Florida Statute 702.03 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY

Chapter 702
FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGES AND STATUTORY LIENS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 702.03

702.03 Certain foreclosures validated.—All mortgage foreclosures heretofore made, or now pending, wherein there has been annexed to the bill of complaint in such cause, an uncertified copy of the mortgage, as provided by chapter 12095, Acts of 1927, entitled: “An act to amend section 3845 RGS relating to complaint in foreclosure of mortgages” are hereby validated and confirmed insofar as they relate to the copy of the mortgage attached to such complaint, to the same extent and effect as if section 3117, RGS, had been expressly repealed by chapter 12095, 1927, entitled: “An act to amend section 3845 RGS relating to complaint in foreclosure of mortgages.”

History.—s. 1, ch. 13642, 1929; CGL 1936 Supp. 5748(1).

F.S. 702.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 702.03 on CourtListener

Amendments to 702.03

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 702.03

Total Results: 14

United States v. Richard Junior Frazier

387 F.3d 1244, 65 Fed. R. Serv. 675, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 21503, 2004 WL 2320339

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 15, 2004 | Docket: 344446

Cited 1155 times | Published

arguments. See 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03[2][a]. Because of the powerful and potentially

Andrews v. State

533 So. 2d 841, 1988 WL 107896

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1988 | Docket: 1656583

Cited 74 times | Published

J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Weinstein's Evidence § 702[03]. (B) THE TECHNIQUE AND TESTIMONY RELATING TO

Nelson v. State

748 So. 2d 237, 1999 WL 343070

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1999 | Docket: 1504846

Cited 71 times | Published

generally Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 702.3 (1997 ed.). The objection in the present case goes

William Booker v. Sumter County Sheriff's Office/North American etc

166 So. 3d 189

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2015 | Docket: 2660703

Cited 26 times | Published

see Charles W. Ehrhardt, 1 Fla. Prac., Evidence § 702.3 (2014 ed.) (“In adopting the amendment to section

Berry v. CSX Transp., Inc.

709 So. 2d 552, 1998 WL 85601

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1998 | Docket: 1682130

Cited 26 times | Published

dissenting; see also Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence, § 702.3 at 526 & 528 n. 18 (1997)). This debate ended when

Ramirez v. State

810 So. 2d 836, 2001 WL 1628609

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2001 | Docket: 1223954

Cited 24 times | Published

community."); Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 702.3 (2000 ed.) ("Merely counting a majority of the

Clena Investments, Inc. v. XL Specialty Insurance

280 F.R.D. 653, 2012 WL 266422, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10626

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2012 | Docket: 66047243

Cited 21 times | Published

Id. at 1262-63 (citing 4 Weinstein’s Fed. Evid. § 702.03[2][a]). Moreover, where an expert opinion has

Giaimo v. Florida Autosport, Inc.

154 So. 3d 385, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19498, 2014 WL 6679290

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2014 | Docket: 60245479

Cited 17 times | Published

see Charles W. Ehrhardt, 1 Fla. Prac., Evidence § 702.3 (2014 ed.) (“In adopting the amendment to section

United States v. Masferrer

367 F. Supp. 2d 1365, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7580, 2005 WL 1009511

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2005 | Docket: 2308215

Cited 7 times | Published

1263-63 (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03). To be admissible, expert testimony must "assist

Hadden v. State

670 So. 2d 77, 1996 WL 61135

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1996 | Docket: 1245758

Cited 6 times | Published

test. 1 Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 702.3 & n. 11, at 524 (1995 ed.). [9] Judge Miner also

John R. Doolittle, as a Person Participating in the Affairs of Bay Gulf Federal Credit Union v. National Credit Union Administration

992 F.2d 1531, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13642, 1993 WL 177195

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 14, 1993 | Docket: 615341

Cited 5 times | Published

ALJ’s findings, that D.oolittle violated 12 C.F.R. § 702.3(c)(2) by not making a proper allowance for loan

Dirling v. Sarasota County Government

871 So. 2d 303, 2004 WL 832795

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2004 | Docket: 1300651

Cited 1 times | Published

generally, Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence, § 702.3 at 627-28 (2003 Ed.). If new or novel scientific

Andrew Maines and Kenneth Maines v. Marcia Drasko Fox

190 So. 3d 1135, 2016 WL 1741950, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6645

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2016 | Docket: 3060115

Published

expert’s opinion.” C. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 702.3 (2015 ed.) (quoting Gen. Elec. Co. v. Joiner

Megan E. Baan, as the Personal etc. v. Columbia County

180 So. 3d 1127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2015 | Docket: 3018839

Published

Charles W. Ehrhardt, 1 Fla. Prac., Florida Evidence § 702.3 (2015 ed.) (“When an expert is relying primarily