Syfert Injury Law Firm

Mykel Anthony Nelson v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-06-28T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: re-sentencing. Compare Martinez v. State, 123 So. 3d 701, 704–05 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); Lundquist v. State, 254 So…2d DCA 2023); Martinez v. State, 123 So. 3d 701, 704–05 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); see also Mirutil v. State,

David William Trappman v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-02-08T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: imposition of two punishments was appropriate. Id. at 704-05. The foundation for our analysis in Hayes

T.R.W., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-02-14T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: will be viewed as a threat.” Romero, 314 So. 3d at 704–05 (quoting Elonis, 575 U.S. at 723). T.R.W. contends

JORGE ARBELAEZ v. MARTHA ORTIZ

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-02-15T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: quash. See Babcock v. Whatmore, 707 So. 2d 702, 704-05 (Fla. 1998) (holding that a defendant waives a

CRICKET KATHLEEN TOOLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-02-19T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: . 75 Id. at 705. 76 Id. at 703. 77 Id. at 704–05. 78 Id. at 705. 79 Id. 80 Phillips, 141 So

State v. Espinoza

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-01-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 264 So. 3d 1055

Snippet: In United States v. Murgio, 209 F.Supp.3d 698, 704-05 (S.D.N.Y. 2016), a case involving the Florida statutes

State v. Espinoza

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-01-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 264 So. 3d 1055

Snippet: In United States v. Murgio, 209 F.Supp.3d 698, 704-05 (S.D.N.Y. 2016), a case involving the Florida statutes

Adam Lloyd Shepard v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2018-11-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 259 So. 3d 701

Snippet: define "weapon." See majority op. at 704-05. Thus, the issue before the Court today is one

STATE OF FLORIDA v. WILLIE J. ANDERSON

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-10-10T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: a crime. See State v. Bullock, 164 So. 3d 701, 704-05 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (“Reasonable suspicion can

Woodruff-Sawyer & Co. v. Ghilotti

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-08-29T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: jurisdiction or seeking affirmative relief. 707 So. 2d at 704-05. In such cases, a court does not reach the due

MICHAEL HUDSON v. CITY OF SUNRISE

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-02-13T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: cause based on the City’s documents. See § 932.704(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (2016); see also Sanchez v. City…seizure.’” (alteration in original) (quoting § 932.704(5)(b))). Later, Hudson filed a written response to

The Sampson Farm Limited Partnership v. Parmenter

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-01-17T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 238 So. 3d 387

Snippet: affirmative relief. Babcock v. Whatmore, 707 So. 2d 702, 704-05 (Fla. 1998) (citations omitted) (quoting Hubbard

Rick Scott, in his official capacity etc. v. Gail Francati

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-03-20T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 214 So. 3d 742

Snippet: considered in a declaratory action. Id. at 704-05 (quoting Martinez v. Scanlan, 582 So.2d 1167, 1170

David Gee, Sheriff of Hillsborough County v. Grantland

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-11-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 203 So. 3d 992

Snippet: allegations of the complaint. See § 932.704(5)(a). The verified factual allegations state… the seizure. See §§ 932.703(2)(a), .704(5)(b). Under the Forfeiture Act, that determination…verifying affidavits if not. See § 932.704(5)(b). No adversarial hearing was requested. After…is requested. See §§ 932.703(2)(a), .704(5)(b). If probable cause exists, the ease moves to… support the seizure in accord with section 932.704(5)(b), and proceed to the next stage of the forfeiture

State of Florida v. C.W., a Child

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-06-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 166 So. 3d 950

Snippet: prosecute.’ ” State v. W.D., 112 So.3d 702, 704-05 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (quoting Cleveland v.

Stephen H. Snider v. Mary Lou Snider Metcalfe, etc., and Randy Ransom Culler, etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-02-04T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 157 So. 3d 422, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1427

Snippet: to avoid the judgments.” Babcock, 707 So.2d at 704-05; see also Faller, 51 So.3d at 1236 (stating that

Orlando Sanchez v. City of West Palm Beach

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-09-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 149 So. 3d 92

Snippet: there was probable cause for the seizure.” § 982.704(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (2013). The evidence Sanchez

State of Florida v. J.C., a child

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-07-09T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 141 So. 3d 756

Snippet: how to prosecute this case. See id. at 704-05. Thus, we reverse and remand the trial court’s

Bretherick v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-11-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 135 So. 3d 337, 2013 WL 5849486, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17324

Snippet: immunity provided by section 776.032(1). Section 18-1-704.5(3) of the Colorado statute provides: “Any occupant…the use of such force.” Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-704.5(3). The Colorado statute applies only to home invasion

Dinkins v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-06-05T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 125 So. 3d 968

Snippet: Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Gusow v. State, 6 So.3d 699, 704-05 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). The defendant, with due diligence