Cases from cite.case.law:

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. v. J. PHILLIPS, J. R. L. J. K., 110 So. 3d 908 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . The Fifth District reasoned that the legislature’s 1999 enactment of section 768.737, subsequent to the . . . Section 768.737 provides, “Where punitive damages are available as a remedy in an arbitration proceeding . . . We cannot agree, however, that the enactment of section 768.737 represented a complete repudiation of . . . We consider section 768.737 to have been a legislative clarification of the punitive damages provision . . .

MARTIN DAYTONA CORPORATION, v. STRICKLAND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES,, 941 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Subsequent to the decision in Miele, the Legislature enacted section 768.737 Florida Statutes (1999), . . . It is clear that the Legislature’s enactment of section 768.737 indicates that the Legislature has a . . . We believe that enactment of section 768.737, in light of the decision in Miele, militates in favor of . . .

In ROLLINS, INC. BLACK,, 552 F. Supp. 2d 1318 (M.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . The Panel does not mention those claims and instead cites to Florida Statutes § 768.737, which requires . . .

SHIELDS COMPANY, s v. G. BRIGHT, s, 254 F. Supp. 2d 1253 (M.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . Respondents further argue that Florida Statute 768.737 became effective after the last transaction in . . .