Florida Statute 770 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLV
TORTS

Chapter 770
DEFAMATION

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 770

DEFAMATION

770.01 Notice condition precedent to action or prosecution for libel or slander.

770.02 Correction, apology, or retraction by newspaper or broadcast station.

770.03 Civil liability of broadcasting stations.

770.04 Civil liability of radio or television broadcasting stations; care to prevent publication or utterance required.

770.05 Limitation of choice of venue.

770.06 Adverse judgment in any jurisdiction a bar to additional action.

770.07 Cause of action, time of accrual.

770.08 Limitation on recovery of damages.

770.01 Notice condition precedent to action or prosecution for libel or slander.—Before any civil action is brought for publication or broadcast, in a newspaper, periodical, or other medium, of a libel or slander, the plaintiff shall, at least 5 days before instituting such action, serve notice in writing on the defendant, specifying the article or broadcast and the statements therein which he or she alleges to be false and defamatory.

History.—s. 1, ch. 16070, 1933; CGL 1936 Supp. 7064(1); s. 1, ch. 76-123; s. 1178, ch. 97-102.

770.02 Correction, apology, or retraction by newspaper or broadcast station.—

(1) If it appears upon the trial that said article or broadcast was published in good faith; that its falsity was due to an honest mistake of the facts; that there were reasonable grounds for believing that the statements in said article or broadcast were true; and that, within the period of time specified in subsection (2), a full and fair correction, apology, or retraction was, in the case of a newspaper or periodical, published in the same editions or corresponding issues of the newspaper or periodical in which said article appeared and in as conspicuous place and type as said original article or, in the case of a broadcast, the correction, apology, or retraction was broadcast at a comparable time, then the plaintiff in such case shall recover only actual damages.

(2) Full and fair correction, apology, or retraction shall be made:

(a) In the case of a broadcast or a daily or weekly newspaper or periodical, within 10 days after service of notice;

(b) In the case of a newspaper or periodical published semimonthly, within 20 days after service of notice;

(d) In the case of a newspaper or periodical published less frequently than monthly, in the next issue, provided notice is served no later than 45 days prior to such publication.

History.—s. 2, ch. 16070, 1933; CGL 1936 Supp. 7064(2); s. 1, ch. 76-123; s. 233, ch. 77-104; s. 1, ch. 80-34.

770.03 Civil liability of broadcasting stations.—The owner, lessee, licensee, or operator of a broadcasting station shall have the right, except when prohibited by federal law or regulation, but shall not be compelled, to require the submission of a written copy of any statement intended to be broadcast over such station 24 hours before the time of the intended broadcast thereof. When such owner, lessee, licensee, or operator has so required the submission of such copy, such owner, lessee, licensee, or operator shall not be liable in damages for any libelous or slanderous utterance made by or for the person or party submitting a copy of such proposed broadcast which is not contained in such copy. This section shall not be construed to relieve the person or party or the agents or servants of such person or party making any such libelous or slanderous utterance from liability therefor.

History.—ss. 1, 2, 3, ch. 19616, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 7064 Supp. 7064(4); s. 1, ch. 20869; s. 1, ch. 76-123.

770.04 Civil liability of radio or television broadcasting stations; care to prevent publication or utterance required.—The owner, licensee, or operator of a radio or television broadcasting station, and the agents or employees of any such owner, licensee or operator, shall not be liable for any damages for any defamatory statement published or uttered in or as a part of a radio or television broadcast, by one other than such owner, licensee or operator, or general agent or employees thereof, unless it shall be alleged and proved by the complaining party, that such owner, licensee, operator, general agent or employee, has failed to exercise due care to prevent the publication or utterance of such statement in such broadcasts, provided, however, the exercise of due care shall be construed to include the bona fide compliance with any federal law or the regulation of any federal regulatory agency.

History.—s. 1, ch. 23802, 1947; s. 1, ch. 25278, 1949.

770.05 Limitation of choice of venue.—No person shall have more than one choice of venue for damages for libel or slander, invasion of privacy, or any other tort founded upon any single publication, exhibition, or utterance, such as any one edition of a newspaper, book, or magazine, any one presentation to an audience, any one broadcast over radio or television, or any one exhibition of a motion picture. Recovery in any action shall include all damages for any such tort suffered by the plaintiff in all jurisdictions.

History.—s. 1, ch. 67-52.

770.06 Adverse judgment in any jurisdiction a bar to additional action.—A judgment in any jurisdiction for or against the plaintiff upon the substantive merits of any action for damages founded upon a single publication or exhibition or utterance as described in s. 770.05 shall bar any other action for damages by the same plaintiff against the same defendant founded upon the same publication or exhibition or utterance.

History.—s. 2, ch. 67-52.

770.07 Cause of action, time of accrual.—The cause of action for damages founded upon a single publication or exhibition or utterance, as described in s. 770.05, shall be deemed to have accrued at the time of the first publication or exhibition or utterance thereof in this state.

History.—s. 3, ch. 67-52.

770.08 Limitation on recovery of damages.—No person shall have more than one choice of venue for damages for libel founded upon a single publication or exhibition or utterance, as described in s. 770.05, and upon his or her election in any one of his or her choices of venue, then the person shall be bound to recover there all damages allowed him or her.

History.—s. 4, ch. 67-52; s. 1179, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 770 on Google Scholar

F.S. 770 on Casetext

Amendments to 770

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 770

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 770.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 770

Total Results: 20

Robert Craft v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-19

Snippet: professional norms.” Hampton v. State, 219 So. 3d 760, 770 (Fla. 2017) (citing Francois v. State, 423 So. 2d

Florida Department of Corrections v. O'Neal

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-11

Snippet: moot. See George v. Dep't of Corr., 278 So. 3d 770 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) ("Unless and until Mr. George

Sumit Sawhney, M.D. v. Northwest Medical Center, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-27

Snippet: Inversiones Efectuadas En U.S.A. v. Citibank, F.S.B., 770 So. 2d 1267, 1269 n.3 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“An unincorporated

School Board of Marion County A/K/A the Marion County School Board, D/B/A Marion County Public Schools v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-21

Snippet: see Irwin v. Signal Safe, Inc., 382 So. 3d 766, 770 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024), such as a county school board

Elizabeth Estevill v. Tomas Estevill

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-20

Snippet: Mesnikoff v. FQ Backyard Trading, LLC, 239 So. 3d 765, 770 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (equitable interest found where

Helvy Rojas v. Ada Isis Pelaez Otero

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-13

Snippet: of the judgment.” Diaz v. Diaz, 300 So. 3d 767, 770 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (quoting Hirsch v. Hirsch, 642

Wester v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-13

Snippet: In United States v. Presgraves, 658 F. Supp. 2d 770, 774 (W.D. Va. 2009), Presgraves, the Sheriff of

Baity v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-06

Snippet: 1995 judgment and sentence. See Baity v. State, 770 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (reversing an order

William J. Osborne and Amanda L. Osborne v. Drees Homes of Florida, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-25

Snippet: at 60 (citing Hymowitz v. Delcrest Bldg. Corp., 770 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Temple Emanu-El

Shridhar D. Marathe v. Molina Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-16

Snippet: see, e.g., George v. Dep’t of Corr., 278 So. 3d 770 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (declining to reach issue that

McLane Foodservice, Inc. v. Elizabeth Wool

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-02

Snippet: 3d 712, 721 (Fla. 2012) (quoting Belair v. Drew, 770 So. 2d 1164, 1166 (Fla. 2000)). “A finding that the

Curtis Leroy Sherrod, II v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-02

Snippet: 631, 650–51 (Fla. 2021) (quoting Knight v. State, 770 So. 2d 663, 670 n.6 (Fla. 2000)); see also Fla. R

Peter Sciallo v. the State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-18

Snippet: subject to prior objections. See Kearse v. State, 770 So. 2d 1119, 1128 (Fla. 2000). The jury found Sciallo

Norman v. Ashburn Square Homeowners Association, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-13

Snippet: Towing Co. v. Third Nat'l Bank, 143 So. 768, 770 (Fla. 1932))). Affirmed. NORTHCUTT and MORRIS

John Sexton v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-12

Snippet: and impartial trial.” Gregory v. State, 118 So. 3d 770, 778 (Fla. 2013) (quoting Rodriguez v. State, 919

Curtis Parker v. Florida Dept. of Corr.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-11

Snippet: 1270, 1271 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Plymel v. Moore, 770 So. 2d 242, 246 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). A couple

Ivan Pacheco v. Arturo Jinete

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-10

Snippet: 6 Meisman, 353 So. 3d at 673; Perez v. Marti, 770 So. 2d 284, 286 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“Perez II”)

Mortgage Assets Management Series I Trust, Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. v. Harvey, Harvey

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-06

Snippet: Carlough v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 609 So. 2d 770, 771–72 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (“Under the circumstances

MICHAEL ALLEN LOVETT v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-16

Snippet: (4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2018); see also Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655, 658 (Fla. 2000) (“It is no different

Sherley Joseph v. The State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-14

Snippet: 3D24-0764, 3D24-0765, 3D24-0766, 3D24-0767, 3D24-0770, 3D24-0776, 3D24-0781, 3D24-0786,