Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 826.01 (2025)
Bigamy; punishment.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
826.01 Bigamy; punishment.—Whoever, having a husband or wife living, marries another person shall, except in the cases mentioned in s. 826.02, be guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.—s. 4, sub-ch. 8, ch. 1637, 1868; RS 2603; GS 3526; RGS 5416; CGL 7559; s. 775, ch. 71-136; s. 44, ch. 74-383; s. 30, ch. 75-298.
Note.—Former s. 799.01.
Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 826.01
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§826.01BIGAMYBIGAMY MARRY ANOTHER WHILE MARRIED
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 2007–2018 · leading case: Estes v. State, 546 S.W.3d 691 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018).
Estes v. State, 546 S.W.3d 691 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018). “Penal Code § 281 (2017) ; Fla. Stat. § 826.01 (2017) ; Mo. Rev. Stat § 568.”
T.M.H. v. D.M.T., 79 So. 3d 787 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). “To use a prior analogy, this would be akin to analyzing a polygamist’s attack on section 826.01, Florida Statutes (making it a felony to marry another person when already married) as violating the recognized fundamental right to marry.”
Gaitan v. Comm'r, 2012 T.C. Memo. 3 (Tax Ct. 2012). “A marriage entered into by a person who has a living spouse is void ab initio.”
State v. Leon, 967 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). “The State charged the defendant, Jorge Jesus Leon, with bigamy in violation of section 826.01, Florida Statutes. Although another assistant state attorney was in attendance, when the filing attorney for the State failed to appear as ordered by the trial court, the trial court…”
Tmh v. Dmt, 79 So. 3d 787 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). “To use a prior analogy, this would be akin to analyzing a polygamist's attack on section 826.01, Florida Statutes (making it a felony to marry another person when already married) as violating the recognized fundamental right to marry.”
Lipton, 2007 T.C. Summary Opinion 36 (1970). “Khalil Aly was, in fact, married at the time that a marriage ceremony was conducted in Florida, assuming that such a ceremony actually occurred.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.