The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . doctor asserted that the patient properly executed informed consents pursuant to sections 768.46 and/or 766.103 . . .
. . . NOTE ON USE FOR 402.4b This instruction is derived from the provisions ofF.S. 766.103. c. . . .
. . . . § 766.103(b) ; see Def.'s Mot. Ex. 3 ("FSA-2525"). . . . See, e.g. , 7 C.F.R. §§ 766.101(b), 766.103(b)(2), 780. . . .
. . . . § 766.103(3)(a)1.-2., Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .
. . . disclosure or use of confidential criminal justice information, a criminal statute; (4) Florida Statute § 766.103 . . .
. . . . § 766.103(3), Fla. . . . requirements of' subsection (3) [and] is validly signed by the patient or another authorized - person:” § 766.103 . . .
. . . NOTE QN USE FOR 402.4b This instruction is derived from the provisions of F.S. 766.103. c. . . .
. . . Id,; see § 766.103(3)(a)(2), (3)(b) (identifying “reasonable individual” and reasonable Ratient as the . . .
. . . NOTE ON USE FOR 402.4b This instruction is derived from the provisions of F.S. 766.103. c. . . .
. . . See § 766.103(3)(a)2, Fla. . . .
. . . NOTE ON USE FOR 402.4b This instruction is derived from the provisions of F.S. 766.103. c. . . . Together these three instructions contain all of the elements of the tort as specified in F.S. 766.103 . . . NOTE ON USE FOR 402.14Í Derived from F.S. 766.103(3)(b). 402.15 BURDEN OF PROOF ON DEFENSE ISSUES If . . .
. . . The Court further notes that liability under the Florida Medical Consent Law, 766.103, Fla. . . .
. . . State of Florida has further codified the doctrine of medical informed consent generally in section 766.103 . . . Section 766.103, Florida Statutes, provides, in pertinent part: No recovery shall be allowed in any court . . . had he or she been advised by the physician ... in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (a). § 766.103 . . .
. . . Section 766.103(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2002), provides, in pertinent part: No recovery shall be allowed . . . Shad did not meet the statutory requirements delineated in § 766.103(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2002), . . . Stat. § 766.103(3)(b); Gassman v. . . . Subsections 3(a) and 3(b) of § 766.103(3) are written in the disjunctive; therefore, if the evidence . . . Stat. § 766.103(4), Parikh v. . . .
. . . Presidential Women’s Center, 707 So.2d at 1150; see also Section 766.103, Fla. Stat.; 20. . . . Section 766.103(3)(a)(2), Fla. Stat.; 21. The Amended Statute contains neither provision. . . . Section 766.103(3)(a)(2), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . . § 766.103. . . .
. . . See § 766.103(4)(b), Fla. . . . See § 766.103(3)(a)(2), Fla. . . . With all respect, we do not understand section 766.103(3) to contain any such requirement to resolve . . . See § 766.103(3)(a)(l) (“The action of the physician ... in obtaining the consent of the patient ... . . .
. . . The current version of the law is codified in section 766.103, Florida Statutes (1997). . . . The reason for this legislative restriction in section 766.103 is that only a treating physician has . . . statutory placement in Chapter 768, Florida Statutes (1975), without amendment, to the present Section 766.103 . . .
. . . . § 766.103; (Defs. Mot. for J. on the Pleadings at ¶ 20; Pls.’ Mem. in Opp’n at 8). . . .
. . . not define informed consent, and accordingly physicians performing abortions could rely on section 766.103 . . . Section 766.103 provides, among other things, that consent is “in accordance with an accepted standard . . . only by the discretion specifically allowed physicians in the general informed consent law, section 766.103 . . . are also specialized informed consent statutes requiring more specific information, such as section 766.103 . . . See § 766.103, Fla. Stat. . See, e.g., Lasky v. State Farm Ins. . . .
. . . . § 768.46(4)(a), amended by, § 766.103(4)(a). . . .