Cases from cite.case.law:

D. J. S. M. S. v. W. R. R., 99 So. 3d 991 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . As to jurisdiction in paternity actions, section 742.06 provides, “The court shall retain jurisdiction . . .

KOCHINSKY, v. MOORE,, 698 So. 2d 397 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . .2d 668, 669-70 (Fla.1974), the supreme court construed the language of section 742.031 and section 742.06 . . .

P. A. G. v. A. F., 602 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. 1992)

. . . The jurisdiction to modify paternity orders derives from section 742.06, Florida Statutes (1989). . . . However, section 742.06 only states that the court “shall retain jurisdiction of the cause for the purpose . . . I am unable to read section 742.06 as incorporating the authority of section 742.031 to award attorney . . .

ELLER, v. THOMAS,, 586 So. 2d 480 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Appel-lee relies on Section 742.06, which states: the court [which determines paternity] shall retain . . .

P. A. G. v. A. F., 564 So. 2d 266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Section 742.06 then provides for the retention of jurisdiction “for the purpose of entering such other . . .

BROWN, v. A. BRAY,, 300 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 1974)

. . . Section 742.06, F.S.A. provides: “742.06 Same; jurisdiction retained for future orders. — The court shall . . . We construe the language of Section 742.031 and of Section 742.06 to authorize the court to enter such . . .

D. R. T. v. O. M., 244 So. 2d 752 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . to modify the decree by way of supersession of its terms and provisions in accordance with Section 742.06 . . . S. § 742.06, F.S.A. If O. . . . have the decree established here and then modified by way of supersession in accordance with F.S. § 742.06 . . . he modified the decree by way of supersession of its terms and provisions in accordance with F.S. § 742.06 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PICKETT S FOOD SERVICE,, 360 F.2d 338 (5th Cir. 1966)

. . . in paragraph 1 (c) of the contract, and claimed the amount of $10,-575.79 ($9,833.73 expenses plus $742.06 . . .

MOCHER, v. RASMUSSEN- TAXDAL,, 180 So. 2d 488 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . to modify the decree by way of supersession of its terms and provisions in accordance with Section 742.06 . . .

CROSBY, a v. CALHOUN,, 76 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 1954)

. . . entered, application was made for a reduction of the amount of the weekly maintenance under Section 742.06 . . .