The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . . §§ 766.101, 104(a). . . . more past due on loan payments," or to any borrower who "[r]equest[s] this information." 7 C.F.R. §§ 766.101 . . . A ("FSA-2510"), 766.101(c); Def.'s Mot. Summ. J. ("Def.'s Mot.") Ex. 1, ECF No. 27-2. . . . See, e.g. , 7 C.F.R. §§ 766.101(b), 766.103(b)(2), 780. . . . accepted, the notice will be sent by first class mail to the borrower's last known address. 7 C.F.R. § 766.101 . . .
. . . application of the statutory discovery protections set forth in sections 395.0191, 395.0193, 395.0197, and 766.101 . . . within the statutory protections set forth in sections 381.028(6)(b), 395.0191(8), 395.0193(8), and 766.101 . . .
. . . See §§ 395.0191(8), 395.0193(8), 766.101(5), Fla. Stat. (2010); W. Fla. Reg’l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. . . .
. . . . §§ 766.101-.316, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . .
. . . risk management/quality assurance discovery limitations under sections 395.0191, 395.0198, 395.0197, 766.101 . . . application of the statutory discovery protections set forth in sections 395.0191, 395.0193, 395.0197, and 766.101 . . .
. . . ANALYSIS Blank Application In See, the First District below determined that section 766.101(5), Florida . . . Even if a blank application falls within the purview of sections 766.101(5) and 395.0191(8), Amendment . . . Blank Application Not Protected Under Sections 766.101(5) and 395.0191(8) Sections 766.101 and 395.0191 . . . See §§ 766.101, 395.0191, Fla. Stat. . . . Section 766.101(5) states: The investigations, proceedings, and records of a committee as described in . . .
. . . with the Acevedos’ claims for medical malpractice and negligent hiring/retention pursuant to section 766.101 . . . that he did so negligently; and that respondent Doctors Hospital was negligent pursuant to section 766.101 . . . See §§ 395.0191(8), .0193(8); § 766.101(5), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . .
. . . The language adopted in section 766.101(5), as well as in sections 395.011(9) and 395.0115(7), Florida . . .
. . . Stat. (2005) (creating a privilege for crash reports); § 766.101(5), Fla. . . .
. . . the documents contained in the Hospital’s credentialing files arise under sections 395.0191(8) and 766.101 . . . Section 766.101(5) contains essentially the same language, except that it applies to medical review committees . . . by such boards and committees if those documents are obtained from other sources. § 395.0191(8); § 766.101 . . . See § 395.0191(8); § 766.101(8); Buster, 984 So.2d at 490-91. . . . whether “a blank hospital form used for testing the competency of nurses” was protected by section 766.101 . . .
. . . See §§ 395.0191(8), 395.0193(8), and 766.101(5), Fla. . . . from liability and damages to peer review bodies or those participating in peer review process); § 766.101 . . .
. . . on the work-product doctrine as follows: Contrary to the clear effect upon [sections 395.0193(8) and 766.101 . . .
. . . See §§ 395.0191(8), .0193(8), 766.101(5), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . 7’s application to existing medical records protected under sections 395.0191(8), 395.0193(8), and 766.101 . . . See §§ 395.0191, .0193, 766.101, .1016, Florida Statutes (2007). . . . .
. . . Plaintiff also challenges the state statutes— sections 766.101, 766.1015, and 395.0193, Florida Statutes . . .
. . . credentialing files which Baptist claims are not discoverable pursuant to sections 395.0191(8) and 766.101 . . . Likewise, under section 766.101(5), Florida Statutes (2007), investigations, procedures and records of . . . discoverable under Amendment 7, but which remain exempt from discovery under sections 395.0191(8) and 766.101 . . . Such a result would violate sections 395.0191(8) and 766.101(5), the very purpose of the statutory exclusions . . . testimony before such a board or opinions formed by him or her as a result of such board meetings. . 766.101 . . .
. . . -20 (Fla.1984) (interpreting former section 768.40(4), Florida Statutes, the predecessor to section 766.101 . . . We hold that the privilege provided by sections 766.101(5) and 395.011(9), Florida Statutes, protects . . . The sections protecting records and statements in peer review are sections 395.0191(8), 395.0193(8), 766.101 . . . Stat. (2004) (providing for a “patient safety data privilege”); § 766.101, Fla. . . . See §§ 395.0191(8), 395.0193(8), 766.101(5), Fla. Stat. (2005); cf. § 766.1016(2), Fla. . . . See §§ 395.0191(8), 395.0193(8), 766.101(5), 766.1016(2), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . provided by law, including, but not limited to, those contained in ss. 395.0191, 395.0193, 395.0197, 766.101 . . . other hospital board otherwise provided by law, including, but not limited to, ss. 395.0191, 395.0193, 766.101 . . .
. . . . § 766.101 et seq. (2007). . . .
. . . Department of Health, except as otherwise provided by law, any medical review committee as defined in s. 766.101 . . .
. . . objected to production of the list, and Brandon sought a protective order under sections 395.0191 and 766.101 . . . 1229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), and was not entitled to the confidentiality protection provided by sections 766.101 . . . 450 So.2d 217, 219-20 (Fla.1984) (interpreting former section 768.40(4), the predecessor to section 766.101 . . . denied discovery of documents created by a peer review committee in civil litigation under sections 766.101 . . . Similarly, section 766.101(5), Florida Statutes (2001), provides: The investigations, proceedings, and . . .
. . . . § 1983 (Count III), medical malpractice under sections 766.101 et seq. of the Florida Statutes (Count . . .
. . . statutes, • sections 458.331(9) and 458.337(3), Florida Statutes (2005), and sections 395.0193(8) and 766.101 . . . Doe, and that the provisions of sections 395.0193(8) and 766.101(5) do not prohibit the release of the . . . disclosure in a malpractice lawsuit or other civil or administrative claim that sections 395.0193(8) and 766.101 . . . As such, the language in sections 395.0193(8) and 766.101(5) that states that these records “shall not . . . A review of the legislative history of sections 395.0193(8) and 766.101(5) reveals that prior to 1990 . . .
. . . Because we decide that the lower court erroneously concluded that section 766.101, Florida Statutes ( . . . The peer-review immunity statute, section 766.101(3)(a), provides in part: There shall be no monetary . . . It is obvious that the lower court’s interpretation of section 766.101(3)(a) in the case at bar was largely . . . committee of a state or local professional society of health care providers,” as defined in section 766.101 . . . See § 766.101(l)(b), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . Because we decide that the lower eourt erroneously concluded that section 766.101, Florida Statutes ( . . . The peer-review immunity statute, section 766.101(3)(a), provides in part: There shall be no monetary . . . It is obvious that the lower court’s interpretation of section 766.101(3)(a) in the case at bar was largely . . . committee of a state or local professional society of health care providers,” as defined in section 766.101 . . . See § 766.101(l)(b), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . "Unquestionably, the amendment would affect sections 395.0193(8) and 766.101(5), of the Florida Statutes . . .
. . . -21, wherein the court stated, “Unquestionably, the amendment would affect sections 395.0193(8) and 766.101 . . . See, e.g., § 766.101(5), Fla. . . . Stat. (2005) (peer review process); § 766.101(3), Fla. . . .
. . . petition because the documents at issue fall within the peer review privilege set forth in sections 766.101 . . . credentialing file is not subject to discovery because it falls within the statutory privilege in sections 766.101 . . . Section 766.101(5) provides that the investigations, proceedings, and records of a medical review committee . . . JFK argues that under sections 766.101(5) and 395.0191(8), proceedings and records of a review committee . . . We have concluded that a broad interpretation of section 766.101(5) is necessary to encourage frank peer . . .
. . . privileged from discovery and use in the underlying litigation pursuant to sections 395.0191(8) and 766.101 . . .
. . . Palms argues that section 766.101(5) and section 395.0191(8), Florida Statutes (2000), makes the information . . . The provisions of section 766.101(5) and section 395.0191(8) create the privilege asserted by Palms. . . . Section 766.101(5), Florida Statutes (2000), provides: The investigations, proceedings, and records of . . .
. . . Unquestionably, the amendment would affect sections 395.0193(8) and 766.101(5) of the Florida Statutes . . .
. . . The hospital objected on the ground that these forms are privileged under section 766.101(5), Florida . . . constitute “the investigations, proceedings, and records” of a medical review committee under section 766.101 . . .
. . . and data sought by Robert Ives, Jr., as personal representative, are privileged pursuant to section 766.101 . . . -220 (Fla.1984) (interpreting former section 768.40(4), Florida Statues, the predecessor to section 766.101 . . . Section 766.101(5), provides: The investigation, proceedings, and records of a [medical review] committee . . .
. . . Professional Regulation, except as otherwise provided by law, any medical review committee as defined in s. 766.101 . . .
. . . health care provider that appellant failed to serve the HMO with presuit notice as required by section 766.101 . . .
. . . from the essential requirements of law, because the report was protected from discovery by section 766.101 . . . The trial court rejected DOC’s assertion that the document was privileged under section 766.101(5), infra . . . Section 766.101(5) provides that the records of medical review committees created in conformity with . . . Section 766.101(5) provides, in pertinent part: The investigations, proceedings, and records of a committee . . . Disclosure of this document cannot be construed as a waiver of section 766.101 protection for the outside . . .
. . . grounds that the application was protected by the peer review and credentialing privileges under section 766.101 . . . Section 766.101(2), Florida Statutes (2000) requires HMO’s to form a medical review committee to screen . . . inadmissible as evidence in any civil or administrative action against a provider of health services. § 766.101 . . . In Cruger, the Supreme Court of Florida held: [T]he privilege provided by sections 766.101(5) and 395.011 . . . material ordered produced in the instant case is protected by the statutory privilege provided in ... 766.101 . . .
. . . This definition conflicts, to some extent, with section 766.101(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), which . . .
. . . . §§ 465.002, 766.101(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999). . § 766.102(1), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . . .
. . . Lingle repeatedly objected to this line of questioning citing the language in § 766.101(5), Fla. . . . Section 766.101(5), Florida Statutes (2000), states, in relevant part, The investigations, proceedings . . . Fla. 4th DCA 1999), but also because information about the peer review process is privileged under § 766.101 . . . In addressing the question of the privilege set forth in § 766.101(5), we noted in Liberty Mutual, The . . . Such information was clearly privileged pursuant to section 766.101(5). . . .
. . . Since Plaintiffs admit they have not complied with the presuit requirements of Section 766.101, Fla. . . .
. . . See § 766.101(5) Fla. Stat. (2000). . . . Section 766.101(5), Florida Statutes (2000), states, in relevant part, The investigations, proceedings . . .
. . . 12, 1996 and that Estanillo gave timely notice of intent to initiate litigation pursuant to section 766.101 . . .
. . . chapter 395, Florida Statutes (1997), and therefore, a “health care provider” as defined in section 766.101 . . . approved by the trial court’s summary judgment are protected from discovery by sections 395.0193(7) and 766.101 . . . Section 766.101(2) provides: (2) A medical review committee of a hospital or ambulatory surgical center . . . Section 766.101(5) provides: (5) The investigations, proceedings, and records of a committee as described . . . The “peer review” process of section 395.0193 and section 766.101 is directed toward physicians and the . . .
. . . We granted certiorari concluding: Section 766.101(5), Florida Statutes, provides: “[t]he investigations . . . Stat. 766.101(5) (1997). In Cruger v. . . . privileges are part of the records of the Medical Review Committee and thus, protected under section 766.101 . . . produced in the instant case is protected by the statutory privilege provided in sections 395.0191 and 766.101 . . .
. . . privilege over documents relating to staff privileges and credentialing pursuant to sections 395.019(8) and 766.101 . . . Sections 766.101(5) and 395.011, Florida Statutes, protect documents considered by a peer review committee . . .
. . . Holmes contends the information sought is privileged under sections 395.0191(8), 395.0193(7) and 766.101 . . .
. . . malpractice incident, so petitioners moved to strike him from the witness listing, arguing that under section 766.101 . . . Section 766.101(5), Florida Statutes (1997), provides that the investigation, proceedings and records . . .
. . . Although sought from different sources, they are privileged and protected from discovery under sections 766.101 . . .
. . . Section 766.101(5), Florida Statutes, provides: “[t]he investigations, proceedings, and records of [the . . . Stat. § 766.101(5) (1997). In Cruger v. . . . privileges are part of the records of the Medical Review Committee and thus, protected under section 766.101 . . .
. . . Overcash maintains that such information is not subject to disclosure because section 766.101(5), Florida . . . Statutes (1997), specifically protects such matters, making them immune from discovery: 766.101 Medical . . . that the deposition questions at issue here fall within the following exception contained in section 766.101 . . . before such a committee or opinions formed by him or her as a result of such committee’s hearings. § 766.101 . . . By enacting section 766.101(5), Florida Statutes (1997), our legislature recognized the importance of . . .
. . . 505 (providing medical review committee records a qualified privilege from discovery); Fla.Stat.ch. 766.101 . . .
. . . Columbia contends the documents are privileged pursuant to sections 766.101(5) and 395.0191(8), Florida . . . the request on five grounds, one of which included the “peer-review” privilege provided in section 766.101 . . . Section 766.101(5) provides: The investigations, proceedings and records of a committee as described . . .
. . . We reject the hospital’s contention the documents requested were privileged pursuant to section 766.101 . . .
. . . statutory medical peer review privilege established by Florida Statutes §§ 395.0191(8), 395.0193(7), and 766.101 . . . to a hospital’s “peer review panel, a committee, a disciplinary board, or a governing board”), and 766.101 . . . Ann. §§ 395.0191(8) (West Supp.1997), 395.0193(7) (West Supp.1997), 766.101(5) (West Supp. 1997). . . . The Hlis court was interpreting § 768.40(4), Florida Statutes, the predecessor to the current § 766.101 . . . courts in Holly and Segal, like the court in Hlis, were examining § 768.40(4), the predecessor to § 766.101 . . .
. . . The last issue involves the appellees’ request for attorney’s fees pursuant to section 766.101(6)(a), . . . Section 766.101(6)(a) provides: In the event that the defendant prevails in an action brought by a health . . . authorized by this section, the court shall award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to the defendant. § 766.101 . . .
. . . See § 766.102; § 768.50(2), Fla.Stat. (1985); § 766.101(l)(b); § 766.105(l)(b). . . . blood banks are listed nowhere else within the statutory definition of chapter 766; e.g., subsections 766.101 . . . Subsection 766.101(l)(b) defines health care providers as: physicians licensed under chapter 458, osteopaths . . . licensed under chapter 465, or hospitals or ambulatory surgical centers licensed under chapter 395. § 766.101 . . .
. . . they: (1) are “peer review” records protected by Florida Statutes §§ 395.0191(8), 395.0193(7), and 766.101 . . . Pan American bases its objections on Florida Statutes §§ 395.0191(8) and 766.101(5). B. . . . Section 766.101(5) applies the rule to a “[medical review] committee.” . . . . § 766.101(5) (West Supp.1997). In Cruger v. . . . We hold that the privilege provided by sections 766.101(5) and [395.0191(8) ], Florida Statutes, protects . . .
. . . sought is protected from disclosure and discovery by the provisions of sections 395.0191, 395.0193 and 766.101 . . . See §§ 395.0191(8), 395.0193(7) and 766.101(5). The petition is granted in part. . . .
. . . affirmative defenses may preclude any discovery of the factual basis for such defenses pursuant to subsection 766.101 . . . Subsection 766.101(5) states: The investigations, proceedings, and records of a committee as described . . . Auld, 450 So.2d 217 (Fla.1984), the Florida Supreme Court, in reviewing section 768.40 (renumbered 766.101 . . . In Cruger, the court stated: “We hold that the privilege provided by sections 766.101(5) and 395.011( . . . court concluded that they necessarily were part of the peer review process for purposes of section 766.101 . . . Century contends that the order infringes the peer review privilege created by subsection 766.101(5), . . . , and no cause of action for damages may arise against the Defendant; pursuant to Florida Statute § 766.101 . . .
. . . A medical review committee, as defined by section 766.101(5), Florida Statutes (1995), created the record . . . Section 766.101(5) contains the following explicit language protecting the proceedings and records of . . . recommendations, evaluations, opinions, or other actions of such committee or any members thereof. § 766.101 . . .
. . . objected to the request on the basis that it sought disclosure of documents privileged under subsections 766.101 . . . Section 766.101(5) states in relevant part: The investigations, proceedings, and records of a committee . . . Section 766.101(l)(a)l defines “committee” as a. . . . Cruger went on to hold that the privilege provided by sections 766.101(5) and 395.011(9) protects any . . . Sims is not on point, however, because the issue of privilege under section 766.101 was not involved. . . .
. . . . §§ 460.413, 766.102, 766.101(l)(b) (1993) and Catron v. . . .
. . . These provisions are comparable to those for medical review committees found in section 766.101, Florida . . . Both sections 395.0191 and 766.101 were created by chapter 85-175, Laws of Florida. . . .
. . . with the presuit investigation and notice requirements of the Medical Malpractice Reform Act, sections 766.101 . . . parts of Chapter 766 include pharmacists in the list of “health care providers,” for example, section 766.101 . . . See § 766.101(l)(b), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .
. . . In the instant case, the entity being sued is a hospital, and sections 766.101(l)(b), 766.102(1) and . . .
. . . See §§ 766.101-.316, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .
. . . Love, 599 So.2d 111 (Fla.1992) (applying Fla.Stat. ch. 766.101(5) & 395.011(9) (1989)); Miami Heart Inst . . . Reis, 638 So.2d 530 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1994) (applying Fla.Stat. ch. 766.101(5) & 395.0191(8) (1993)). . . .
. . . Love, 599 So.2d 111 (Fla.1992), in which our supreme court held that section 766.101(5), Florida Statutes . . . Section 766.101(5) provides in part: The investigations, proceedings, and records of a [medical review . . . 1990), in which the court also quashed discovery of information which was privileged under section 766.101 . . . If the legislature had intended for there to be an exception to section 766.101(5) for claims brought . . .
. . . court has previously held that nursing homes are not "health care providers” as defined in sections 766.101 . . .
. . . objecting to interrogatories 12 and «13, claiming that the information sought was privileged under sections 766.101 . . . Section 766.101 provides: (1) As used in this section: (a) The term “medical review committee” or “committee . . . As the Second District held: Discovery of material pertaining to peer review is protected by section 766.101 . . .
. . . MHI objected to the subpoenas on the ground that the records sought were privileged under sections 766.101 . . . Sections 395.0191 and 766.101(5) establish the same privilege against disclosure; section 395.-0191 applies . . . to the proceedings of all hospital boards, and section 766.101(5) applies to medical review committee . . .
. . . See § 768.50(2), Florida Statutes (1985); §§ 766.101(l)(b), .105(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1991). . . . Section 766.101(l)(b) defines health care providers as physicians licensed under chapter 458, osteopaths . . .
. . . . § 766.101 et seq. (West 1993). . . .
. . . was based upon the exclusion of nursing homes from definitions of “health care provider” in sections 766.101 . . .
. . . Section 768.40(6)(b), Florida Statutes (1987) was renumbered as section 766.101(6)(b), Florida Statutes . . .
. . . .-0115(8)(b) and 766.101(6)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), violate the constitution. . . .
. . . District Court of Appeal invalidated sections 395.01l(10)(b) 395.0115(5)(b), Florida Statutes (1987), and 766.101 . . . The issue before the Court is whether sections 395.011(10)(b), 395.0115(5)(b), and 766.101(6)(b), which . . . We hold that sections 395.011(10)(b), 395.-0115(5)(b) and 766.101(6)(b) are unconstitutional because . . . Thus, Psychiatric Associates argued that sections 395.011, 395.0115, and 766.101 provided them statutory . . . Section 766.101(6)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988), reads as follows: As a condition of any health . . .
. . . . § 766.101, et seq. 1990), there is a separate section relating to the liability of health care facilities . . .
. . . Love, 599 So.2d 111 (Fla.1992), the supreme court again gave section 766.101(5), Florida Statutes (1989 . . . Unlike the language in section 458.3315, section 766.101(5) at issue in Holly v. Auld and Cruger v. . . . The language adopted in section 766.101(5), as well as in sections 395.011(9) and 395.0115(7), Florida . . . This provision, now renumbered § 766.101(5), Fla.Stat. (1991), is part of the statutory provision according . . .
. . . hospital committee meeting and, thus, the proceedings were privileged from discovery under Section 766.101 . . . meeting is absolutely protected from discovery by the medical review committee privilege in Section 766.101 . . . Section 766.101(5) provides immunity from liability for medical review committees and states in pertinent . . . Section 766.101(1) defines a medical review committee, for purposes of the privilege, and states that . . . apparent that the meeting was not the type of medical review committee meeting envisioned in Section 766.101 . . .
. . . District Court of Appeal held that the documents were privileged from discovery by virtue of sections 766.101 . . . Sections 766.101 and 395.011 pertain to peer review and credentialing by hospitals and other health care . . . Section 766.101(2) requires that medical review committees screen, evaluate, and review the professional . . . Section 766.101(5), provides: The investigations, proceedings, and records of a [medical review] committee . . . We hold that the privilege provided by sections 766.101(5) and 395.011(9), Florida Statutes, protects . . . 1316-17 (Allen, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part), the language of sections 395.011(9) and 766.101 . . . ,” and “records” except those that are “otherwise available from original sources.” §§ 395.011(9) & 766.101 . . .
. . . Hospital, and Walter Jones, M.D., for failure to post a bond pursuant to sections 395.0115(8)(b), and 766.101 . . . Oct. 25, 1990), and hold that sections 395.-0115(8)(b), and 766.101(6)(b), requiring the posting of a . . .
. . . Nursing homes are not included in the definition of health care provider in either section 766.101(l) . . .
. . . See § 766.101(5), Fla.Stat. (1989); § 395.011(9), Fla.Stat. (1989); Tarpon Springs General Hospital v . . .
. . . conclude that a health maintenance organization which conducts peer review of physicians under section 766.101 . . . 1989), is a “person” entitled to attorney’s fees and costs as a prevailing defendant under paragraph 766.101 . . .
. . . For instance, the term “health care providers” as defined in subsection 766.101(l)(b) includes many practitioners . . .
. . . Renumbered as § 766.101(6)(b). . . .
. . . Hlis, 372 So.2d 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), as well as the construction placed upon sections 766.101 and . . .
. . . .-0115(5)(b), Florida Statutes (1987), and section 766.101(6)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988), which . . . The statute at issue in Guerrero, section 768.-40, is the predecessor to section 766.101; subsection . . . (6)(b) of section 768.40 is identical to subsection (6)(b) of section 766.101. . . .
. . . . § 766.101(5), Fla.Stat. (1989); Burton v. Becker, 516 So.2d 283 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). . . . records were privileged by virtue of section 768.40(4), Florida Statutes (1983) (presently section 766.101 . . .
. . . .-011(9), Florida Statutes (1989), and Section 766.101(5), Florida Statutes (1989). Dr. . . . Sections 395.011(9) and 766.101(5) each prohibit discovery of investigations, proceedings, and records . . . Becker, 516 So.2d 283 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) (section 766.101(5), formerly section 768.40(5), exception to . . . physician’s initial and renewal applications for staff privileges were immune from discovery under sections 766.101 . . . seems to be that the “otherwise available from original sources” language in Sections 395.011(9) and 766.101 . . .
. . . In 1988, apparently in response to Wait, the Legislature amended Section 766.101, Florida Statutes. . . . Section 766.101(5), Florida Statutes (1989), provides in pertinent part: The investigations, proceedings . . . Section 766.101(7)(c), Florida Statutes (1989), states, in pertinent part: So as not to inhibit the willing . . .
. . . limine to hold the record of its Provider Grievance Committee immune from discovery pursuant to section 766.101 . . . Pardell argues that the trial court erred in granting the motion in limine by applying section 766.101 . . . Section 766.101(l)(a)(l)(a) expressly includes an HMO’s medical review committee within the definition . . . Moreover, the privilege created by section 766.101(5) extends not only to the individual members of a . . . Section 766.101(5) provides in pertinent part: The investigations, proceedings, and records of a committee . . .
. . . out of medical peer review are precluded by the peer review immunity provisions of Florida Statutes § 766.101 . . .
. . . Perez for staff membership is privileged and not subject to production under the provisions of section 766.101 . . . Section 766.101 pertains to peer review by a hospital’s medical review committee. . . . Section 766.101(5) provides that the investigations, proceedings, and records of a medical review committee . . .