Syfert Injury Law Firm

Samantha Elaine Tsuji v. H. Bart Fleet, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2023-06-29T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: limitations period set forth in s. 733.710.” § 733.702(5), Fla. Stat. So we come to subsection (1) …two-year statute of limitations . . . in sections 733.702(5) and 733.710,” the trial court had entered judgments…action against the employee under sections 733.702(5) and 733.710(1) exonerated the employee, the district

Howitt v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-02-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 266 So. 3d 219

Snippet: arrest based upon the available evidence. Id. at 702-05. Stated differently, Taylor's decision to

Howitt v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-02-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 266 So. 3d 219

Snippet: arrest based upon the available evidence. Id. at 702-05. Stated differently, Taylor's decision to

Estate of Arroyo v. Infinity Indemnity Insurance Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-01-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 211 So. 3d 240, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 456

Snippet: section 733.702(4)(b) is followed by section 733.702(5), reiterating that nothing in section 733.702 “shall

Reyes v. Infinity Indemnity Insurance Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-01-17T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: section 733.702(4)(b) is followed by section 733.702(5), reiterating that nothing in section 733.702 “shall

Kareem Daniel Farrell v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-05-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 186 So. 3d 1046, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7069

Snippet: quoting Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 702.5, at 601-03 (2001)). See also Cheshire v. State,

Snelgrove v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2012-04-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 107 So. 3d 242, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 303, 2012 WL 1345485, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 754

Snippet: cross-examination.” Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 702.5 (2011 ed.); see also § 90.705(1), Fla. Stat. (2008

Campbell v. Racetrack Bingo, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-10-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 75 So. 3d 321, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16267, 2011 WL 4905744

Snippet: of the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act.” § 932.702(5), Fla. Stat.; see also § 932.701(2)(a)5., Fla. Stat

Citizens Property Insurance Corp. v. Hamilton

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-07-07T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 43 So. 3d 746, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9885, 2010 WL 2671808

Snippet: damages to these “other structures.” See § 627.702(5), Fla. Stat. (providing that the VPL does not “apply

Ceballo v. Citizens Property Ins. Corp.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2007-09-20T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 967 So. 2d 811

Snippet: applicable to that particular structure." § 627.702(5), Fla. Stat. (2004). Since the supplemental coverage

Goswami v. Lennox Industries, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-01-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 947 So. 2d 1221, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 886, 2007 WL 187704

Snippet: INTANGIBLE ASSETS 1. United States Patent Nos. 5,533,702; 5,993,738 and 5,835,840 (see attachment). 2. United

Bogosian v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-05-29T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 817 So. 2d 968

Snippet: quoting Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 702.5 (1998)); Sun Charm Ranch, Inc. v. City of Orlando

Flores v. Miami-Dade County

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2001-06-13T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 787 So. 2d 955

Snippet: witness. Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 702.5, at 601-03 (2001) (footnotes omitted). The doctor

May v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-11-16T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 771 So. 2d 1143

Snippet: the legislature was careful to add in section 733.702(5) that "nothing in this section shall extend…period, together with the provision in section 733.702(5) negating any use of the enlargement provision to…Carter court, relying on the fact that section 733.702(5) expressly disclaims any power to extend the two-year… or statute of repose because "section 733.702(5) expressly prohibits any court from granting an

Latman v. Costa Cruise Lines, NV

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-02-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 758 So. 2d 699

Snippet: Nautilus *702 Motor Tanker Co., 900 F.Supp. 697, 702-05 (D.N.J.1995); F/V Robins Nest, Inc. v. Atlantic

AHCA v. Estate of Johnson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1999-09-08T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 743 So. 2d 83

Snippet: statute of repose." This is because section 733.702(5) expressly prohibits any court from granting an

Milburn v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1999-08-18T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 742 So. 2d 362

Snippet: ." Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 702.5 (1998) (footnote omitted). In Sun Charm Ranch, Inc

Buettner v. CELLULAR ONE INC.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1997-09-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 700 So. 2d 48

Snippet: statute of limitations provided in sections 733.702(5) and 733.710, Florida Statutes. Appellant did not

Comerica Bank v. SDI Operating Partners

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1996-05-15T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 673 So. 2d 163

Snippet: the legislature was careful to add in section 733.702(5) that "nothing in this section shall extend…period, together with the provision in section 733.702(5) negating any use of the enlargement provision to…provision for enlargement and as to which section 733.702(5) expressly disclaims any power to enlarge. Most

University Plaza Shopping Center, Inc. v. Stewart

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1973-01-23T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 272 So. 2d 507

Snippet: Indemnity, § 15 at p. 700. [4] Ibid., pp. 700-702. [5] United States v. Seckinger, 397 U.S. 203, 90