The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLII
ESTATES AND TRUSTS

Chapter 734
PROBATE CODE: FOREIGN PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES; ANCILLARY ADMINISTRATION

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 734

PROBATE CODE: FOREIGN PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES; ANCILLARY ADMINISTRATION

PART I

GENERAL PROVISIONS

(ss. 734.101-734.104)

PART II

JURISDICTION OVER FOREIGN PERSONAL
REPRESENTATIVES

(ss. 734.201, 734.202)

PART I

GENERAL PROVISIONS

734.101 Foreign personal representative.

734.102 Ancillary administration.

734.1025 Nonresident decedent’s testate estate with property not exceeding $50,000 in this state; determination of claims.

734.104 Foreign wills; admission to record; effect on title.

734.101 Foreign personal representative.—

(1) Personal representatives who produce authenticated copies of probated wills or letters of administration duly obtained in any state or territory of the United States may maintain actions in the courts of this state.

(2) Personal representatives appointed in any state or country may be sued in this state concerning property in this state and may defend actions or proceedings brought in this state.

(3) Debtors who have not received a written demand for payment from a personal representative or curator appointed in this state within 90 days after appointment of a personal representative in any other state or country, and whose property in Florida is subject to a mortgage or other lien securing the debt held by the foreign personal representative, may pay the foreign personal representative after the expiration of 90 days from the date of appointment of the foreign personal representative. Thereafter, a satisfaction of the mortgage or lien executed by the foreign personal representative, with an authenticated copy of the letters or other evidence of authority attached, may be recorded in the public records. The satisfaction shall be an effective discharge of the mortgage or lien, irrespective of whether the debtor making payment had received a written demand before paying the debt.

(4) Except as provided in s. 655.936, all persons indebted to the estate of a decedent, or having possession of personal property belonging to the estate, who have received no written demand from a personal representative or curator appointed in this state for payment of the debt or the delivery of the property are authorized to pay the debt or to deliver the personal property to the foreign personal representative after the expiration of 90 days from the date of appointment of the foreign personal representative.

History.—s. 1, ch. 74-106; s. 98, ch. 75-220; s. 1028, ch. 97-102; s. 170, ch. 2001-226; s. 110, ch. 2002-1; s. 16, ch. 2007-74.

Note.—Created from former s. 734.30.

734.102 Ancillary administration.—

(1) If a nonresident of this state dies leaving assets in this state, credits due from residents in this state, or liens on property in this state, a personal representative specifically designated in the decedent’s will to administer the Florida property shall be entitled to have ancillary letters issued, if qualified to act in Florida. Otherwise, the foreign personal representative of the decedent’s estate shall be entitled to have letters issued, if qualified to act in Florida. If the foreign personal representative is not qualified to act in Florida and the will names an alternate or successor who is qualified to act in Florida, the alternate or successor shall be entitled to have letters issued. Otherwise, those entitled to a majority interest of the Florida property may have letters issued to a personal representative selected by them who is qualified to act in Florida. If the decedent dies intestate and the foreign personal representative is not qualified to act in Florida, the order of preference for appointment of a personal representative as prescribed in this code shall apply. If ancillary letters are applied for by other than the domiciliary personal representative, prior notice shall be given to any domiciliary personal representative.

(2) Ancillary administration shall be commenced as provided by the Florida Probate Rules.

(3) If the will and any codicils are executed as required by the code, they shall be admitted to probate.

(4) The ancillary personal representative shall give bond as do personal representatives generally. All proceedings for appointment and administration of the estate shall be as similar to those in original administrations as possible.

(5) Unless creditors’ claims are otherwise barred by s. 733.710, the ancillary personal representative shall cause a notice to creditors to be served and published according to the requirements of chapter 733. Claims not filed in accordance with chapter 733 shall be barred as provided in s. 733.702.

(6) After the payment of all expenses of administration and claims against the estate, the court may order the remaining property held by the ancillary personal representative transferred to the foreign personal representative or distributed to the beneficiaries.

(7) Ancillary personal representatives shall have the same rights, powers, and authority as other personal representatives in Florida to manage and settle estates; to sell, lease, or mortgage local property; and to raise funds for the payment of debts, claims, and devises in the domiciliary jurisdiction. No property shall be sold, leased, or mortgaged to pay a debt or claim that is barred by any statute of limitation or of nonclaim of this state.

History.—s. 1, ch. 74-106; s. 98, ch. 75-220; s. 43, ch. 77-87; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 1029, ch. 97-102; s. 171, ch. 2001-226.

Note.—Created from former s. 734.31.

734.1025 Nonresident decedent’s testate estate with property not exceeding $50,000 in this state; determination of claims.—

(1) When a nonresident decedent dies testate and leaves property subject to administration in this state the gross value of which does not exceed $50,000 at the date of death, the foreign personal representative of the estate before the expiration of 2 years after the decedent’s death may file in the circuit court of the county where any property is located an authenticated transcript of so much of the foreign proceedings as will show the will and beneficiaries of the estate, as provided in the Florida Probate Rules. The court shall admit the will and any codicils to probate if they comply with s. 732.502(1), (2), or (3).

(2) The foreign personal representative may cause a notice to creditors to be served and published according to the relevant requirements of chapter 733. Claims not filed in accordance with chapter 733 shall be barred as provided in s. 733.702. If any claim is filed, a personal representative shall be appointed as provided in the Florida Probate Rules.

History.—s. 1, ch. 80-203; s. 10, ch. 89-340; s. 1030, ch. 97-102; s. 79, ch. 99-3; s. 172, ch. 2001-226; s. 12, ch. 2003-154.

734.104 Foreign wills; admission to record; effect on title.—

(1) An authenticated copy of the will of a nonresident that devises real property in this state, or any right, title, or interest in the property, may be admitted to record in any county of this state where the property is located at any time after 2 years from the death of the decedent or at any time after the domiciliary personal representative has been discharged if there has been no proceeding to administer the estate of the decedent in this state, provided:

(a) The will was executed as required by chapter 732; and

(b) The will has been admitted to probate in the proper court of any other state, territory, or country.

(2) A petition to admit a foreign will to record may be filed by any person and shall be accompanied by authenticated copies of the foreign will, the petition for probate, and the order admitting the will to probate. If no petition is required as a prerequisite to the probate of a will in the jurisdiction where the will of the nonresident was probated, upon proof by affidavit or certificate that no petition is required, an authenticated copy of the will may be admitted to record without an authenticated copy of a petition for probate, and the order admitting the will to record in this state shall recite that no petition was required in the jurisdiction of original probate.

(3) If the court finds that the requirements of this section have been met, it shall enter an order admitting the foreign will to record.

(4) When admitted to record, the foreign will shall be as valid and effectual to pass title to real property and any right, title, or interest therein as if the will had been admitted to probate in this state.

History.—s. 3, ch. 74-106; s. 98, ch. 75-220; s. 45, ch. 77-87; s. 229, ch. 77-104; s. 15, ch. 79-221; s. 274, ch. 79-400; s. 11, ch. 89-340; s. 173, ch. 2001-226.

Note.—Created from former s. 736.06.

PART II

JURISDICTION OVER FOREIGN
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES

734.201 Jurisdiction by act of foreign personal representative.

734.202 Jurisdiction by act of decedent.

734.201 Jurisdiction by act of foreign personal representative.—A foreign personal representative submits personally to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state in any proceeding concerning the estate by:

(1) Filing authenticated copies of the domiciliary proceedings under s. 734.104;

(2) Receiving payment of money or taking delivery of personal property, under s. 734.101; or

(3) Doing any act as a personal representative in this state that would have given the state jurisdiction over that person as an individual.

History.—s. 1, ch. 74-106; s. 99, ch. 75-220; s. 1031, ch. 97-102; s. 174, ch. 2001-226.

734.202 Jurisdiction by act of decedent.—In addition to jurisdiction conferred by s. 734.201, a foreign personal representative is subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state to the same extent that the decedent was subject to jurisdiction immediately before death.

History.—s. 1, ch. 74-106; s. 1032, ch. 97-102; s. 175, ch. 2001-226.

F.S. 734 on Google Scholar

F.S. 734 on Casetext

Amendments to 734

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 734

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S627.734 2a - FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENT - INFORMATION REPORT RE VEHICLE AND INSURANCE - M: F

S627.734 2b - FORGERY OF - SIGN WO AUTHORITY VEHICLE PROOF OF SECURITY - M: F

S627.734 2c - FORGERY - OFFER FILE FORGED WO AUTH VEH PROOF SECURITY - M: F

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 9 Pet. 711, 734, 9 L.Ed. 283 (1835) ; e.g. , 1856 Treaty, Art. I, 11 Stat. 699. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . apprehended on the battlefield in Afghanistan" and elsewhere, not while crossing the border. 553 U.S. at 734 . . . McAleenan , 435 F.Supp.3d 731, 734 - 735, 738 - 739 (ND Tex., Jan. 22, 2020) (declining to follow the . . .

C. LIU, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 140 S. Ct. 1936 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Scribner , 144 U.S. 488, 12 S.Ct. 734, 36 L.Ed. 514 (1892), a copyright case. . . . Id. , at 507, 12 S.Ct. 734 ; see also Washingtonian Publishing Co. v. . . .

C. HERNANDEZ, v. MESA, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 735 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See 899 F.3d at 734. . . .

R. PATTERSON, v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1112 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-734 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

REED v. TEXAS, 140 S. Ct. 686 (U.S. 2020)

. . . , 513 U.S. 298, 328, 115 S.Ct. 851, 130 L.Ed.2d 808 (1995) )); Ex parte Reed , 271 S.W.3d 698, 733-734 . . . Reed , 271 S.W.3d at 734. . . .

RITZEN GROUP, INC. v. JACKSON MASONRY, LLC, 140 S. Ct. 582 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Ltd. , 484 U.S. 365, 108 S.Ct. 626, 98 L.Ed.2d 740 (1988) ; In re American Mariner Industries, Inc. , 734 . . .

NATIONAL REVIEW, INC. v. E. MANN v. E., 140 S. Ct. 344 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Globe Newspaper Co. , 398 Mass. 731, 734, 500 N.E.2d 794, 797 (1986) ; Caron v. . . .

SCHINK, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 935 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Heckler , 734 F.2d 513, 518 (11th Cir. 1984) (per curiam). . . .

L. SMITH, v. SHARP,, 935 F.3d 1064 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . State, 955 P.2d 734 (Okla. Crim. App. 1998). . . .

U. S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. HUI FENG Of PC,, 935 F.3d 721 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Supp. 718, 734 (C.D. . . .

IN RE BOWLES,, 935 F.3d 1210 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. at 734. Bowles pleaded guilty to the murder of all three of the victims. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HAWKINS, a. k. a. D III, a. k. a., 934 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Haines , 803 F.3d 713, 734 (5th Cir. 2015) (finding testimony was admitted in error where agent "offere . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. HOPPER,, 934 F.3d 740 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Adams , 746 F.3d 734, 743 (7th Cir. 2014) ("When a district court incorrectly calculates the guideline . . .

ANDERSON, AS TRUSTEE FOR NEXT- OF- KIN OF ANDERSON v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Dr. M. D. HCMC D. J. A. F. HCMC M. D. s J. L. L. T. D. M. T., 934 F.3d 876 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 734-35, 122 S.Ct. 2508. . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Yocom , 433 F.3d 727, 734 (10th Cir. 2006). . . .

PARKER, v. LANDRY,, 935 F.3d 9 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . United States, 734 F.3d 100, 103 (1st Cir. 2013) ; Rodríguez-Reyes v. . . . García-Catalán, 734 F.3d at 105 (quoting Menard v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BEGAY,, 934 F.3d 1033 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . the presence of a passenger in a motor vehicle under California Penal Code section 417.3, Bolanos , 734 . . . Holder , 734 F.3d 875, 878 (9th Cir. 2013) (Cal. Penal Code § 417.3 ). Rosales-Rosales v. . . .

BOWLES, v. DESANTIS,, 934 F.3d 1230 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Martinez, 543 U.S. 371, 380-81, 125 S.Ct. 716, 160 L.Ed.2d 734 (2005) (stating that statutes should be . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. JONES,, 934 F.3d 842 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Blair , 734 F.3d 218, 226-28 (3d Cir. 2013) ; United States v. . . .

MYMAIL, LTD. v. OOVOO, LLC, IAC, 934 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . J.A. 733, J.A. 734 n.8, J.A. 740, J.A. 750-82. In Yahoo! . . .

LEWIS, v. CITY OF UNION CITY, GEORGIA,, 934 F.3d 1169 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bd. of Educ . of City of Chi. , 637 F.3d 729, 734 (7th Cir. 2011), overruled by Ortiz v. . . .

HAWKINS v. I- TV DIGITALIS TAVKOZLESI ZRT. f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V. v. i- TV f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V., 935 F.3d 211 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Islamic Republic of Iran , 734 F.3d 1175, 1181 (D.C. Cir. 2013). . . .

UNITED STATES v. NORMAN,, 935 F.3d 232 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Hemingway , 734 F.3d 323, 335 (4th Cir. 2013) (holding that a previous case, which assumed a sentencing . . .

LILLY, v. CITY OF NEW YORK NYPD No. NYPD No., 934 F.3d 222 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 734-35 & n.24, 106 S.Ct. 1531 (collecting examples of attorney's fee awards greater than the merits . . .

UNITED STATES v. HERNANDEZ- MARTINEZ, v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v., 933 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Tercero , 734 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2013), addressed an issue similar to the statutory question posed in . . .

IN RE M. STERLING,, 933 F.3d 828 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 370 U.S. 626, 634, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962) ). . . .

RAM REZ- P REZ, v. P. BARR,, 934 F.3d 47 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Holder, 734 F.3d 82, 84 (1st Cir. 2013). . . .

UNITED STATES v. SAINZ,, 933 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Tercero , 734 F.3d 979, 981 (9th Cir. 2013) ("It is well-established that the government can waive waiver . . .

BASTARDO- VALE, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES, 934 F.3d 255 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 734 F.3d 207, 212 (3d Cir. 2013) (en banc). . . . See Al-Sharif, 734 F.3d at 212. . . .

CLARK, v. WARDEN,, 934 F.3d 483 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 734 F.3d 600, 607 (6th Cir. 2013) (alteration in original) (quoting Turner v. . . . See id. at 468, 127 S.Ct. 1933 ; Huff , 734 F.3d at 607. . . . See Huff , 734 F.3d at 607. . . .

UNITED STATES v. JONES,, 935 F.3d 266 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 734, 736, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993) ). . . .

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, v. HOSPIRA, INC. v. Dr. s Dr. s, 933 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Rudolph Techs., Inc. , 734 F.3d 1352, 1356 (Fed. . . . Integrated , 734 F.3d at 1358 (quoting Cross Med. Prods., Inc. v. . . . said to have "lacked the words to describe" pemetrexed ditromethamine, see Festo VIII , 535 U.S. at 734 . . .

FIFTH THIRD MORTGAGE COMPANY, v. KAUFMAN,, 934 F.3d 585 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sasafrasnet, LLC , 734 F.3d 745, 747 (7th Cir. 2013). . . .

MOGARD, v. CITY OF MILBANK,, 932 F.3d 1184 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Walsh Cty. , 757 F.3d 734, 738 (8th Cir. 2014). . . . TCBY Sys. , 52 F.3d 734, 737 (8th Cir. 1995) (plaintiff's unsupported allegations "with no hint as to . . .

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC. v. COUNTY OF LEHIGH,, 933 F.3d 275 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . McNair , 413 U.S. 734, 741, 93 S.Ct. 2868, 37 L.Ed.2d 923 (1973) (stating Lemon provides "no more than . . .

FURGESS, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 933 F.3d 285 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Educ. , 734 F.3d 229, 236 n.11 (3d Cir. 2013). . . .

T. SCHMITT v. LAROSE,, 933 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Maryland , 380 U.S. 51, 85 S.Ct. 734, 13 L.Ed.2d 649 (1965). . . . necessary for a system of prior restraint to survive constitutional challenge. 380 U.S. at 57-59, 85 S.Ct. 734 . . . of Nashville , 274 F.3d 377, 400 (6th Cir. 2001) (discussing Freedman , 380 U.S. at 57-59, 85 S.Ct. 734 . . . Deja Vu , 274 F.3d at 377 (licensing scheme for nude dance clubs); Freedman , 380 U.S. at 61, 85 S.Ct. 734 . . .

AJINOMOTO CO. INC. v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, CJ CJ PT CJ CJ PT v. Co., 932 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Rudolph Techs., Inc. , 734 F.3d 1352, 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (quoting Cross Med. Prods., Inc. v. . . . Integrated Tech. , 734 F.3d at 1359. . . .

TEXAS, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION EEOC P. U. S., 933 F.3d 433 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . FEC , 554 U.S. 724, 734, 128 S.Ct. 2759, 171 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). . . .

UNITED STATES v. PRADO,, 933 F.3d 121 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Martinez , 543 U.S. 371, 380-82, 125 S.Ct. 716, 160 L.Ed.2d 734 (2005) (discussing the canon of constitutional . . .

INGRAM v. UNITED STATES, 932 F.3d 1084 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 734 F.3d 573, 580 (6th Cir. 2013) (holding an intervening federal court of appeals decision . . .

ASSOCIATION OF EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS AGCO CNH LLC v. BURGUM, s, 932 F.3d 727 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Supra, at 734 n.2. But neither case support that interpretation. . . .

K. W. P. By v. KANSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS In In, 931 F.3d 813 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Struebing , 734 F.3d 807, 809 (8th Cir. 2013) (alteration in original) (quoting Keil v. . . . Walsh Cty. , 757 F.3d 734, 738 (8th Cir. 2014). . . .

ORDUNO, v. PIETRZAK, v., 932 F.3d 710 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 734, 736 (9th Cir. 2010). . . .

D. LISLE, Jr. v. WELBORN,, 933 F.3d 705 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Meyerhoff , 734 F.3d 740, 743 (7th Cir. 2013), citing Marion v. . . .

VIEIRA, v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE, LLC LLC LLC, 392 F. Supp. 3d 1117 (C.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . App'x 734, 735 (9th Cir. 2016) (internal quotation marks omitted). . . . Remington Arms Co. , 24 Cal App.3d 711, 734, 101 Cal.Rptr. 314 (1972) ; see also Mazza v. Am. . . .

E. HANEY, v. J. BRENNAN,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 633 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . First Judicial District , 734 F. App'x 136, 139-40 (3d Cir. 2018). Opsatnik v. . . .

HESS, III v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY,, 931 F.3d 198 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Astrue , 621 F.3d 734, 738 (8th Cir. 2010) ("Before moving to step four, the ALJ must determine a claimant's . . .

HEISLER, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 931 F.3d 786 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Health & Senior Servs. , 421 F.3d 734, 739 (8th Cir. 2005) ); see also Montgomery v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CORNETTE,, 932 F.3d 204 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Hemingway , 734 F.3d 323, 331 (4th Cir. 2013). . . . Hemingway , 734 F.3d at 332. . . .

UNITED STATES v. GALECKI, v., 932 F.3d 176 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ritchie , 734 F. App'x 876 (4th Cir. 2018) (Ritchie II ). . . . See Ritchie II , 734 F. App'x at 878-81. Defendants framed Dr. . . . Ritchie II , 734 F. App'x at 879. . . . Our decision to "not address" every issue in the first appeal, Ritchie II , 734 F. . . . Ritchie II , 734 F. App'x at 879-81. . . .

UNITED STATES v. DEL CARPIO FRESCAS,, 932 F.3d 324 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 734, 113 S.Ct. 1770. That is, it must be prejudicial. Ibid. . . .

IN RE SCHATZ, v., 602 B.R. 411 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 2019)

. . . (In re Kopf), 245 B.R. 731, 739-40 & 734 n.16 (Bankr. D. Me. 2000). Mass. Gen. . . .

GORSS MOTELS, INC. a a E G, a a v. SAFEMARK SYSTEMS, LP,, 931 F.3d 1094 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Martinez , 543 U.S. 371, 380-81, 125 S.Ct. 716, 160 L.Ed.2d 734 (2005). . . .

SEVUGAN, v. DIRECT ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, a, 931 F.3d 610 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 351 Ill.App.3d 752, 286 Ill.Dec. 734, 814 N.E.2d 960, 967 (2004) ). . . .

IN RE VEG LIQUIDATION, INC. LLC, R. II, v. URS LP LLC LLC LLC Co. LLC LLC LLC LLC LLC IV, L. P. IV, L. P. IV L. P. L. P. L. P. LLC IV L. P., 931 F.3d 730 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Credit Based Asset Servicing & Securitization , 516 F.3d 734, 737 (8th Cir. 2008). . . .

SMITH, v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,, 932 F.3d 302 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Horwood , 58 S.W.3d 732, 734 (Tex. 2001). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BONIN,, 932 F.3d 523 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . which "targets falsity and nothing more"). 567 U.S. at 717, 719, 132 S.Ct. 2537 ; see also id . at 734 . . . Alvarez , 567 U.S. at 721, 132 S.Ct. 2537 (plurality opinion); see also id. at 734-35, 132 S.Ct. 2537 . . .

LOVELACE v. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, 931 F.3d 698 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 734. . . .

ANDERSON, v. CITY OF ROCKFORD,, 932 F.3d 494 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Pierce , 263 F.3d 734, 740 (7th Cir. 2001). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MUSCHETTE, 392 F. Supp. 3d 282 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Jiau , 734 F.3d 147, 152 (2d Cir. 2013) ). . . .

MCADAMS, v. JEFFERSON COUNTY EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS DISTRICT, INC, THE,, 931 F.3d 1132 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Governor's Council on Indian Affairs, Inc., 734 F.2d 730, 732 (11th Cir. 1984) (stating that the "most . . .

HAHN, v. MOSELEY,, 931 F.3d 295 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Wheeler , 734 F. App'x 892 (4th Cir. 2018). . . .

STATE BY AND THROUGH TENNESSEE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE,, 931 F.3d 499 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Medicine Bird Black Bear White Eagle , 63 S.W.3d 734, 772 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001) ; see also Tenn. . . . Medicine Bird Black Bear White Eagle , 63 S.W.3d 734, 772 n.58 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). . . . FEC , 554 U.S. 724, 734, 128 S.Ct. 2759, 171 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). . . .

UNITED STATES v. IWAI,, 930 F.3d 1141 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Blake , 632 F.2d 731, 734 (9th Cir. 1980) ("[U]nder the circumstances of this case the acquisition of . . . Etchin , 614 F.3d 726, 734 (7th Cir. 2010) ("The sound of someone walking around, for example, or a voice . . .

OBASI INVESTMENT LTD Wu v. TIBET PHARMACEUTICALS, INC Yu Z. L. III Co. L. L. P. L. III,, 931 F.3d 179 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Durham, 683 F.3d 734, 738 (6th Cir. 2012) ("Clayton's brief on appeal seeks to add more, but the effort . . . Durham , 683 F.3d 734 (6th Cir. 2012), a case interpreting "performing similar functions" language in . . .

UNITED STATES v. LINDSAY,, 931 F.3d 852 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 734, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993) ). . . .

MIZRAHI, v. YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U. S. A. Co., 389 F. Supp. 3d 1135 (S.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . Id. at 734. . . .

COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, v. CRAWFORD, v., 930 F.3d 715 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Crockett , 734 F.3d 594, 599 (6th Cir. 2013) ; Herrington v. Waterstone Mortg. . . . See , e.g. , Reed Elsevier , 734 F.3d at 598 ; Catamaran , 864 F.3d at 972. . . .

NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY P. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 499 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . United States , 318 U.S. 236, 244, 63 S.Ct. 561, 87 L.Ed. 734 (1943). . . .

DE LA FUENTE, v. PADILLA,, 930 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Election Comm'n , 554 U.S. 724, 734, 128 S.Ct. 2759, 171 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). . . .

IN RE BIG DOG II, LLC,, 602 B.R. 64 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . See In re Mellor, 734 F.2d 1396, 1400 n. 2 (9th Cir. 1984). . . .

SOUTHERN HENS, INCORPORATED, v. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION R., 930 F.3d 667 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Perez , 811 F.3d 730, 734 (5th Cir. 2016). . . . Sanderson Farms , 811 F.3d at 734. (quotation omitted). . . .

DAHAL, v. P. BARR,, 931 F.3d 15 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Holder, 734 F.3d 105, 110 (1st Cir. 2013) (quoting Elien v. . . .

ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a BY ADAMS OUTDOOR GP, LLC, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 930 F.3d 199 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Maryland , 380 U.S. 51, 57, 85 S.Ct. 734, 13 L.Ed.2d 649 (1965) (discussing the dangers of prior restraint . . .

CARELLO, v. AURORA POLICEMEN CREDIT UNION,, 930 F.3d 830 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Chicago , 851 F.3d 734, 738 (7th Cir. 2017) (citation omitted). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MUNIZ- SANCHEZ,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 1284 (E.D. Wash. 2019)

. . . Ashcroft , 366 F.3d 732, 734 (9th Cir. 2004). . . .

IN RE GILMAN, R. R. a v. R. R. a v., 603 B.R. 437 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rptr. 3d 734, 194 P.3d 1026.) . . .

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, v. P. BARR, R., 929 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Heckler , 734 F.2d 1359, 1365 (9th Cir. 1984) ("[W]hen challenged agency conduct allegedly renders a . . .

UNITED STATES v. RANKIN,, 929 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 489 U.S. 705, 716, 109 S.Ct. 1443, 103 L.Ed.2d 734 (1989) ). . . .

FUSARO, v. R. COGAN, C. J. A. J. Jr., 930 F.3d 241 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bennett , 564 U.S. 721, 734, 131 S.Ct. 2806, 180 L.Ed.2d 664 (2011). . . .

STARR INDEMNITY LIABILITY COMPANY, v. BRIGHTSTAR CORP., 388 F. Supp. 3d 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co., 86 N.Y.2d 685, 690, 636 N.Y.S.2d 734, 660 N.E.2d 415 (1995). . . . constitutes 'unmistakable language of condition.' "); Oppenheimer & Co., 86 N.Y.2d at 691, 636 N.Y.S.2d 734 . . . those agreed to and imposed by the parties themselves," Oppenheimer, 86 N.Y.2d at 690, 636 N.Y.S.2d 734 . . . See id. at 691, 636 N.Y.S.2d 734, 660 N.E.2d 415. . . . See Oppenheimer, 86 N.Y.2d at 691, 636 N.Y.S.2d 734, 660 N.E.2d 415 ("the nonoccurrence of the condition . . .

UNITED STATES v. MILLS,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 895 (E.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . See Uttecht, 551 U.S. at 9, 127 S.Ct. 2218 ; Morgan, 504 U.S. at 733-734, 112 S.Ct. 2222 ; Lockhart, . . .

PRIME RATE PREMIUM FINANCE CORPORATION, INC. v. E. LARSON, A., 930 F.3d 759 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 370 U.S. 626, 632, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). . . .

UNITED STATES v. SHIPP,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 300 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . D'Amico, 734 F. Supp. 2d 321, 359 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (quoting United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PAYANO,, 930 F.3d 186 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 734-35, 113 S.Ct. 1770. Here, the first two are clearly satisfied. . . . Id. at 734, 739, 113 S.Ct. 1770. . . .

FORREST, v. PARRY, PHM PHM I- IV, 930 F.3d 93 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d 734, 769 (D.N.J. 2016) ; see also Smith v. Harrah's Casino Resort of Atl. . . .

REINALT- THOMAS CORPORATION, d b a v. MAVIS TIRE SUPPLY, LLC,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 1261 (N.D. Ga. 2019)

. . . Rubinstein, M.D., P.A. , 734 F. Supp. 2d 1262, 1278 (M.D. Fla. 2010). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BRIONES, Jr., 929 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. at 734. . . . Ct. at 734-36. . . . Id. at 734. . . . Id. at 734-35. . . . Ct. at 734, and, if life without parole is imposed, it must be proportionate. . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. FINCHER,, 929 F.3d 501 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Harakaly , 734 F.3d 88, 97-99 (1st Cir. 2013). . . . See Harakaly , 734 F.3d at 97-99. . . .

UNITED STATES v. WILLIAMS,, 930 F.3d 44 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Lopez-Medina , 596 F.3d 716, 734 (10th Cir. 2010) ("We have held the rule of completeness embodied in . . .

UNITED STATES v. FIGUEROA- FIGUEROA,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 70 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . United States, 365 U.S. 505, 511, 81 S.Ct. 679, 683, 5 L.Ed.2d 734 )(Emphasis ours). . . . United States, 365 U.S. 505, 512, 81 S.Ct. 679, 5 L.Ed.2d 734 (1961)). . . .

BEVAN ASSOCIATES, LP A, INC. W. M. v. YOST, H. M. L., 929 F.3d 366 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Martinez , 543 U.S. 371, 385, 125 S.Ct. 716, 160 L.Ed.2d 734 (2005). . . .

GODINEZ v. P. BARR,, 929 F.3d 598 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 734 (quoting Marroquin-Ochoma v. Holder, 574 F.3d 574, 577 (8th Cir. 2009) ). . . .

ST. PAUL PARK REFINING CO. LLC, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD St. Co. LLC, v., 929 F.3d 610 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . RELCO Locomotives, Inc., 734 F.3d 764, 780 (8th Cir. 2013) (citing 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) ). . . . RELCO, 734 F.3d at 780. . . . See RELCO, 734 F.3d at 785 ; see also NLRB v. . . . which the employee was allegedly fired, and disparate treatment of the discharged employees.' " RELCO, 734 . . .

UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. OF PUERTO RICO UBS v. XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO. Co. Co., 929 F.3d 11 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Co., 734 F.3d 51, 56 (1st Cir. 2013), we held applying Massachusetts law that "[t]he 'or in any way involving . . . See Clark Sch. for Creative Learning, 734 F.3d at 56 (so noting). . . .

OGLESBY, v. LESAN, 929 F.3d 526 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Madson, 921 F.3d 725, 734-35 (8th Cir. 2019) (quoting Anderson, 483 U.S. at 641, 107 S.Ct. 3034 ). . . .

MALDEN TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. LLC,, 386 F. Supp. 3d 96 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Manor Drug Stores, 421 U.S. 723, 734-35, 95 S.Ct. 1917, 44 L.Ed.2d 539 (1975). . . .

M. MOTE, M. J. N. a v. CITY OF CHELSEA, v., 391 F. Supp. 3d 720 (E.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . Village of Streamwood , 734 F. . . .