The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . See §§ 718.104(2), 718.105, Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . . § 718.105(b) (2008) (“A blood-gas study shall initially be administered at rest and in a sitting position . . .
. . . . § 718.105. J.A. 239-40. . . . . § 718.105 (1995). Dr. Zaldivar’s test failed to include each of these items. . . . , which state that arterial blood gas test results “shall specify” certain information. 20 C.F.R. § 718.105 . . . The ALJ essentially looked to the requirements in § 718.105 to determine the weight that he should assign . . . At the very least, the quality standards embodied in § 718.105 identify the types of information that . . .
. . . . § 718.105(b) which requires that blood gas samples be drawn during exercise, and, to the extent that . . .
. . . . § 718.105(b)(1996). However, in disparaging the fact that Drs. . . .
. . . See §§ 718.104(4)(e) and 718.105, Fla.Stat. . . .
. . . . § 718.105(b) indicate that an arterial blood gas study should not be conducted after exercise if the . . .
. . . . § 718.105(b); 20 C.F.R. part 410, appendix to subpart D, and that therefore the test conducted after . . .
. . . . § 718.105; (2) in not considering the report and testimony of Dr. . . . was erroneous because the tests did not conform to the quality criteria established in 20 C.F.R. § 718.105 . . .
. . . . § 718.105(b) provides that if the results of blood gas tests at rest produce nonqualifying values, . . .
. . . See 20 CFR §§718.103, 718.105 (1987). . . . the results obtained at rest, and the other reporting the results of testing during exercise. 20 CFR §718.105 . . . See §§ 410.426(b) and 718.105(b) and (c). . . .
. . . . § 718.105 (1987). . . .
. . . Consolidated Coal Co., 9 Black Lung Rep. 1-137 (1986) (en banc) (construing § 718.105, which sets standards . . .
. . . . § 718.105. . . .
. . . . §§ 410-426(b); 410.428; 410.430; 718.102; 718.103; 718.105; Part 718, Appendices A, B, C; 727.206 ( . . . . §§ 206(a), 718.103, 718.105, 410.430. . . . .
. . . enforcement of the subject ordinances specified that conflict existed between the ordinances and sections 718.105 . . . A comparison of the Condominium Act and the ordinances in question reveals apparent conflict: A.§718.105 . . .