Cases from cite.case.law:

MAZUR, KYC LLC LLC U. S. v. OSPINA BARAYA,, 275 So. 3d 812 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Interestingly, section 770.05, which addresses limitation of choice of venue, does specifically include . . .

NORKIN, v. THE FLORIDA BAR, a, 311 F. Supp. 3d 1299 (S.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . action for damages founded upon a single publication or exhibition or utterance, as described in s. 770.05 . . . Stat. §§ 770.05, 770.07. . . .

Dr. ASHRAF, v. ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM SUNBELT, INC. a d b a, 200 So. 3d 173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . action for damages founded upon a single publication or exhibition or utterance, as described in s. 770.05 . . .

PENNSYLVANIA CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION, v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION,, 76 F. Supp. 3d 722 (N.D. Ill. 2014)

. . . The firm asks the Court to award $391.94 for database access, $4,764.85 for depositions, $770.05 for . . .

BASKIN, v. BOGAN, v., 766 F.3d 648 (7th Cir. 2014)

. . . Id., § 770.05(5). . . .

MILLER, v. ANHEUSER BUSCH, INC. a, 348 F. App'x 547 (11th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 770.05 (“No person shall have more than one choice of venue for damages for libel or slander, invasion . . . action for damages founded upon a single publication or exhibition or utterance, as described in s.770.05 . . .

MILLER, v. ANHEUSER BUSCH, INC., 591 F. Supp. 2d 1377 (S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . action for damages founded upon a single publication or exhibition or utterance, as described in s. 770.05 . . . Stat, § 770.05 (defines actions subject to single publication rule as “libel or slander, invasion of . . .

In C. McVICKER, Co. v. C., 234 B.R. 732 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1999)

. . . May 4 when she spent $794.64, April 29 when her purchases totaled $940.21, April 27 when she charged $770.05 . . .

PUTNAM BERKLEY GROUP, INC. a a v. DININ, 734 So. 2d 532 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 770.05, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

In UNITED MARINE SHIPBUILDING, INC. B. McCARTY, v. NATIONAL BANK OF ALASKA, N. A., 198 B.R. 970 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 1996)

. . . Arguably, the $770.05 set off by the IRS relating to the period ending December 31, 1993, is for a period . . .

A. PELULLO, v. S. PATTERSON, II,, 788 F. Supp. 234 (D.N.J. 1992)

. . . . § 770.05, which defines a single publication to include “any one edition of a newspaper, book or magazine . . .

J. C. ARMSTRONG, Jr. v. TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY d b a St., 481 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . In Per-due, supra, this statute was construed in pari materia with Section 770.05, which addresses the . . .

OAK LAMINATES DIVISION OF OAK MATERIALS GROUP, v. UNITED STATES,, 601 F. Supp. 1031 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1984)

. . . Plaintiff contended that the merchandise was properly classifiable under item 770.05, TSUS, as “articles . . . properly classified as “articles not specially provided for, of rubber or plastics ... other,” under item 770.05 . . .

d o v., 8 Ct. Int'l Trade 300 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1984)

. . . Plaintiff contended that the merchandise was properly classifiable under item 770.05, TSUS, as “articles . . . classified as “articles not specially provided for, of rubber or plastics * * * other,” under item 770.05 . . .

OAK LAMINATES DIVISION OAK MATERIALS GROUP, v. UNITED STATES,, 628 F. Supp. 1577 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1984)

. . . protests this classification and contends that the merchandise is properly classifiable under item 770.05 . . . not specially provided for wholly or almost wholly of reinforced or laminated plastics: Laminated: 770.05 . . . that the merchandise was incorrectly classified by customs, and is properly classifiable under item 770.05 . . . properly classified as “articles not specially provided for, of rubber or plastics ... other,” under item 770.05 . . .

d o v., 8 Ct. Int'l Trade 175 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1984)

. . . protests this classification and contends that the merchandise is properly classifiable under item 770.05 . . . that the merchandise was incorrectly classified by customs, and is properly classifiable under item 770.05 . . . classified as “articles not specially provided for, of rubber or plastics * * * other,” under item 770.05 . . .

EDWARD L. NEZELEK, INC. a v. SUNBEAM TELEVISION CORPORATION, A d b a WCKT- TV, 413 So. 2d 51 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . . §§ 770.05, 770.08, Florida Statutes (1979), Perdue v. . . .

PERDUE, a k a v. MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING COMPANY, a, 291 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 1974)

. . . . §§ 770.05-770.08, F.S.A., and held that venue of the instant action properly lay only in Dade County . . . Legislature responded to the above decision by enacting Chapter 67-52 which in pertinent part became F.S. § 770.05 . . . distribution or circulation. . ” (emphasis added) Thus, when we read our “single publication” act (§ 770.05 . . . course, as earlier outlined, only one of these available venues may be chosen in accordance with F.S. § 770.05 . . . action for damages founded upon a single publication or exhibition or utterance, as described in § 770.05 . . . of 1966, the Florida Legislature sought to reverse the effect of that decision by enacting Section 770.05 . . .

PERDUE v. MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING CO., 34 Fla. Supp. 3 (De Soto Cty. Cir. Ct. 1970)

. . . News-Journal Corporation, 196 So.2d 97 (1966), rehearing denied, February 8, 1967, the legislature enacted §§770.05 . . .