The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . Section 712.05(1), Florida Statutes (2015), provides, in part: “[A] homeowners’ association desiring . . . notice must be filed during the thirty-year period following the effective date of the root of title. § 712.05 . . .
. . . Section 712.05(1), Florida Statutes (2010), states, in part: “[A] homeowners’ association desiring to . . . circuit court, claiming that the association’s board was refusing to file the notice required under 712.05 . . .
. . . muniments of title under section 712.03(1) or by recording a proper notice under sections 712.03(2), 712.05 . . . argument concerning the failure of any interested party to file a proper notice under sections 712.03(2), 712.05 . . .
. . . Section 712.05 provides that a claim to interest in land can avoid extinguishment under the Act by filing . . .
. . . provisions under section 712.03 can be preserved by recording that interest as prescribed by sections 712.05 . . . 2003), within the “30-year period immediately following the effective date of the root of title.” § 712.05 . . .
. . . In this regard, section 712.05 of MRTA specifically provides: Any person claiming an interest in land . . . a period of not longer than 30 years after filing the same unless again filed as required herein. § 712.05 . . . be extinguished by section 712.03(1), Florida Statutes, unless those matters are filed under section 712.05 . . . H & F contends it could not and should not have had to file a claim under section 712.05 or otherwise . . . We conclude that section 712.05 clearly mandates and H & F’s predecessors had the opportunity to record . . .
. . . . § 712.05, Fla. Stat. (1989). . . . .
. . . . § 84-712.05 (Reissue 1987), and therefore not subject to public disclosure as sought by Nebraska Public . . . implementing the Act, and the trade secrets exemption to the Nebraska Public Records Act, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 84-712.05 . . . released would give advantage to business competitors and serve no public purpose_ Neb.Rev.Stat. § 84-712.05 . . . Id. § 84-712.05(3). . . . .
. . . . § 712.05, or if the claimant falls within one of the statutory exceptions. See id. § 712.03. . . . Appellants could have maintained their interest by filing the notice prescribed by Section 712.05 ... . . .
. . . . § 84-712.05, which I shall call the Nebraska Public Records Act. . . . (Reissue 1947) § 84-712.05. . . . The manifest intent of the Legislature would not be violated if the word “may” in § 84-712.05 were interpreted . . . (Reissue 1947) § 84-712.05. . . . Stat. § 84-712.05(3). Henkle & Joyce Hardware Co. v. . . .
. . . See § 712.05(1), Fla.Stat. See also Holland v. Hattaway, 438 So.2d 456 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). . . . be extinguished by section 712.03(1), Florida Statutes, unless those matters are filed under section 712.05 . . .
. . . . §§ 712.05, 712.06 (1969), was recorded in the chain of title. . . .
. . . to import separate entities for its [merchandise] said entities would not be classified under Item 712.05 . . . Customs Service classifications, plaintiff does allege that classification of the merchandise under item 712.05 . . .
. . . The merchandise was classified by the Customs Service as “optical instruments” under item 712.05 of the . . . Service’s original classification of the imported “spark detectors” as “optical instruments” under item 712.05 . . .
. . . The merchandise was classified by the Customs Service as "optical instruments” under item 712.05 of the . . . Service’s original classification of the imported "spark detectors” as "optical instruments” under item 712.05 . . .
. . . Customs had classified the merchandise as “optical instruments” under item 712.05, TSUS. . . . Service’s original classification of the imported “spark detectors” as “optical instruments” under item 712.05 . . .
. . . Customs had classified the merchandise as "optical instruments” under item 712.05, TSUS. . . . Service’s original classification of the imported "spark detectors” as "optical instruments” under item 712.05 . . .
. . . The merchandise was classified by the Customs Service as “optical instruments” under item 712.05 of the . . . measuring, checking, analyzing, or automatically controlling instruments and apparatus, and parts thereof: 712.05 . . . whether the imported articles are properly classifiable as “optical instruments,” as provided in item 712.05 . . . The parties agree that the superior heading to items 712.05 to 712.51 covers the imported articles. . . .
. . . The merchandise was classified by the Customs Service as "optical instruments” under item 712.05 of the . . . measuring, checking, analyzing, or automatically controlling instruments and apparatus, and parts thereof: 712.05 . . . whether the imported articles are properly classifiable as "optical instruments,” as provided in item 712.05 . . . The parties agree that the superior heading to items 712.05 to 712.51 covers the imported articles. . . .
. . . In considering the overall intent of MRTA we note sections 712.05 and 712.06 which provide a method of . . . interest in the land in question and both serve the same purpose as a recorded notice filed under section 712.05 . . . because of multiple ownership or other legitimate reason, the burden of filing a notice under section 712.05 . . .
. . . or who may be proceeded against as an involuntary bankrupt”. (13 Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed.), ¶ 712.05 . . .
. . . held that MRTA could extinguish such an interest if timely notice was not filed pursuant to section 712.05 . . . Since there is no evidence in the record that appellants filed timely notice under section 712.05, or . . . Under section 712.05, Florida Statutes (1981), a person claiming an interest in land may preserve it . . .
. . . or who may be proceeded against as an involuntary bankrupt”. (13 Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed.), ¶712.05 . . .
. . . claim has been placed of record for more than thirty years and no notice of claim pursuant to section 712.05 . . .
. . . Appellants could have maintained their interest by filing notice prescribed by Section 712.05, Florida . . .
. . . filing a notice within the 30-year period subsequent to the root of title in accordance with Section 712.05 . . .
. . . length of time provided and the easy way in which the City could have protected its claim, see Section 712.05 . . .
. . . .-03 and the specific provision in Section 712.05 for the protection of valid claims indicates a legislative . . .
. . . estate claimed); (2) estates or charges preserved by filing proper notices in accordance with Section 712.05 . . .
. . . specific enumeration of exceptions to the act in Section 712.03 and the specific provision in Section 712.05 . . .
. . . specific enumeration of exceptions to the act in Section 712.03 and the specific provision in Section 712.05 . . . in by two other members of his Court, construed that the legislative intent of Chapters 712.03 and 712.05 . . .
. . . Statutes, includes savings provisions whereby affected persons may protect their interests, and says: “712.05 . . . 712.09 states: “Extension of thirty year period. — If the thirty year period for filing notice under § 712.05 . . .
. . . plaintiff, since the integrators are not optical instruments nor any of the other articles named in items 712.05 . . .
. . . specific enumeration of exceptions to the act in Section 712.03 and the specific provision in Section 712.05 . . . plaintiff’s claim unless the claim is exempt from marketability under either Section 712.03 or Section 712.05 . . . the claim of the plaintiff to the title was preserved by a notice filed in accordance with Section 712.05 . . .
. . . invoices covered by the above protests, and assessed with duty at 50 per centum ad valorem under Item 712.05 . . .
. . . provided for elsewhere in the Tariff Schedule, which instruments and parts are not described under Items 712.05 . . .
. . . enumerated above, assessed with duty at the rate of 50 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of Item 712.05 . . .