Florida Statute 702.03 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY

Chapter 702
FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGES AND STATUTORY LIENS

View Entire Chapter

702.03 Certain foreclosures validated.—All mortgage foreclosures heretofore made, or now pending, wherein there has been annexed to the bill of complaint in such cause, an uncertified copy of the mortgage, as provided by chapter 12095, Acts of 1927, entitled: “An act to amend section 3845 RGS relating to complaint in foreclosure of mortgages” are hereby validated and confirmed insofar as they relate to the copy of the mortgage attached to such complaint, to the same extent and effect as if section 3117, RGS, had been expressly repealed by chapter 12095, 1927, entitled: “An act to amend section 3845 RGS relating to complaint in foreclosure of mortgages.”

History.—s. 1, ch. 13642, 1929; CGL 1936 Supp. 5748(1).

F.S. 702.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 702.03 on CourtListener

Amendments to 702.03

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 702.03

Total Results: 14 | Sort by: Relevance | Newest First

Copy

United States v. Richard Junior Frazier, 387 F.3d 1244 (11th Cir. 2004).

Cited 1155 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 65 Fed. R. Serv. 675, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 21503, 2004 WL 2320339

...Proffered expert testimony generally will not help the trier of 36 fact when it offers nothing more than what lawyers for the parties can argue in closing arguments. See 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03[2][a]. Because of the powerful and potentially misleading effect of expert evidence, see Daubert, 509 U.S....

Copy

Andrews v. State, 533 So. 2d 841 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Cited 74 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 107896

J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Weinstein's Evidence § 702[03]. (B) THE TECHNIQUE AND TESTIMONY RELATING TO

Copy

Nelson v. State, 748 So. 2d 237 (Fla. 1999).

Cited 71 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1999 WL 343070

generally Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 702.3 (1997 ed.). The objection in the present case goes

Copy

William Booker v. Sumter Cnty. Sheriff's Off./North Am. etc, 166 So. 3d 189 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Cited 26 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

see Charles W. Ehrhardt, 1 Fla. Prac., Evidence § 702.3 (2014 ed.) (“In adopting the amendment to section

Copy

Berry v. CSX Transp., Inc., 709 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

Cited 26 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 85601

dissenting; see also Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence, § 702.3 at 526 & 528 n. 18 (1997)). This debate ended when

Copy

Ramirez v. State, 810 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 2001).

Cited 24 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2001 WL 1628609

community."); Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 702.3 (2000 ed.) ("Merely counting a majority of the

Copy

Clena Investments, Inc. v. XL Specialty Ins., 280 F.R.D. 653 (S.D. Fla. 2012).

Cited 21 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2012 WL 266422, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10626

...May 18, 2010). In other words, “[p]roffered expert testimony generally will not help the trier of fact when it offers nothing more than what lawyers for the parties can argue in closing arguments.” Id. at 1262-63 (citing 4 Weinstein’s Fed. Evid. § 702.03[2][a])....

Copy

Giaimo v. Florida Autosport, Inc., 154 So. 3d 385 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Cited 17 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19498, 2014 WL 6679290

see Charles W. Ehrhardt, 1 Fla. Prac., Evidence § 702.3 (2014 ed.) (“In adopting the amendment to section

Copy

United States v. Masferrer, 367 F. Supp. 2d 1365 (S.D. Fla. 2005).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7580, 2005 WL 1009511

...Proffered expert testimony generally will not help the trier of fact when it offers nothing more than factual and legal conclusions argued by experienced lawyers for the parties in closing arguments. Frazier, 387 F.3d at 1263-63 (quoting 4 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03)....

Copy

Hadden v. State, 670 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 61135

test. 1 Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 702.3 & n. 11, at 524 (1995 ed.). [9] Judge Miner also

Copy

John R. Doolittle, as a Person Participating in the Affairs of Bay Gulf Fed. Credit Union v. Nat'l Credit Union Admin., 992 F.2d 1531 (11th Cir. 1993).

Cited 5 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13642, 1993 WL 177195

ALJ’s findings, that D.oolittle violated 12 C.F.R. § 702.3(c)(2) by not making a proper allowance for loan

Copy

Dirling v. Sarasota Cnty. Gov't, 871 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 832795

generally, Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence, § 702.3 at 627-28 (2003 Ed.). If new or novel scientific

Copy

Andrew Maines & Kenneth Maines v. Marcia Drasko Fox, 190 So. 3d 1135 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2016 WL 1741950, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6645

expert’s opinion.” C. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 702.3 (2015 ed.) (quoting Gen. Elec. Co. v. Joiner

Copy

Megan E. Baan, as the Pers. etc. v. Columbia Cnty., 180 So. 3d 1127 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

Charles W. Ehrhardt, 1 Fla. Prac., Florida Evidence § 702.3 (2015 ed.) (“When an expert is relying primarily

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.