Cases from cite.case.law:

MAZUR, KYC LLC LLC U. S. v. OSPINA BARAYA,, 275 So. 3d 812 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . publish news quickly can also issue retractions or corrections quickly, as provided for in section 770.02 . . . : 770.02. . . . Sections 770.01 and 770.02 work together "to afford newspapers and periodicals an opportunity to make . . . for in section 770.01 and the opportunity to retract the offending statement provided for in section 770.02 . . . Reading sections 770.01 and 770.02 in harmony, it becomes clear that the "other medium" language is not . . .

M. COMINS, v. VANVOORHIS,, 135 So. 3d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . The following additions were also made to Section 770.02: “or broadcast station” in the section’s heading . . . Maneini court noted that “there is nothing in the language of the companion retraction provision, section 770.02 . . .

DORESTIN K. v. HOLLYWOOD IMPORTS, INC. a d b a, 45 So. 3d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . § 770.02(1), Fla. . . .

CANONICO, v. CALLAWAY E. W. ABC ABC,, 26 So. 3d 53 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 770.02, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

In J. ECKER J. LLC, v. J., 400 B.R. 669 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 2009)

. . . Ecker was responsible for maintaining for their benefit pursuant to section 770.02(5), Wis. Stats. . . .

JEWS FOR JESUS, INC. v. RAPP,, 997 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 2008)

. . . Further, section 770.02, Florida Statutes (2007), limits the amount of damages a plaintiff may recover . . .

ZELINKA, v. AMERICARE HEALTHSCAN, INC. P. D L., 763 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Section 770.02 allows the defendants to whom section 770.01 is applicable the right to avoid punitive . . .

MANCINI, v. PERSONALIZED AIR CONDITIONING HEATING, INC. a, 702 So. 2d 1376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Section 770.01, the notice provision, and section 770.02, the retraction provision, grant valuable rights . . . Further, there is nothing in the language of the companion retraction provision, section 770.02, that . . . The retraction provision of subsection 770.02(1), in “the case of a newspaper” provides that a full and . . . If a retraction does not timely occur as provided for in section 770.02, the plaintiff may file suit . . . Civ.Code § 48a (emphasis supplied) with § 770.02, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . .

TOBKIN, v. L. JARBOE, 695 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . The Florida Supreme Court’s analysis of sections 770.01 and 770.02 in Ross, makes it clear that the classification . . .

O. COOK v. POMPANO SHOPPER, INC., 582 So. 2d 37 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Consequently, and pursuant to Florida Statute 770.02 and 836.08 (Sup.1986) demand is respectfully made . . .

In PIKES PEAK WATER COMPANY, a TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. PIKES PEAK WATER COMPANY, a, 779 F.2d 1456 (10th Cir. 1985)

. . . that the amount due on May 24, 1982, the date of the filing of the Chapter 11 proceedings, was $1,723,-770.02 . . .

In PIKES PEAK WATER COMPANY, a TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. PIKES PEAK WATER COMPANY, a, 779 F.2d 1456 (10th Cir. 1985)

. . . that the amount due on May 24, 1982, the date of the filing of the Chapter 11 proceedings, was $1,723,-770.02 . . .

C. DAVIES, v. BOSSERT,, 449 So. 2d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . In discussing Ross’ equal protection argument with respect to Section 770.02, which in 1950 referred . . . The following additions were also made to Section 770.02: “or broadcast station” in the section’s heading . . .

BRIDGES P. v. WILLIAMSON, Al, 449 So. 2d 400 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . See § 770.02, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

J. LANEY, v. KNIGHT- RIDDER NEWSPAPERS, INC., 532 F. Supp. 910 (S.D. Fla. 1982)

. . . . § 770.02. . . .

CAPE PUBLICATIONS, INC. a v. TERI S HEALTH STUDIO, INC. a, 385 So. 2d 188 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Of primary concern here are sections 770.01 and 770.02, and they are as follows: 770.01 Notice condition . . . specifying the article or broadcast and the statements therein which he alleges to be false and defamatory. 770.02 . . .

TIME, INC. v. FIRESTONE, 424 U.S. 448 (U.S. 1976)

. . . . §§770.01-770.02 (1963). . . .

FIRESTONE, v. TIME, INC., 305 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 1974)

. . . requesting retraction of the defamatory publication which is the subject of this suit, Sections 770.01 and 770.02 . . .

L. TORNILLO, Jr. v. MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING COMPANY, a, 287 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 1973)

. . . similar questions might well be posed as to the vagueness of certain provisions of Florida Statute 770.02 . . . Florida Statute 770.02, F.S.A. provides: “If it appears upon the trial that said article was published . . .

FIRESTONE, v. TIME, INC., 271 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 1972)

. . . In recognition of this fact, our state legislature has provided in Section 770.02, Florida Statutes, . . . Florida have not hesitated to retract and correct inadvertent misstatements in accordance with Section 770.02 . . .

LASKY, v. STATE FARM INSURANCE CO., 37 Fla. Supp. 178 (Broward Cty. Ct. Rec. 1972)

. . . suits (Florida Statute 608.131), limit the award of punitive damages in libel suits (Florida Statute 770.02 . . .

BROWN, v. FAWCETT PUBLICATIONS, INC. a a d b a, 196 So. 2d 465 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . Sec. 770.02, F.S.A. which would legally have restricted plaintiff to actual damages. . . . Brown holds that Sec. 770.02, if properly complied with by the publisher, rules out punitive damages. . . . Here Fawcett defied Sec. 770.02, which action in effect invited punitive damages. . . . Sec. 770.02, F.S.A. provides: “If it appears upon the trial that said article was published in good faith . . .

O NEAL, v. TRIBUNE COMPANY, a, 176 So. 2d 535 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . after demand, published a retraction and apology in both the Times and the Tribune pursuant to section 770.02 . . .

CARROLL v. FLORIDA PUBLISHING CO., 25 Fla. Supp. 7 (Duval Cty. Cir. Ct. 1964)

. . . The plaintiff urges that the publisher’s failure to publish a retraction pursuant to Florida Statute 770.02 . . . 161; Harper & James, Law of Torts, vol. 1, §5.18), but only to suggest that the application of F.S. 770.02 . . .

v. MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING CO. a, 119 So. 2d 85 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)

. . . A.L.R. 466, holding that the principles expressed in that case were not changed by sections 770.01 and 770.02 . . . Tribune Company, supra, but also by Florida Statutes, § 770.01 and § 770.02. The facts in Layne v. . . . Miami Herald, after notice from the appellant, failed to follow the provisions of Florida Statutes, § 770.02 . . . Chapter 16071, Laws of Florida, 1933 (§ 770.01 and § 770.02, Florida Statutes, 1959, F.S.A.) was passed . . . Company, supra, and that such holding is not affected or changed by Florida Statutes, § 770.01 and § 770.02 . . .

MIAMI HERALD PUB. CO. v. BROWN, 66 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 1953)

. . . jury fixed in view of the corrective statement the newspaper published and its efficacy under Section 770.02 . . .

STROBEL WILKEN CO. v. KNOST, 99 F. 409 (S.D. Ohio 1900)

. . . With the exception of $2,500 withdrawn by the bankrupts, $400 paid to the insolvent’s attorney, and $770.02 . . .