Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 726.101 (2025)
Short title.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
726.101 Short title.—This act may be cited as the “Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 91
cases (14 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: Wiand Ex Rel. Valhalla Inv. Partners, L.P. v. Lee, 753 F.3d 1194 (11th Cir. 2014).
Wiand Ex Rel. Valhalla Inv. Partners, L.P. v. Lee, 753 F.3d 1194 (11th Cir. 2014). “Wiand (“the Receiver”) on the Receiver’s complaint brought pursuant to the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“FUF-TA”), Fla. Stat. § 726.101 et seq. The Receiver sought to void distributions of profits to the Lee Defendants from the receivership entities, which were used…”
Wiand v. Waxenberg, 611 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (M.D. Fla. 2009). “The Receiver brings claims pursuant to Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“FUFTA”), Fla. Stat. §§ 726.101 et seq. (Counts I, III, and V) and for unjust enrichment (Counts II, IV, and VI).”
Wiand v. Morgan, 919 F. Supp. 2d 1342 (M.D. Fla. 2013). “The Receiver has sued numerous hedge fund investors, including Samuel Ross Morgan (“Morgan”), seeking to claw back “false profits” under two theories grounded on the same illegal scheme the indictment tracks: avoidance of fraudulent transfers under Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent…”
Wiand v. Cloud, 919 F. Supp. 2d 1319 (M.D. Fla. 2013). “The Receiver has sued numerous hedge fund investors, including Diana Cloud (“Cloud”), seeking to claw back “false profits” under two theories grounded on the same illegal scheme the indictment tracks: avoidance of fraudulent transfers under Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer…”
Cuthill v. Kime (In Re Evergreen Sec., Ltd.), 319 B.R. 245 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2003). “§ 548 and in Fla. Stat. § 726.101 et. seq. 2. A trustee seeking to avoid transfers of a debtor must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the 1) Debtor transferred an interest in property and 2) the transfer was made with the actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud…”
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Barber, 85 F. Supp. 3d 1308 (M.D. Fla. 2015). “Counts 3 & 4: Avoidance of Fraudulent Transfers Based on Actual and Constructive Fraud The Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“FUFTA”), Fla. Stat. §§ 726.101 -.201, provides creditors 'with various forms of relief to avoid a debtor’s fraudulent transfer of assets or funds.”
Beal Bank, SSB v. Almand & Assocs., 780 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 2001). “[21] Concerns such as preventing fraud on creditors or fraudulent transfers, however, are more properly addressed by those statutes that prevent fraudulent transfers; for example, the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, found in chapter 726 of the Florida Statutes.”
Advest, Inc. v. Rader, 743 F. Supp. 851 (S.D. Fla. 1990). “However, the same result is reached under the successor statute, Fla.Stat. § 726.101 et seq., the Uniform Fraudulent *854 Transfer Act, as the Florida legislature substantially incorporated the legal and equitable principles of the predecessor act into the present act.”
Jonathan E. Perlman v. Bank of Am., N.A., 561 F. App'x 810 (11th Cir. 2014). “Theodule and his entities had personal and business accounts -- alleging in relevant part that it aided and abetted a breach of fiduciary duty, and that it violated the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Fla. Stat. § 726.101 et seq., by acting as the initial transferee of…”
Bakst v. Marks (In Re Marks), 131 B.R. 220 (S.D. Fla. 1991). “§§ 544 and 550 and Fla.Stat. §§ 726.101, et seq., as well as its predecessor statute Fla.”
Feltman v. Warmus (In Re Am. Way Serv. Corp.), 229 B.R. 496 (Bankr. S.D. Florida 1999). “Fla.Stat.Ann. § 726.101 etseq. 109 . Mich.”
Cathy Jackson-Platts v. Gen. Elec. Capital Corp., 727 F.3d 1127 (11th Cir. 2013). “29(6) requires an intent to delay, hinder, or defraud creditors, a proceeding under that section involves an issue of substantive law that is independent of the underlying action.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.