Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 718.1232 (2025)

Cable television service; resident’s right to access without extra charge.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

718.1232 Cable television service; resident’s right to access without extra charge.—No resident of any condominium dwelling unit, whether tenant or owner, shall be denied access to any available franchised or licensed cable television service, nor shall such resident or cable television service be required to pay anything of value in order to obtain or provide such service except those charges normally paid for like services by residents of, or providers of such services to, single-family homes within the same franchised or licensed area and except for installation charges as such charges may be agreed to between such resident and the provider of such services.

History.—s. 16, ch. 81-185.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1984–2007 · leading case: Marco Island Cable, Inc. v. Comcast Cablevision of the South, Inc., 509 F. Supp. 2d 1158 (M.D. Fla. 2007).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Marco Island Cable, Inc. v. Comcast Cablevision of the South, Inc., 509 F. Supp. 2d 1158 (M.D. Fla. 2007). · cites it 46× “Plaintiff argues that Fla. Stat. § 718.1232 gives residents of condominiums a statutory right to choose among available franchised or licensed cable service providers, and gives franchised or licensed cable service providers an enforceable right to serve any resident who wants…”

Beattie v. Shelter Props., IV, 457 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). · cites it 2× “See also, Chapter 82-66, Laws of Florida, section 14 (1982); section 718.1232, Florida Statutes (1981).”

Dynamic Cablevision of Florida, Inc. v. Biltmore II Condo. Assoc., Inc., 498 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). · cites it 3× “Section 718.1232, Florida Statutes (1983), provides: Cable television service; resident’s right to access without extra charge.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.