Florida Statute 702.06 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY

Chapter 702
FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGES AND STATUTORY LIENS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 702.06

702.06 Deficiency decree; common-law suit to recover deficiency.—In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore or hereafter executed the entry of a deficiency decree for any portion of a deficiency, should one exist, shall be within the sound discretion of the court; however, in the case of an owner-occupied residential property, the amount of the deficiency may not exceed the difference between the judgment amount, or in the case of a short sale, the outstanding debt, and the fair market value of the property on the date of sale. For purposes of this section, there is a rebuttable presumption that a residential property for which a homestead exemption for taxation was granted according to the certified rolls of the latest assessment by the county property appraiser, before the filing of the foreclosure action, is an owner-occupied residential property. The complainant shall also have the right to sue at common law to recover such deficiency, unless the court in the foreclosure action has granted or denied a claim for a deficiency judgment.

History.—s. 1, ch. 11993, 1927; CGL 5751; s. 1, ch. 13625, 1929; s. 5, ch. 2013-137.

F.S. 702.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 702.06 on CourtListener

Amendments to 702.06

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 702.06

Total Results: 80

United States v. Hilario R. Alvarado, Madel Socorro

5 F.3d 1425, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28581, 1993 WL 413895

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 3, 1993 | Docket: 260119

Cited 32 times | Published

11 . See, e.g., Fla.Stat. § 702.06 (authorizing entry of deficiency decree in foreclosure

Garcia v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.

178 So. 3d 433, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14889, 2015 WL 5829818

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2015 | Docket: 2865037

Cited 18 times | Published

default judgment. II. Analysis Section 702.06 of the Florida Statutes provides the authority

Capital Bank v. Needle

596 So. 2d 1134, 1992 WL 48704

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1992 | Docket: 1358716

Cited 18 times | Published

same statutory provisions now contained in section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1989), which provide: In

Provident Nat. Bank v. THUNDERBIRD ASS'N

364 So. 2d 790

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1978 | Docket: 1513892

Cited 12 times | Published

trial court were framed. [16] See, however, F.S. 702.06. [17] $1,429,493.66.

Chrestensen v. Eurogest, Inc.

906 So. 2d 343, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1688

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2005 | Docket: 1775398

Cited 11 times | Published

jurisdiction to enter deficiency judgments, section 702.06, Florida Statutes, allows the claimant to bring

Scheneman v. Barnett

53 So. 2d 641, 1951 Fla. LEXIS 1475

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1951 | Docket: 2541076

Cited 10 times | Published

after foreclosure sale. Under the provisions of Section 702.06, Florida Statutes 1949, F.S.A., the entry of

H & F Land v. Panama City-Bay Co. Airport

736 So. 2d 1167, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 264, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 1047, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 264

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1999 | Docket: 1434171

Cited 8 times | Published

contained in a recorded notice as required by section 702.06. As such, they could and should have properly

FLAGSHIP STATE BANK, ETC. v. Drew Equipment Co.

392 So. 2d 609

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1981 | Docket: 1268665

Cited 7 times | Published

HAROLD, R., Associate Judge, concur. NOTES [1] § 702.06, Fla. Stat. (1979) reads in part: In all suits

Mandell v. Fortenberry

290 So. 2d 3

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1974 | Docket: 450727

Cited 7 times | Published

equity as well as the rule established by F.S. Section 702.06, F.S.A. authorized the trial judge in his

Kissling v. McCarthy

100 So. 2d 434

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1958 | Docket: 1226724

Cited 7 times | Published

of the court," is provided for by statute, Section 702.06, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. But, as pointed out in

Royal Palm Corporate Center Ass'n v. PNC Bank, NA

89 So. 3d 923, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4471, 2012 WL 933060

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2012 | Docket: 60308850

Cited 6 times | Published

time. The statute concerning deficiencies, section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2008), is more limited in

In Re Lockwood

5 B.R. 294, 2 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 781, 1980 Bankr. LEXIS 4782, 6 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 680

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jul 22, 1980 | Docket: 1085175

Cited 6 times | Published

Florida courts as enunciated in Florida Statutes, § 702.06, and the cases thereunder, it is likely that no

Redus Florida Commercial, LLC v. College Station Retail Center, LLC

777 F.3d 1187, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 23975, 2014 WL 7210784

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 19, 2014 | Docket: 2617337

Cited 5 times | Published

1529 (3d ed.); see, e.g., Fla. Stat. § 702.06 (2014) (“In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages

De Las Cuevas v. National Enterprises, Inc.

927 So. 2d 41, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4485, 2006 WL 782867

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2006 | Docket: 1765648

Cited 5 times | Published

had not been entered in the RTC litigation. Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2005) states as follows:

Weinstein v. Park Manor Construction Company

166 So. 2d 842

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 1964 | Docket: 1284383

Cited 5 times | Published

Associate Judge, concur. NOTES [1] Fla. Stat. § 702.06, F.S.A., states: "In all suits for the foreclosure

Galloway v. Musgrave

154 So. 2d 846

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1963 | Docket: 1693638

Cited 5 times | Published

mortgage foreclosure suits, provided for by statute (§ 702.06, Fla. Stat., F.S.A.), is not absolute and unbridled

L.A.D. Property Ventures, Inc. v. First Bank

19 So. 3d 1126, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15525, 2009 WL 3270846

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2009 | Docket: 1163220

Cited 4 times | Published

So.2d 282, 283 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (citing section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1987) and Waybright v. Turner

Timmers v. HARBOR FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN

548 So. 2d 282, 1989 WL 101073

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1989 | Docket: 2529073

Cited 4 times | Published

proceedings for entry of a deficiency judgment. Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1987), the statutory section

NCNB NAT. BK., FLA. v. Pyramid Corp.

497 So. 2d 1353

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1986 | Docket: 1689826

Cited 4 times | Published

request the court to enter a deficiency decree. Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1983). Generally a defendant

Matz v. O'CONNELL

155 So. 2d 705

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1963 | Docket: 1517468

Cited 4 times | Published

upon the maker of the note and mortgage. Although § 702.06, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., in effect states that

First Union v. Goodwin Beach Partnership

644 So. 2d 1361, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8865, 1994 WL 501294

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1994 | Docket: 1248925

Cited 3 times | Published

in the foreclosure case." 368 So.2d at 393. Section 702.06, Florida Statutes, authorizes entry of a deficiency

Prigal v. Kearn

557 So. 2d 647, 1990 WL 17505

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1990 | Docket: 456898

Cited 3 times | Published

Alternatively, he could have proceeded under section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1987) after establishing

Steketee v. Ballance Homes, Inc.

376 So. 2d 873

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1979 | Docket: 1411534

Cited 3 times | Published

maintenance of the independent action sanctioned by Section 702.06, Florida Statutes. In October, 1978, the second

Frank v. Levine

159 So. 2d 665

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1964 | Docket: 423767

Cited 3 times | Published

foreclosure sale is expressly conferred by statute. § 702.06, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. Exceptional circumstances

GAIL FLINN v. KEVIN DOTY, as Curator of the Estate of Robert A. Flinn

275 So. 3d 671

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2019 | Docket: 15897435

Cited 2 times | Published

should be entered. However, the court cited to section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2018), which governs mortgage

Dukes v. Suncoast Credit Union (In Re Dukes)

909 F.3d 1306

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 6, 2018 | Docket: 8347864

Cited 2 times | Published

judgment against Debtor. See Fla. Stat. § 702.06 ; see also Royal Palm Corp.

WHITNEY BANK, a Mississippi state v. Von Daniel Grant Jr., and Lisa D. Grant

223 So. 3d 476, 2017 WL 3360822, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11399

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2017 | Docket: 6133736

Cited 2 times | Published

the foregoing statute in pari materia with section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2015), which provides that

Aluia v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.

205 So. 3d 768, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10881

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2016 | Docket: 4111232

Cited 2 times | Published

judgments. DONI initiated its action pursuant to section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2014). Mr. Aluia filed

FDIC v. Hy Kom Dev. Co.

603 So. 2d 59, 1992 WL 171578

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1992 | Docket: 1739055

Cited 2 times | Published

within the sound judicial discretion of the court. § 702.06, Fla. Stat. (1989). However, a trial court's discretion

Ricard v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSUR. SOC.

462 So. 2d 592, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1985 | Docket: 2144933

Cited 2 times | Published

to the same rules of foreclosure, and that section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1983), applies to authorize

Bonita Real Estate Partners, LLC v. SLF IV Lending, L.P.

222 So. 3d 647, 2017 WL 2988898, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10102

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2017 | Docket: 6119788

Cited 1 times | Published

motion for deficiency judgment pursuant to section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2012), claiming that the

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. McKenna

198 So. 3d 1038, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12212, 2016 WL 4262111

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 2016 | Docket: 60256379

Cited 1 times | Published

a deficiency judgment. This court held that section 702.06, Florida Statutes, “is unambiguous,” and “the

Rojas v. Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, P.L.

142 F. Supp. 3d 1206, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151373, 2015 WL 6777609

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2015 | Docket: 64305137

Cited 1 times | Published

subsequent suits at law. See Fla. Stat. § 702.06. Section 702.06 provides in relevant part: In all suits

Hammond v. Kingsley Asset Management, LLC

144 So. 3d 673, 2014 WL 3929145, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12414

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2014 | Docket: 935069

Cited 1 times | Published

amount and the judgment amount pursuant to section 702.06, Florida Statutes. Id.-, see also Flagship

Arvelo v. Park Finance of Broward, Inc.

15 So. 3d 660, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8526, 2009 WL 1766693

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 2009 | Docket: 1192159

Cited 1 times | Published

papers did not controvert the allegation. [4] § 702.06, Fla. Stat. (2007). Deficiency claims pertaining

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Morley

915 F.2d 1517

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 30, 1990 | Docket: 66258778

Cited 1 times | Published

its “sound judicial discretion.” Fla.Stat.Ann. § 702.06 (West 1976). The exercise of that discretion will

Maudo, Inc. v. Stein

201 So. 2d 821, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4700

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1967 | Docket: 64502121

Cited 1 times | Published

Larsen v. Allocca, Fla.App.1966, 187 So.2d 903; Section 702.06, Florida Statutes, F. S.A. We do not find a

U.S. Bank, National Association v. Estate of Robert Vadney, Vadney

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2024 | Docket: 68561954

Published

3d at 464. 4 § 702.06, Fla. Stat. (2021) (emphasis added). As

STUART L. LONGMAN vs ATLANTIC COAST BANK, ROBERT J. MCKAY, WHITFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORP., DREAMFIELDS EQUESTRIAN COMMUNITY HOMEWONERS ASSOCIATION, INC. AND TDMA, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2023 | Docket: 68034317

Published

(“TDMA”). Longman argues that pursuant to section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2021), the trial court lacked

JULIO LAGO v. MERCANTIL COMMERCEBANK, N.A., etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 2021 | Docket: 59988822

Published

deficiency judgment by virtue of [Florida Statutes] section 702.06 which provides, in pertinent part, that [i]n

EDMUND ACCARDI v. REGIONS BANK

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2020 | Docket: 18726938

Published

Florida Statutes. Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2020), allows a mortgagee

DYCK-O'NEAL, INC. v. RUDOLPH HERMAN

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2020 | Docket: 18620298

Published

citations and quotation marks omitted); see also § 702.06, Fla. Stat. (2019) (“In all suits for the foreclosure

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Heather Lanham

264 So. 3d 1115

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2019 | Docket: 14556845

Published

with this Court’s precedent and held “that section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2014), permits an independent

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Oerti Stermilli

249 So. 3d 797

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2018 | Docket: 7587958

Published

judgment claim but has not adjudicated the claim, section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2014), permits the lender

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Heather Lanham

257 So. 3d 1

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2018 | Docket: 7361260

Published

judgment claim but has not adjudicated the claim, section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2014), permits the lender

Bush v. Whitney Bank

219 So. 3d 257, 2017 WL 2200223, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7182

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2017 | Docket: 6066362

Published

11(5)(h) should be interpreted in conjunction with section 702.06 of the Florida Statutes (2015) which reads:

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Meikle

215 So. 3d 604, 2017 WL 1278075, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4630

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2017 | Docket: 60264839

Published

a money deficiency judgment pursuant to Florida Statute 702.06 which is both vague and a violation of

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Konstantinos

251 So. 3d 220

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2016 | Docket: 4550689

Published

one is authorized by the plain language of section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2013), we reverse.

Sylvia Higgins and Collier Higgins v. Dyck O'Neal, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2016 | Docket: 4426695

Published

ours) that have upheld the clear language of section 702.06, Florida Statutes. The drum beat has gone

Gdovin v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.

198 So. 3d 986, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12038, 2016 WL 4204470

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2016 | Docket: 4118419

Published

District’s conclusion that the plain language of section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2013), authprizes the filing

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Rojas

197 So. 3d 1200, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10854, 2016 WL 3769012

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2016 | Docket: 4115977

Published

filed a separate action at law pursuant to section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2013), to obtain a deficiency

Collins Asset Group, LLC v. Property Asset Management, etc.

197 So. 3d 87, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10764, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1599

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2016 | Docket: 4113610

Published

post-judgment motion for deficiency judgment. § 702.06, Fla. Stat. The motion was properly filed as a

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Beckett

200 So. 3d 179, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10152, 2016 WL 3570108

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 2016 | Docket: 4109015

Published

resolution of this appeal comes from the language of section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2014), which provides in

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Hendrick

200 So. 3d 181, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10163, 2016 WL 3570112

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 2016 | Docket: 4109016

Published

resolution of this appeal comes from the language of section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2014), which provides in

Sylvia Higgins and Collier Higgins v. Dyck O'Neal, Inc.

201 So. 3d 157, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8901

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2016 | Docket: 3072184

Published

or denied a claim for a deficiency judgment.” § 702.06, Fla. Stat.; Ch. 2013-137, Laws of Fla. Because

John Cheng v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.

199 So. 3d 932, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6875, 2016 WL 2348304

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2016 | Docket: 3062268

Published

190 So.3d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016), that section 702.06, Florida Statutes, is unambiguous: “The complainant

Domenic Grosso a/k/a Domenic L. Grosso v. HSBC Bank, USA, N.A.

195 So. 3d 393, 2016 WL 1688564, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6415

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2016 | Docket: 3062296

Published

right of action to recover a deficiency judgment. § 702.06, Fla. Stat. (2015). The Borrower’s entitlement

Shaffer v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

190 So. 3d 654, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4233, 2016 WL 1062807

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2016 | Docket: 60254934

Published

Wells Fargo any deficiency judgment whatsoever. Section 702.06 gives the court power to limit deficiency judgments

Dyck-O' Neal, Inc. v. Weinberg

190 So. 3d 137, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1407, 2016 WL 403443

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2016 | Docket: 3033846

Published

jurisdiction. Based on the unambiguous language of section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2013) and the holding in

Robert G. Reid v. Compass Bank

164 So. 3d 49

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2015 | Docket: 2654135

Published

reviewable de novo). Prior to June 7, 2013, section 702.06, Florida Statutes, which is entitled “Deficiency

Trenda Kinney f/k/a Trenda Boutin and Peter Kinney v. Countrywide Home Loan Servicing, L.P.

165 So. 3d 691, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6314, 2015 WL 1934290

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2015 | Docket: 2679366

Published

remedy of a deficiency judgment by virtue of section 702.06 which provides, in pertinent part, that “[i]n

Redus Florida Commercial, LLC v. College Station Retail Center, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 19, 2014 | Docket: 2900745

Published

Property § 1529 (3d ed.); see, e.g., Fla Stat. § 702.06 (2014) (“In all suits for the foreclosure of

Franklin v. Regions Bank

25 So. 3d 621, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20026, 2009 WL 4927976

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2009 | Docket: 1193659

Published

deficiency decree. The appellants further rely on section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2008), which provides, in

Beal Bank v. P.V. Associates

782 So. 2d 999, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5252, 2001 WL 395194

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2001 | Docket: 64804891

Published

Ltd., 538 So.2d 864, 866 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); § 702.06, Fla. Stat. (1997). AFFIRMED. BARFIELD, C.J. and

Century Group, Inc. v. Premier Financial Services East, L.P.

724 So. 2d 661, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 259, 1999 WL 13278

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1999 | Docket: 64785583

Published

amount and the judgment amount pursuant to section 702.06, Florida Statutes.1 In this case, prior to

Estepa v. Jordan

678 So. 2d 876, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8834, 1996 WL 464253

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1996 | Docket: 64766902

Published

005.92 minus $175,000.00 = $57,190.10. . See § 702.06, Fla. Stat. (1995) ("In all suits for the foreclosure

PMI Mortgage Insurance v. Cavendar

615 So. 2d 710, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 1993 | Docket: 64695065

Published

and dismissed PMI’s action. PMI has appealed. Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1991), provides: In all

South Atlantic Production Credit Ass'n v. Morgan

573 So. 2d 965, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 488, 1991 WL 7108

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1991 | Docket: 64656043

Published

within the sound discretion of the trial court. § 702.06, Fla.Stat. Where a deficiency is denied, the trial

Bank of Florida v. Keenan

519 So. 2d 51, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 227, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 251, 1988 WL 4045

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1988 | Docket: 64632185

Published

entering summary judgment for the appellees. Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1985), expressly permits

Ricard v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

462 So. 2d 592, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 241, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12001

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1985 | Docket: 64609462

Published

to the same rules of foreclosure, and that section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1983), applies to authorize

Saints In Christ, Temple of the Holy Ghost v. Fowler

448 So. 2d 1158, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1984 | Docket: 64604313

Published

sound judicial discretion of the trial judge. Section 702.06, Florida Statutes; Lloyd v. Cannon, 399 So

Coppola v. Housing Investment Corp.

400 So. 2d 112, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20215

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1981 | Docket: 64583415

Published

Cominole, 253 So.2d 898 (Fla.1st DCA 1971); and Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1979). Sub judice the foregoing

Morgan v. Kearney

395 So. 2d 570, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18786

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1981 | Docket: 64581130

Published

against appellee, Dudley Kear-ney, pursuant to Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1979), and a subsequent

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Big Four Construction Co.

394 So. 2d 199, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18771

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1981 | Docket: 64580468

Published

seeking of same after repossession and sale. Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1977) provides as follows:

Bradberry v. Atlantic Bank of St. Augustine

336 So. 2d 1248, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15443

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1976 | Docket: 64554937

Published

chancery, unless otherwise provided by statute.” § 702.06, Florida Statutes (1975), provides that: “In all

Junction Bit & Tool Co. v. Village Apartments, Inc.

262 So. 2d 659, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3757

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1972 | Docket: 64526151

Published

It has been urged by petitioner that Fla.Stat. § 702.06, F.S.A., relating to deficiency suits arising

601 West 26 Corp. v. Equity Capital Co.

235 So. 2d 771, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6461

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1970 | Docket: 64514801

Published

considerations interposed by the defendants. See § 702.06 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Kurkjian v. Fish Carburetor

United States v. Skipper Smith's Marina, Inc.

283 F. Supp. 408, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7826

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1968 | Docket: 66047258

Published

case to deny the deficiency decree. See Fla.Stat. § 702.06 (1967), F.S.A. This contention is erroneous on

Frank v. Jensen

114 So. 2d 331

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1959 | Docket: 60193169

Published

the later action at law for such deficiency. See § 702.06, Fla.Stat, F.S.A.; Provost v. Swinson, 109 Fla

Florida Industrial Commission v. Hurlbert

114 So. 2d 209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1959 | Docket: 60193136

Published

53 So.2d 641: “(1) Under the provisions of Section 702.06, Florida Statutes 1949, F.S. A., the entry