Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 712.07 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 712.07 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 712.07

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
Chapter 712
MARKETABLE RECORD TITLES TO REAL PROPERTY
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 712.07
712.07 Limitations of actions and recording acts.Nothing contained in this law shall be construed to extend the period for the bringing of an action or for the doing of any other act required under any statute of limitations or to affect the operation of any statute governing the effect of the recording or the failure to record any instrument affecting land. This law shall not vitiate any curative statute.
History.s. 7, ch. 63-133.

F.S. 712.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 712.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 712.07


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 712.07
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 712.07.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 712.07

Total Results: 6

Price v. Mingo

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-11-26

Citation: 994 So. 2d 1249, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 17856, 2008 WL 4998775

Snippet: 95.031, 95.231, Florida Statutes (2008). See § 712.07, Fla. Stat. (2008); cf. Aronson v. Aronson, 930

State v. Klayman

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-11-14

Citation: 835 So. 2d 248, 2002 WL 31519926

Snippet: statute. See Fiore, 531 U.S. at 227, 121 S.Ct. 712. [7] This Court in Witt v. State, 387 So.2d 922 (Fla

H & F Land v. Panama City-Bay Co. Airport

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-06-10

Citation: 736 So. 2d 1167, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 264, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 1047

Snippet: general recording statute.[10] However, section 712.07 provides that courts should construe MRTA independent

Marshall v. Hollywood, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-05-13

Citation: 236 So. 2d 114, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2729

Snippet: dismissal of petitioner’s amended complaint. F.S. § 712.07, F.S.A. states: “Nothing contained in this Act

Marshall v. Hollywood, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-05-13

Citation: 236 So. 2d 114

Snippet: dismissal of petitioner's amended complaint. F.S. § 712.07, F.S.A. states: "Nothing contained in this Act

Thoman v. Ashley

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-12-18

Citation: 170 So. 2d 332

Snippet: Civil Procedure. See Commentary 30 P.S.A., page 712; 7 Pla. L.Rev. 125, 137. . “When a rule is adopted