Florida Statute 701.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY

Chapter 701
ASSIGNMENT AND CANCELLATION OF MORTGAGES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 701.04

701.04 Cancellation of mortgages, liens, and judgments.—

(1)(a) Within 10 days after receipt of the written request of a mortgagor, a record title owner of the property, a fiduciary or trustee lawfully acting on behalf of a record title owner, or any other person lawfully authorized to act on behalf of a mortgagor or record title owner of the property, the mortgagee or mortgage servicer shall send or cause to be sent an estoppel letter setting forth the unpaid balance of the loan secured by the mortgage. If the written request is made by a person other than the mortgagor, the request must include a copy of the instrument showing such person’s title in the property or other lawful authorization, and the mortgagee or mortgage servicer must notify the mortgagor of the request.

(b) The estoppel letter must at a minimum include:

1. The unpaid balance of the loan secured by the mortgage as of the date specified in the estoppel letter, including an itemization of the principal, interest, and any other charges comprising the unpaid balance; and

2. Interest accruing on a per-day basis for the unpaid balance from and after the date specified in the estoppel letter, if applicable.

(c)1. Except for mortgages for which a notice of lis pendens in a foreclosure action or a suggestion of bankruptcy has been properly filed and recorded, the mortgagee or mortgage servicer may not qualify, reserve the right to change, or condition or disclaim the reliance of others on the information provided in an estoppel letter under paragraph (b), and any attempt to do so is void and unenforceable. However, if the mortgagee or mortgage servicer determines that any of the information provided in the estoppel letter under paragraph (b) was inaccurate, the mortgagee or mortgage servicer may send a corrected estoppel letter to the person who requested the estoppel letter in the same manner as used to respond to the original written request. If the original written request is made by a person other than the mortgagor, the mortgagee or mortgage servicer must also provide a copy of any corrected estoppel letter to the mortgagor.

2. If the person who requested the original estoppel letter under paragraph (a) receives a corrected estoppel letter by 3 p.m. in such person’s time zone at least 1 business day before a payment is issued in reliance on the previous estoppel letter, the corrected estoppel letter supersedes all prior estoppel letters.

3. If any of the information provided in the estoppel letter under paragraph (b) was inaccurate, but the person who requested the estoppel letter did not timely receive a corrected estoppel letter as provided in subparagraph 2., the mortgagee or mortgage servicer may not deny the accuracy of such information as against any person who relied on it. This subparagraph does not affect the right of a mortgagee to recover any sum that it did not include in an estoppel letter from any person liable for payment of the loan or other obligations secured by the mortgage, nor does it limit any claim or defense to recovery which such person may have at law or in equity.

(d) The mortgagee or mortgage servicer acting in accordance with a request in substantial compliance with this subsection is expressly discharged from any obligation or liability to any person on account of the release of the requested information, other than the obligation to comply with the terms of the estoppel letter.

(e) If a payment is received at the location and in the manner specified by the mortgagee or mortgage servicer, the mortgagee or mortgage servicer must accept and may not return any payment received in reliance on an estoppel letter and must promptly apply such payment to the unpaid balance of the loan properly due under or secured by the mortgage.

(f)1. A written request for an estoppel letter under paragraph (a) must be sent to the mortgagee or mortgage servicer by first-class mail, postage prepaid; by common carrier delivery service; or by e-mail, facsimile, or other electronic means at the address made available by the mortgagee or mortgage servicer for such purpose or through an automated system provided by the mortgagee or mortgage servicer for requesting an estoppel letter. The written request is considered received by the mortgagee or mortgage servicer:

a. Five business days after the request sent by first-class mail is deposited with the United States Postal Service;

b. The day the request is delivered by a common carrier delivery service; or

c. The day the request is sent by e-mail, facsimile, or other electronic means or through an automated system provided by the mortgagee or mortgage servicer for requesting an estoppel letter.

If any of the days in sub-subparagraph a., sub-subparagraph b., or sub-subparagraph c. fall on a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday specified in s. 110.117(1) or the laws of the United States, the request for an estoppel letter is considered timely received by the mortgagee or mortgage servicer on the next business day.

2. The mortgagee or mortgage servicer must send an estoppel letter by first-class mail, postage prepaid; by common carrier delivery service; or by e-mail, facsimile, or other electronic means, as directed in the written request, or through an automated system provided by the mortgagee or mortgage servicer for this purpose. However, the mortgagee or mortgage servicer is not required to pay for a common carrier delivery service. If the 10-day period after a written request is received by the mortgagee or mortgage servicer ends on a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday specified in s. 110.117(1) or the laws of the United States, the estoppel letter is considered timely if it is sent by the close of business on the next business day.

(g) Notwithstanding s. 655.059, a mortgagee or mortgage servicer may provide the financial information required under this subsection to a person authorized under this subsection to request the financial information.

(2)(a) Within 60 days after the unpaid balance of a loan secured by a mortgage has been fully paid or paid pursuant to an estoppel letter under subsection (1), whichever is earlier, the mortgagee or mortgage servicer shall execute in writing an instrument acknowledging release of the mortgage; have the instrument acknowledged, or proven, and send it or cause it to be sent for recording in the official records of the proper county; and send or cause to be sent the recorded release to the mortgagor or record title owner of the property. The prevailing party in a civil action brought against the mortgagee or mortgage servicer to enforce the requirements of this paragraph is entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs.

(b) The recorded release of the mortgage does not relieve the mortgagor, or the mortgagor’s successors or assigns, from any personal liability on the loan or other obligations previously secured by the mortgage.

(3) Within 60 days after the unpaid balance on a lien or judgment has been fully paid to the person entitled to the payment thereof, the creditor or assignee, or the attorney of record in the case of a judgment, to whom the payment was made shall execute in writing an instrument acknowledging satisfaction of the lien or judgment; have the instrument acknowledged, or proven, and send it or cause it to be sent for recording in the official records of the proper county; and send or cause to be sent the recorded satisfaction to the person who has made the full payment. The prevailing party in a civil action brought against the creditor or assignee, or the attorney of record in the case of a judgment, to enforce the requirements of this subsection is entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs.

(4) When a writ of execution has been issued, docketed, and indexed with a sheriff and the judgment upon which it was issued has been fully paid, it is the responsibility of the person receiving payment to request, in writing, addressed to the sheriff, return of the writ of execution as fully satisfied.

History.—s. 1, ch. 4138, 1893; s. 1, ch. 4918, 1901; GS 2500; RGS 3843; CGL 5746; s. 1, ch. 80-17; s. 15, ch. 93-250; s. 12, ch. 94-170; s. 8, ch. 2007-44; s. 1, ch. 2012-49; s. 1, ch. 2023-135.

F.S. 701.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 701.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 701.04

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 701.04

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 701.04.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 701.04

Total Results: 20

Safe Harbor Equity Distressed Debt Fund 3, L.P. v. 9775 Dixie LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-05-15T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: 4 letter as required by section 701.04 of the Florida Statues,1 (ii) quiet title in the…balance of the loan secured by the mortgage. § 701.04(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2023).

THOMAS DEMASE AND JOANNE DEMASE vs STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-11-14T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: - size requirements established by section 627.701(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2009), rendered a noncompliant

2000 PRESIDENTIAL WAY LLC v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FIRST BANKS, INC., and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-08-04T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: and costs.” § 701.04(2), Fla. Stat. (2019). Here, BONY did not violate section 701.04 because no estoppel… value and that the defendants violated section 701.04, Florida Statutes, by failing to timely provide…based on First Bank’s alleged violation of section 701.04. BONY then intervened as a defendant to the action… to provide an estoppel letter violated section 701.04, Florida Statutes (2019), entitling Presidential…respect to the 2005 mortgage was valid under section 701.04. 6 Such

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure - 2019 Fast-Track Report

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2020-01-08T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: 39.6251(2)(e), 39.6251(6), 39.701(2)(d), and 39.701(4), Fla. Stat., effective July 1, 2019); ch. 2019-…39.701(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (2018), and enacting § 39.701(4)(f)-(g), Fla. Stat. (2019)). New subdivision (f)

BAUTISTA REO U.S., LLC v. ARR INVESTMENTS, INC.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-07-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 229 So. 3d 362

Snippet: Bautista REO alleging: (1) violation of section 701.04(1), Florida Statutes (2016); (2) interference …continuing to violate sections 687.04, 687.071, and 701.04, Florida Statutes, and from tortiously interfering

& SC15-2005 Nelson Serrano v. State of Florida and Nelson Serrano v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-05-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 225 So. 3d 737

Snippet: - 30 - 3d 678, 701-04 (Fla. 2013), after reviewing the evidence presented

Shelton v. The Bank of New York Mellon

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-11-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 203 So. 3d 1003, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16641

Snippet: right of redemption. Mr. Shelton relies on section 701.04, Florida Statutes (2014): Cancellation of …the Bank’s alleged failure to comply with section 701.04 is not a basis to set aside the sale.. See

Whitburn, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-12-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 190 So. 3d 1087, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18951, 2015 WL 9258474

Snippet: provide an estoppel letter in accordance with section 701.04, Florida Statutes (2014), thus abrogating Whitburn… that Wells Fargo failed to comply with section 701.04. Whitburn also alleged that the notice of sale

Dale Norman v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-02-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 159 So. 3d 205, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2178, 2015 WL 669582

Snippet: 679 F.3d at 518; Ezell, 651 F.3d at 701-04; United States v. Chester (Chester II),

Florida Peninsula Insurance Company v. Cespedes

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-12-17T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 161 So. 3d 581, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20366

Snippet: on the declarations page. Likewise, section 627.701(4)(a), Florida Statutes, required a bold warning on

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-11-14T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 131 So. 3d 643, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 836, 2013 WL 6164572, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2476

Snippet: acknowledanent required bv sections 695.03 and 701.04, Florida Statutes. *683FORM 1.982. CONTEMPT NOTICE

Essex Insurance Co. v. Integrated Drainage Solutions, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-10-04T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 124 So. 3d 947, 2013 WL 5495541, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15681

Snippet: type-size requirements established by Fla. Stat. § 627.701(4)(a) render a noncompliant hurricane deductible provision

Berkovich v. Casa Paradiso North, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-05-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 125 So. 3d 938, 2013 WL 2320680, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8466

Snippet: consent and include their signature. See § 617.0701(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005) (requiring that a “written

QBE Insurance Corp. v. Chalfonte Condominium Apartment Ass'n

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2012-05-31T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 94 So. 3d 541, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 395, 2012 WL 1947863, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1063

Snippet: appealed the dismissal of claims under section 627.701(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2009), and the denial of … (Count III), and violation of Fla. Stat. § 627.701(4)(a) (Count IV). The district court dismissed Count…concluded that the Policy did not comply with § 627.701(4)(a). The district court entered a final judgment…hurricane deductible provisions set forth in § 627.701(4)(a). Chalfonte also filed a motion to amend the …type-size requirements established by Fla. Stat. § 627.701(4)(a)? 4. Does an insurer’s failure to comply with

Kalb v. NACK HOLDING, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-02-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 79 So. 3d 175, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1541, 2012 WL 385536

Snippet: prevailed in its claim that Kalb violated Section 701.04, Florida Statutes (2010), which requires timely…, 617 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (stating "Section 701.04 is a statute in derogation of the common law and…and must be strictly construed"). Section 701.04 does not specify the mechanism by which the attorney

Spencer v. DIGIACOMO

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 62 So. 3d 1168, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8082, 2011 WL 2135634

Snippet: plaintiff to record a satisfaction of judgment. See § 701.04(1), Fla. Stat. (2009) ("Within 60 days of

In re Revisions to Simplified Forms Pursuant to Rule 10-2.1(a) of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2010-04-15T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 50 So. 3d 503, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 216, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 568, 2010 WL 1488111

Snippet: attorneys’ fees and costs. SOURCE: Section 55.141 and 701.04 Florida Statutes (40052007) FORM NOTES ARE FOR …attorneys’ fees and costs. SOURCE: Section 55.141 and 701.04 Florida Statutes (49952007) *541FORM NOTES ARE

NACK HOLDINGS, LLC v. Kalb

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-05-20T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 13 So. 3d 92, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5787, 2009 WL 1393324

Snippet: principles that mandate a reversal here. Section 701.04, Florida Statutes Paragraph 5 of the loan agreement… contravenes a controlling Florida law. Section 701.04(1), Florida Statutes (2003), specifies that: Whenever…contravene a controlling Florida statute, section 701.04(1), will not be given effect. The amended final

JP Morgan Chase v. New Millennial, LC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-03-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 6 So. 3d 681, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2221, 2009 WL 691187

Snippet: procedures outlined in section 701.04 were not followed in this case. Section 701.04 provides, in relevant part…representatives followed the procedures set forth in section 701.04 by obtaining a computer printout furnished by AmSouth… two recorded mortgages, as required by section 701.04(1). Instead, they proceeded to closing even though…for such purposes in the proper county." § 701.04(1) (emphasis added). The computer printouts faxed

Nero v. Continental Country Club R.O., Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-12-14T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 979 So. 2d 263, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 19769, 2007 WL 4352745

Snippet: alleged that the Association violated section 617.0701(4), Florida Statutes (2003). The statute allows the…by written agreement as required by section 617.0701(4)(c). If the allegations contained in the complaint…Appellants from office did not comply with section 617.0701(4). Therefore, the trial court erred in dismissing