Florida Statute 876.13 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVI
CRIMES

Chapter 876
CRIMINAL ANARCHY, TREASON, AND OTHER CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 876.13

876.13 Wearing mask, hood, or other device on public property.—No person or persons shall in this state, while wearing any mask, hood, or device whereby any portion of the face is so hidden, concealed, or covered as to conceal the identity of the wearer, enter upon, or be, or appear upon or within the public property of any municipality or county of the state.

History.—s. 3, ch. 26542, 1951.

F.S. 876.13 on Google Scholar

F.S. 876.13 on Casetext

Amendments to 876.13

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 876.13

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S876.13 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - WEAR HOOD OR MASK ON PUBLIC PROPERTY - M: S

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 876.13

Total Results: 20

Nicol v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-10-13

Citation: 939 So. 2d 231, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17011, 2006 WL 2918751

Snippet: wearing a mask or hood on a public way; section 876.13 criminalizes the wearing of a hood or mask on public

Liggett Group, Inc. v. Engle

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-05-21

Citation: 853 So. 2d 434, 2003 WL 21180319

Snippet: decision in McLain v. Pensacola Coach Corp., 152 Fla. 876, 13 So.2d 221 (1943), and held that a jury finding

Ault v. Lohr

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-02-02

Citation: 538 So. 2d 454, 1989 WL 9190

Snippet: interpretations of McLain v. Pensacola Coach Corp., 152 Fla. 876, 13 So.2d 221 (1943), and Lassiter v. International

Mash v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-12-18

Citation: 499 So. 2d 35, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 142

Snippet: convicted of wearing a mask, pursuant to sections 876.13 and 876.155(4), Florida Statutes, the use of this

Fletcher v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-06-27

Citation: 472 So. 2d 537, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1610

Snippet: 58,232, decided December 18, 1980, held that s. 876.13, Florida Statutes, was unconstitutional because

Globe Security Systems Co. v. Mayor's Jewelers, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-11-06

Citation: 458 So. 2d 828, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2326, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15793

Snippet: (citing McLain v. Pensacola Coach Corp., 152 Fla. 876, 13 So.2d 221, 222 (1943)). Unless there is a separate

Stinson v. Feminist Women's Health Center, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-06-28

Citation: 416 So. 2d 1183

Snippet: citing McLain v. Pensacola Coach Corp., 152 Fla. 876, 13 So.2d 221 (1943).

Guthartz v. Lewis

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-12-08

Citation: 408 So. 2d 600, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21858

Snippet: McLain v. Pensacola Coach Corporation, 152 Fla. 876, 13 So.2d 221 (1943), means only “unless liability

Guthartz v. Lewis

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-12-08

Citation: 408 So. 2d 600

Snippet: McLain v. Pensacola Coach Corporation, 152 Fla. 876, 13 So.2d 221 (1943), means only "unless liability

Baro v. Southeast First National Bank of Miami Springs

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-11-10

Citation: 406 So. 2d 532, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21591

Snippet: McLain v. Pensacola Coach Corporation, 152 Fla. 876, 13 So.2d 221 (1943); 17 Fla.Jur.2d, Damages, § 114

Robinson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-12-18

Citation: 393 So. 2d 1076

Snippet: (1972). Appellant was charged with violating section 876.13, Florida Statutes (1977). That section provides:

Tennant v. Vazquez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-08-27

Citation: 389 So. 2d 1183

Snippet: damages. McLain v. Pensacola Coach Corp., 152 Fla. 876, 13 So.2d 221 (1943). These compensatory damages for

Goldkamp v. Rose

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-07-30

Citation: 386 So. 2d 1257, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16827

Snippet: See McLain v. Pensacola Coach Corp., 152 Fla. 876, 13 So.2d 221 (1943). Even though some of the claimant’s

American Motorcycle Institute v. Mitchell

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-02-27

Citation: 380 So. 2d 452

Snippet: damages. McLain v. Pensacola Coach Corp., 152 Fla. 876, 13 So.2d 221 (1943). These compensatory damages for

Hauser Motor Co., Inc. v. Byrd

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-12-05

Citation: 377 So. 2d 773

Snippet: citing McLain v. Pensacola Coach Corp., 152 Fla. 876, 13 So.2d 221 (1943) and Sonson v. Nelson, supra, and

Raffa v. Dania Bank

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-07-18

Citation: 372 So. 2d 1173, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15100

Snippet: damages. McLain v. Pensacola Coach Corp., 152 Fla. 876, 13 So.2d 221 (1943); Sonson v. Nelson, 357 So.2d 747

Overseas Equip. Co., Inc. v. Aceros Arquitectonicos

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-07-03

Citation: 374 So. 2d 537

Snippet: McLain v. Pensacola Coach Corporation, 152 Fla. 876, 13 So.2d 221 (1943); LeJeune Road Hospital, Incorporated

Sonson v. Nelson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-04-11

Citation: 357 So. 2d 747

Snippet: language in McLain v. Pensacola Corp., 152 Fla. 876, 13 So.2d 221 (1943), approving and applying the following

Lassitter v. Intern. Union of Op. Engin.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-05-26

Citation: 349 So. 2d 622

Snippet: language in McLain v. Pensacola Corp., 152 Fla. 876, 13 So.2d 221 (1943), approving and applying the following

Touchette v. Bould

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-12-26

Citation: 324 So. 2d 707

Snippet: McLain v. Pensacola Coach Corporation, 152 Fla. 876, 13 So.2d 221, 222 (1943); Miami National Bank v. Sobel