Cases from cite.case.law:

ANDERSON, v. McDONOUGH, E., 189 So. 3d 266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 732.506,- Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .

E. DAHLY, v. DAHLY,, 866 So. 2d 745 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Section 732.506 sets forth the statutory requirements for revocation by act: 732.506. . . . . § 732.506, Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

TAFT, a k a v. ZACK, Jr., 830 So. 2d 881 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Taft, the record reflects that she did not revoke the will by an act as contemplated by section 732.506 . . .

DALK, v. ALLEN,, 774 So. 2d 787 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . an exact copy of the original codicil, believing it to be the original, the requirements of section 732.506 . . .

In ESTATE OF TOLIN, 622 So. 2d 988 (Fla. 1993)

. . . Section 732.506 provides the procedure for revoking a will or codicil by physical act. . . . Section 732.506 provides that [a] will or codicil is revoked by the testator, or by some other person . . . Creaig argues that section 732.506 does not specifically require the destruction of the original codicil . . . Section 732.506, which describes the manner for revoking a will or codicil by a physical act, uses the . . . We note the district court's opinion inadvertently cited section 732.506, Florida Statutes (1975). . . .

In ESTATE OF TOLIN, 594 So. 2d 309 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . An original will or codicil may only be revoked consistent with the provisions of section 732.506, Fla.Stat . . .

In ESTATE OF DICKSON, BERTOGLIO, v. DICKSON, 590 So. 2d 471 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . s natural daughter who claimed that the decedent had revoked the will by cancellation under section 732.506 . . . testator performed sufficient acts of cancellation or obliteration to fall within the rubric of section 732.506 . . . We conclude that the physical acts may be sufficient to meet the requirements of section 732.506, providing . . . Section 732.506 provides for revocation by act, stating: A will or codicil is revoked by the testator . . . Whether the attempted revocation also fails under section 732.506 as acts performed with the intent and . . . cause with directions to revoke the probate of the will and order that the estate pass by intestacy. . 732.506 . . .

SRENCO S. v. SRENCO,, 549 So. 2d 774 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . court found that Lillian Paul’s will had not been revoked by her physical act, pursuant to section 732.506 . . .

IN RE ESTATE OF ARTHUR E. DAVIS,, 8 Fla. Supp. 2d 45 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1981)

. . . Section 732.506. . . .

In ESTATE GRIFFIS,, 330 So. 2d 797 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . being operative until after January 1, 1976, are not dispositive of this case (see in particular §§ 732.506 . . . See, for example and compare sections 732.506 and 732.508, F.S. . . . This determination not only comports with the common law rule (now substantially reflected in sections 732.506 . . . even though such former will is in existence at the date of the revocation of the subsequent will.” . “732.506 . . .