Home
Menu
904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 815.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 815.01 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 815.01

The 2023 Florida Statutes

Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 815
COMPUTER-RELATED CRIMES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 815.01
815.01 Short title.The provisions of this act shall be known and may be cited as the “Florida Computer Crimes Act.”
History.s. 1, ch. 78-92.

F.S. 815.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 815.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 815.01


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 815.01
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 815.01.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

10 Cases from Casetext:Date Descending

U.S. Supreme Court11th Cir. - Ct. App.11th Cir. - MD FL11th Cir. - ND FL11th Cir. - SD FLFed. Reg.Secondary Sources - All
  1. MNI is a licensed mortgage lender that is authorized to conduct business in Florida. MNI sues former branch manager of its Destin, Florida, office and MNI vice-president Bryan Stone ("Stone"); former Destin branch office loan originator Phillip Heppding ("Heppding"); and mortgage lender Guaranteed Home Mortgage Corporation ("GHMC"), MNI's competitor and the prospective employer of Stone and Heppding. MNI describes this case as one involving the theft of computerized data, the improper use of proprietary information trade secrets, and the violation of a non-competition agreement. According to MNI, prior to leaving MNI for employment with GHMC in February 2009, Stone and Heppding misappropriated MNI's trade secrets, proprietary and confidential business information, including loan applicant files, applicant social security and credit card numbers, MNI's propriety Lending Tree information, personnel information, and other information. MNI's nine-count complaint asserts the following claims: breach of fiduciary duty (Stone); breach of the duty of loyalty (Stone and Heppding); violation of the Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act ("FUTSA"), Fla. Stat. § 688.001, et seq. (Stone, Heppding…

Cases from cite.case.law:

M. McDEVITT, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., 946 F. Supp. 2d 160 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . . ¶ 34 (citing D.C.Code §§ 42-815; 42-815.01). . . .

HENOK, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC,, 922 F. Supp. 2d 110 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . Code § 42-815.01(b) (2001). . . . Code § 42-815.01(a) (2001). Although Henok characterizes the mortgage as a “residential mortgage! . . .

HENOK, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC,, 915 F. Supp. 2d 162 (D.C. Cir. 2013)

. . . Compl. at 19, Counts 2, 14, 19, and adds statutory claims of wrongful foreclosure under D.C.Code § 42-815.01 . . . D.C.Code § 42-815.01(a) (2001). . . .

HENOK, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC,, 915 F. Supp. 2d 109 (D.C. Cir. 2013)

. . . Compl. at 19, Counts 2, 14,19, and adds statutory claims of wrongful foreclosure under D.C.Code § 42-815.01 . . . D.C.Code § 42-815.01(a) (2001). . . .

HENOK, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC,, 890 F. Supp. 2d 65 (D.D.C. 2012)

. . . Code § 42-815.01 (2001) (requiring that to cure a default, a residential mortgage debtor shall “[p]ay . . . Code § 42-815.01(a). . . . .

MOVAHEDI, v. US BANK, N. A., 853 F. Supp. 2d 19 (D.D.C. 2012)

. . . Section 42-815.01 of the D.C.Code provides that, with certain limitations, the mortgage debtor must be . . . D.C.Code § 42 — 815.01(c)(1)—(3). . . . D.C.Code § 42-815.01(b). . . .

DIABY, v. N. BIERMAN,, 795 F. Supp. 2d 108 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . D.C.Code § 42-815.01(b)-(c). . . .

RICHARDS, v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORP., 682 F. Supp. 2d 40 (D.D.C. 2010)

. . . violations of the District of Columbia Right to Cure Residential Mortgage Default Act, D.C.Code § 42-815.01 . . . D.C.Code § 42-815.01(b) and (c). . . . She argues that Option One violated Section 815.01 because it refused to provide her with accurate payoff . . . plaintiff assumes that if the lender does not provide a payoff amount upon request, it has breached Section 815.01 . . .