Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 696.06 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 696.06 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 696.06

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
Chapter 696
RECORD OF CONTRACTS; PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORDING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 696.06
696.06 Photographic recording by county court judge.
(1) In every county in the state, the county court judge may record any and all instruments filed for record by photographic process, this phrase being used in its most general sense not excluding any photographic process heretofore or hereafter devised, however designated, such as may be recommended by the county court judge from time to time and approved by the board of county commissioners, and the board of county commissioners shall provide out of the general revenue fund adequate equipment and supplies for making and preserving such records in accordance with the process so recommended and approved.
(2) Any instrument heretofore recorded and any action of the boards of county commissioners or county court judges heretofore performed in accordance with the provisions of this section shall be held good and valid.
History.s. 1, ch. 11382, 1925; CGL 5723; ss. 1, 2, ch. 21785, 1943; s. 26, ch. 73-334.

F.S. 696.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 696.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 696.06


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 696.06
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 696.06.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 696.06

Total Results: 5

Snead Construction Corp. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-12-16

Citation: 342 So. 2d 517, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16170

Snippet: advances,” Investors Syndicate v. Henderson, 148 Fla. 696, 6 So.2d 629 (1942), or not, Franklin Savings & Loan

Snead Const. v. FIRST FED. S & L ASS'N

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-12-16

Citation: 342 So. 2d 517

Snippet: advances," Investors Syndicate v. Henderson, 148 Fla. 696, 6 So.2d 629 (1942), or not, Franklin Savings & Loan

Ward v. Miami Lock & Hardware Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-03-23

Citation: 119 So. 2d 395, 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2457

Snippet: See Investors’ Syndicate v. Henderson, 148 Fla. 696, 6 So.2d 629; Curtis v. McCardel, Fla. 1953, 63 So

Roberts v. Lesser

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1957-07-10

Citation: 96 So. 2d 222, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3546

Snippet: notice. Investors Syndicate v. Henderson, 148 Fla. 696, 6 So.2d 629. Nor will the failure to file the cautionary

Maule Industries v. Trugman

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1952-02-15

Citation: 59 So. 2d 27, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1624

Snippet: 572; Investors Syndicate v. Henderson, 148 Fla. 696, 6 So.2d 629. The defendant, Blackiston, was also