section 687.06, Florida Statutes (2008), raises a presumption … the statute here at issue. Pursuant to section 687.06, "it shall not be necessary for the court …solicitor." Id. Accordingly, although section 687.06 limits a trial court's discretion to review

Donofro v. Dick

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1996-06-04T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 680 So. 2d 1039, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5692, 1996 WL 291929

Snippet: is greater). . Section 687.06, Florida Statutes (1993), provides: 687.06 Attorney’s fee in enforcing…terms of the note and the mortgage. Under section 687.06, Florida Statutes (1993),2 where the parties have

Carroll Steel Erectors v. Alderman

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-04-30T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 599 So. 2d 181

Snippet: Panama City Stevedoring Co. v. Padgett, 149 Fla. 687, 6 So.2d 822 (1942); MacDon Lumber Co. v. Stevenson

Sand Dollar Investments, Inc. v. Anja, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-05-21T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 492 So. 2d 1, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1180, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7904

Snippet: Judge, dissenting. I do not agree that section 687.06, Florida Statutes (1985) does not apply. Quite

Dean v. Coyne

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-08-29T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 455 So. 2d 576

Snippet: the trial judge's determination that section 687.06, Florida Statutes (1983), is unconstitutional.

A & E International Enterprises, Inc. v. Gold Credit Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-05-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 450 So. 2d 1166

Snippet: percent of the original principle amount”), Section 687.06, Florida Statutes (1983)1 creates a conclusive …construed, is unconstitutional. Affirmed. . Section 687.06, Florida Statutes (1983) provides in pertinent

Brann v. Flagship Bank of Pinellas, NA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-04-11T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 450 So. 2d 237

Snippet: amount of reasonable attorneys' fees. See § 687.06, Fla. Stat. (1981). The trial court also erred

Wise v. EL Copeland Builders

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-07-22T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 435 So. 2d 339

Snippet: City Stevedoring Co., Inc. v. Padgett, 149 Fla. 687, 6 So.2d 822, 823 (1942), provides the following test…Panama City Stevedoring Co. v. Padgett, 149 Fla. 687, 6 So.2d 822, supra, actually a dependent; 2. That

Terrinoni v. WESTWARD HO!

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-08-23T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 418 So. 2d 1143

Snippet: Panama City Stevedoring Co. v. Padgett, 149 Fla. 687, 6 So.2d 822, 823 (1942). The test is whether the

Ramer's Feed Inc. v. Fleig

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-05-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 414 So. 2d 17, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19978

Snippet: City Stevedoring Co., Inc. v. Padgett, 149 Fla. 687, 6 So.2d 822 (1942) and MacDon Lumber Co. v. Stevenson

Melweb Signs, Inc. v. Wright

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-02-12T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 394 So. 2d 475

Snippet: Panama City Stevedoring Co. v. Padgett, 147 Fla. 687, 6 So.2d 822, which sets forth the criteria for dependency

Sepler v. Emanuel

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1980-09-16T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 388 So. 2d 28

Snippet: by the successful plaintiff. Section 687.06 is as follows: 687.06 Attorney's fee in enforcing nonusurious…amount of the fee? The trial judge held that Section 687.06, Florida Statutes (1977), authorized the assessment… for 10% of the principal. We hold that Section 687.06, Florida Statutes (1977), does not authorize judgment

North Am. Mtg. Investors v. Cape San Blas

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1979-12-19T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 378 So. 2d 287

Snippet: together with an attorney's fee, as provided in § 687.06. [4] Ch. 65-299, Laws of Florida. [5] Ch. 65-

Donner v. Franklin National Bank

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1975-08-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 316 So. 2d 307

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed upon authority of § 687.06, Fla.Stat. No. 74-1631 District Court

First Mortgage Corp. v. Stellmon

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1964-12-08T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 170 So. 2d 302

Snippet: now appears as Sections 687.02, 687.03, 687.04, 687.06, 687.07, 687.08 and 687.09, Fla. Stat., F.S.A.

Berlanti Construction Co. v. Republic of Cuba

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1962-10-09T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 145 So. 2d 256

Snippet: v. Republic of Cuba, Fla.App. 1961, 127 So.2d 687. [6] Cooper v. Reynolds' Lessee, supra; Pennoyer

Floriland Farms, Inc. v. Peterman

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1961-06-21T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 131 So. 2d 477, 1961 Fla. LEXIS 2247

Snippet: Panama City Stevedoring Co. v. Padgett, 149 Fla. 687, 6 So.2d 822, and MacDon Lumber Co. v. Stevenson,

MacDon Lumber Co. v. Stevenson

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1960-01-26T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 117 So. 2d 487

Snippet: City Stevedoring Co. v. Padgett, 1942, 149 Fla. 687, 6 So.2d 822, at page 823, this Court speaking through…Panama City Stevedoring Co. v. Padgett, 149 Fla. 687, 6 So.2d 822, supra, actually a dependent; 2. That

Paul Spellman, Inc. v. Spellman

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1958-06-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 103 So. 2d 661, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2902

Snippet: Stevedoring Co., Inc., v. Padgett, 1942, 149 Fla. 687, 6 So.2d 822, 823, and quote therefrom: “Some of the

Sherman v. Florida Tar & Creosote Corp.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1948-07-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 36 So. 2d 267, 160 Fla. 696, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 836

Snippet: Stevedoring Co. Inc. et al. v. Padgett,149 Fla. 687, 6 So.2d 822, this Court cut the pattern to guide