Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 767.05 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 767.05 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 767.05

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLV
TORTS
Chapter 767
DAMAGE BY DOGS; DANGEROUS DOGS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 767.05
767.05 Owner’s liability for damages by dog to dairy cattle.An owner or keeper of any dog that kills, wounds, or harasses any dairy cattle shall be jointly and severally liable to the owner of such dairy cattle for all damages done by such dog; and it is not necessary to prove notice to or knowledge by any such owner or keeper of such dog that the dog was mischievous or disposed to kill or worry any dairy cattle.
History.s. 2, ch. 79-315; s. 482, ch. 81-259.

F.S. 767.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 767.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 767.05


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 767.05
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 767.05.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 767.05

Total Results: 11

Standard Jury Instructions-Civil Cases

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-07-06

Citation: 778 So. 2d 264, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 518, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1371, 2000 WL 889771

Snippet: "improper." See, e.g., Restatement (Second) of Torts § 767. 5. In cases where a claimant alternatively asserts

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-10-31

Citation: 684 So. 2d 756, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 495, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 1865, 1996 WL 628190

Snippet: established by law for waiver of jurisdiction.' *767(5) After hearing as provided in this rule: (A) The

Wipperfurth v. Huie

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-03-09

Citation: 654 So. 2d 116, 1995 WL 94414

Snippet: owners of any dog," with the wording of section 767.05, "an owner or keeper of any dog."[4] In line with

Huie v. Wipperfurth

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-03-04

Citation: 632 So. 2d 1109, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1682, 1994 WL 63320

Snippet: rehearing on April 7, 1978. Compare with section 767.05, Florida Statutes (1979), which specifically refers

Belcher Yacht, Inc. v. Stickney

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-05-03

Citation: 450 So. 2d 1111

Snippet: 04, Fla. Stat. (1979). [2] Compare with section 767.05, Florida Statutes (1979), which specifically refers

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1979-05-02

Snippet: outlay and debt service funds as provided by s. 230.767(5), [F. S.].' See s. 230.717(1)(c) and (3), F. S.

COMMODORE PLAZA AT CENTURY 21, ETC. v. Cohen

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-09-20

Citation: 350 So. 2d 502

Snippet: matter of appeal filed under Clerk's File No. 76-767. [5] This is the subject matter of appeal filed under

Goldstein v. Walters

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-01-27

Citation: 126 So. 2d 759

Snippet: plaintiff recovered $1,000 and her father recovered $1,767.05, the exact amount of his claimed and proved medical

Astor v. Astor

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-12-02

Citation: 107 So. 2d 201

Snippet: dismissal of complaint) 9 Misc.2d 645, 165 N.Y.S.2d 767. [5] See note 4 supra. [6] Astor v. Astor, 160 N

Radiant Oil Co. v. Herring

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1941-02-14

Citation: 200 So. 376, 146 Fla. 154, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1096

Snippet: medical expenses and recovered a verdict of $1,767.05, the exact amount claimed and shown to have been

Flynn-Harris-Bullard Co. v. Hampton

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1915-11-02

Citation: 70 Fla. 231, 70 So. 385

Snippet: seven hundred sixty-seven and 5-100 dollars ($11,767.05). Thereupon said company pleaded its claim by way