Cases from cite.case.law:

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO., 192 So. 3d 1183 (Fla. 2016)

. . . This instruction conflicts' with F.S. 768.77(2)(a)2. and should not be given in medical malpractice cases . . . This instruction conflicts with F.S. 768.77(2)(a)2. and should not .be given in medical malpractice cases . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO. PRODUCTS LIABILITY, 160 So. 3d 869 (Fla. 2015)

. . . For a model itemized verdict form, as contemplated by section 768.77, Florida Statutes, refer to Model . . .

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. W. DARRAGH,, 95 So. 3d 897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . to reduce future economic damages to present value had been superced-ed by an amendment to section 768.77 . . . damages to their present value was a common law requirement that pre-dated the enactment of section 768.77 . . . Section 768.77(1) was originally enacted as part of the Tort Reform Act of 1986, see Ch. 86-160, § 56 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO. PRODUCTS LIABILITY, 91 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 2012)

. . . FOREMAN OR FOREWOMAN NQ-T-E-ON US-E Eor — a model-itemized verdict form, as contemplated- by section 768.77 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO. In No. In No. In No. In No. s In No. In No. In No. In No., 35 So. 3d 666 (Fla. 2010)

. . . F.S. 768.77 was amended to delete the requirements that required designation of past or future damages . . . Under the 1999 amendment to F.S. 768.77(1), damages for all non-medical negligence cases only have to . . . F.S. 768.77(2), however, requires further itemization for medical negligence cases. . . . Verdict Forms 2(a) and 2(b) to comply with the minimum requirements of the 1999 amendments to F.S. 768.77 . . . For verdict requirements in medical negligence claims, see F.S. 768.77(2) and 768.78(2)(a). . . .

P. JOHNSON, v. CLARK,, 484 F. Supp. 2d 1242 (M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . . § 768.77(1). Such itemization is mandatory if requested by a party. Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. . . .

SHELL SEEKERS, INC. W. B. A W. B. B. v. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS,, 308 F. Supp. 2d 579 (D.V.I. 2004)

. . . $77,837.00_$40,000.00_$583.77_$300.00_$ 283.77 1998 477,837.00 $42,000.00_$583.77 $315.00_$ 268.77 _Total:_$ 768.77 . . .

SHELL SEEKERS, INC. W. B. A W. B. B. v. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS,, 308 F. Supp. 2d 592 (D.V.I. 2004)

. . . DECREED that the trustee has overpaid his 1996-1998 property tax bills on this property by a total of $768.77 . . . accordingly, it is hereby DECREED that the trustee is entitled to a refund for the 1996 to 1998 tax years of $768.77 . . .

MORTON ROOFING, INC. A. v. D. PRATHER B., 864 So. 2d 64 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See § 768.77, Fla. Stat. . . . .

PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC. v. G. YOUNG, 848 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . We reverse because the court failed to use the itemized verdict form required by section 768.77, Florida . . . Section 768.77 requires an itemized verdict in a negligence action. . . . . § 768.77, Fla. Stat. (2001) (emphasis added). . . . The original version of section 768.77 was enacted as part of the Tort Reform and Insurance Act, which . . . The itemized verdict required by section 768.77 “is mandatory when requested by a party.” . . .

STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS- CIVIL CASES NOS., 825 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 2002)

. . . In 1999, section 768.77, Florida Statutes, was amended to require itemization of only economic losses . . . No court opinion has expressly determined whether section 768.77 or section 768.78 is constitutional . . . The committee also submits Model Verdict Forms 8.1e and 8.1f as forms complying with section 768.77, . . . Its publication does not imply any view of the constitutionality of § 768.77 under Art. . . . OF 1986, § 768.77, FLA. . . .

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. THORNTON, 781 So. 2d 416 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . The remaining points on appeal regarding the former version of Florida Statute 768.77(2)(1986), and the . . .

BEAUVAIS, v. EDELL,, 760 So. 2d 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . trial judge to make this review of damages, at the same time the legislature also created in section 768.77 . . . The Legislature has since amended section 768.77 by deleting subsection (2). . . . In a number of cases decided before section 768.77 was adopted involving the same circumstance — a verdict . . . The statute requiring an itemized verdict, section 768.77, does not require that economic losses be separated . . .

ITT HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHEAST, v. OWENS A., 760 So. 2d 210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . § 768.77, is to facilitate judicial review of the jury’s award by the trial judge and the appellate . . .

PERRY v. W. ALLEN,, 720 So. 2d 614 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . the Tort Reform and Insurance Act of 1986, Chapter 86-160, Laws of Florida, it provided in section 768.77 . . .

FOOD LION, v. JACKSON,, 712 So. 2d 800 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . the above verdict form, the parties and trial court ignored the itemization requirements of section 768.77 . . . to all of the parties to complain about the noncompliance with the verdict form required by section 768.77 . . .

STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS- CIVIL CASES NO., 711 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1998)

. . . FOREMAN OR FOREWOMAN NOTE ON USE For a model itemized verdict form, as contemplated by section 768.77 . . . For a model itemized .verdict form, as contemplated by section 768.77, Florida Statutes, refer to Model . . . FOREMAN OR FOREWOMAN NOTE ON USE For a model itemized verdict form, as contemplated by section 768.77 . . . FOREMAN OR FOREWOMAN NOTE ON USE For a model itemized verdict form, as contemplated by section 768.77 . . . FOREMAN OR FOREWOMAN NOTE ON USE For a model itemized verdict form, as contemplated by section 768.77 . . .

PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE OF DEL- RAY, INC. d b a At M. D. v. KEEL,, 717 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . result to any party, enter a judgment ordering future economic damages, as itemized pursuant to s. 768.77 . . . request of either party, enter a judgment ordering future economic damages, as itemized pursuant to s. 768.77 . . .

DOUGHTY a v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA a k a CIGNA,, 701 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . We sometimes wonder whether the 1986 tort reform legislation which requires itemized verdicts, § 768.77 . . .

STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS- CIVIL CASES- NO., 700 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 1997)

. . . For a model itemized verdict form, as contemplated by § 768.77, Florida Statutes, refer to Model Verdict . . .

McELHANEY, R. N. NME d b a v. UEBRICH,, 699 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . This case presents a classic example of why the requirements of section 768.77, Florida Statutes (1995 . . .

KRISTON, v. A. WEBSTER,, 688 So. 2d 346 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . verdict form to the jury rather than an itemized verdict form requested by Kriston pursuant to section 768.77 . . . the Tort Reform and Insurance Act of 1986, Chapter 86-160, Laws of Florida, it provided in section 768.77 . . .

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. MANASSE,, 681 So. 2d 779 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . based on the use of an itemized verdict was part of the stated legislative intent in enacting section 768.77 . . . , which mandates itemization of damage amounts broken down into categories. §§ 768.74(6), 768.77, Fla . . . Section 768.77 was part of the Tort Reform and Insurance Act, which became effective in 1986. . . . From a review of the appellate cases decided subsequent to the enactment of section 768.77, it appears . . .

W. R. GRACE COMPANY- CONN. v. PYKE,, 661 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Section 768.77, Florida Statutes (1993); Townsend v. Gibson, 67 So.2d 225 (Fla.1953). . . . Section 768.77, Florida Statutes (1993). . . .

M. SIMPSON R. v. STONE,, 662 So. 2d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Since the enactment of section 768.77, Florida Statutes (1991), most tort cases are now submitted to . . .

S. COWEN, v. M. THORNTON,, 621 So. 2d 684 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Since the enactment of section 768.77, Florida Statutes (1991), most tort cases are now submitted to . . .

W. DYES v. J. SPICK a, 606 So. 2d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Two important aspects of tort reform are the itemized verdict statute, section 768.77, Florida Statutes . . .

SILVA, v. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA BLOOD BANK, INC. SMITH, v. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA BLOOD BANK, INC., 601 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 1992)

. . . See § 768.77, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

EDWARD M. CHADBOURNE, INC. v. VAN DYKE, n k a, 590 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . In this case the court submitted to the jury an itemized verdict pursuant to Section 768.77, Florida . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS- CIVIL NO., 570 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 1990)

. . . paragraph should be given when using one of the itemized verdict forms in Part VIII to comply with sec. 768.77 . . .

VIBRANT VIDEO, INC. v. DIXIE POINTE ASSOCIATES,, 567 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Ziegler, 305 So.2d 864, 865-66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); § 768.77, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

G. BURTON, v. POWELL, 547 So. 2d 330 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . to compensation for future losses because of the provisions of the Tort Reform Act of 1986, section 768.77 . . . Florida Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions (Civil) has attempted to interpret section 768.77 . . . that its publication of the verdict form “does not imply any view of the constitutionality of section 768.77 . . . We note the Florida Supreme Court’s intimation that section 768.77 represents an unconstitutional invasion . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS CIVIL CASES, 541 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 1989)

. . . comments, entitled: MODEL FORM OF VERDICT ITEMIZING PERSONAL INJURY DAMAGES (TORT REFORM ACT OF 1986, § 768.77 . . . F.S.1987) and MODEL FORM OF VERDICT ITEMIZING WRONGFUL DEATH DAMAGES (TORT REFORM ACT OF 1986, § 768.77 . . . It has been suggested that we should ignore the provisions of sections 768.77 and 768.78 in structuring . . . MODEL FORM OF VERDICT ITEMIZING PERSONAL INJURY DAMAGES (TORT REFORM ACT OF 1986, § 768.77 F.S.1987) . . . Its publication does not imply any view of the constitutionality of § 768.77 under Art. . . .

BROWN, v. M. SIMS, M. D. s M. D., 538 So. 2d 901 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Section 768.77, Florida Statutes (1987), which now requires an itemized verdict for categories of damages . . .

R. BAUMGARDNER E. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 251 F.2d 311 (9th Cir. 1957)

. . . .$ 904.09 1945 ..... 768.77 1949 ..... 705.11 1946 ..... 1093.39 1950 ..... 626.18 1947 ..... 929.74 . . .