Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 696.06 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 696.06 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 696.06

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
Chapter 696
RECORD OF CONTRACTS; PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORDING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 696.06
696.06 Photographic recording by county court judge.
(1) In every county in the state, the county court judge may record any and all instruments filed for record by photographic process, this phrase being used in its most general sense not excluding any photographic process heretofore or hereafter devised, however designated, such as may be recommended by the county court judge from time to time and approved by the board of county commissioners, and the board of county commissioners shall provide out of the general revenue fund adequate equipment and supplies for making and preserving such records in accordance with the process so recommended and approved.
(2) Any instrument heretofore recorded and any action of the boards of county commissioners or county court judges heretofore performed in accordance with the provisions of this section shall be held good and valid.
History.s. 1, ch. 11382, 1925; CGL 5723; ss. 1, 2, ch. 21785, 1943; s. 26, ch. 73-334.

F.S. 696.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 696.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 696.06


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 696.06
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 696.06.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ABOUSHABAN, s v. S. MUELLER, s, 475 F. Supp. 2d 943 (N.D. Cal. 2007)

. . . Plaintiff also seeks the recovery of $696.06 in costs. . . . necessary for the prepáration of the action and accordingly award him the full amount of costs requested, $696.06 . . . (107.53 hours of attorney work multiplied by the adjusted statutory rate of $171.03 per hour) and $696.06 . . .

In INDUSTRIAL SAPPHIRE MFG. CO., 182 F.2d 591 (3d Cir. 1950)

. . . by increasing the liability of Industrial Sapphire Corporation to the trustee from $1,059.81 to $2,-696.06 . . .

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. OLD COLONY R. R., 26 F.2d 408 (1st Cir. 1928)

. . . (being the apportionment to the taxable year of premiums on bonds sold as hereinafter stated) and $696.06 . . . But the Commissioner, regarding it as income, found an additional tax due thereon of $696.06 and considering . . .

I. J. v., 7 B.T.A. 110 (B.T.A. 1927)

. . . redetermination of a deficiency in income tax for 1919, 1920, and 1921, in the amounts of $540.37, $696.06 . . .

Co. v., 6 B.T.A. 1025 (B.T.A. 1927)

. . . representing an apportionment of premiums on bonds sold prior to the year 1909. (2) The amount of $696.06 . . . The Commissioner further increased petitioner’s taxable income for 1920 by $696.06, on the theory that . . .