Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 7
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-01-01T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 972 So. 2d 992
Snippet: not act in good faith in accordance with section 723.021, Florida Statutes (2005), because the eviction …good faith and fair dealing required in section 723.021, which provides that "[e]very rental agreement…dealings in its performance or enforcement." § 723.021, Fla. Stat. (2005). In its pleading opposing the
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1991-01-16T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 576 So. 2d 1294
Snippet: faith and fair dealings requirement of section 723.021 of the Florida Statutes (1985), and asking for …dealings in its performance or enforcement." § 723.021, Fla. Stat. (1985). Thus, even if a park owner
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-10-04T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 550 So. 2d 1160, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2352, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5423, 1989 WL 113874
Snippet: faith and fair deal*1161ing contained in section 723.021, Florida Statutes (1985). We affirm. Here, the
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1987-12-09T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 516 So. 2d 1031, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2768, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11416, 1987 WL 2277
Snippet: , 9 So.2d 715 (1942); In re Raughley, 155 Fla. 723, 21 So.2d 212 (1945). Our disposition of this issue
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1987-05-08T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 506 So. 2d 426
Snippet: and fair dealings in rental agreements (Section 723.021); (4) regulations as to the mobile home lot rental… of a mobile home park. As required by Section 723.021, Florida Statutes (1983), the prospectus gives
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-02-10T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 396 So. 2d 199
Snippet: The 1977 return also showed a valuation of $628,723.21 for the buildings and improvements without the
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1946-05-03T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 26 So. 2d 50, 157 Fla. 395, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 752
Snippet: the same. In the case of In re Raughley, 155 Fla. 723,21 So.2d 212, and in which opinion was filed on March