741.235
Doctrine of interspousal tort immunity abrogated.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
741.235 Doctrine of interspousal tort immunity abrogated.—The common-law doctrine of interspousal tort immunity is hereby abrogated with regard to the intentional tort of battery, and the ability of a person to sue another person for the intentional tort of battery shall not be affected by any marital relationship between the persons.
History.—s. 1, ch. 85-328.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1991–1999 · leading case: Waite v. Waite
Waite v. Waite (1993)
“1988), permits a claim by a former spouse for battery against the other spouse, committed during the marriage, and prior to the effective date of section 741.235, Florida Statutes (1985), where the claim is limited to the extent of insurance coverage, the spouse was convicted of…”
Waite v. Waite (1992)
“[5] § 741.235, Fla. Stat. (1989). Nevertheless, Florida continues to apply the doctrine.”
Weiand v. State (1999)
“; § 741.235, Fla. Stat. (1997). [15] We sua sponte adopt this as an interim Standard Jury Instruction and instruct the Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases to provide us with any recommendations as to the wording of the instruction by July 1, 1999.”
Hogan v. Tavzel (1995)
“He recognized that section 741.235, Florida Statutes (1985) abrogated interspousal immunity as to the battery count.”
Snedaker v. Snedaker (1995)
“Therefore, the trial court erred in applying the change of circumstances test, which resulted in an erroneous upward modification of Wife's support payments and in an erroneous additional award of lump sum alimony.”
Richards v. Richards (1992)
“NOTES [1] We also note that the legislature abrogated interspousal immunity for battery in 1985, section 741.235, Florida Statutes, but did not alter parent-child immunity.”
Harris v. Jaquis (In Re Jaquis) (1991)
“§ 741.235 concerning the intentional tort of battery.”
Hahn v. Hahn (1992)
“§ 741.235, Fla. Stat. (1985). DELL and WARNER, JJ.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.