Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 766.1065 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 766.1065 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 766.1065

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLV
TORTS
Chapter 766
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND RELATED MATTERS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 766.1065
766.1065 Authorization for release of protected health information.
(1) Presuit notice of intent to initiate litigation for medical negligence under s. 766.106(2) must be accompanied by an authorization for release of protected health information in the form specified by this section, authorizing the disclosure of protected health information that is potentially relevant to the claim of personal injury or wrongful death. The presuit notice is void if this authorization does not accompany the presuit notice and other materials required by s. 766.106(2).
(2) If the authorization required by this section is revoked, the presuit notice under s. 766.106(2) is deemed retroactively void from the date of issuance, and any tolling effect that the presuit notice may have had on any applicable statute-of-limitations period is retroactively rendered void.
(3) The authorization required by this section shall be in the following form and shall be construed in accordance with the “Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information” in 45 C.F.R. parts 160 and 164:

AUTHORIZATION FOR RELEASE OF
PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION

A. I,   (Name of patient or authorized representative)   [hereinafter “Patient”], authorize that   (Name of health care provider to whom the presuit notice is directed)   and his/her/its insurer(s), self-insurer(s), and attorney(s), and the designated treating health care provider(s) listed below and his/her/its insurer(s), self-insurer(s), and attorney(s) may obtain and disclose (within the parameters set out below) the protected health information described below for the following specific purposes:

1. Facilitating the investigation and evaluation of the medical negligence claim described in the accompanying presuit notice;

2. Defending against any litigation arising out of the medical negligence claim made on the basis of the accompanying presuit notice; or

3. Obtaining legal advice or representation arising out of the medical negligence claim described in the accompanying presuit notice.

B. The health information obtained, used, or disclosed extends to, and includes, verbal health information as well as written health information and is described as follows:

1. The health information in the custody of the following health care providers who have examined, evaluated, or treated the Patient in connection with injuries complained of after the alleged act of negligence: (List the name and current address of all health care providers). This authorization extends to any additional health care providers that may in the future evaluate, examine, or treat the Patient for the injuries complained of.

2. The health information in the custody of the following health care providers who have examined, evaluated, or treated the Patient during a period commencing 2 years before the incident that is the basis of the accompanying presuit notice.

(List the name and current address of such health care providers, if applicable.)

C. This authorization does not apply to the following list of health care providers possessing health care information about the Patient because the Patient certifies that such health care information is not potentially relevant to the claim of personal injury or wrongful death that is the basis of the accompanying presuit notice.

(List the name of each health care provider to whom this authorization does not apply and the inclusive dates of examination, evaluation, or treatment to be withheld from disclosure. If none, specify “none.”)

D. The persons or class of persons to whom the Patient authorizes such health information to be disclosed or by whom such health information is to be used:

1. Any health care provider providing care or treatment for the Patient.

2. Any liability insurer or self-insurer providing liability insurance coverage, self-insurance, or defense to any health care provider to whom presuit notice is given, or to any health care provider listed in subsections B.1.-2. above, regarding the care and treatment of the Patient.

3. Any consulting or testifying expert employed by or on behalf of (name of health care provider to whom presuit notice was given) and his/her/its insurer(s), self-insurer(s), or attorney(s) regarding the matter of the presuit notice accompanying this authorization.

4. Any attorney (including his/her staff) employed by or on behalf of (name of health care provider to whom presuit notice was given) or employed by or on behalf of any health care provider(s) listed in subsections B.1.-2. above, regarding the matter of the presuit notice accompanying this authorization or the care and treatment of the Patient.

5. Any trier of the law or facts relating to any suit filed seeking damages arising out of the medical care or treatment of the Patient.

E. This authorization expressly allows the persons or class of persons listed in subsections D.2.-4. above to interview the health care providers listed in subsections B.1.-2. above, without the presence of the Patient or the Patient’s attorney.

F. This authorization expires upon resolution of the claim or at the conclusion of any litigation instituted in connection with the matter of the presuit notice accompanying this authorization, whichever occurs first.

G. The Patient understands that, without exception, the Patient has the right to revoke this authorization in writing. The Patient further understands that the consequence of any such revocation is that the presuit notice under s. 766.106(2), Florida Statutes, is deemed retroactively void from the date of issuance, and any tolling effect that the presuit notice may have had on any applicable statute-of-limitations period is retroactively rendered void.

H. The Patient understands that signing this authorization is not a condition for continued treatment, payment, enrollment, or eligibility for health plan benefits.

I. The Patient understands that information used or disclosed under this authorization may be subject to additional disclosure by the recipient and may not be protected by federal HIPAA privacy regulations.

Signature of Patient/Representative: 

Date: 

Name of Patient/Representative: 

Description of Representative’s Authority: 

History.s. 12, ch. 2011-233; s. 83, ch. 2012-5; s. 4, ch. 2013-108.

F.S. 766.1065 on Google Scholar

F.S. 766.1065 on Casetext

Amendments to 766.1065


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 766.1065
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 766.1065.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 766.1065

Total Results: 6

ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM/SUNBELT, INC. D/B/A FLORIDA HOSPITAL ALTAMONTE AND WILLIAM HUETHER, III, M.D. vs SALLY MACHALEK AND MATTHEW APTER, M.D.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-10-06

Snippet: accompanying the notice of intent required under s. 766.1065 is not completed in good faith by the claimant

ALFRED RHINER v. TAKASHI KOYAMA, DMD

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-09-08

Snippet: executed authorization form provided in s. 766.1065. Appellee moved to dismiss the complaint.

Emma Gayle Weaver, etc. v. Stephen C. Myers, M.D.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-11-09

Citation: 229 So. 3d 1118

Snippet: to the 2013 amendments to sections 766.106 and 766.1065 of the Florida Statutes. Generally,-the statutes

Bery v. Fahel

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-07-06

Citation: 194 So. 3d 1099, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10359, 2016 WL 3611022

Snippet: accompanying the notice of intent required undér s. 766.1065 is not completed in good faith by the claimant

Weaver v. Myers

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-07-21

Citation: 170 So. 3d 873, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10952, 2015 WL 4429170

Snippet: of the Florida Statutes:' sections 766.106 and 766.1065. These amendments in pertinent part allow for

Salazar v. Coello

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-12-17

Citation: 154 So. 3d 430, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20403, 2014 WL 7156859

Snippet: the executed authorization form provided in s. 766.1065.... (3) PRESUIT INVESTIGATION BY PROSPECTIVE