Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 826.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 826.02 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 826.02

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 826
BIGAMY; INCEST
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 826.02
826.02 Exceptions.The provisions of s. 826.01 shall not extend to any person:
(1) Who reasonably believes that the prior spouse is dead.
(2) Whose prior spouse has voluntarily deserted him or her and remained absent for the space of 3 years continuously, the party marrying again not knowing the other to be living within that time.
(3) Whose bonds of matrimony have been dissolved.
(4) Who violates its provisions because a domestic or foreign court has entered an invalid judgment purporting to terminate or annul the prior marriage and the defendant does not know that judgment to be invalid.
(5) Who reasonably believes that he or she is legally eligible to remarry.
History.s. 5, sub-ch. 8, ch. 1637, 1868; RS 2604; s. 1, ch. 4963, 1901; GS 3527; RGS 5417; CGL 7560; s. 1, ch. 73-300; s. 45, ch. 74-383; s. 1280, ch. 97-102.
Note.Former s. 799.02.

F.S. 826.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 826.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 826.02


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 826.02
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 826.02.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 826.02

Total Results: 16

Del Valle v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2011-12-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 80 So. 3d 999, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 732, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 2878, 2011 WL 6220783

Snippet: insanity by clear and convincing evidence.”); § 826.02, Fla. Stat. (2011) (providing statutory affirmative

In Re Amend. to the Fla. Family Law Forms

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2010-12-15T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 59 So. 3d 792

Snippet: -------------------|-----------|-----------| *826 2. Husband shall pay as his own the following and

Toro v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-05-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 712 So. 2d 423, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5939, 1998 WL 263821

Snippet: exceptions2 to the bigamy statute, particularly section .826.02(2), Florida Statutes, (1993). The testimony of … appellant came within the exception of section 826.02(2) Florida Statutes (1993). See Williams v. State

State v. Hunter

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1991-08-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 586 So. 2d 319

Snippet: 356 U.S. 369, 372, 382-83, 78 S.Ct. 819, 820-21, 826, 2 L.Ed.2d 848 (1958) (majority opinion and opinion

Palm Beach County v. Tessler

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1989-02-15T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 538 So. 2d 846

Snippet: parties owned property abutting State Road 826 on which two outdoor movie theaters were operated. In the

Montgomery Distrib., Inc. v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-11-25T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 505 So. 2d 443

Snippet: ," American Safety Equipment, 391 F.2d at 826; (2) the complexity of the issues and extensiveness

Rubin v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-06-17T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 490 So. 2d 1001

Snippet: complete defense to illegal wiretap prosecution); § 826.02(4), Fla. Stat. (1985) (codification of rule that

Sabates v. International Med. Centers, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-04-02T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 450 So. 2d 514

Snippet: Corp. v. J.P. Maguire & Co., 391 F.2d at 826; (2) the complexity of the issues and extensiveness

Quest v. Joseph

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-01-06T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 392 So. 2d 256

Snippet: ... inconsistent herewith." 353 So.2d at 826. [2] Berman, Time to Abolish Parent-Child Tort Immunity

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1979-07-27T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Benefit of Florida Electric Supply, Inc., 134 So.2d 826 (2 D.C.A. Fla., 1961). A surety insurer is one who

Mouchon v. Palmer

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1972-07-24T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 265 So. 2d 429, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6419

Snippet: Mutual Insurance Company, 10 Cir. 1967, 385 F.2d 826. 2. The retroactive request goes only to the amount

MIDWAY SHOP. MALL, INC. v. Airtech Air Con., Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1971-10-12T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 253 So. 2d 900

Snippet: Mutual Insurance Company, Fla.App. 1966, 189 So.2d 826. [2] E.g., State ex rel. Royal Insurance Co. v. Barrs

Posner v. Posner

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1968-01-22T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 206 So. 2d 416

Snippet: Divorce & Separation, § 12; Annot. 70 A.L.R. 826; 2 Nelson, Divorce and Annulment, §§ 13.02, 13.22;

Thomas v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1966-05-03T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 185 So. 2d 745

Snippet: Dupuy v. State, Fla.App. 1962, 141 So.2d 825, 826. [2] Peters v. Brown, Fla. 1951, 55 So.2d 334.

Sullivan v. Decerb

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1945-10-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 23 So. 2d 571, 156 Fla. 496, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 907

Snippet: 227, 134 A.L.R. 1381; Bramley v. State, 187 Ga. 826, 2 S.E.2d 647; State v. Lawrence,213 N.C. 674, 197

Howe v. MacDonald

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1940-02-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 194 So. 802, 141 Fla. 822, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 869

Snippet: . BUFORD and THOMAS, J. J., dissent. *Page 826 2 April 1940 Supreme Court of Florida fla Fla