Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 655.059 (2025)
Access to books and records; confidentiality; penalty for disclosure.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes: through the 2025 Regular Session (some sections already show 2026 laws)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
655.059 Access to books and records; confidentiality; penalty for disclosure.—
(1) The books and records of a financial institution are confidential and shall be made available for inspection and examination only:
(a) To the office or its duly authorized representative;
(b) To any person duly authorized to act for the financial institution;
(c) To any federal or state instrumentality or agency authorized to inspect or examine the books and records of an insured financial institution;
(d) With respect to an international banking corporation or international trust entity, to the home-country supervisor of the international banking corporation or international trust entity, provided:
1. The home-country supervisor provides advance notice to the office that the home-country supervisor intends to examine the Florida office of the international banking corporation or international trust entity. Such examination may be conducted onsite or offsite and may include ongoing reporting by the Florida office of the international banking corporation or international trust entity to the home-country supervisor.
2. The home-country supervisor confirms to the office that the purpose of the examination is to ensure the safety and soundness of the international banking corporation or international trust entity.
3. The books and records pertaining to customer deposit, investment, custodial, and trust accounts are not disclosed to the home-country supervisor.
4. At any time during the conduct of the examination, the office reserves the right to have an examiner present, to participate jointly in the examination, or to receive copies of all information provided to the home-country supervisor.
As used in this paragraph, the term “home-country supervisor” means the governmental entity in the international banking corporation’s or international trust entity’s home country with responsibility for the supervision and regulation of the safety and soundness of the international banking corporation or international trust entity;
(e) As compelled by a court of competent jurisdiction, pursuant to a subpoena issued pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or pursuant to a subpoena issued in accordance with state or federal law. Before the production of the books and records of a financial institution, the party seeking production must reimburse the financial institution for the reasonable costs and fees incurred in compliance with the production. If the parties disagree regarding the amount of reimbursement, the party seeking the records may request the court or agency having jurisdiction to set the amount of reimbursement;
(f) As compelled by legislative subpoena as provided by law, in which case the provisions of s. 655.057 apply;
(g) Pursuant to a subpoena, to any federal or state law enforcement or prosecutorial instrumentality authorized to investigate suspected criminal activity;
(h) As authorized by the board of directors of the financial institution; or
(i) As provided in subsection (2).
(2)(a) Each depositor, borrower, member, or stockholder has the right to inspect such books and records of a financial institution as pertain to her or his loans or accounts or the determination of her or his voting rights.
(b) The books and records pertaining to trust accounts and the deposit accounts and loans of depositors, borrowers, members, and stockholders of any financial institution shall be kept confidential by the financial institution and its directors, officers, and employees and may not be released except upon express authorization of the account holder as to her or his own accounts, loans, or voting rights. However, information relating to any loan made by a financial institution may be released without the borrower’s authorization in a manner prescribed by the board of directors for the purpose of meeting the needs of commerce and for fair and accurate credit information. Information may also be released, without the authorization of a member or depositor but in a manner prescribed by the board of directors, to verify or corroborate the existence or amount of a customer’s or member’s account when such information is reasonably provided to meet the needs of commerce and to ensure accurate credit information. In addition, a financial institution, affiliate, and its subsidiaries, and any holding company of the financial institution or subsidiary of such holding company, may furnish to one another information relating to their customers or members, subject to the requirement that each corporation receiving information that is confidential maintain the confidentiality of such information and not provide or disclose such information to any unaffiliated person or entity. Notwithstanding this paragraph, this subsection does not prohibit:
1. A financial institution from disclosing financial information as referenced in this subsection as authorized in 15 U.S.C. s. 6802 (2010).
2. The Florida office of the international banking corporation or international trust entity from sharing books and records under this subsection with the home-country supervisor in accordance with subsection (1).
3. A financial institution from disclosing the existence of and amounts on deposit in any qualified account of a decedent pursuant to s. 735.303, and from providing a copy of any affidavit delivered to the financial institution pursuant thereto, to a person authorized to receive such information under s. 735.303.
4. A financial institution from disclosing the existence of and amounts on deposit in any individual account of a decedent to a petitioner that filed with the court a petition pursuant to s. 734.1025 or s. 735.203, or to an affiant that filed with the court an affidavit for disposition without administration pursuant to s. 735.301 or s. 735.304.
History.—ss. 7, 30, ch. 89-229; s. 1, ch. 91-307; ss. 1, 29, ch. 92-303; s. 524, ch. 97-102; s. 1, ch. 97-109; s. 4, ch. 2001-243; s. 1721, ch. 2003-261; s. 9, ch. 2004-340; s. 92, ch. 2004-390; s. 2, ch. 2017-83; s. 1, ch. 2020-110.
Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 655.059
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§655.059(2c)INVADE PRIVACYDISCLOSE CONFID INFO FINANCIAL INSTITUTION REC
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: Mehrbach v. Citibank, N.A., 316 F. Supp. 3d 264 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
Mehrbach v. Citibank, N.A., 316 F. Supp. 3d 264 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “Mehrbach contends that Citibank violated Fla. Stat. § 655.059 by producing the records and breached its duty of confidentiality by failing to take legal action to resist the subpoena.”
Berkeley v. Eisen, 699 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). “§ 655.059(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1995); see § 655.”
Laterza v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 221 F. Supp. 3d 1347 (S.D. Fla. 2016). “and; § 655.059, Fla. Stat. Moreover, Chase did not obtain or use Plaintiffs’ funds in the manner contemplated in the civil theft statute when disclosing those funds to the Task Force after receiving the Search Warrant, and by transmitting Plaintiffs’ funds to the State of…”
State v. Schultz, 850 P.2d 818 (Kan. 1993). “(1993); Fla. Stat. Ann. § 655.059 (West 1993 Supp.”
Banc of Am. Inv. Servs. v. Barnett, 997 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). “Banc of America objected to number six on grounds that the documents requested were confidential pursuant to section 655.059(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2007).”
Mehrbach v. Citibank, N.A., No. 2017-2739 (D.D.C. July 11, 2018). “Mehrbach’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because (1) Fla. Stat. § 655.059 does not provide for a private cause of action, and (2) Florida law creates no duty requiring Citibank to challenge, or to refuse to comply with, such a subpoena.”
Medine v. Washington Mut., FA, 185 F.R.D. 366 (S.D. Fla. 1998). “Whether the Bank shared confidential information with the other Defendant entities concerning Bank customers without the written consent or knowledge of the customer and whether such practice violated Florida Statutes § 655.059; e. Whether Defendants’ marketing scheme and…”
Alban Osio v. Maduro Moros, No. 1:21-cv-20706 (S.D. Fla. July 13, 2023). “§ 655.059 )]. It follows, according to the Bank, that because “the customers holding blocked accounts have not authorized Sunstate to disclose any records that Sunstate may have .”
Palm Avenue Hialeah Trust v. Eisenberg, No. 1:24-cv-23586 (S.D. Fla. May 6, 2025). “” See Fla. Stat. § 655.059 (2)(b). Even so, § 655.”
News Am. Mktg. FSI LLC v. Four Corners Direct, Inc, 192 F. Supp. 3d 1277 (M.D. Fla. 2016). “) Garnishee objected to producing the subject documents, stating that pursuant to section 655.059, Florida Statutes, it could not produce the documents without a court order because Defendant objected to the production of the documents.”
Lesti v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, 297 F.R.D. 665 (M.D. Fla. 2014). “When the depositions occurred, Wells Fargo properly invoked Fla. Stat. § 655.059 to protect Fuchs’ and other non-parties’ confidential banking information.”
Foster v. Bank of Am., N.A., 215 So. 3d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). “We note that BOA’s objection to Foster’s production request was reasonable and necessary.”
655.059(1)(e): 4 cases
Mehrbach v. Citibank, N.A., 316 F. Supp. 3d 264 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “Mehrbach contends that Citibank violated Fla. Stat. § 655.059 by producing the records and breached its duty of confidentiality by failing to take legal action to resist the subpoena.”
Alban Osio v. Maduro Moros, No. 1:21-cv-20706 (S.D. Fla. July 13, 2023). “§ 655.059 )]. It follows, according to the Bank, that because “the customers holding blocked accounts have not authorized Sunstate to disclose any records that Sunstate may have .”
Ontario Wound Mgmt., LLC v. Legacy Med. Consultants, L.P., 434 So. 3d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 2026).
Mehrbach v. Citibank, N.A., No. 2017-2739 (D.D.C. July 11, 2018). “Mehrbach’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because (1) Fla. Stat. § 655.059 does not provide for a private cause of action, and (2) Florida law creates no duty requiring Citibank to challenge, or to refuse to comply with, such a subpoena.”
655.059(2)(A): 1 case
Lesti v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, 297 F.R.D. 665 (M.D. Fla. 2014). “When the depositions occurred, Wells Fargo properly invoked Fla. Stat. § 655.059 to protect Fuchs’ and other non-parties’ confidential banking information.”
655.059(2)(b): 4 cases
Berkeley v. Eisen, 699 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). “§ 655.059(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1995); see § 655.”
Banc of Am. Inv. Servs. v. Barnett, 997 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). “Banc of America objected to number six on grounds that the documents requested were confidential pursuant to section 655.059(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2007).”
News Am. Mktg. FSI LLC v. Four Corners Direct, Inc, 192 F. Supp. 3d 1277 (M.D. Fla. 2016). “) Garnishee objected to producing the subject documents, stating that pursuant to section 655.059, Florida Statutes, it could not produce the documents without a court order because Defendant objected to the production of the documents.”
Centennial Bank v. Horus Constr. Servs., Inc., No. 8:19-cv-00415 (M.D. Fla. May 12, 2020).
655.059(2)(c): 1 case
Foster v. Bank of Am., N.A., 215 So. 3d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). “We note that BOA’s objection to Foster’s production request was reasonable and necessary.”
655.059(l)(e): 2 cases
Laterza v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 221 F. Supp. 3d 1347 (S.D. Fla. 2016). “and; § 655.059, Fla. Stat. Moreover, Chase did not obtain or use Plaintiffs’ funds in the manner contemplated in the civil theft statute when disclosing those funds to the Task Force after receiving the Search Warrant, and by transmitting Plaintiffs’ funds to the State of…”
Foster v. Bank of Am., N.A., 215 So. 3d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). “We note that BOA’s objection to Foster’s production request was reasonable and necessary.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.