Fla. Stat. » 817
Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 817.68 (2025)

Part II not exclusive.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
817.68 Part II not exclusive.—This part shall not be construed to preclude the applicability of any other provision of the criminal law of this state which presently applies or may in the future apply to any transaction which violates this part, unless such provision is inconsistent with the terms of this part.
History.—s. 11, ch. 67-340.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1972–1986 · leading case: Fayerweather v. State, 332 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fayerweather v. State, 332 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1976). · cites it 5× “" The issue to be decided is whether conduct which violates both the State Credit Card Crime Act, Section 817.”
State v. Young, 357 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). · cites it 2× “" Section 817.68, Florida Statutes (1973). Affirmed.”
State v. Gledhill, 342 A.2d 161 (N.J. 1975). “11 of the 1967 Act, brought down in the compilations as F. S. §817.68, F. S. A., provided as follows: “This part shall not be construed to preclude the applicability of any other provision of the criminal law of this state which presently applies or may in the future apply to…”
State v. McCurdy, 257 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972). · cites it 2× “11 of the 1967 Act, brought down in the compilations as F.S. § 817.68, F.S.A., provided as follows: “This part shall not be construed to preclude the applicability of any other provision of the .”
Strada v. State, 267 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972). “This holding was based solely on what we conceived to be the intent of the legislature as manifested by the State Credit Card Crime Act and specifically Section 817.68 thereof. The same rationale may apply to the situation now before the court.”
McConnell v. State, 298 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). “" The court also referred to § 817.68, F.S.A., which specifically provides that the State Credit Card Crime Act shall not be construed to preclude the applicability of any other provision of the criminal law of the state unless such provision is inconsistent with the terms of…”
Smith v. State, 383 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). · cites it 2× “This Court formerly, held that if conduct constituted a violation of a state criminal statute which was enacted before the State Credit Card Crime Act of 1967 and at the same time constituted a violation of that act, the penal provisions of the State Credit Card Crime Act should…”
State v. Weir, 488 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). “Section 817.68 of the state Credit Card Crime Act suggests no legislative retreat from this practice.”
Lore v. State, 267 So. 2d 699 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972). · cites it 2× “, is a part, specifically provides in Section 817.68 thereof : “817.68 Part II not exclusive.”
Pastoria v. State, 312 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). “This holding was based solely on what we conceived to be the intent of the legislature as manifested by the State Credit Card Crime Act and specifically Section 817.68 thereof. It appears from the record in the present case that the conduct of the defendant which violated…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.

This Florida statute resource is curated by a Jacksonville criminal defense attorney, a Jacksonville, Florida criminal defense attorney (Florida Bar No. 39104). Attorney Syfert regularly handles Chapter 817 matters in the context of fraud and white collar defense and represents clients throughout Northeast Florida. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.