Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 774.003 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 774.003 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 774.003

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLV
TORTS
Chapter 774
ASBESTOS-RELATED AND SILICA-RELATED CLAIMS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 774.003
774.003 Applicability.—
(1) The limitations in s. 774.004 apply to a corporation that is a successor and became a successor before January 1, 1972, or is any of that successor corporation’s successors.
(2) The limitations in s. 774.004 do not apply to:
(a) Workers’ compensation benefits paid by or on behalf of an employer to an employee under chapter 440 or a comparable workers’ compensation law of another jurisdiction;
(b) Any claim against a corporation that does not constitute a successor asbestos-related liability;
(c) An insurance company, as defined in s. 717.101;
(d) Any obligations under the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, or under any collective bargaining agreement; or
(e) A successor that, after a merger or consolidation, continued in the business of mining asbestos; in the business of selling or distributing asbestos fibers; or in the business of manufacturing, distributing, removing, or installing asbestos-containing products that were the same or substantially the same as those products previously manufactured, distributed, removed, or installed by the transferor.
History.—s. 3, ch. 2005-269.

F.S. 774.003 on Google Scholar

F.S. 774.003 on Casetext

Amendments to 774.003


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 774.003
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 774.003.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 774.003

Total Results: 2

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1974-03-28

Snippet: doctrine of res judicata. Rubin v. Sanford, 168 So.2d 774 (3 D.C.A. Fla., 1964); Metropolitan Dade County Board

Bloxham v. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1895-01-15

Citation: 35 Fla. 625

Snippet: City, Ft. Scott & Memphis R. R. Co., 52 Kansas, 774; 3 Wood’s Railway Law, sec. 486; Tomlinson vs. Branch