The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 726.101-726.112. . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101-726.201) and unjust enrichment. (ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 1, 38-52.) . . .
. . . . § 726.101. . . .
. . . provides as follows: A cause of action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .
. . . Stat. 726.101, 11 U.S.C. § 1125(c); Count X, Preliminary and Permanent Injunction. . . .
. . . Florida Statutes, provides: (1) In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .
. . . incorporating the legal standards of Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Florida Statute sections 726.101 . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101-.201, provides creditors 'with various forms of relief to avoid a debtor’s fraudulent transfer . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101-.112. Morton v. Cord Realty, Inc., 677 So.2d 1322, 1324 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1996). . . .
. . . See §§ 726.101-.201, Fla. Stat. (2000).” Id. . . .
. . . . § 726.101, et seq. . Adv. Pro. No. 8:13-ap-336-CED, Doc. No. 1. . Adv. Pro. . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq. After a thorough review, we affirm in part and reverse in part. I. . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq. After a thorough review, we affirm in part and reverse in part. I. . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101-726.210. . . . Stat. §§ 726.101-726.201, is Florida’s version of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (the "UFTA”). . . .
. . . which states in relevant part: (1) In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under §§ 726.101 . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq. . . . Stat. § 726.101(2) (defining “asset” to mean “property of a debtor”). . . . Stat. § 726.101(4). . . . .
. . . . .Section 726.108 provides: (1) In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq. (“FUFTA”), for the following reasons. . . . . § 726.101 et seq., by acting as the initial transferee of millions of dollars fraudulently transferred . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101-.201, commonly known as UFTA, to give meaning to and interpret the “delay, hinder or defraud . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101, et seq., against First-Citizens, which acquired Sun American’s deposit liabilities and . . .
. . . Han and Envión Under Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, § 726.101 et seq. . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101, et seq. (“FUFTA”), and unjust enrichment. . . . defendant was not “property” of Nadel under Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (FUFTA), Section 726.101 . . . Stat. §§ 726.101, et seq. (“FUFTA”), and unjust enrichment. . . . Stat. § 726.101, et seq.), like other UFTA schemes, a receiver may proceed under two theories, actual . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101, et seq. (“FUFTA”), and unjust enrichment. . . . Stat. §§ 726.101, et seq. (“FUFTA”), and unjust enrichment. . . . Stat. § 726.101, et seq.), like other UFTA schemes, a receiver may proceed under two theories, actual . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101, et seq. (“FUFTA”), and unjust enrichment. . . . the Receiver to bring the action under the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act (FUFTA), Section 726.101 . . . Stat. §§ 726.101, et seq. (“FUFTA”), and unjust enrichment. . . . Stat. § 726.101, et seq.), like other UFTA schemes, a receiver may proceed under two theories, actual . . .
. . . The statute provides: A cause of action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . . See § 726.101, Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq. . . .
. . . or defraud creditors or that has been transferred in a manner making the transfer voidable under ss. 726.101 . . .
. . . Receiver to pursue actions under Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (Florida Statute Sections 726.101 . . .
. . . which relies on section 544 and Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Florida Statutes sections 726.101 . . .
. . . See §§ 726.101-.201, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .
. . . § 726.110 states: "A cause of action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .
. . . fraudulent transfer voidable by other creditors under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, sections 726.101 . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq,). . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq; Wiand v. . . .
. . . Stat. 726.101, et seq. To prevail under Fla. . . . ) provides, in relevant part: "Notwithstanding voidability of a transfer or an obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .
. . . Ann. secs. 726.101 to 726.112 (West 2000); and (2) whether respondent is equitably estopped from asserting . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq. Dowling v. Davis, No. 8:06-cv-562-T-27TGW (M.D.Fla. . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101 et seq. (Counts I, III, and V) and for unjust enrichment (Counts II, IV, and VI). . . . Stat. §§ 726.101, et seq. . . .
. . . trustee’s claim was brought under Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“UFTA”), Florida Statutes § 726.101 . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq. . When Bankinvest was sold to Baez-Figueroa, it assumed Interduty’s debts. . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101, et seq. See Cumulative Annual Pocket Part Vol. 20A at p. 99 (West 2006). . . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101-.201 (2005). . . .
. . . No. 102-256 (1992), and the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“FUFTA”), Florida Statutes § 726.101 . . .
. . . Florida Statute § 726.111, specifically provides that, unless displaced by the provisions of § 726.101 . . .
. . . In this case, the debtor only became entitled to assert its claims under Florida Statute Sections 726.101 . . . plaintiff refers is Florida's Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, embodied in Florida Statute Sections 726.101 . . . For example, Florida Statute Sections 726.101, et. seq. . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101, et seq., against parties who are neither debtors nor transferees. . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101 et seq. (2002), and remand for proceedings consistent with the Florida Supreme Court decision . . .
. . . .— (1) In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101-726.112, a creditor . . .
. . . . § 726.101, et seq. . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et. seq. 2. . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101 et seq. (2002), provisions defining fraudulent transfers are similar to 11 U.S.C. § 548 . . . Stat. § 726.111 reads: Unless displaced by the provisions of ss. 726.101-726.112, the principles of law . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101 et seq. (2002), provisions defining fraudulent transfers are similar to 11 U.S.C. § 548 . . . Stat. § 726.111 reads: Unless displaced by the provisions of ss. 726.101-726.112, the principles of law . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq., as made applicable by Section 544(b) of the Code, the transfers from the Family . . . Stat. § 726.101 et seq., as made applicable by Section 544(b) of the Code, transfers from the Family . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq. (UFTA). . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq. (UFTA). . . .
. . . Stat. ch. 726.101-726.201 (West.2001). . . .
. . . A cause of action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101-726.112 is extinguished . . .
. . . See §§ 726.101-.201, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .
. . . See §§ 726.101-.112, Fla.Stat. (1999). Carbonell, however, was not able to serve Marie. . . .
. . . provides, in pertinent part, that: (1) In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .
. . . (l)In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101-726.112, a creditor, subject . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq. The B.R.E. Holding court expressly recognized the case of Sneed v. . . .
. . . the UFTA’s application: 726.111 Supplementary provisions Unless displaced by the provisions of ss. 726.101 . . .
. . . We note that the statute provides, “Unless displaced by the provisions of ss. 726.101-726.112 [the Fraudulent . . .
. . . (1) and the transfer is not so perfected before the commencement of an action for relief under ss. 726.101 . . .
. . . defendants, including Kitazawa, for violation of Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, see §§ 726.101 . . .
. . . . § 726.101 etseq. . Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. § 566.11 etseq. . See § 544(b). . . .
. . . Temporary Injunction and the Enforcement Order, it is sought'to be set aside based on Florida Statute § 726.101 . . .
. . . . §§ 544, 548 and Florida Statutes §§ 726.101, 726.105(l)(a), 726.105(l)(b), 726.106(1), and alternatively . . .
. . . as proscribed by Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (the Act) which is codified , at chapters 726.101 . . .
. . . . § 726.101, et seq. . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101 et seq. or by obtaining outside insurance. 30 U.S.C. § 933(a) (1994); 20 C.F.R. § 725.494 . . . negotiable securities in an amount sufficient to discharge its liability under the Act. 20 C.F.R. § 726.101 . . . To fulfill its obligations under section 726.101, Kaiser obtained two indemnity bonds from INA, one in . . .
. . . transactions cannot be deemed fraudulent transfers under section 56.29 (proceedings supplementary) or section 726.101 . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101 — .201, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .
. . . See §§ 726.101-.201, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .
. . . . § 726.101. . . .
. . . Ch. 726.101-.201 (Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act), and an alleged conspiracy to commit fraudulent transfers . . .
. . . . § 548 and Florida Statutes §§ 726.101-201, and could be avoided pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 544. . . .
. . . . §§ 726.4, 726.101 (1994). . Pub.L. . . .
. . . First, Defendant maintained that application of § 726.101, Fla.Stat. (1993) to transfers occurring in . . . RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF THE STATUTE In paragraph 20 of the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff cites to § 726.101 . . . Defendant argues that to apply § 726.101 FlcuStat (1993) to transfers occurring in 1988 and 1989 represents . . . provides the following: A cause of action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under §§ 726.101 . . .
. . . Florida Statute § 726.108(1) provides: In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .
. . . Florida Statute § 726.108(1) provides: In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 726.101. . . .
. . . Wayne Stoecklin in violation of §§ 726.101 et seq., Florida Statutes, Florida’s codification of the Uniform . . .
. . . Statutes (1991) provides: A cause of action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101 . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101, et seq., as well as its predecessor statute Fla.Stat. §§ 726.01 et seq. . . . purchase the two annuity contracts constituted a “transfer” for purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 544 or Fla.Stat. § 726.101 . . .
. . . The new Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act adopted by Florida under § 726.101, et seq. does not affect this . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq., the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, as the Florida legislature substantially incorporated . . . under the act which replaced section 726.01 in 1988, the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Fla.Stat. § 726.101 . . .
. . . . § 726.101. . . . .
. . . adopted by this state by Fla.Stat. 676.6-101, et seq., and a fraudulent transfer claim based on Fla.Stat. 726.101 . . .
. . . . §§ 726.101-.201 (1987). . . .
. . . . § 726.101 et seq. of certain promissory notes to the Defendants. . . .
. . . . § 726.101. The defendant transferee has answered. The matter was tried on June 6. . . .
. . . Section 726.101 et seq., Florida Statutes (1987). . . .