Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 695.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 695.09 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 695.09

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
Chapter 695
RECORD OF CONVEYANCES OF REAL ESTATE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 695.09
695.09 Identity of grantor.—No acknowledgment or proof shall be taken, except as set forth in s. 695.03(3), by any officer within or without the United States unless the officer knows, or has satisfactory proof, that the person making the acknowledgment is the individual described in, and who executed, such instrument or that the person offering to make proof is one of the subscribing witnesses to such instrument.
History.—RS 1975; GS 2486; RGS 3828; CGL 5706; s. 3, ch. 84-97; s. 765, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 695.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 695.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 695.09


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 695.09
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 695.09.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 695.09

Total Results: 5

Pimentel v. Alamo

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-01-09

Citation: 555 So. 2d 895, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 125, 1990 WL 948

Snippet: admissibility). See generally §§ 90.803(14), 90.902(4), 695.-09, Fla.Stat. (1987); 1 Fla.Jur.2d Acknowl edgments

Walker v. City of Jacksonville

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-07-25

Citation: 360 So. 2d 52

Snippet: notary the execution of the instrument. (See F.S. 695.09) The mere existence of an acknowledgment on an

Edenfield v. Wingard

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1956-09-19

Citation: 89 So. 2d 776

Snippet: another material portion of the statute, Sec. 695.09, requires that: “No acknowledgment * * * shall

Harris v. Ferris

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1881-01-15

Citation: 18 Fla. 84

Snippet: §1296; 6 Simons, 605; 6 Paige, 127; 27 Vermont, 695; 9 C. E. Green, 25. This follows from the general

Randall v. Parramore

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1847-01-15

Citation: 1 Fla. 409

Snippet: purchased from them and Willis to secure the sum of 12,695 9-100 dollars, which he proposed to pay off from the