The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . amount of deficiency between the foreclosure sale amount and the judgment amount pursuant to section 702.06 . . . However, the court cited to section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2018), which governs mortgage foreclosures . . .
. . . On review, the Florida Supreme Court disagreed with this Court's precedent and held "that section 702.06 . . .
. . . . § 702.06 ; see also Royal Palm Corp. Ctr. Ass'n v. . . .
. . . reserves jurisdiction to adjudicate a deficiency judgment claim but has not adjudicated the claim, section 702.06 . . .
. . . reserves jurisdiction to adjudicate a deficiency judgment claim but has not adjudicated the claim, section 702.06 . . . its conclusion that the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the suit under section 702.06 . . . ANALYSIS The sole issue in this case is governed by section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2014), which every . . . Section 702.06 reads in relevant part: In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore or hereafter . . . unless the court in the foreclosure action has granted or denied a claim for a deficiency judgment. § 702.06 . . .
. . . Berger, Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.06[5][b], at 702-158 (Mark S. . . . See 4 Weinstein & Berger, § 702.06[5][b], at 702-158. We affirm. III. . . .
. . . The Grants’ argument reads the foregoing statute in pari materia with section 702.06, Florida Statutes . . . See § 702.06, Fla. Stat. . . . Reading section 95.11(5)(h) in pari materia with section 702.06 is therefore unwarranted, since this . . .
. . . underlying foreclosure action, the lender filed a motion for deficiency judgment pursuant to section 702.06 . . . We note that section- 702.06 provides in relevant part that a party “shall also have the right to sue . . .
. . . In particular, he argued that section 95.11(5)(h) should be interpreted in conjunction with section 702.06 . . . Specifically, he contends that section 95.11(5)(h) must be interpreted in conjunction with section 702.06 . . . section 95.11(5)(h) does not apply to an action following a short sale, then the portion of section 702.06 . . . The language of section 702.06 does suggest that the Legislature considers an action following a short . . . Thus, our interpretation of .section 95.11(5)(h) does not render the short sale provision in section 702.06 . . .
. . . Plaintiff seeks to use that judgment to obtain a money deficiency judgment pursuant to Florida Statute 702.06 . . . Second, the court also incorrectly found that section 702.06 was unenforceable because it was “vague . . . Section 702.06 provides in pertinent part: In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore or . . . unless the court in the foreclosure action has granted or denied a claim for a deficiency judgment. § 702.06 . . . We have recently held that section 702.06 is “unambiguous” and permits a separate suit to recover a deficiency . . .
. . . separate deficiency action such as the underlying one is authorized by the plain language of section 702.06 . . . This court stated: "[T]he plain language of section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2013),[ ] authorizes the . . . in which the First District "rejected the Third District's plain language interpretation of section 702.06 . . . Section 702.06 provides as follows: In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore or hereafter . . .
. . . This court held that section 702.06, Florida Statutes, “is unambiguous,” and “the foreclosure judgment . . .
. . . We agree with the Third District’s conclusion that the plain language of section 702.06, Florida Statutes . . . The court in Higgins rejected the Third District’s plain language interpretation of section 702.06 and . . . Makar stated in his dissenting opinion in Higgins, the plain language of the 2013 amendment to section 702.06 . . .
. . . Thereafter, Appellant filed a separate action at law pursuant to section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2013 . . . Neal, Inc,, 178 So.3d 433, 436 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (holding that the unambiguous language of section 702.06 . . . original foreclosure proceeding because, under the facts of the case, the plain language of section 702.06 . . .
. . . DONI initiated its action pursuant to section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2014). Mr. . . . Florida’s deficiency decree statute, section 702.06 “binds a plaintiff [in a mortgage foreclosure action . . . PNC Bank, NA, 89 So.3d 923, 931 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (quoting § 702.06, Fla. Stat. 2008). . . . And “[a]lthough the reporters of the Restatement seem to believe that section 702.06 is something of . . .
. . . . § 702.06, Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . The resolution of this appeal comes from the language of section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2014), which . . . unless the court in the foreclosure action has granted or denied a claim for a deficiency judgment. § 702.06 . . . Both courts determined that the language in section 702.06 is unambiguous and that a separate action . . . Section 702.06 is unambiguous. . . . Thus, the plain language of section 702.06 permitted Appellant to bring the suit at issue to recover . . .
. . . The resolution of this appeal comes from the language of section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2014), which . . . unless the court in the foreclosure action has granted or denied a claim for a deficiency judgment. § 702.06 . . . Both courts determined that the language in section 702.06 is unambiguous and that a separate action . . . We agree with the Third District and Fourth District that section 702.06 is unambiguous. . . . Thus, the plain language of section 702.06 permitted Appellant to bring the suit at issue to recover . . .
. . . .” § 702.06, Fla. Stat.; Ch. 2013-137, Laws of Fla. . . . Every Florida court addressing the issue of whether section 702.06 jurisdictionally bars a separate suit . . . if the “court in the foreclosure action has granted or denied a claim for a deficiency judgment.” § 702.06 . . . Neal, Inc., 199 So.3d 932 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (agreeing with Third District decisions “that section 702.06 . . . If the statutory “right to sue” in section 702.06 results in significant problems—which appears unlikely . . . the unbroken string of district courts (save for ours) that have upheld the clear language of section 702.06 . . . The Fifth District recently held that the “plain language” of section 702.06 permitted the company to . . . And the Second District recently characterized section 702.06 as allowing the “filing of the statutorily . . . even our court has allowed an independently filed complaint for a deficiency judgment under section 702.06 . . . we return to the analysis of this court’s decision in Compass Bank: Prior to June 7, 2013, section 702.06 . . . Section 702.06 was amended in 2013 to read: In all suits for .the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore . . . In addressing Appellant’s argument, a review of the case law construing section 702.06 is instructive . . . While we agree that-the plain language of both versions of section 702.06 supports an argument that a . . . We need look no further than the plain language of section 702.06. . . .
. . . Weinberg, 190 So.3d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016), that section 702.06, Florida Statutes, is unambiguous: “The . . .
. . . . § 702.06, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .
. . . Section 702.06 gives the court power to limit deficiency judgments. . . . .” § 702.06, Fla. Stat. (2015) (emphasis added). . . .
. . . Based on the unambiguous language of section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2013) and the holding in Garcia . . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2013) 'governs suits to recover deficiencies. . . . On appeal, this Court found the language of section 702.06 to be unambiguous, and -also found the dicta . . .
. . . Analysis Section 702.06 of the Florida Statutes provides the authority for affirming the trial court’ . . . unless the court, in the foreclosure action has granted or denied a claim for a deficiency judgment. § 702.06 . . . Notwithstanding the clear and unambiguous language of section 702.06, Garcia argues that First Federal . . . We need look no further than the plain language of section 702.06. . . . The remedial nature of the 2013 amendment to section 702.06 militates against our further interpreting . . .
. . . Prior to June 7, 2013, section 702.06, Florida Statutes, which is entitled “Deficiency decree; common-law . . . Section 702.06 was amended in 2013 to read: In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore . . . In addressing Appellant’s argument, a review of the case law construing section 702.06 is instructive . . . While we agree that the plain language of both versions of section 702.06 supports an argument that a . . . Inc., 927 So.2d 41, 44-45 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (noting that section 702.06 has been interpreted to allow . . .
. . . explicitly granted the authority to enter the legal remedy of a deficiency judgment by virtue of section 702.06 . . . portion of a deficiency, should one exist, shall be within the sound judicial discretion of the court.” § 702.06 . . .
. . . . § 702.06. . . . Section 702.06 provides in relevant part: In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore or . . .
. . . . § 702.06 (2014) (“In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore or hereafter executed the . . .
. . . , and the trier of fact may accord it the weight it deems proper.” 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06 . . .
. . . amount of deficiency between the foreclosure sale amount and the judgment amount pursuant to section 702.06 . . .
. . . McLaughlin et al., Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06[2][c], at 702-138 (2d ed.2012). . . .
. . . The statute concerning deficiencies, section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2008), is more limited in nature . . . Although the reporters of the Restatement seem to believe that section 702.06 is something of a one-action . . . Section 702.06 binds a plaintiff to a deficiency decree once the plaintiff sets the deficiency process . . . With regard to the statute’s history, the legislature enacted what is now section 702.06, which took . . . Section 702.06’s grant of such power was designed to “relieve the parties from the expense and vexation . . .
. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, § 702.06[8] (2d ed.2000) (“[t]here is no requirement under Rule . . .
. . . . §§ 702.06, 702.10. . . .
. . . The appellants further rely on section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2008), which provides, in pertinent . . . but the complainant shall also have the right to sue at common law to recover such deficiency.... § 702.06 . . . We agree that, under section 702.06, the circuit court had the discretion, post-foreclosure, to allow . . . Our decision is without prejudice to the appellants’ right under section 702.06 to file a separate action . . .
. . . . & Loan Ass’n, 548 So.2d 282, 283 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (citing section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1987 . . .
. . . . § 702.06, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .
. . . action, and on about October 6, 2005, O’Neil obtained a default judgment against it in the amount of $702.06 . . .
. . . . § 702.06[1]; Redman v. John D. Brush and Co., 111 F.3d 1174 (4th Cir.1997). . . .
. . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2005) states as follows: Deficiency decree; common-law suit to recover . . . thereof at foreclosure sale and also is granted a deficiency decree against the original mortgagor. § 702.06 . . .
. . . See Weinstein & Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06 (2005). . . .
. . . foreclosure specifically retained and reserved jurisdiction to enter deficiency judgments, section 702.06 . . .
. . . Weinstein et al., Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06 (2d ed.2005). . . .
. . . .”); 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06 (“The credibility of witnesses is normally an issue left . . .
. . . . § 702.06[1], at 702-52 (2000). . . .
. . . . § 702.06[1], at 702-52 (2000). . . .
. . . Kelley, 6 F.Supp.2d 1168, 1183 (D.Kan.1998) (quoting 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06[8], p. 702 . . .
. . . See 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06[3] n. 59. . . . See 4 Weinstein’s Feder al Evidence § 702.06[3]. . . .
. . . . § 702.06[1], at 702-52 (2000). . . .
. . . Shoreline Garden Town- homes, II, Ltd., 538 So.2d 864, 866 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); § 702.06, Fla. . . .
. . . . § 702.06[8] at 702-59 (“An expert witness’s bias goes to the weight, not the admissibility of the testimony . . .
. . . of the testimony, and should be brought out on cross-examination.” 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06 . . .
. . . had access to all the information that must be contained in a recorded notice as required by section 702.06 . . .
. . . amount of deficiency between the foreclosure sale amount and the judgment amount pursuant to section 702.06 . . .
. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06[4], at 702-39 (2d ed. 1997) (“A person may qualify as an . . .
. . . of the testimony, and should be brought out on cross-examination.” 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06 . . .
. . . 634 So.2d 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (denial of deficiency on these facts an abuse of discretion); sec. 702.06 . . .
. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 702.06 at 702-29. . . .
. . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes, authorizes entry of a deficiency decree, should a deficiency exist, . . . Meyer, 100 Fla. 235, 130 So. 57 (1930); § 702.06, Fla. Stat. (1993). . Consales, N.V. v. . . .
. . . . § 702.06 (authorizing entry of deficiency decree in foreclosure proceeding). . 55 Am.Jur. . . .
. . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1991), provides: In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore . . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1985), expressly permits the bank to sue to recover a deficiency after . . .
. . . . § 702.06, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .
. . . These holdings appear to be based upon the same statutory provisions now contained in section 702.06, . . .
. . . . § 702.06, Fla.Stat. . . .
. . . . § 702.06 (West 1976). The exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed absent abuse. . . . Rather than compelling an additional, lengthy procedure, the rationale behind section 702.06 has been . . .
. . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1987), the statutory section under which the appellee/bank asserted . . .
. . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1985), expressly permits the bank to sue to recover a deficiency after . . .
. . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1983). . . .
. . . section 697.01, Florida Statutes (1983), subject to the same rules of foreclosure, and that section 702.06 . . .
. . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes; Lloyd v. Cannon, 399 So.2d 1095 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). . . .
. . . Cominole, 253 So.2d 898 (Fla.1st DCA 1971); and Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1979). . . .
. . . denied a motion for deficiency judgment sought against appellee, Dudley Kear-ney, pursuant to Section 702.06 . . .
. . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1977) provides as follows: 702.06 Deficiency decree; common law suit . . . chapter might be thought to apply only to real estate but that limitation is dispensed with when Section 702.06 . . .
. . . . § 702.06, Fla.Stat. (1979) reads in part: In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore . . .
. . . Under the policy of the Florida courts as enunciated in Florida Statutes, § 702.06, and the cases thereunder . . .
. . . Savings & Loan Assoc. would not bar the maintenance of the independent action sanctioned by Section 702.06 . . .
. . . See, however, F.S. 702.06. . $1,429,493.66. . . .
. . . to grant (or deny) deficiency decrees in mortgage foreclosure suits, provided for by statute (Sec. 702.06 . . .
. . . Statute 702.06, so heavily relied upon by respondents, does not require a plaintiff to sue in foreclosure . . .
. . . .” § 702.06, Florida Statutes (1975), provides that: “In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore . . .
. . . Section 702.06, F.S.A. — authorized the trial judge in his sound discretion to determine the portion . . .
. . . . § 702.06, F.S.A., relating to deficiency suits arising out of foreclosures, suggests a contrary result . . .
. . . See § 702.06 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Kurkjian v. Fish Carburetor Corp., Fla.App. 1962, 145 So.2d 523. . . .
. . . . § 702.06, which permits the award of deficiency judgments in the sound discretion of the court. . . .
. . . . § 702.06 (1967), F.S.A. This contention is erroneous on both points. . . .
. . . Allocca, Fla.App.1966, 187 So.2d 903; Section 702.06, Florida Statutes, F. S.A. . . .
. . . the right to secure a deficiency decree at law following a mortgage foreclosure is conferred by Sec. 702.06 . . . Nor do we find any evidence of interference with the relevant portion of Sec-702.06, supra, securing . . .
. . . The discretion to grant deficiency decrees in mortgage foreclosure suits, provided for by statute (§ 702.06 . . .
. . . The discretion to grant deficiency decrees in mortgage foreclosure suits, provided for by statute (§ 702.06 . . . Ma.Stat. § 702.06, F.S.A., states: “In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore or hereafter . . .
. . . . § 702.06, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. . . .
. . . The discretion to grant deficiency decrees in mortgage foreclosure suits, provided for by statute (§ 702.06 . . .
. . . Although § 702.06, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., in effect states that in all suits for the foreclosure of . . .
. . . . §§ 702.02 and 702.06, F.S.A. . . .
. . . Jur. 510, 525; F.S. 702.06; Degge v. First State Bank (1941), 145 Fla. 438, 199 So. 564; Tendler v. . . .
. . . The jurisdiction conferred by statute to enter a deficiency decree in a mortgage foreclosure suit [§ 702.06 . . .
. . . See § 702.06, Fla.Stat, F.S.A.; Provost v. . . .
. . . Barnett, Fla., 53 So.2d 641: “(1) Under the provisions of Section 702.06, Florida Statutes 1949, F.S. . . .
. . . deficiency decrees “within the sound judicial discretion of the court,” is provided for by statute, Section 702.06 . . .