Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 772.14 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 772.14 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 772.14 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 772.14

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLV
TORTS
Chapter 772
CIVIL REMEDIES FOR CRIMINAL PRACTICES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 772.14
772.14 Estoppel of defendant.A final judgment or decree rendered in favor of the state in any criminal proceeding concerning the conduct of the defendant which forms the basis for a civil cause of action under this chapter, or in any criminal proceeding under chapter 895, shall estop the defendant in any action brought pursuant to this chapter as to all matters as to which such judgment or decree would be an estoppel as if the plaintiff had been a party in the criminal action.
History.s. 3, ch. 86-277.

F.S. 772.14 on Google Scholar

F.S. 772.14 on CourtListener

Amendments to 772.14


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 772.14

Total Results: 13

Stogniew v. McQueen

656 So. 2d 917, 1995 WL 256203

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1995 | Docket: 387494

Cited 46 times | Published

any subsequent independent civil recovery. Section 772.14 provides: A final judgment or decree rendered

Starr Tyme, Inc. v. Cohen

659 So. 2d 1064, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 447, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1417, 1995 WL 511416

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1995 | Docket: 2484834

Cited 39 times | Published

remedies for criminal practices estoppel statute, section 772.14, Florida Statutes (1991). In the subsequent

Cook v. State

921 So. 2d 631, 2005 WL 2242710

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 2005 | Docket: 1662918

Cited 23 times | Published

subsequent criminal proceedings. Id. [2] See, e.g., § 772.14, Fla. Stat. (2004); Blumberg v. USAA Cas. Ins

Paterno v. Fernandez

569 So. 2d 1349, 1990 WL 175107

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1990 | Docket: 1660554

Cited 11 times | Published

addressing the plaintiffs' contention that Section 772.14, Florida Statutes (1985) also estops the defendant

City of Orlando v. Pineiro

66 So. 3d 1064, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12266, 2011 WL 3359613

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 2011 | Docket: 2363235

Cited 8 times | Published

person's plea of guilty to the criminal offense. § 772.14, Fla. Stat. (2010); Boshnack v. World Wide Rent-A-Car

Board of Regents v. Taborsky

648 So. 2d 748, 1994 WL 497991

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1994 | Docket: 1342313

Cited 7 times | Published

judgment against Taborsky as provided for under Section 772.14, Fla.Stats., and to damages, attorney's fees

Roofing v. Flemmings

138 So. 3d 524, 2014 WL 1696187, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2014 | Docket: 60240701

Cited 3 times | Published

against any subsequent independent civil recovery. § 772.14, Fla. Stat. (2014); § 775.089(8), Fla. Stat (2014)

Stafford v. Don Reid Ford, Inc.

920 So. 2d 791, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2018, 2006 WL 358261

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2006 | Docket: 1440947

Cited 3 times | Published

plaintiff had been a party in the criminal action." § 772.14, Fla. Stat. (2005). This includes all matters

Kristian J. Hall v. Dyan Myara

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2024 | Docket: 68484206

Published

that resulted in the prior criminal charges.”); § 772.14, Fla. Stat. (“A final judgment or decree rendered

ARTHUR SAGER v. MADALINA BLANCO AND RICARDO F. BLANCO

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2022 | Docket: 65417127

Published

examine the respective findings, in turn. Section 772.14, Florida Statutes, located within the Civil

ARTHUR SAGER v. MADALINA BLANCO AND RICARDO F. BLANCO

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2022 | Docket: 63385757

Published

7 Section 772.14, Florida Statutes, located within the Civil

Allen v. Greenwasser (In Re Greenwasser)

269 B.R. 918

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Dec 4, 2001 | Docket: 1777095

Published

The Debtor further argues that Florida Statutes § 772.14 does not operate as to bar his denial of the allegation

Starr Tyme, Inc. v. Cohen

638 So. 2d 599, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6135, 1994 WL 275641

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1994 | Docket: 64749207

Published

civil theft claim. In doing so, it relied on section 772.14, Florida Statutes (1991), Florida’s collateral