The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY

Chapter 696
RECORD OF CONTRACTS; PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORDING

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 696

RECORD OF CONTRACTS; PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORDING

696.01 Contracts for sale of realty must be acknowledged in order to be recorded.

696.02 Assignments of contracts for sale of realty not entitled to record unless original is recorded or entitled to record.

696.03 When agreement executed by agent or attorney may be recorded.

696.04 What instruments affected by ss. 696.01-696.03.

696.05 Photographic recording by clerk of circuit court.

696.06 Photographic recording by county court judge.

696.01 Contracts for sale of realty must be acknowledged in order to be recorded.—No contract, agreement, or other instrument purporting to contain an agreement to purchase or sell real estate shall be recorded in the public records of any county in the state, unless such contract, agreement or other instrument is acknowledged by the vendor in the manner provided by law for the acknowledgment of deeds; and where there is no acknowledgment on the part of the vendor, the recording officers in the various counties of this state shall refuse to accept such instrument for record.

History.—s. 1, ch. 11813, 1927; CGL 5719.

696.02 Assignments of contracts for sale of realty not entitled to record unless original is recorded or entitled to record.—No assignment of any contract, agreement, or other instrument purporting to contain an agreement to purchase or sell real estate shall be recorded in any of the public records of this state, unless the contract, agreement or other instrument sought to be assigned shall have been recorded, or is entitled to be recorded under the provisions of ss. 696.01-696.04.

History.—s. 2, ch. 11813, 1927; CGL 5720.

696.03 When agreement executed by agent or attorney may be recorded.—No contract or agreement or other instrument purporting to contain an agreement to sell or purchase real estate, which has been executed by an agent or attorney in fact shall be recorded in any of the public records of this state, unless the authority of such agent or attorney in fact to execute the instrument sought to be recorded is produced and recorded by the recording officer, or is already recorded in the county where such instrument is sought to be recorded; and for the purposes of ss. 696.01-696.04 no authority for the execution of instruments by an agent or attorney in fact shall be accepted which is not executed in the manner provided by law for the execution of deeds.

History.—s. 3, ch. 11813, 1927; CGL 5721.

696.04 What instruments affected by ss. 696.01-696.03.—Sections 696.01-696.03 shall apply to all contracts and instruments, which had not been recorded on June 6, 1927; but nothing therein contained shall enlarge, impair, alter, or diminish the obligation of any such contract or agreement affected thereby as between the parties privy thereto, or as to those who have actual notice thereof.

History.—s. 4, ch. 11813, 1927; CGL 5722.

696.05 Photographic recording by clerk of circuit court.—

(1) In every county in this state, the clerk of the circuit court may record any and all instruments filed for record by photographic process, this phrase being used in its most general sense and including miniature photographic, microfilming or microphotographic processes or any other photographic, mechanical or other process heretofore or hereafter devised, however designated, such as may be recommended by the clerk from time to time and approved by the board of county commissioners. The board of county commissioners shall provide out of the general revenue fund adequate equipment and supplies for making and preserving such records in accordance with the process so recommended and approved, and shall also provide adequate equipment for reproduction, and for viewing where said recording process is miniature photographic, microfilming or microphotographic, it being the intent hereof that such records shall be readily available for public inspection and copying. The clerk of the circuit court may note on the index to the photographic record of a mortgage or lien a note of assignment or a note of satisfaction of the mortgage or lien.

(2) All instruments heretofore recorded and all action of the boards of county commissioners and clerks of the circuit courts heretofore performed in the purchase of photographic equipment and its use in accordance with the provisions of this act are hereby validated and shall be held good and valid. All service charges shall be as provided in s. 28.24.

History.—s. 1, ch. 10300, 1925; CGL 1936 Supp. 5722(1); ss. 1, 2, 3, 4, ch. 22051, 1943; s. 8, ch. 29749, 1955; s. 1, ch. 59-429; s. 1, ch. 61-186; s. 28, ch. 70-134.

696.06 Photographic recording by county court judge.—

(1) In every county in the state, the county court judge may record any and all instruments filed for record by photographic process, this phrase being used in its most general sense not excluding any photographic process heretofore or hereafter devised, however designated, such as may be recommended by the county court judge from time to time and approved by the board of county commissioners, and the board of county commissioners shall provide out of the general revenue fund adequate equipment and supplies for making and preserving such records in accordance with the process so recommended and approved.

(2) Any instrument heretofore recorded and any action of the boards of county commissioners or county court judges heretofore performed in accordance with the provisions of this section shall be held good and valid.

History.—s. 1, ch. 11382, 1925; CGL 5723; ss. 1, 2, ch. 21785, 1943; s. 26, ch. 73-334.

F.S. 696 on Google Scholar

F.S. 696 on Casetext

Amendments to 696

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 696

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 696.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

CALVARY CHAPEL DAYTON VALLEY v. SISOLAK,, 140 S. Ct. 2603 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See, e.g., Walz , 397 U.S. at 696, 90 S.Ct. 1409 (opinion of Harlan, J.) . . .

OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SCHOOL, v. MORRISSEY- BERRU St. v., 140 S. Ct. 2049 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Milivojevich , 426 U.S. 696, 96 S.Ct. 2372, 49 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976), also concerned the control of property . . . Milivojevich , 426 U.S. 696, 715, n. 8, 96 S.Ct. 2372, 49 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976) (" 'It is not to be supposed . . .

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, v. PENNSYLVANIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 2367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. , 573 U.S. 682, 696-697, 134 S.Ct. 2751, 189 L.Ed.2d 675 (2014). . . . S. ----, ----, 136 S.Ct. 1557, 1560, 194 L.Ed.2d 696 (2016) (per curiam ). . . . S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 1557, 194 L.Ed.2d 696 (2016) (per curiam ), but instead of resolving the legal dispute . . . S. ----, ----, 136 S.Ct. 1557, 1560, 194 L.Ed.2d 696 (2016) (per curiam ) ("[T]he parties on remand should . . . S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 1557, 194 L.Ed.2d 696 (2016) (per curiam ), and Hobby Lobby , 573 U.S. 682, 134 S.Ct . . .

SEILA LAW LLC, v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, 140 S. Ct. 2183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . and prosecute particular alleged crimes by high-ranking Government officials. 487 U.S. at 662-663, 696 . . . Rev. 696, 704, 713-715 (2007) (generally favoring administrative independence). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id. , at 695-696, 128 S.Ct. 2207 (citing Wilson v. . . . extradition or similar transfer to a foreign sovereign exercising a right to prosecution. 553 U.S. at 696 . . .

OPATI, v. REPUBLIC OF SUDAN,, 140 S. Ct. 1601 (U.S. 2020)

. . . conduct in reliance on the promise of future immunity from suit in United States courts." 541 U.S. at 696 . . .

COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII, v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND,, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id. , at 696. . . .

KANSAS, v. GLOVER, 140 S. Ct. 1183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 517 U.S. 690, 696, 116 S.Ct. 1657, 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996) ; see also United States v. . . . Cortez , 449 U.S. at 418, 101 S.Ct. 690 ; Ornelas , 517 U.S. at 696, 116 S.Ct. 1657 (" '[e]ach case is . . .

HAENDEL, v. REED,, 140 S. Ct. 958 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-696 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

UNITED STATES, v. ROMERO, Jr., 935 F.3d 1124 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . You don't want to deal with this, you can go to jail. 696 F.3d 987, 991 (10th Cir. 2012) ("Officer" and . . .

ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 935 F.3d 858 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gulick , 411 F.2d 696, 703 (D.C. . . .

EDMO, v. CORIZON, INC. Al v. Al, 935 F.3d 757 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Corizon Health Inc. , 696 F. App'x 792, 794 n.1 (9th Cir. 2017). . . .

RAWA, A. W. Jr. v. MONSANTO COMPANY, v., 934 F.3d 862 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Keil , 862 F.3d at 696. A nationwide settlement need not account for differences in state laws. . . . Id . at 696 (internal quotation omitted). . . .

SCRIMO, v. LEE,, 935 F.3d 103 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Attorney General of the State of New York, 696 F.2d 186 (2d Cir. 1982) (in banc), which considered whether . . .

BURKE, v. REGALADO, v., 935 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Jones , 696 F.2d 1069, 1072 (4th Cir. 1982) ; see also United States v. . . .

MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN, v. PIER IMPORTS, INCORPORATED W. H., 935 F.3d 424 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . IP Axess Inc. , 407 F.3d 690, 696-97 (5th Cir. 2005). . . . See Plotkin , 407 F.3d at 696-97. . . .

UNITED STATES v. F GARO- BENJAM N, 392 F. Supp. 3d 280 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . Trancheff, 633 F.3d 696, 698 (8th Cir. 2011) (holding that the district court did not err "by denying . . .

UNITED STATES v. CANO,, 934 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . McNeely , 569 U.S. 141, 154, 133 S.Ct. 1552, 185 L.Ed.2d 696 (2013) ); see Riley , 573 U.S. at 401, 134 . . .

BRAND v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, 934 F.3d 799 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Todd, 547 N.W.2d 696, 698 (Minn. 1996) ). . . .

HARVILLE, v. CITY OF HOUSTON, MISSISSIPPI,, 935 F.3d 404 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Chickasaw Cty., Miss. , 930 F.3d 696, 704 (5th Cir. 2019) (considering a municipal liability claim under . . .

A. VAN BUSKIRK A. v. UNITED GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC. DCG LLC, DCG UGOC II, LLC, J. F. MCM LLC, LLC, F. F. W. Jr., 935 F.3d 49 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Balch, Hardy & Scheinman, Inc ., 696 F. . . .

J. MALOUF, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,, 933 F.3d 1248 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . SEC , 446 U.S. 680, 696 n.13, 100 S.Ct. 1945, 64 L.Ed.2d 611 (1980) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BLAIR,, 933 F.3d 1271 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Mike , 632 F.3d 686, 696 (10th Cir. 2011) ). . . . Bear , 769 F.3d at 1230 (citing Mike , 632 F.3d at 696 ). . . . Ullmann , 788 F.3d at 1264 (citing Mike , 632 F.3d at 696 ). . . . See Mike , 632 F.3d at 696. . . . Mike , 632 F.3d at 696. . . .

DOE, v. COLUMBIA COLLEGE CHICAGO,, 933 F.3d 849 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Aurora Univ. , 346 Ill.App.3d 728, 282 Ill.Dec. 77, 805 N.E.2d 696, 699 (2004). . . .

RAM REZ- P REZ, v. P. BARR,, 934 F.3d 47 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 690, 696 (1st Cir. 2015). Ramírez failed to satisfy this burden. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MARCHAN,, 935 F.3d 540 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Castelan , 219 F.3d 690, 696 (7th Cir. 2000) (articulating the test for harmless error). . . .

IN RE MIAMI METALS I, INC., 603 B.R. 531 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . See Stipulation and Order Granting Standing to the Committee at 2 [ECF No. 696 ]. . . .

IN RE MIAMI METALS I, INC., 603 B.R. 727 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Mercantile Bank , 989 So. 2d 696, 697 (Fla. 1st Dist. Ct. . . .

UNITED STATES v. NG LAP SENG, Ng, Ng W. C., 934 F.3d 110 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 544 U.S. 696, 705, 125 S.Ct. 2129, 161 L.Ed.2d 1008 (2005) (stating that " '[c]orrupt . . .

WYNNEWOOD REFINING COMPANY, L. L. C. v. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION, 933 F.3d 499 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Marshall , 592 F.2d 693, 696 (3d Cir. 1979). . . .

PARENT PROFESSIONAL ADVOCACY LEAGUE M. W. a F. D. S. S. a S. Y. v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS J., 934 F.3d 13 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Union Carbide Corp., 361 F.3d 696, 714 (2d Cir. 2004) (stating that an "organization lacks standing to . . .

STERLINSKI, v. CATHOLIC BISHOP OF CHICAGO,, 934 F.3d 568 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Milivojevich , 426 U.S. 696, 709, 96 S.Ct. 2372, 49 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976). . . .

T. SCHMITT v. LAROSE,, 933 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bd. of Elections , 148 Ohio St.3d 176, 179-80, 69 N.E.3d 696 (2016) (initiative making marijuana possession . . .

UNITED STATES v. SIMPSON, 932 F.3d 1154 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ristine , 335 F.3d 692, 696 (8th Cir. 2003). . . .

MALDONADO L. Jr. v. RODRIGUEZ, Jr., 932 F.3d 388 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Fort Bend County , 145 F.3d 691, 696-97 (5th Cir. 1998) ; Click v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. THOMAS,, 933 F.3d 605 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Zobel , 696 F.3d 558, 569-72 (6th Cir. 2012) (15-month variance); Lanning , 633 F.3d at 474-76 (18-month . . .

BREDA, v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d b a, 934 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Moran, 661 F.3d 696, 702-03 (1st Cir. 2011) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) ). . . .

JONES, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 831 (M.D. Tenn. 2019)

. . . Id., referencing TR 696-701. . . .

CAMPBELL, H. C. H. v. UNITED STATES,, 932 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 460 Mich. 696, 597 N.W.2d 506, 510 (1999) (quoting Turner v. Bituminous Cas. . . .

UNITED STATES, v. GAUDET,, 933 F.3d 11 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Colon-Rodriguez, 696 F.3d 102, 108 (1st Cir. 2012) (internal quotation omitted). . . .

MITCHELL, v. MACLAREN,, 933 F.3d 526 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Prysock , 453 U.S. 355, 360-61, 101 S.Ct. 2806, 69 L.Ed.2d 696 (1981) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MATHIS, a k a a k a a k a D- v. a k a a k a v. a k a a k a a k a v. a k a a k a K. a k a a k a v. a k a a k a a k a v. a k a a k a a k a a k a, 932 F.3d 242 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 544 U.S. 696, 125 S.Ct. 2129, 161 L.Ed.2d 1008 (2005), clarified that the government . . .

UNITED STATES v. BUCHANAN,, 933 F.3d 501 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gillis , 592 F.3d 696, 699 (6th Cir. 2009) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted); see also . . .

AL- BALUCHI a k a v. T. ESPER,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 46 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Bond, 395 U.S. 683, 696 n. 8, 89 S.Ct. 1876, 23 L.Ed.2d 631 (1969) ; Khadr v. Bush, 587 F. . . . Bond, 395 U.S. at 696 n. 8, 89 S.Ct. 1876. . . .

UNITED STATES v. GLENN,, 931 F.3d 424 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 517 U.S. 690, 696, 116 S.Ct. 1657, 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996). . . .

MARAMBO v. P. BARR,, 932 F.3d 650 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . INS, 92 F.3d 696, 700 (8th Cir. 1996). . . .

DEXTER, a k a v. DEALOGIC, LLC,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 233 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Fleet Nat'l Bank, 456 Mass. 562, 924 N.E.2d 696, 704 (2010) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. VARGAS- MOLINA,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 809 (E.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . INS , 237 F.3d 696, 699 (6th Cir. 2001) )). . . .

HUPP R. H. a v. COOK C. R., 931 F.3d 307 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Place , 462 U.S. 696, 701, 103 S.Ct. 2637, 77 L.Ed.2d 110 (1983). . . .

Z. J. a BY AND THROUGH Je JONES, v. KANSAS CITY BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS,, 931 F.3d 672 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Smith , 696 F.3d 716, 731 (8th Cir. 2012). . . .

HIGHPOINT TOWER TECHNOLOGY INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 931 F.3d 1050 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . C.I.R., 696 F.3d 1124, 1135 (11th Cir. 2012) (citing § 6662(e)(1)(A), (h)(2)(A)(i) ). . . . therefore, and the applicable penalty rate is 40 percent. 26 C.F.R. § 1.6662-5(g) ; see also Gustashaw, 696 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CORRALES- VAZQUEZ,, 931 F.3d 944 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 278 F. 694, 696-97 (9th Cir. 1922). . . .

EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT, v. BARR,, 385 F. Supp. 3d 922 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . BethEnergy Mines, Inc. , 501 U.S. 680, 696, 111 S.Ct. 2524, 115 L.Ed.2d 604 (1991) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. IWAI,, 930 F.3d 1141 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . McNeely , 569 U.S. 141, 154 n.4, 133 S.Ct. 1552, 185 L.Ed.2d 696 (2013) ); Leidner , 99 F.3d at 1425 . . .

NANTUME, v. P. BARR,, 931 F.3d 35 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Clark, 96 U.S. 37, 49, 24 L.Ed. 696 (1877) (Harlan, J., dissenting) (quoting Lord Campbell in East India . . .

MATSON, v. SANDERSON FARMS, INC., 388 F. Supp. 3d 853 (S.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . App'x 691, 696 (6th Cir. 2011) ("A valid certification 'must show that the employee's serious health . . .

WECKESSER, v. KNIGHT ENTERPRISES S. E. LLC,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 631 (D.S.C. 2019)

. . . Gold Cup Coffee Servs., Inc. , 214 F.R.D. 696, 697-98 (S.D.Ala.2003). . . .

IN RE LICKING RIVER MINING, LLC, v. LLC,, 603 B.R. 336 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2019)

. . . Adams , 296 S.W.2d 696, 699 (Ky. 1956) ). . . .

CORBETT, v. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,, 930 F.3d 1225 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 696-705. . . .

ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. WATTLES COMPANY, a, 930 F.3d 1240 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . City Comm'rs of City of Cordele, 315 Ga.App. 696, 727 S.E.2d 524, 527 (2012). . . .

DAHAL, v. P. BARR,, 931 F.3d 15 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Holder, 696 F.3d 121, 123 (1st Cir. 2012). . . .

IN RE SANDIFER, 603 B.R. 648 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2019)

. . . Fla. 2008) ; see also In re Ellegood , 362 B.R. 696, 704 (Bankr. E.D. . . .

GRAVES, I. Y. M. Y. A. Y. v. A. LIOI L. Jr. I. Y. M. Y. A. Y. v. A. L. Jr., 930 F.3d 307 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . J.A. 696-97 (responding to Williams' question about whether Mrs. . . .

UNITED STATES v. LIPSCOMB,, 386 F. Supp. 3d 680 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . United States, 517 U.S. 690, 696, 116 S.Ct. 1657, 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996) (citations omitted). . . . See Ornelas, 517 U.S. at 696, 116 S.Ct. 1657 (probable cause exists where "contraband or evidence of . . .

ALARM DETECTION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, v. VILLAGE OF SCHAUMBURG, a, 930 F.3d 812 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Marian Catholic High Sch. , 852 F.3d 690, 696 (7th Cir. 2017) (explaining that there must be a "nexus . . .

MURPHY, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 59 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Gov't, 875 F.3d 685, 696 (D.C. Cir. 2017). . . .

INC. v. INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY, IGT, DOUBLEDOWN INTERACTIVE LLC,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 828 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Doubledown had also contributorily infringed, and that IGT Holding, IGT NV, and Doubledown had committed 696 . . . infringed with respect to all six games; and that IGT Holding, IGT NV, and Doubledown had committed 696 . . . The jury accepted that contention and found 696 separate instances of each of the four types of DMCA . . . that these four types of violations overlapped and therefore merged them into a cumulative total of 696 . . . GC2 opted for statutory damages for the 696 DMCA violations that the jury found IGT Holding, IGT NV, . . .

F. MAY, v. SEGOVIA,, 929 F.3d 1223 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Charrier , 262 F.3d 687, 696 (8th Cir. 2001). Mr. . . .

UNITED STATES v. STRUBBERG,, 929 F.3d 969 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ristine , 335 F.3d 692, 696-97 (8th Cir. 2003) (upholding a similar condition under plain error review . . .

PENNSYLVANIA v. PRESIDENT UNITED STATES D. C., 930 F.3d 543 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 1557, 194 L.Ed.2d 696 (2016) (per curiam), the Supreme Court addressed the petitioners' assertions . . .

ABC SOILS, INC. v. DRS POWER TECHNOLOGY, INC., 386 F. Supp. 3d 107 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Ct. 691, 696, 941 N.E.2d 688, 692 (2011). . . .

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, v. S. NADKARNI,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 917 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Pacifica Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990). . . .

UNITED STATES v. WHYTE, a. k. a., 928 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Feola , 420 U.S. 671, 696, 95 S.Ct. 1255, 43 L.Ed.2d 541 (1965). . . . Id. at 676, 95 S.Ct. 1255 ; see also id. at 686, 696, 95 S.Ct. 1255. . . .

CORBITT, SDC, a v. VICKERS,, 929 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Summers, 452 U.S. 692, 696 n.5, 101 S. Ct. 2587, 2591 n.5, 69 L.Ed.2d 340 (1981) (quoting Terry v. . . .

IN RE CHICAGO MANAGEMENT CONSULTING GROUP, INC. v., 929 F.3d 803 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Illinois , 554 F.3d 693, 696 (7th Cir. 2009). These were reasonable sanctions. E. . . .

PHL VARIABLE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. TOWN OF OYSTER BAY,, 929 F.3d 79 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Hempstead , 41 N.Y.2d 691, 696, 395 N.Y.S.2d 143, 363 N.E.2d 694 (N.Y. 1977) (quotations and citations . . . New York Telephone , 41 N.Y.2d at 696, 395 N.Y.S.2d at 146, 363 N.E.2d 694 (quoting Seif , 286 N.Y. at . . . New York Telephone , 41 N.Y.2d at 696, 395 N.Y.S.2d at 146, 363 N.E.2d 694 (internal quotation marks . . .

EUROPA EYE WEAR CORP. v. KAIZEN ADVISORS, LLC AO v. LLC,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 228 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Suez, S.A. , 585 F.3d 696, 701 (2d Cir. 2009). . . .

FOX v. AMAZON. COM, INC., 930 F.3d 415 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , 696 F.3d 604, 607 (6th Cir. 2012). . . .

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, SHEET METAL WORKERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND, v. FOUR- C- AIRE, INC., 929 F.3d 135 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Just Born II, Inc. , 888 F.3d 696, 698 n.1 (4th Cir. 2018) (internal quotation marks omitted). . . .

SIERRA CLUB v. J. TRUMP, T. K., 929 F.3d 670 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Op. at 696 ("Plaintiffs claim that to the extent Defendants did not have statutory authority to reprogram . . . Op. at 696. . . . Op. at 696. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SMITH,, 928 F.3d 1215 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . McNeely , 569 U.S. 141, 150, 133 S.Ct. 1552, 185 L.Ed.2d 696 (2013) ; Stephens v. . . . Ct. 1552, 1559, 185 L.Ed.2d 696 (2013) (explaining "the fact-specific nature of the reasonableness inquiry . . .

J. CUNNINGHAM, v. WAWA, INC., 387 F. Supp. 3d 529 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Ivaco, 216 F.R.D. 693, 696 (N.D. . . .

TD BANK N. A. v. W. HILL, II,, 928 F.3d 259 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Kass , 91 N.Y.2d 554, 673 N.Y.S.2d 350, 696 N.E.2d 174, 181 (1998) (citation omitted). . . .

E. D. v. SHARKEY BCRC- IFC BCRC- IFC BCRC- IFC, 928 F.3d 299 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Levi , 696 F.3d 352, 364 (3d Cir. 2012). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MATHEWS,, 928 F.3d 968 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Pablo , 696 F.3d 1280, 1287 (10th Cir. 2012). . . .

IN RE M. THORPE,, 602 B.R. 906 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . . # 696) (emphasis in original). . . .

WESTROCK VIRGINIA CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 928 F.3d 1019 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Kappos , 696 F.3d 1379, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2012). . . .

BERKSHIRE v. BEAUVAIS,, 928 F.3d 520 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Tepe , 693 F.3d 696, 697, 704 (6th Cir. 2012) (holding that a private doctor working for the government . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. LICKERS,, 928 F.3d 609 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Figueroa-Espana , 511 F.3d 696, 701 (7th Cir. 2007) (explaining that we review a district court's legal . . .

D. NELSON, v. GREAT LAKES EDUCATIONAL LOAN SERVICES, INC., 928 F.3d 639 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Entertainment Inc. , 763 F.3d 696, 700 (7th Cir. 2014). A. . . .

P. MITCHELL, v. WISCONSIN, 139 S. Ct. 2525 (U.S. 2019)

. . . McNeely , 569 U.S. 141, 149, 133 S.Ct. 1552, 185 L.Ed.2d 696 (2013). . . . McNeely , 569 U.S. 141, 133 S.Ct. 1552, 185 L.Ed.2d 696 (2013) (dissenting opinion). Birchfield v. . . . McNeely , 569 U.S. 141, 148, 133 S.Ct. 1552, 185 L.Ed.2d 696 (2013). . . .

L. KISOR, v. WILKIE,, 139 S. Ct. 2400 (U.S. 2019)

. . . BethEnergy Mines, Inc. , 501 U.S. 680, 696, 111 S.Ct. 2524, 115 L.Ed.2d 604 (1991) (discussing as a matter . . . Pauley , 501 U.S. at 696, 111 S.Ct. 2524. . . . Rev. 612, 696 (1996). Kisor v. Shulkin , 869 F.3d 1360, 1367 (2017). Id. , at 1368. Kisor v. . . . Nixon , 418 U.S. 683, 695-696, 94 S.Ct. 3090, 41 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1974). Perez , 575 U. . . .

KLEYA, v. KARL STORZ ENDOVISION, INC., 385 F. Supp. 3d 99 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Co. , 696 F.3d 78, 89 (1st Cir. 2012) ; see also Mulloy v. . . . Jones , 696 F.3d at 89 (citations omitted). . . .

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v. B. III G. M. J. R. J. A. Jr., 927 F.3d 597 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Detroit (In re City of Detroit ), 841 F.3d 684, 696 (6th Cir. 2016) (holding that section 904 . . . 919 F.3d at 648, as did the Sixth Circuit in the municipal-bankruptcy setting, see Lyda, 841 F.3d at 696 . . .

ESTATE OF OSUNA, v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, s, 392 F. Supp. 3d 1162 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Pacifica Police Dep't , 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990). . . .

DOMINIC W. ON BEHALF OF SOFIA W. v. NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY EMPLOYEE WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN d b a, 392 F. Supp. 3d 907 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Props. , 921 F.3d 696, 699-700 (7th Cir. 2019). . . .

AMBELLU v. RE ESE ADBARAT DEBRE SELAM KIDIST MARIAM,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 71 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Milivojevich , 426 U.S. 696, 698, 96 S.Ct. 2372, 49 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976). . . .

UNITED STATES v. EMERY,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 1023 (D. S.D. 2019)

. . . Place, 462 U.S. 696, 103 S.Ct. 2637, 77 L.Ed.2d 110 (1983), were distinguishable, the Court explained . . .

REHAIF, v. UNITED STATES, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Valencia Gonzales , 568 U.S. 57, 66, 133 S.Ct. 696, 184 L.Ed.2d 528 (2013) (internal quotation marks . . .

FAN LLC v. STONEMOR PARTNERS LP GP LLC GP LLC LLC P. B. Jr. R., 927 F.3d 710 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Litig. , 90 F.3d 696, 714 (3d Cir. 1996) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting TSC Indus. v. . . .